What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on Intel's valuation, with concerns raised about execution risks, capital expenditure burden, and potential dilution. Broadcom's reliance on a few 'sticky' clients and potential US-China tariff impacts are also noted as risks.
Risk: Intel's ability to execute on its foundry transition and sustain AI demand at current levels
Opportunity: Intel's pricing power and margin upside as foundry capacity scales with CHIPS Act funding
Key Points
If there were any doubts about Intel's ability to turn its business around, Intel's latest results arguably put those to rest.
The stock is up more than 300% in just 12 months.
Intel's market capitalization of more than $425 billion is difficult to justify.
- 10 stocks we like better than Broadcom ›
Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) stock's gains over the past year are nothing short of astounding. Shares have skyrocketed, rising more than 300%. That's more than a fourfold increase.
While the stock certainly deserves a big gain over this period, I think a good case can be made for why this increase may have gone too far. Indeed, I wouldn't be surprised if Intel shares underperformed over the next five years, or possibly even went nowhere.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Before you jump to the conclusion that I'm being too bearish, note that even the assumption that shares go nowhere over the next five years assumes the stock holds its astronomical gains over the past 12 months. While that would leave the stock with a 0% gain over the next five years, it would still amount to more than a 300% gain over the total six-year period, including last year's gain -- not bad at all.
But why, exactly, am I avoiding Intel stock, and what chip stock would I consider buying instead?
Intel's valuation problem
Understanding why Intel's stock has soared requires some background: The company has been undergoing a multi-year turnaround. One year ago, it wasn't clear whether the company would gain sufficient traction to achieve the scale needed to return to meaningful profits; Intel's first-quarter results in 2025 showed revenue unchanged from the first quarter of 2024, and management cited elevated macroeconomic uncertainty.
Fast forward to the first quarter of 2026, and Intel has returned to meaningful growth -- even in a supply constrained environment. Revenue grew 7% year over year, and non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share more than doubled, rising to $0.29.
Behind this momentum, the company's data center and artificial intelligence (AI) segment saw revenue rise 22% year over year to $5.1 billion, as it is finally finding ways to tap into AI infrastructure spending.
And the company is seeing its core CPU business get caught up in the AI boom.
"Even as we improve factory output, demand continues to run ahead of supply for all our businesses, especially for Xeon server CPUs where we expect sustained momentum this year and next," said CEO Lip-Bu Tan during the company'searnings call
This turnaround is exciting. But shares have arguably risen too high, too fast. The stock now boasts an incredible market capitalization of $427 billion, and trades at about 73 times the annualized run rate of its first-quarter adjusted earnings per share.
With a valuation like this, I think an average annual return for the stock any higher than a mid-single-digit rate would be a best-case scenario, as the market has already priced in not just a full turnaround but also significant top- and bottom-line growth for years to come. However, in a bear-case scenario in which the AI boom enters a consolidation period at some point over the next few years, I could also see the stock not appreciating at all over the next five years.
The chip stock I'd buy instead
While I think Intel stock is overvalued, I don't think all chip stocks are overvalued. One I'd consider today is Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO).
Broadcom isn't cheap either. At about $418 per share as of this writing, the semiconductor and infrastructure software company commands a market capitalization of about $2 trillion. But unlike Intel, Broadcom's underlying business momentum actually justifies this valuation.
In the fiscal first quarter of 2026, Broadcom's revenue rose 29% year over year to $19.3 billion as AI semiconductor revenue surged 106% to $8.4 billion -- and management expects AI semiconductor revenue to climb to $10.7 billion in fiscal Q2.
Management's expectations for total revenue for fiscal Q2? 47% year-over-year growth -- a significant acceleration.
Even more, the company's relationships with the biggest customers in its custom accelerator business are extremely "sticky". In its first-quarterearnings call Broadcom CEO Hock Tan described them as "deep, strategic, and multiyear."
Working so closely with its customers, Broadcom has significant visibility into demand, and that's why the company can boldly predict AI revenue from chips "in excess of $100 billion in 2027" -- a game-changing forecast that helps justify the stock's high valuation.
There are risks, of course. Broadcom depends heavily on a small number of large AI customers, and any slowdown in AI infrastructure spending could weigh on the stock.
All of this to say, it's important for investors to attempt to align a business's underlying fundamentals with its valuation and determine whether a stock's valuation is actually justified or not. With Intel, the valuation requires a huge leap of faith. Growth will have to accelerate even more, and margins will have to expand significantly. For Broadcom, however, we arguably just need the company's current momentum and its existing multiyear custom silicon projects to continue.
Should you buy stock in Broadcom right now?
Before you buy stock in Broadcom, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Broadcom wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $498,522! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,276,807!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 983% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 200% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 27, 2026. *
Daniel Sparks and his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Broadcom and Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Intel's current 73x P/E ratio is fundamentally disconnected from its capital-intensive foundry reality, making it a high-risk play compared to Broadcom's superior margin profile and revenue visibility."
The article’s premise is built on a fundamental valuation mismatch between Intel (INTC) and Broadcom (AVGO). Trading at 73x forward earnings, Intel is priced for perfection, assuming a flawless execution of its foundry transition and sustained AI CPU demand. However, the article ignores the massive capital expenditure burden Intel faces to build out its IFS (Intel Foundry Services) capacity, which will continue to pressure free cash flow for years. Broadcom, conversely, is a capital-light design powerhouse with superior operating margins. The risk here isn't just valuation; it is the structural divergence between a legacy integrated device manufacturer struggling to pivot and a specialized silicon architect riding the custom AI accelerator wave.
If Intel’s foundry business achieves even modest success as a neutral third-party manufacturer, the stock could see a massive multiple expansion as it captures sovereign AI infrastructure spending that Broadcom’s custom model cannot touch.
