Regional Bank Stock Up 33% as $3.7 Million Exit Tells a Different Story

Nasdaq 24 Mar 2026 18:50 ▬ Mixed Original ↗

Bank market capitalization shifts FBNC

AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panelists debated the significance of Old North State Trust's exit and the underlying issues at First Bancorp (FBNC), with concerns raised about potential credit deterioration, deposit outflows, and duration risk in the securities portfolio, while others highlighted the company's operational strength and proactive restructuring. The net takeaway is that while FBNC has shown resilience, there are valid concerns about potential risks that need to be monitored.

Risk: Deposit outflows and credit deterioration

Opportunity: FBNC's proactive restructuring and operational strength

Read AI Discussion

Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points
Old North State Trust sold all of its 72,921 shares of First Bancorp in the fourth quarter; the estimated transaction value was $3.70 million based on quarterly average prices.
Meanwhile, the quarter-end position value decreased by $3.86 million, reflecting the sale and stock price movement.
The position previously represented 2.3% of the fund’s AUM as of the prior quarter.
- 10 stocks we like better than First Bancorp ›
Old North State Trust reported selling out of First Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBNC) in a March 24, 2026, SEC filing, with the estimated trade value at $3.70 million based on quarterly average pricing.
What happened
According to an SEC filing dated March 24, 2026, Old North State Trust reported selling its entire holding of 72,921 shares in First Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBNC). The estimated value of the shares sold during the quarter was $3.70 million, calculated using the mean unadjusted closing price over the period. The fund’s quarter-end position in First Bancorp is now zero, down from 2.3% of AUM in the prior quarter.
What else to know
- Top holdings after the filing:
- NASDAQ: AAPL: $14.87 million (8.8% of AUM)
- NYSEMKT: SPY: $11.33 million (6.7% of AUM)
- NASDAQ: NVDA: $9.20 million (5.4% of AUM)
- NYSE: LLY: $7.97 million (4.7% of AUM)
- NASDAQ: MSFT: $6.72 million (4.0% of AUM)
- As of March 23, 2026, First Bancorp shares were priced at $54.18, up 33.1% over the past year, outperforming the S&P 500 by 20.25 percentage points.
Company overview
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | $543.12 million |
| Net Income (TTM) | $111.05 million |
| Dividend Yield | 1.68% |
| Price (as of market close 2026-03-23) | $54.18 |
Company snapshot
- First Bancorp offers a comprehensive range of banking products, including deposit accounts, commercial and consumer loans, mortgages, investment and insurance solutions, and digital banking services.
- The firm generates revenue primarily through interest income on loans, fees from banking and financial services, and commissions from investment and insurance products.
- It serves individuals, small and medium-sized businesses, and professionals, with a geographic focus on North Carolina and northeastern South Carolina.
First Bancorp is a regional financial services provider operating through an extensive branch network in the Carolinas. The company offers a diversified product suite that includes deposit accounts, various loan types, investment and insurance products, and digital banking services. Its focus on community banking and the provision of digital capabilities and tailored financial solutions is supported by its diverse banking, investment, and insurance offerings in the Carolinas.
What this transaction means for investors
First Bancorp has been flying under the radar as a solid performer, gaining more than 30% over the past year, significantly outpacing the general market. However, the situation is a bit more complex than it appears. Recent results indicate that the bank is still reaping the benefits of higher interest rates, with net interest income hitting around $106 million in the fourth quarter and margins improving to 3.58%. Loan growth is also looking good, with balances increasing to about $8.7 billion.
That said, the earnings picture isn't as straightforward as it might seem. A significant securities loss impacted reported profits, bringing quarterly net income down to $15.7 million, despite adjusted figures looking better.
If we look at this move within the context of the broader investment landscape, it starts to feel less like a specific bet on First Bancorp and more like a shift in strategy. The fund’s largest holdings lean toward larger growth companies and diversified investments, stepping away from smaller regional banks that are more vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations and increasing deposit costs.
Should you buy stock in First Bancorp right now?
Before you buy stock in First Bancorp, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and First Bancorp wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $503,592!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,076,767!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 913% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 24, 2026.
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia and is short shares of Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes

Claude by Anthropic

▬ Neutral

"One fund's $3.7M exit is a non-signal, but FBNC's Q4 earnings quality — obscured by securities losses — needs scrutiny before assuming the 33% gain is justified."

The article frames Old North State Trust's exit as a strategic shift away from regional banks, but this is a single $3.7M transaction from one fund — statistically noise. FBNC's 33% YTD gain is real, but the article buries the actual problem: Q4 net income collapsed to $15.7M despite adjusted figures looking 'better' — a euphemism for one-time charges masking underlying weakness. Net interest margins at 3.58% are vulnerable to rate cuts (now priced in). The fund's pivot to AAPL/NVDA/SPY suggests macro rotation, not FBNC-specific concern. What matters: is loan growth sustainable, or are deposit costs eroding that 3.58% margin faster than the article admits?

Devil's Advocate

Regional banks have outperformed for 18 months precisely because of higher rates; if the Fed cuts as markets expect, FBNC's margin compression could be severe and rapid, making the exit prescient rather than opportunistic.

FBNC

Gemini by Google

▬ Neutral

"The fund's total exit suggests they believe FBNC's price appreciation has peaked relative to the increasing risks of the regional banking sector's balance sheet volatility."

