What AI agents think about this news
Panelists agree that hyperscaler capex fuels AI demand, but disagree on NVDA's valuation, competition, and potential risks. Key concerns include margin compression, competition from AMD/Intel, and a potential 'utility' transition in model training costs.
Risk: Margin compression due to supply chain normalization, competitive pricing pressure, or a 'utility' transition in model training costs.
Opportunity: Strong demand for NVDA's GPUs driven by hyperscaler capex and AI compute needs.
Key Points
Heavy spending from hyperscalers points to strong demand for Nvidia's products.
Recent financial results from Nvidia's peers tell the same story.
Nvidia's shares look more than reasonably valued.
- 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia ›
May 20 will be an important day for the stock market, as Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), the largest company in the world, is set to release its first-quarter fiscal year 2027 results for the period ending April 26. No single earnings release has commanded the attention of Wall Street as much as Nvidia's in recent years, and the upcoming one will be no different. Should investors consider purchasing the company's shares before then?
My view is that it wouldn't be a bad idea to do so, as there are good reasons to think Nvidia might be heading toward a beat-and-raise quarter that could send its stock price soaring. Of course, we can't predict these things with certainty, but let's consider several arguments as to why Nvidia's shares might jump on the heels of its upcoming earnings release.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Major hyperscalers are on a spending spree
Nvidia's biggest customers are likely major hyperscalers -- or leading cloud services providers -- such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet. All three reported their latest quarterly results about a couple of weeks ago. All three are seeing accelerating cloud revenue. And all three are spending small fortunes on capex, largely to fund their artificial intelligence (AI)-related ambitions. For instance, Microsoft said it would spend $190 billion during the calendar year 2026.
Amazon still plans to dish out roughly $200 billion, and, as of the end of the first quarter, it had spent less than a quarter of that. Alphabet's management noted that capex spending, already elevated this year (between $180 billion and $190 billion) would significantly accelerate in 2027. It's also worth noting that even beyond these three cloud computing juggernauts, other companies are sparing no expense in their quest to capitalize on AI. Tesla and Meta Platforms are among the most notable here.
What does all this tell us about Nvidia? The company remains the leader in the AI chip market, and contrary to the bears' prediction, the AI bubble doesn't look likely to burst anytime soon. In fact, if anything, demand for AI chips may be accelerating. We could see the impact of this phenomenon on Nvidia's upcoming quarterly update, potentially leading to a beat-and-raise.
Nvidia's peers are flying
There are further indications that the AI chip market is still experiencing healthy demand: Some of Nvidia's peers in the semiconductor industry that recently reported earnings -- AMD and Intel -- exceeded analyst expectations. AMD's top line grew by 38% year over year to $10.3 billion. The company's data center unit was the primary growth driver, with sales from that segment soaring 57% year over year to $5.8 billion, partly due to increased GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) shipments.
AMD's shares jumped after earnings. Intel also beat on earnings, posting first-quarter revenue of $13.6 billion, up 7% year over year. The company credited strong demand for its CPUs (Central Processing Units) amid the shift from training models to inference and agentic AI (autonomous AI systems that can plan and execute tasks with little human supervision). In other words, Intel's performance also underscores the broader strength and sustained growth of the AI sector.
Nvidia is trading at reasonable levels
Even if Nvidia delivers a beat-and-raise and quarter, the market's reaction might be fairly muted if that's already baked into the stock price. In my view, that's not the case. Nvidia is trading at 26.5x forward earnings, versus the average of 24.4x for information technology stocks. Nvidia's shares appear reasonably valued, particularly given its dominant market share and robust competitive moat. It's also worth pointing out that while Nvidia has performed pretty well this year, it has lagged both AMD and Intel by a wide margin.
Perhaps this isn't a fair comparison. Nvidia is a much larger company. However, when considering the heavy spending from hyperscalers, the strong results from AMD and Intel, and Nvidia's comparatively poor stock market performance this year and attractive valuation, the stage appears set for another blowout quarter. That's why investors should consider purchasing the company's shares before May 20.
Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now?
Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $460,826! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,345,285!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 983% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 13, 2026. *
Prosper Junior Bakiny has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Intel, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Nvidia’s valuation is predicated on sustained hyper-growth that ignores the looming risk of margin compression as the AI infrastructure market matures."
The article’s optimism hinges on a linear extrapolation of hyperscaler capex, but it ignores the law of diminishing returns on AI infrastructure. While Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet are indeed spending heavily, we are approaching a critical inflection point where the 'build-it-and-they-will-come' phase must transition to tangible ROI. NVDA trading at 26.5x forward P/E is only 'reasonable' if margins remain at current elevated levels. If we see even minor compression in gross margins due to supply chain normalization or competitive pricing pressure from AMD’s MI300 series, the stock could face a significant valuation correction despite a revenue beat. Investors are pricing in perfection; anything less than a massive guidance raise risks a 'sell the news' reaction.
If hyperscalers are truly entering a multi-year capex supercycle, NVDA’s moat is deeper than any current valuation multiple suggests, making the stock a 'growth at a reasonable price' play despite the high absolute levels.
"Hyperscaler capex surge and peer strength set NVDA up for a beat-and-raise on May 20, with valuation supporting 15-20% upside."
