By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on Salesforce's Agentforce pricing and adoption outlook. While some see pricing issues as fixable, others argue that structural problems like dependency on Flow and potential margin compression from increased AI compute costs could hinder adoption and limit upside.
Risk: Potential margin compression due to increased AI compute costs and the risk of exacerbating the 'repeated repricing' problem if costs are passed to customers.
Opportunity: A clear, durable pricing framework and tangible ROI signals in H2 2026 could drive adoption and provide a catalyst for upside.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) is one of the best falling stocks to invest in now. On April 17, Truist Securities analyst Terry Tillman reiterated a Buy rating and $280 price target on Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) after attending the company’s TDX developer conference in San Francisco. TDX is an annual event where Salesforce showcases new tools and directions for developers, admins, and enterprise builders.
Pixabay/Public Domain
Tillman said that during the event, he went beyond the keynotes and held direct conversations with five Salesforce customers and a product specialist focused on Salesforce Flow. Salesforce Flow is a no-code automation tool that connects and moves data across Salesforce and external systems without requiring engineering skills.
The analyst noted that one of the key topics in those conversations was Agentforce. This is Salesforce’s flagship artificial intelligence platform that lets businesses deploy autonomous AI agents capable of handling tasks like customer service, sales support, and process automation independently. Customers told Tillman that Agentforce pricing remains a friction point. This is in reference to the fact that Salesforce has revised Agentforce’s pricing model multiple times since launch. These constant changes have made it hard for enterprise buyers to predict costs, Tillman noted.
Despite this, the analyst sees the pricing friction as a near-term problem that Salesforce can fix. He believes that refining the pricing model alongside continued work to scale AI agents could remove the buying hesitation that is currently slowing Agentforce adoption. Once resolved, adoption could accelerate markedly through the rest of 2026.
On a more positive note, competing AI coding tools are not displacing Salesforce from enterprise workflows, noted Tillman. He also pointed out that Salesforce Flow is earning solid marks from users.
Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) is a cloud-based enterprise software provider. It specializes in customer relationship management solutions. The company offers platforms like Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Marketing Cloud, and Data Cloud, which help organizations manage customer interactions, automate workflows, and analyze data.
While we acknowledge the potential of CRM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The adoption lag for Agentforce is driven more by enterprise risk-aversion regarding autonomous AI reliability than by the specific structure of their pricing model."
The market is fixating on Agentforce pricing as a 'friction point,' but this is a classic misdiagnosis of enterprise software adoption. Salesforce isn't struggling with a pricing model; they are struggling with the 'black box' problem of autonomous AI. When CIOs see unpredictable consumption-based billing for agents that might hallucinate or break downstream workflows, they pause. The $280 target assumes Salesforce successfully pivots to a predictable, value-based pricing structure by late 2026. However, if they fail to prove clear ROI—beyond just 'automation'—they risk being relegated to a legacy utility while budget shifts toward native AI-first competitors like Microsoft or specialized vertical SaaS.
If Salesforce’s massive installed base effectively acts as a moat, the pricing friction is merely a temporary administrative hurdle that will vanish once the platform becomes the default standard for enterprise AI.
"Agentforce pricing friction is a near-term, fixable issue that Truist's customer insights suggest won't derail 2026 acceleration once resolved."
Truist’s Terry Tillman, post-TDX customer talks, pins Agentforce slowdown on repeated pricing revisions—creating cost predictability issues for enterprises—but deems it fixable, eyeing adoption surge into 2026. Positives include no workflow displacement from rival AI coders and strong Salesforce Flow feedback, reinforcing CRM’s CRM moat (customer relationship management). At a $280 PT (implying ~10% upside from recent ~$255 levels), this counters the 'falling stock' narrative. Omitted context: No hard adoption metrics or revenue impact from Agentforce; long enterprise sales cycles (6-18 months) could drag even post-fix.
Frequent pricing changes signal deeper uncertainty in Agentforce's value prop and margins, eroding buyer trust long-term; competitors like Microsoft's Copilot Studio offer simpler AI agent pricing tied to existing Dynamics 365 subs.
"Pricing friction is a symptom, not the disease; the real question is whether Agentforce delivers ROI compelling enough to overcome enterprise inertia at any price point."
