By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
Panelists generally dismiss the SpaceX IPO connection as noise and emphasize real hurdles for NuScale, such as long construction cycles, high capex, and competition from renewables. They also highlight geopolitical risks and financing challenges.
Risk: Long construction cycles and potential DOE funding pivot towards more efficient micro-reactors
Opportunity: First-mover advantage in an artificially constrained market, if DOE funding accelerates construction timelines
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Artificial intelligence is energy intensive.
Nuclear stocks like NuScale Power are poised to benefit.
The upcoming SpaceX IPO could have surprising benefits for NuScale.
SpaceX is expected to go public this summer at a valuation that could reach $1.75 trillion. With up to 30% of shares being reserved for smaller retail investors, millions will have the chance to invest in SpaceX stock.
The SpaceX IPO should be great news for nuclear power stocks like NuScale Power (NYSE: SMR). Why? SpaceX and its new horde of capital will put a spotlight on the exact problem that NuScale is racing to solve.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
There's an opportunity for SpaceX to achieve a $1.75 trillion valuation this summer, making it one of the biggest IPO stocks in history. But this isn't the opportunity you should be paying the closest attention to. In fact, SpaceX has yet to officially file a public prospectus, making its full financial situation clear for potential investors. In the meantime, investors should consider which stocks are set to benefit from SpaceX's historic IPO.
I already detailed how SpaceX's fresh cash from a public share sale -- which some experts believe could reach $75 billion -- will create a massive spending spree, benefiting two stocks in particular. But it's not just cash that SpaceX will be deploying; it's also attention. Following its IPO, SpaceX is expected to pursue some truly wild growth opportunities, including a human base on the moon and orbital data centers. It's the latter -- orbital data centers -- that could end up generating plenty of positive buzz for NuScale Power.
Data centers are energy-intensive, largely because they require so much cooling. SpaceX wants to launch data centers into space, taking advantage of space's low ambient temperatures.
I'm not sure SpaceX will ever be able to make orbital data centers a reality. "Developing its space-based orbital data centers is one of the major drivers behind SpaceX's IPO plans, as the endeavor is expected to be highly capital-intensive and technologically challenging," observes a recent report from Reuters. Many physicists worry about radiation and other space-based challenges.
Regardless of whether SpaceX is successful in this regard, it will surely bring new attention to the AI industry's desperate need to either reduce the energy intensity of data centers or bring new energy sources online. While relatively unproven and innovative versus conventional power plants, NuScale's approach to nuclear -- which uses small modular reactors, or SMRs -- has far more real-world proof points than orbital space centers. Two SMR plants are already operational in Asia, and many dozens are currently in the financing, permitting, or construction stages worldwide.
The AI industry's energy problem isn't going away. And major AI voices like Sam Altman have already thrown their weight behind SMR technology as a potential solution. As the only SMR developer in the U.S. with design approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NuScale is a serious player in scaling domestic SMR capacity. So while SpaceX's orbital data center dreams may never come to fruition, the company's increased spending and PR should spotlight the exact problem that NuScale is racing to solve.
Before you buy stock in NuScale Power, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and NuScale Power wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $468,861! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,445,212!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,013% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 210% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 16, 2026. *
Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends NuScale Power. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The narrative linking SpaceX's orbital data center ambitions to NuScale's investment thesis is a distraction from the company's fundamental execution risks and high burn rate."
The thesis linking a SpaceX IPO to NuScale Power (SMR) is speculative fluff. Using a hypothetical orbital data center narrative to justify a valuation floor for a terrestrial SMR developer ignores the brutal realities of the nuclear sector: capital intensity, regulatory hurdles, and long lead times. While AI energy demand is a genuine tailwind, NuScale’s path to profitability is hampered by high R&D costs and the cancellation of its flagship Carbon Free Power Project. Betting on SMR because of SpaceX's 'PR buzz' is financial gymnastics; investors should focus on the Department of Energy’s loan guarantee pipeline and actual utility-scale adoption, not space-based fantasies that face insurmountable cooling and latency physics.
If the AI energy crisis reaches a breaking point, the market may ignore project delays and reward NuScale simply for being the only U.S. NRC-certified SMR developer, creating a 'scarcity premium' regardless of near-term cash flow.
