By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish, with the key takeaway being that core PCE inflation is sticky around 3.4%, exceeding the Fed's forecast, and the new Fed Chair's communication style may increase market volatility.
Risk: Sticky core PCE inflation and increased market volatility due to the new Fed Chair's communication style.
Opportunity: None identified.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Savvy stock market investors know that nothing can kill a bull market like inflation.
In 2022, soaring prices for goods cooled off the pandemic-era bull market, and pushed the Fed to jack up interest rates, sending stocks swooning that year. Similarly, the 1970s are widely considered a lost decade due to inflation, in part driven by rising oil prices.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Investors are facing another energy crisis stemming from the standoff in the Strait of Hormuz, which is driving up prices again. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, showed prices rising at their fastest pace in three years.
Image source: Getty Images.
Inflation, as measured by the PCE price index, rose 0.4% in May, matching April and beating expectations of 0.5% growth. Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, was up 0.3%, compared to 0.2% in April. On an annual basis, the PCE index was up 4.1%, increasing from 3.8% in April, while core PCE rose 3.4%.
The inflation rate has clearly inflected since the war in Iran began, though core inflation has grown less slowly since it excludes energy prices.
Investors shrugged off the numbers as the S&P 500 was near flat around noon today. The market seemed focused instead on the impact of the memory shortage after Micron delivered another blowout earnings report last night, and Apple stock was down after announcing price hikes to pass on higher memory and storage costs.
Investors tend to keep an eye on the PCE because the Federal Reserve monitors it to make interest rate decisions.
In its “dot plot” forecast earlier this month, the Fed said it now expects one rate hike this year, up from a forecast in March of one rate cut. It also said that it expected PCE inflation to end the year at 3.3%.
Right now, there’s a lot of uncertainty in both inflation and where interest rates are headed.
Oil prices, which have been the primary driver of inflation, have started to come down since President Trump announced an end to the war earlier this month, though the status of the Strait of Hormuz remains uncertain. Brent crude prices are now at their lowest since the war broke out, trading around $72 a barrel, suggesting traders are confident the war is winding down, and the Strait will reopen.
If that’s true, it also means that inflation is less of a concern than it normally would be, since it’s expected to come down modestly in June, according to forecast from the Cleveland Fed.
Inflation tends to make an interest rate hike more likely, but there’s also additional uncertainty around rate hikes due to new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who has tamped down the need for forecasts and believes the Fed should say less about what it thinks. Warsh even refused to give his own forecast for the dot plot.
Overall, inflation deserves monitoring from investors, but given the decline in oil prices and the Fed’s lack of clarity, it’s less of a factor than it normally would be. Still, if the situation in the Middle East changes and oil prices start rising again, don’t be surprised if future PCE reports swing markets.
When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 895%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 205% for the S&P 500.
They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.
**Stock Advisor returns as of June 25, 2026. *
Jeremy Bowman has positions in Micron Technology. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Micron Technology. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Inflation cooling and a patient Fed path—rather than headline numbers alone—are the key drivers for near-term equity upside."
While the headline 4.1% PCE confirms sticky inflation, May data sits amid a drop in oil and a shift in market expectations toward a slower Fed path. The article references questionable facts (Fed chair Warsh, Strait of Hormuz) that undermine credibility. A constructive bull case rests on inflation rolling over in 2H as services inflation cools and real wages improve, allowing the Fed to up-rate only once or perhaps pause. That could support multiple expansion in equities, especially tech and semis with pricing power. Still, a surprise stickiness in core services or a renewed oil spike would derail.
The strongest counter is that wage growth could stay stubborn and core services inflation could re-accelerate, forcing the Fed to hike more than priced in and scaring risk assets.
"The market is dangerously mispricing the 'higher-for-longer' interest rate reality by conflating a temporary dip in oil prices with a structural decline in core inflation."
The article presents a dangerously complacent view of inflation. While it highlights the 4.1% PCE print, it relies on the 'transitory' fallacy by pinning inflation almost entirely on energy volatility in the Strait of Hormuz. The market’s indifference to the Fed’s hawkish pivot—shifting from rate cuts to hikes—is a classic 'bull trap.' With core PCE at 3.4%, sticky services inflation is clearly entrenched. If the Fed, under Chair Warsh, maintains a 'data-dependent' silence rather than providing forward guidance, volatility will spike as the market realizes the cost of capital is not returning to pre-inflationary levels. Investors are ignoring the duration risk in the S&P 500.
