What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on the impact of Iran-led oil shocks on markets, with some arguing it could trigger a Fed rate hike and valuation compression (Gemini, ChatGPT), while others see it as a short-term risk with long-term energy sector upside (Claude, Grok).
Risk: Valuation compression in high-growth tech stocks due to a potential Fed rate hike and energy-driven inflation (Gemini, ChatGPT)
Opportunity: Upside in U.S. energy sector due to low-cost production and increased output (Grok)
Key Points
Although the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite have risen under most presidents, their annualized returns under Donald Trump are among the best.
President Trump's tax policy has been foundational to Wall Street's bull market rally.
However, the president's attacks on Iran have kick-started a domino effect that seems destined to culminate in the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) raising interest rates before the year ends.
- 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index ›
Based solely on performance, Wall Street has been thrilled to have President Donald Trump in the White House. During Trump's first, non-consecutive term, the mature-stock-driven Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI), benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), and tech-stock-inspired Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) rallied 57%, 70%, and 142%, respectively.
While these major indexes have risen under most presidents since the late 1890s, the annualized returns under Trump are among the best.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
But this doesn't mean the stock market has moved from Point A to B in a straight line, or that this Trump bull market can last indefinitely. Headwinds are mounting on Wall Street, with one, in particular, standing out as particularly troublesome for a historically pricey stock market.
Thanks to the president's own actions, the Trump bull market appears set to end this year at the Federal Reserve's hand.
A flurry of catalysts has sparked the Trump bull market rally
Before digging into the details of how this bull market ends, we first have to understand what made equities fly in the first place.
To begin with, investors can't get enough of the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. The arrival of AI is on par with the advent and proliferation of the internet three decades ago, in terms of what it can do for corporate America. Empowering software and systems with the tools to make split-second decisions without human oversight is an addressable market that can top $15 trillion by 2030, according to PwC analysts.
However, AI isn't the only trend that's piquing investors' interest. The advent of quantum computing, the rise of the space industry, and ongoing stock-split euphoria are all playing roles in sending the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite to new heights.
Investors have also been excited about the Federal Reserve's rate-easing cycle. Since September 2024, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) -- the 12-person body, including Fed Chair Jerome Powell, responsible for setting the nation's monetary policy -- has lowered the federal funds target rate six times. Lower lending rates make it more attractive to build AI data centers and spend aggressively on innovation.
But President Trump's fingerprints are on this rally, too. While the rise of AI and interest rate cuts have nothing to do with Trump, the president's signing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) into law in December 2017 has had a positive impact on the stock market.
The TCJA permanently lowered the peak marginal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% -- the lowest level since 1939. Businesses retaining more of their earnings have led to a significant increase in share buyback activity among S&P 500 companies. Share repurchases can increase earnings per share for companies with steady or growing net income.
One decision by President Trump can upend Wall Street's bull market
While plenty has gone right for the stock market, one headwind, by Trump's own doing, appears insurmountable.
On Feb. 28, at Trump's command, U.S. military forces, along with Israel, began military attacks against Iran. Shortly after these military operations commenced, Iran virtually closed the Strait of Hormuz to oil exports. Approximately 20 million barrels of petroleum liquids, equating to 20% of the world's demand, pass through the Strait of Hormuz daily.
While Iran partially reopened the Strait of Hormuz on April 5, we're still talking about the largest energy supply disruption in history. This energy supply chain monkey wrench has sent crude oil prices soaring.
Although the most immediate impact of higher crude oil prices is sticker shock at the fuel pump, there are bigger issues at hand. Namely, the prevailing U.S. inflation rate and the Federal Reserve's monetary policy.
As of April 6, the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland's Inflation Nowcasting tool was projecting an 85-basis-point increase in the trailing 12-month (TTM) inflation rate in March from February (3.25% from 2.40%). The TTM inflation rate for April is estimated to climb 13 basis points to 3.38%.