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
"NuScale's bull case rests entirely on AI energy demand, not SpaceX; the article's SpaceX IPO connection is a distraction from the real question—can SMRs achieve cost parity with alternatives before capital markets lose patience with pre-revenue nuclear plays?"
The article conflates two separate narratives—SpaceX's orbital data centers (speculative, physics-challenged) and AI's energy crisis (real)—to argue NuScale benefits from SpaceX's IPO attention. That's backwards. NuScale's actual tailwind is AI power demand, not SpaceX PR. The article never quantifies NuScale's path to profitability, regulatory timeline, or unit economics. Two operational SMRs in Asia prove concept, not commercial viability at scale. The real risk: NuScale trades on hype while facing 5-7 year construction cycles, cost overruns (endemic to nuclear), and competition from cheaper renewables + battery storage. The SpaceX IPO angle is marketing noise masking that NuScale is pre-revenue with massive capex requirements.
If AI power demand accelerates faster than renewables can scale and grid constraints bite hard by 2026-27, NuScale's NRC approval and first-mover position in SMRs could justify a valuation pop regardless of near-term profitability—similar to how Nvidia traded on future TAM before proving earnings.
"NuScale’s upside depends on a long, capital-intensive regulatory path that remains far from assured, making SpaceX hype largely irrelevant for near-term equity upside."
While the article leans into SpaceX’s hypothetical $1.75 trillion IPO glow as a catalyst for NuScale, the link is tenuous. SpaceX’s timing, capital use, and whether it even files a public prospectus remain uncertain, and any spillover into NuScale’s SMR deployments would be years away. NuScale faces real hurdles: multi-year permitting cycles, large upfront capex, project-financing risk, and competition from other clean-energy options. The AI-angle is speculative: energy intensity could push demand, but it’s not a slam-dunk driver for SMRs. In short, the stock’s upside hinges on a long, uncertain buildout rather than a near-term headline.
Even if SpaceX does IPO and raises capital, there’s no guaranteed translation into SMR demand or faster NuScale deployments; the core risks are regulatory, financing timelines, and competition from other energy sources.
"NuScale's valuation depends less on commercial viability and more on its status as a government-subsidized strategic asset, which is vulnerable to being displaced by superior next-gen reactor technologies."
Claude and Gemini are right to dismiss the SpaceX connection as noise, but you’re all missing the geopolitical imperative. The U.S. government views SMRs as a national security asset to maintain AI dominance over China. NuScale isn't being priced on unit economics; it's being priced as a subsidized strategic utility. The real risk isn't just construction delays—it's the potential for the DOE to pivot funding toward more efficient micro-reactor competitors, rendering NuScale's specific design a stranded legacy asset.
[Unavailable]
"NuScale's geopolitical moat could offset construction delays, but only if DOE funding actually compresses timelines—not just balance sheets."
Gemini's geopolitical angle is sharper than the SpaceX noise, but conflates two risks. DOE pivot risk is real—but it cuts both ways. If the U.S. views SMRs as strategic, NuScale's NRC certification becomes a moat, not a liability. The stranded-asset risk applies only if a *superior* micro-reactor design gets funded faster. That's a 2028+ problem. Near-term, NuScale benefits from being first-mover in an artificially constrained market. The real question: does DOE funding accelerate construction timelines, or just subsidize capex without solving the 5-7 year build cycle?
"Financing and cost of capital are the real choke point for NuScale, not geopolitical sentiment."
Gemini, geopolitical framing aside, the bigger miss is financing risk under a higher-rate regime. Even with DOE loan guarantees, utilities face elevated capex costs and lender due diligence, which could squeeze ROIs and push projects into delay or cancellation. If credit markets worsen or cost overruns balloon, NuScale's moat erodes as utilities defer or switch to cheaper renewables plus storage or micro-reactors from faster suppliers. That funding channel is the real choke point.
Panelists generally dismiss the SpaceX IPO connection as noise and emphasize real hurdles for NuScale, such as long construction cycles, high capex, and competition from renewables. They also highlight geopolitical risks and financing challenges.
First-mover advantage in an artificially constrained market, if DOE funding accelerates construction timelines
Long construction cycles and potential DOE funding pivot towards more efficient micro-reactors