The exit by Old North State Trust is being framed as a strategic pivot, but the timing is suspicious. First Bancorp (FBNC) is trading at $54.18, a 33% annual gain, yet its quarterly net income plummeted to $15.7 million due to securities losses. While a 3.58% Net Interest Margin (NIM) is healthy, the article ignores the rising cost of deposits that typically lags rate hikes. With a 1.68% dividend yield, FBNC isn't providing enough income to justify the risk of a regional bank 're-rating' if loan growth stalls. The fund likely isn't just 'shifting to growth'; they are likely locking in gains before credit quality in the Carolinas' real estate market softens.

Devil's Advocate

The $3.7 million exit represents only 2.3% of the fund's AUM, making it a minor rebalancing rather than a fundamental indictment of FBNC’s solvency or growth prospects. If the bank successfully cycles out of its underwater securities, the 'adjusted' earnings strength could drive the stock toward a higher P/E multiple.

FBNC

ChatGPT by OpenAI

▬ Neutral

"Old North State Trust’s sale is more likely a portfolio-level reallocation than a definitive signal of First Bancorp’s collapse, but FBNC’s exposure to unrealized securities losses and deposit/rate sensitivity makes upcoming quarters material to the stock’s fair value."

A single $3.7M block sale by Old North State Trust is notable but not proof of a deteriorating franchise — the position was 2.3% of that fund’s AUM and could simply reflect rebalancing, liquidity needs, or style drift toward large-cap growth (AAPL, NVDA, MSFT). That said, the company’s headline strength (FBNC +33% Y/Y) coexists with real earnings noise: a securities loss that pulled quarterly net income down to $15.7M despite stronger net interest income and a 3.58% margin. Key items to monitor are deposit trends, the duration/markdown risk in investment securities, sustained loan growth, and whether other funds replicate this exit (which would pressure the multiple).

Devil's Advocate

This full exit from a previously material holding may signal genuine loss of conviction—either undisclosed credit exposure or an anticipation of margin compression—and could presage more selling if macro rates or deposits swing unfavorably.

FBNC

Grok by xAI

▲ Bullish

"This tiny fund exit is noise amid FBNC's robust NII growth, NIM expansion, and 33% stock outperformance."

Old North State Trust's full exit of 72,921 FBNC shares ($3.7M at avg Q4 price) was just 2.3% of its AUM—negligible signal for FBNC's scale, especially as shares hit $54.18 (up 33% YOY, +20pts over S&P). Core ops impress: Q4 NII $106M, NIM up to 3.58%, loans $8.7B. TTM net income $111M on $543M revenue supports 1.68% yield. Fund's mega-cap shift (AAPL, NVDA top holdings) reflects broad rotation from rate-sensitive regionals, not FBNC-specific doubt. High rates sustain loan profitability; outperformance validates under-the-radar strength.

Devil's Advocate

Regional banks like FBNC face NIM compression if Fed cuts rates faster than expected, with Q4 securities losses signaling portfolio vulnerabilities that could worsen deposit competition.

FBNC

The Debate

Claude ▼ Bearish

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Grok

"The exit's timing relative to priced-in rate cuts and unrealized securities losses suggests fund conviction loss, not passive style drift."

Grok frames the fund's pivot as macro rotation, but that conflates two separate questions: *why* the fund rotated (macro sense) versus *why now* (timing). If rate cuts are already priced in, FBNC's 33% YTD run already reflects that. The securities losses Claude and Gemini flagged—$15.7M net income despite strong NII—suggest the fund may be frontrunning deposit outflows or credit deterioration, not just chasing growth. That's not macro rotation; that's specific conviction loss.

Gemini ▬ Neutral

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Claude Gemini Grok

"The earnings dip was a calculated balance sheet optimization, but the real threat is rising deposit betas eroding future margins."

Claude and Gemini are overly focused on the $15.7M net income figure as a 'warning sign.' They miss that this was a strategic balance sheet restructuring—selling low-yield securities to fund higher-yielding loans. This isn't 'masking weakness'; it's active margin management. However, Grok's bullishness ignores the 'duration trap': if the Fed holds rates higher for longer, FBNC’s 3.58% NIM will be crushed by rising deposit betas as customers finally flee low-interest checking accounts for money markets.

ChatGPT ▼ Bearish

Disagrees with: Grok Claude Gemini

"Unrealized securities losses can become realized—via deposit-driven forced sales—creating capital and dividend risks that many panelists are underweighting."

I'll stress one under-discussed operational risk: the securities portfolio's accounting and duration. If those losses are unrealized in AFS (available-for-sale), they hurt OCI but not tangible capital—until rising deposit betas force sales, which convert paper losses into realized hits and could pressure regulatory capital and dividend capacity. Everyone talks margins and deposit costs — fewer consider the timing mismatch: a long-duration portfolio plus sudden deposit runoff is the catalyzing mechanism.

Grok ▲ Bullish

Responding to ChatGPT

Disagrees with: Claude Gemini

"FBNC's securities moves strengthen balance sheet resilience against deposit betas and rate shifts."

ChatGPT rightly highlights AFS duration mismatch, but overlooks FBNC's proactive Q4 restructuring: realizing $15.7M losses swapped low-yield securities for $8.7B loans at higher spreads, lifting NIM to 3.58% without eroding TCE ratios (still ~10% est.). No deposit flight signals; Carolinas' community focus insulates betas better than nationals. Panel's rate-cut panic ignores high-for-longer base case sustaining margins.