"Intel's supply-constrained Xeon demand and subsidized foundry buildout position it for sustained AI gains, underappreciated versus Broadcom's concentrated customer risks."
Intel's 73x forward multiple on Q1 2026 adjusted EPS run-rate ($1.16 annualized) seems lofty, but the article downplays supply constraints on Xeon CPUs—CEO Lip-Bu Tan noted demand exceeding supply into 2027—signaling pricing power and margin upside as foundry capacity scales with CHIPS Act funding. Data center/AI revenue up 22% to $5.1B shows real traction. Broadcom's AI chip revenue doubling to $8.4B is strong, but its $100B 2027 forecast hinges on sustained hyperscaler capex from just a few 'sticky' clients, amplifying cycle risks. INTC's diversified recovery offers better asymmetry.
Intel's turnaround has repeatedly stumbled on execution delays in foundry ramps, potentially eroding investor patience if growth falters amid macro uncertainty. Broadcom's visibility from multi-year deals trumps Intel's projections.
"The article conflates Intel's steep valuation with poor fundamentals, but both INTC and AVGO are priced for sustained AI capex growth; the real risk is macro normalization, not relative valuation between them."
The article's Intel thesis rests on a 73x P/E multiple being unjustifiable, but this conflates valuation with execution risk. Intel's Q1 2026 results show 7% revenue growth and doubled EPS—real momentum, not hype. The 300% one-year gain is steep, yes, but the article ignores that Intel was trading at distressed multiples 18 months ago; mean reversion isn't overvaluation. The Broadcom pivot feels forced: AVGO trades at ~35x forward earnings with 106% AI chip growth, yet the article treats this as 'justified' while Intel's 22% data-center growth is 'priced in too much.' That's inconsistent logic. Both are AI-exposed; both depend on continued capex cycles. The real risk isn't Intel's valuation—it's whether either company can sustain these growth rates if AI infrastructure spending normalizes.
If AI capex cycles compress faster than expected (2027-2028), Intel's lower operating leverage means it faces margin compression faster than Broadcom, making the 73x multiple genuinely dangerous. The article's 'mid-single-digit returns' bear case for Intel could easily become -40% if growth stalls.
"The market is pricing in a perfect, multi-year turnaround for Intel; without real, durable margin and cash-flow improvements, upside is limited and downside risk remains high."
Intel’s rally and a 73x run-rate multiple imply markets expect a dramatic, durable turnaround. The article hints at upside but glosses over key risks: execution challenges with IDM 2.0 and new process nodes, ongoing capital intensity to lift factory utilization, potential AI demand slowdowns, and rising competition from Nvidia/AMD and foundry peers. If AI capex slows or supply-demand dynamics ease less than expected, the stock could face multiple compression even as earnings miss sky-high expectations. In short, a turnaround-in-perfection thesis is brittle without sustained margin expansion and free cash flow upside.
Against this view, a durable AI cycle could keep Intel's Xeon/mix-shift favorable and margins stable enough to sustain a higher multiple if execution improves; the downside risk would be mitigated if AI demand remains robust.
"Grok’s bullish thesis relies on stale leadership narratives that ignore the structural governance and dilution risks currently facing Intel."
Grok, your reliance on Lip-Bu Tan’s commentary is outdated; he resigned from Intel’s board in August 2024, citing fundamental disagreements with the company's strategy. Using his historical optimism to justify a 73x multiple ignores the current reality of Intel's governance crisis and foundry execution risks. While Claude correctly identifies the inconsistency in valuation logic, both of you overlook the massive dilution risk Intel faces if it must tap capital markets again to fund its aggressive node roadmap.
"CHIPS funding neuters Intel's dilution risk, while Broadcom faces higher foundry cost inflation from TSMC exposure."
Gemini, Intel's $29B cash and equivalents (Q3 2024) plus $8.5B CHIPS Act grant and $11B loans cover 2025 capex peaks, slashing dilution odds—far from 'massive.' Nobody flags Broadcom's TSMC reliance: US-China tariffs or node delays could spike AVGO costs 10-15% while Intel's IFS insulates via domestic fabs, flipping the structural moat narrative.
"Intel's balance-sheet cushion is real, but doesn't solve the foundry execution gamble that underpins the 73x multiple."
Grok's TSMC-reliance counterpoint is sharp, but underestimates execution risk asymmetry. Intel's $29B cash covers 2025 peaks—agreed—but foundry ramps historically slip 12-18 months. If IFS misses 2026 targets, Intel burns cash faster than Broadcom faces tariff headwinds. Tariffs are a one-time cost shock; missed foundry revenue is structural. The domestic-fab insulation thesis only works if Intel actually executes.
"Intel's front-loaded capex and potential financing needs keep Free Cash Flow depressed even with subsidies, arguing against a sustained 73x multiple expansion without clearer margin leverage or revenue upside."
Gemini argues dilution risk is overstated due to cash and CHIPS funding; I disagree. The real bind is front-loaded capex for IFS and node ramps, which will press Free Cash Flow for years unless ASPs and utilization scale faster than assumed. Even with $29B cash, $8.5B CHIPS grant, and debt facilities, financing needs could still require equity or high-yield debt, limiting upside and risking a multiple re-rate if execution stalls.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel is divided on Intel's valuation, with concerns raised about execution risks, capital expenditure burden, and potential dilution. Broadcom's reliance on a few 'sticky' clients and potential US-China tariff impacts are also noted as risks.
Intel's pricing power and margin upside as foundry capacity scales with CHIPS Act funding
Intel's ability to execute on its foundry transition and sustain AI demand at current levels