A nearly one-percentage-point jump in TTM U.S. inflation over two months could halt the Fed's rate-easing cycle in its tracks. Even more worrisome, it may encourage the FOMC to shift its strategy entirely and point to rate hikes before the end of this year. Keep in mind that this rapid uptick in inflation comes at a time when the price stickiness of Donald Trump's tariffs is still being felt in the goods sector.
S&P 500 Shiller PE Ratio hits 2nd highest level in history 🚨 The highest was the Dot Com Bubble 🤯 pic.twitter.com/Lx634H7xKa
-- Barchart (@Barchart) December 28, 2025
Normally, a monetary policy about-face by the nation's central bank wouldn't be devastating for the stock market. But it's not every day that the stock market enters the year at its second-priciest valuation since January 1871. The few times that the S&P 500's Shiller Price-to-Earnings Ratio has surpassed 40 throughout history have been followed by peak-to-trough declines of 49% (the dot-com bubble) and 25% (the 2022 bear market) for the benchmark index.
Though the FOMC tends to be reactive to economic data rather than proactive in its monetary policy decisions, President Trump's actions in Iran have kick-started a domino effect that seems destined to culminate in the Fed raising interest rates before the end of 2026. Higher borrowing costs would effectively crush a historically expensive stock market that's been counting on rate cuts, not hikes.
Even if the Iran war wraps up in the next couple of weeks, the inflationary effects of this conflict will linger for several quarters to come. It's a worst-case scenario for the Trump bull market.
Should you buy stock in S&P 500 Index right now?
Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 12, 2026. *
Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article conflates a temporary energy shock with structural inflation, then assumes the Fed will hike into weakness—but recent data dependency language and May's softer CPI suggest the FOMC is far more likely to hold than the article implies."
The article's Iran-inflation-rate-hike thesis rests on a shaky causal chain. Yes, crude spiked post-Feb 28, but the Cleveland Fed's 85bps inflation jump projection (2.40% to 3.25% TTM) is speculative nowcasting, not realized data. More critically: energy shocks typically don't sustain unless supply stays disrupted. Iran partially reopened the Strait by April 5. Oil has mean-reverted before on geopolitical noise. The real risk isn't the Fed hiking—it's valuation (Shiller PE ~40). But that's a *multiple compression* risk, not a rate-hike-driven one. The article conflates two separate problems and assumes the Fed will tighten into a slowdown, which contradicts recent FOMC messaging focused on data dependency.
If energy prices stabilize and inflation prints below 3% by Q2, the Fed stays on pause indefinitely, and a 40x Shiller multiple becomes defensible if AI capex drives 15%+ EPS growth for three years—exactly what the bull case assumes.
"A forced pivot from rate cuts to rate hikes due to an energy supply shock will cause a catastrophic valuation re-rating for an overextended stock market."
The article outlines a classic 'supply shock' scenario where geopolitical instability in the Strait of Hormuz—responsible for 20% of global oil—forces the Fed's hand. With the Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40, the market is priced for perfection and continuous rate cuts. A pivot back to rate hikes to combat energy-driven inflation would trigger a massive valuation compression, as high-growth tech stocks are most sensitive to the discount rate. The 'Trump rally' is currently built on the fragile foundation of cheap capital and tax-efficient buybacks; if the cost of debt rises while energy costs squeeze margins, the 142% Nasdaq gains since 2024 are at extreme risk of a 20-30% correction.
The Fed often 'looks through' transitory energy spikes to focus on core inflation, and a resolution in the Middle East could lead to a 'relief rally' and an immediate collapse in crude prices, actually accelerating the disinflationary trend.
"A sustained oil-driven inflation shock could force Fed tightening, but supply responses, demand reaction, and the Fed’s focus on core inflation make a catastrophic Fed‑caused market collapse this year unlikely; a sharp, uneven correction or sector rotation is the more probable outcome."
The article correctly ties a plausible chain — Iran-led oil shocks → higher headline CPI → Fed policy reversal — to market vulnerability, and it’s right to flag valuation risk (the Shiller CAPE is extremely high). But inevitability is overstated. Oil-flow disruptions rarely remain total: strategic reserves, OPEC+/non‑Iran production responses, and demand destruction can blunt price spikes. The Fed will weigh core services inflation and labor-market trends more than headline oil alone. Also, gains are concentrated in a handful of AI/mega-cap names and buybacks, so an adverse policy move is likelier to cause a rotation and a sharp pullback in cyclical/financials than a uniform, permanent wipeout of US equities.