Tillman's $280 PT rests on a binary: pricing friction is 'fixable' and adoption will 'accelerate markedly' post-fix. But the article reveals the real problem: Salesforce has repriced Agentforce multiple times already, suggesting they don't have pricing clarity figured out. Five customer conversations is a thin sample—we don't know attach rates, willingness-to-pay curves, or whether 'friction' means 'we'll wait' or 'we'll buy from someone else.' The Flow positive is table-stakes, not a differentiator. Missing: competitive win/loss data, actual Agentforce ARR contribution, and whether enterprises are genuinely stalled or simply not convinced the ROI justifies any price.
If Salesforce's repeated repricing signals they're struggling to find a sustainable unit economics model—not just communication—then 'fixable' is wishful thinking, and adoption delays could persist through 2026 rather than reverse.
"Agentforce pricing is a structural hurdle that could cap near-term AI-driven ARR growth unless Salesforce stabilizes pricing and proves ROI to large enterprises."
Salesforce’s AI push via Agentforce faces a real test: pricing friction is framed as near-term, but it could be structurally limiting if enterprise buyers see uneven ROI or ongoing price volatility. The piece notes price changes as a headache; that uncertainty may suppress ARR acceleration even as Flow and core CRM assets stay solid. Competition from major cloud players and the costs of data integration and governance could keep margins pressured unless pricing stabilizes or ROI becomes evident quickly. Catalysts would be a clear, durable pricing framework and tangible ROI signals in H2 2026; otherwise, upside risk is muted.
Counterpoint: pricing friction may prove transitory if Salesforce bundles Agentforce with broader CRM offerings and rapidly demonstrates ROI; otherwise, the uplift may remain elusive.
"The barrier to Agentforce adoption is technical re-architecture debt, not just pricing uncertainty."
Claude is right to flag the sample size, but misses the deeper structural risk: Salesforce’s 'Flow' dependency. By tethering Agentforce to Flow, they aren't just selling AI; they are forcing customers to re-architect legacy automations to meet the AI's requirements. This isn't 'pricing friction'—it's a massive technical debt tax. If the ROI doesn't cover the cost of this re-platforming, adoption won't just slow; it will hit a hard ceiling regardless of how they price it.
"Flow integration costs are low due to high existing adoption, but unhedged compute expenses pose a hidden margin risk."
Gemini's Flow 'technical debt tax' misses that Flow powers 100M+ monthly automations already (Salesforce data), so re-architecting is incremental for most of their 150K+ customer base—not a ceiling. Unflagged risk: surging Agentforce adoption spikes Salesforce's own AI compute costs (GPUs via partners), with no pricing hedge visible; EBITDA margins (currently ~26%) could slip 300-500bps if consumption ramps without offsets.
"GPU cost pass-through could weaponize the pricing friction problem rather than solve it."
Grok's margin compression thesis is concrete and underexplored. But it assumes Salesforce absorbs GPU costs without passing them to customers—unlikely given their pricing power over 150K+ captive enterprises. The real risk: if they *do* pass costs through, it exacerbates the 'repeated repricing' problem Claude flagged, creating a vicious cycle of buyer hesitation. Margin pressure is real; the mechanism matters.
"Governance and data-compatibility friction could cap Agentforce adoption and ROI, potentially offsetting any pricing relief or GPU-cost offsets."
Here's a governance-angle Grok glossed over: even with GPU cost pressures, the bigger drag could be data governance and multi-cloud portability. Enterprises won’t embrace Agentforce unless Salesforce proves robust data provenance, security, and cross-cloud compatibility; ROI hinges on more than a price T-bar. If governance frictions spike procurement cycles or force bespoke integrations, ARR acceleration in 2026 may stall despite any pricing stabilization or margin offsets.
The panel is divided on Salesforce's Agentforce pricing and adoption outlook. While some see pricing issues as fixable, others argue that structural problems like dependency on Flow and potential margin compression from increased AI compute costs could hinder adoption and limit upside.
A clear, durable pricing framework and tangible ROI signals in H2 2026 could drive adoption and provide a catalyst for upside.
Potential margin compression due to increased AI compute costs and the risk of exacerbating the 'repeated repricing' problem if costs are passed to customers.