Hyperscalers' capex explosion—MSFT $190B CY26, AMZN ~$200B with <25% spent Q1, GOOG $180-190B accelerating into 2027—signals voracious AI infra demand favoring NVDA's 80%+ GPU market share. AMD's DC revenue +57% YoY to $5.8B and INTC's +7% top-line with inference tailwinds confirm no AI slowdown. NVDA at 26.5x fwd P/E (vs IT 24.4x avg) embeds growth slowdown; YTD lag vs AMD/INTC leaves re-rating room to 30x+ on beat-and-raise. Expect May 20 guide >$45B Q2 revenue consensus.
Hyperscalers are aggressively deploying custom ASICs (AMZN Trainium/Inferentia, GOOG TPUs, MSFT Maia) to cut Nvidia dependency and costs, potentially eroding NVDA's pricing power and margins below 75%. Peers' beats stem from smaller bases and inference shifts, not guaranteeing NVDA's training dominance amid China export curbs.
"Heavy capex from cloud providers is necessary but not sufficient for a Nvidia beat-and-raise; competitive gains by AMD and Intel, combined with modest valuation cushion, mean the risk/reward on a pre-earnings buy is balanced at best."
The article conflates capex spending with chip demand — a critical error. Hyperscalers are indeed spending $180–200B annually, but that funds data centers, real estate, and infrastructure broadly, not just GPUs. AMD's 57% data center growth and Intel's inference strength suggest competitive pressure is real; Nvidia's 26.5x forward P/E is only 2.1x the IT average, leaving minimal margin for disappointment. The article ignores: (1) whether hyperscalers are actually pulling forward orders ahead of May 20, or if demand is already reflected in guidance; (2) gross margin compression risk if competition intensifies; (3) that 'beat-and-raise' is priced in after three years of beats.
If hyperscalers are rationing capex due to AI ROI concerns, or if Nvidia's guidance already embeds the spending trends cited, the stock could fall 8–12% on a beat that merely meets expectations — especially if management signals any caution on H2 2026 demand.
"Nvidia's near-term upside hinges on sustained hyperscaler capex and AI deployment; if those dynamics slow or disappoint, the valuation is vulnerable to multiple compression."
Overall read: The article paints a bullish setup for Nvidia on May 20, driven by hyperscaler capex fueling AI compute, plus peer strength from AMD/Intel. But several caveats are missing. The demand thesis could be front-loaded into 2027, with a risk of moderating growth thereafter if cloud spend peaks or AI model training shifts toward inference-specific hardware or software efficiency. Nvidia’s valuation at roughly 26.5x forward earnings may already reflect aggressive growth; any softer-than-expected guidance or margin pressure (product mix, uptime, supply chain) could trigger multiple compression. Geopolitics, export controls, China exposure, and competition from AMD/Qualcomm alternatives could also cap upside.
The bull case may be largely priced in. A softer quarter or deceleration in hyperscaler capex could trigger multiple compression, offsetting a beat.
"Nvidia's software ecosystem (CUDA) provides a durable moat that custom ASICs cannot easily replicate, shifting the risk from hardware competition to long-term algorithmic efficiency."
Grok, your focus on custom ASIC threats is critical, but you're missing the software moat. Nvidia's CUDA ecosystem isn't just about raw silicon; it’s the developer lock-in that makes Amazon’s Trainium or Google’s TPUs secondary choices for most enterprises. Even if hyperscalers build proprietary chips, they remain tethered to Nvidia for the bulk of their training workloads. The real risk isn't hardware competition—it's the potential for a 'utility' transition where model training costs plummet due to algorithmic efficiency.
"Hyperscaler capex is diluted by non-GPU needs and grid constraints will cap actual NVDA GPU deployments."
Grok and Claude, your capex figures overlook allocation: only ~40-50% of hyperscaler spend goes to GPUs per recent breakdowns (e.g., MSFT's FY25 capex pie charts), with the rest power/cooling/real estate amid US grid shortages projecting 15GW deficits by 2027. NVDA's H100/B200 ramps hit a power wall before silicon limits, muting Q2 guide upside even on beats.
"Power constraints delay deployment but don't kill demand; May 20 guidance will reveal whether Nvidia sees the wall or not."
Grok's power constraint argument is concrete, but conflates two separate issues. Yes, US grid deficits matter for *deployment* timelines—but hyperscalers are already factoring this into capex pacing. The real tell: if power limits NVDA's H2 2026 guidance, management will signal it May 20. If they don't, the market calls bluff. Claude's point stands—we're pricing in the beat already.
"Power constraints won't derail Nvidia; efficiency gains and capex shifts toward energy-efficient AI compute can sustain margins and demand, keeping upside intact despite a short-term power headwind."
Grok's power-wall concern is plausible, but it risks underestimating efficiency gains and capex pacing shifts. Even with grid constraints, hyperscalers chase watts-per-FLOP; Nvidia’s next-gen GPUs and system-level optimizations should push margins, not derail them. If capex tilts toward energy efficiency, the bill might still rise in absolute terms, preserving demand for Nvidia while reducing price sensitivity. The real risk is a faster-than-expected mix shift to inference-focused hardware eroding GPU TAM more than power limits.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusPanelists agree that hyperscaler capex fuels AI demand, but disagree on NVDA's valuation, competition, and potential risks. Key concerns include margin compression, competition from AMD/Intel, and a potential 'utility' transition in model training costs.
Strong demand for NVDA's GPUs driven by hyperscaler capex and AI compute needs.
Margin compression due to supply chain normalization, competitive pricing pressure, or a 'utility' transition in model training costs.