If oil exports remain meaningfully constrained and headline inflation creeps sustainably above ~4% while wages accelerate, the Fed would likely hike — and with the S&P extremely richly valued, that could trigger a severe 20–40% peak‑to‑trough decline.
"Strait of Hormuz disruption creates substantial profit upside for U.S. energy producers like XOM and CVX, decoupling from broad market downside."
The article's bearish thesis hinges on Trump's alleged Iran strikes disrupting 20% of global oil via the Strait of Hormuz, spiking inflation (Cleveland nowcast: 3.25% March, 3.38% April) and forcing Fed rate hikes into a frothy market (S&P 500 Shiller PE near dot-com highs). But it misses the massive windfall for U.S. energy: WTI crude surges benefit low-cost producers in XLE ETF, like Exxon (XOM) and Chevron (CVX) with $40-50/bbl breakevens. U.S. shale output ramps under Trump's deregulation, historically delivering 20-50% sector gains in oil shocks (e.g., 2022). Broad indices vulnerable, but energy thrives on second-order supply dynamics.
If Iran fully reopens the Strait soon and global recession curbs demand, oil prices could plummet, crushing energy stocks' earnings and multiples.
"Energy sector optionality is real but too slow to offset near-term rate-hike risk to valuations."
Grok flags energy upside—XOM, CVX breakevens at $40-50/bbl—but sidesteps the real constraint: U.S. shale ramp takes 6-12 months to materialize. Near-term (Q2-Q3), if Strait stays disrupted, oil stays elevated and energy sector gains don't offset broad multiple compression in mega-cap tech. The 'second-order' supply dynamics Grok cites are real, but they're Q4/2025 stories, not Q2 hedges. Meanwhile, the Fed acts on *current* inflation prints, not forward production curves.
"Rising discount rates from Fed hikes will cause universal multiple compression that outweighs sector-specific earnings growth in energy."
Grok’s energy hedge thesis ignores the 'liquidity vacuum' effect. If oil-driven inflation forces the Fed to hike, the resulting spike in the 10-year Treasury yield crushes the equity risk premium across all sectors. Even with $100 oil, XOM and CVX won't trade at 15x P/E if the discount rate jumps 100bps; they’ll see multiple compression alongside tech. You cannot hedge a systemic valuation reset with cyclical equities when the entire curve shifts upward.
"An oil-driven spike can tighten global financial conditions via USD appreciation and EM stress, causing equity multiple compression before shale supply responds."
Grok is right that U.S. energy benefits, but he misses the systemic transmission: even a temporary oil spike often strengthens the dollar and triggers rapid EM capital flight, widening sovereign and corporate spreads within weeks. That tightening of global financial conditions — not just Fed hikes — can force equity multiple compression and liquidity-driven selloffs (levered funds, ETFs) well before U.S. shale production meaningfully offsets supply shortfalls.
"Energy stocks offer true rate-hedge via yields, FCF, and rapid DUC conversion, defying broad multiple compression."
Gemini ignores energy's low beta to rates: XOM/CVX trade at 12-14x forward P/E with 4-5% yields and $20B+ FCF, surging 60%+ in 2022 hikes while Nasdaq fell 30%. ChatGPT's dollar strength aids US shale exporters vs EM peers. Shale DUC inventory (4mm bbl/d capacity) converts in 3 months, not 6-12 as Claude says—real hedge materializes Q3.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel is divided on the impact of Iran-led oil shocks on markets, with some arguing it could trigger a Fed rate hike and valuation compression (Gemini, ChatGPT), while others see it as a short-term risk with long-term energy sector upside (Claude, Grok).
Upside in U.S. energy sector due to low-cost production and increased output (Grok)
Valuation compression in high-growth tech stocks due to a potential Fed rate hike and energy-driven inflation (Gemini, ChatGPT)