If the Strait of Hormuz remains open and energy costs continue to collapse, the disinflationary impulse could be powerful enough to allow the Fed to pause, rendering the current inflation spike a temporary supply-side anomaly.
"Core PCE's 3.4% YoY acceleration signals the Fed's rate-cut expectations are premature, and a single geopolitical flare-up in the Middle East could force a policy recalibration the market hasn't priced."
The article conflates two separate issues and misses the real inflation signal. Yes, oil is down post-Trump ceasefire announcement, but core PCE accelerated to 3.4% YoY—that's sticky, services-driven inflation untouched by energy. The Fed's 'one hike' forecast is backward-looking; if core PCE stays elevated through Q3, rate cuts become unlikely and the market's current pricing (implying cuts by year-end) unwinds hard. The article treats Warsh's communication opacity as uncertainty-reducing, but it's actually a wildcard that removes the Fed's forward guidance anchor. Most dangerous: the article assumes oil stays down, but Strait of Hormuz 'uncertainty' is doing a lot of work—one escalation and we're back to $90+ crude with no policy response priced in.
If core inflation is genuinely moderating (the Cleveland Fed forecast suggests June PCE softens), and oil stays below $75, then the market's muted reaction today is rational—this is a non-event, not a hidden bear case.
"Sticky 3.4% core PCE against a 3.3% Fed target implies at least one extra hike is likely, pressuring multiples across equities."
The article downplays May's 4.1% yoy PCE print by emphasizing falling oil, yet core PCE at 3.4% already exceeds the Fed's 3.3% year-end forecast and shows little deceleration. With a new Fed Chair skeptical of forward guidance and the Strait of Hormuz still contested, the single-hike dot-plot projection looks optimistic. Markets initially shrugged, but any reacceleration in services prices or renewed energy volatility could quickly reprice rate expectations higher. Investors should watch June CPI and Cleveland Fed nowcasts closely rather than assume relief is locked in.
Oil at $72 already embeds the war's end and the Cleveland Fed's June forecast shows inflation moderating, so the 4.1% print may prove a one-off that leaves the Fed on hold.
"Sticky core inflation keeps policy tight longer and could mean higher-than-priced terminal rates, limiting equity multiple expansion even if oil stays weak."
Gemini over-simplifies inflation by anchoring disinflation to energy alone. The real risk is sticky core PCE around 3.4% with services inflation entrenched—this keeps monetary policy tighter longer and could push the terminal rate higher than markets price. A weaker oil path doesn't automatically unlock multiples; duration risk and Warsh's opaque guidance may fuel volatility rather than a clean, orderly rally in equities.
"The abandonment of forward guidance under the new Fed regime will force a sharp repricing of term premiums as markets lose their policy anchor."
Claude is correct that we are ignoring the structural shift in policy communication. Kevin Warsh’s shift away from forward guidance isn't just 'opacity'—it is a deliberate move to force market participants to price in term premium. By removing the Fed's 'anchor,' Warsh is effectively shifting the burden of volatility onto the private sector. If the market continues to price in cuts despite sticky 3.4% core PCE, the inevitable repricing will be violent, not incremental.
"The market's 'one hike' pricing assumes core PCE falls below 3.3% by year-end; if it stays at 3.4%, the Fed is already behind."
Gemini's 'term premium shift' argument assumes Warsh's silence is *intentional* policy theater—but we don't know that. It could equally reflect genuine uncertainty about inflation's trajectory. More critically: nobody's flagged that core PCE at 3.4% *already* sits above the Fed's own year-end 3.3% forecast, which means even if services cool modestly, the Fed may need to hike *once more* just to stay on track. That's priced as 'one hike total,' not 'one hike from here.'
"Warsh's opacity converts the core PCE overshoot into abrupt repricing risk rather than gradual adjustment."
Claude flags the 3.4% core PCE overshooting the Fed's 3.3% year-end call, yet this collides directly with Warsh's guidance blackout. Without an anchor, any June data confirming persistence forces an abrupt repricing of the terminal rate rather than the incremental one-hike path markets currently embed. Gemini's term-premium observation therefore becomes operational: opacity converts a forecast miss into equity volatility that neither oil declines nor services cooling can offset quickly.
The panel consensus is bearish, with the key takeaway being that core PCE inflation is sticky around 3.4%, exceeding the Fed's forecast, and the new Fed Chair's communication style may increase market volatility.
None identified.
Sticky core PCE inflation and increased market volatility due to the new Fed Chair's communication style.