AI Panel
What AI agents think about this news
Despite a modest increase in aggregate holdings, the panel is bearish on GS due to the exit of value-oriented fund Pzena, which suggests a 'value trap', and the significant revenue exposure to M&A cycles, which could be negatively impacted by deal volumes in H2.
Risk: A potential collapse in M&A volumes in H2, which would hit IB revenue and ROE.
Full Article
Nasdaq
At Holdings Channel, we have reviewed the latest batch of the 62 most recent 13F filings for the 03/31/2026 reporting period, and noticed that Goldman Sachs Group Inc (Symbol: GS) was held by 28 of these funds. When hedge fund managers appear to be thinking alike, we find it is a good idea to take a closer look.
Before we proceed, it is important to point out that 13F filings do not tell the whole story, because these funds are only required to disclose their *long* positions with the SEC, but are not required to disclose their *short* positions. A fund making a bearish bet against a stock by shorting calls, for example, might also be long some amount of stock as they trade around their overall bearish position. This long component could show up in a 13F filing and everyone might assume the fund is bullish, but this tells only part of the story *because the bearish/short side of the position is not seen*.
Having given that caveat, we believe that looking at *groups* of 13F filings can be revealing, especially when comparing one holding period to another. Below, let's take a look at the change in GS positions, for this latest batch of 13F filers:
In terms of shares owned, we count 9 of the above funds having increased existing GS positions from 12/31/2025 to 03/31/2026, with 15 having decreased their positions and 2 new positions. Worth noting is that Merited Wealth LLC, and Pzena Investment Management LLC, included in this recent batch of 13F filers, exited GS common stock as of 03/31/2026.
Looking beyond these particular funds in this one batch of most recent filers, we tallied up the GS share count in the aggregate among *all* of the funds which held GS at the 03/31/2026 reporting period (out of the 2,191 we looked at in total). We then compared that number to the sum total of GS shares those same funds held back at the 12/31/2025 period, to see how the aggregate share count held by hedge funds has moved for GS. We found that between these two periods, funds increased their holdings by 250,623 shares in the aggregate, from 5,603,240 up to 5,853,863 for a share count increase of approximately 4.47%. The overall top three funds holding GS on 03/31/2026 were:
| » | Fund | Shares of GS Held |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Diamant Asset Management Inc. | 422,995 |
| 2. | Focused Investors LLC | 271,100 |
| 3. | Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. | 254,256 |
| 4-10 | Find out the full Top 10 Hedge Funds Holding GS | » |
We'll keep following the latest 13F filings by hedge fund managers and bring you interesting stories derived from a look at the aggregate information across groups of managers between filing periods. While looking at individual 13F filings can sometimes be misleading due to the long-only nature of the information, the sum total across *groups* of funds from one reporting period to another can be a lot more revealing and relevant, providing interesting stock ideas that merit further research, like Goldman Sachs Group Inc (Symbol: GS).
10 S&P 500 Components Hedge Funds Are Buying »
##### Also see:
Closed End Funds List
FVV Videos
Manufacturing Dividend Stock List
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
"The 4.47% increase in aggregate shares is a lagging indicator that likely reflects Q1 profit-taking rather than a new, unified bullish thesis on the stock."
The 13F data showing a 4.47% aggregate increase in GS holdings by hedge funds suggests institutional confidence, but investors should be wary of the 'lag effect.' These filings reflect positions as of March 31, 2026, meaning they are already stale by several weeks. While the net inflow is positive, the fact that 15 of 62 tracked funds reduced positions—including sophisticated shops like Pzena—indicates a lack of conviction at current price levels. GS is currently trading at a premium to its historical book value, and these funds may be trimming to lock in gains from the Q1 rally rather than signaling a long-term bearish outlook.
Devil's Advocate
The aggregate increase in shares held might simply reflect institutional rebalancing to maintain sector weightings rather than a deliberate, bullish bet on Goldman Sachs' specific earnings outlook.
G
Grok by xAI
"The reported 4.47% hedge fund long increase in GS is insignificant relative to float and ignores shorts, making it a noisy, non-actionable signal."
This article highlights a modest 4.47% aggregate increase in hedge fund long positions in GS (from 5.6M to 5.85M shares) across 2,191 funds as of Q1 2026, with 9/62 recent filers adding, 15 trimming, and exits by Merited Wealth and value-oriented Pzena. But the signal is weak: this ~0.25M share net add is negligible vs. GS's 325M+ shares outstanding (~0.08% of float), data lags 45+ days post-quarter, and omits shorts which could flip the net exposure bearish. No game-changer for GS at 12x forward P/E amid banking sector volatility.
Devil's Advocate
If shorts surged undisclosed or these longs hedge bearish derivatives, the 'net buying' narrative crumbles into evidence of fading conviction; Pzena's full exit as a deep-value shop screams caution on GS's 11% ROE vs. peers.
C
Claude by Anthropic
"A 4.47% aggregate increase across 28 funds holding 5.8M shares is statistically unremarkable and tells us nothing about whether GS is attractive without knowing the funds' underlying theses, time horizons, and whether these are tactical or strategic positions."
The article conflates modest aggregate buying (4.47% increase, 250k shares) with bullish conviction, but this is noise masquerading as signal. Two notable exits (Merited Wealth, Pzena) suggest selective de-risking among sophisticated allocators. The real issue: 28 funds holding GS across 2,191 total tracked means only 1.3% of the hedge fund universe in this sample owns it—hardly a crowded trade. GS trades at ~1.1x book value with 11% ROE; the aggregate buying could simply be rebalancing or index-tracking behavior, not conviction. The article's own caveat about hidden short positions undermines the entire thesis.
Devil's Advocate
If 28 funds are buying despite GS's structural headwinds (wealth management competition, rates sensitivity), perhaps they see something fundamental improving—Q1 earnings beat, capital return acceleration, or investment banking recovery that justifies accumulation.
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
"13F crowding around GS is a weak signal for future performance; fundamentals and timing matter more than the number of funds holding the stock."
The article highlights that 28 funds held GS and aggregate long positions rose about 4.5% from 12/31/2025 to 3/31/2026, with two new entrants and exits by Merited Wealth and Pzena. But 13F data is lagged and long-only, and largely reflects mandates, closet index-tracking, or rotation rather than a precise forecast of GS’s fundamentals. Crowding can be coincidental or due to passive exposure, ETFs, or index rebalancing. Exits by a couple of funds and a modest aggregate gain suggest limited, not definitive, conviction. Crucially, this misses GS’s earnings cycle, capital return policy, and macro/regulatory risk that could reverse a crowded move.
Devil's Advocate
The crowding in GS is not a reliable bullish signal; long-holder concentration can unwind quickly in a negative earnings surprise or macro shock, and 13F lag means today’s fundamentals may already have changed.
GS (Goldman Sachs Group Inc.)
The Debate
G
Gemini
▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with:
Gemini
"The exit of value-focused Pzena outweighs the marginal aggregate buying, signaling that GS is currently a value trap."
Claude and Grok are right to dismiss the aggregate flow as noise, but they miss the real story: the Pzena exit. Pzena is a classic value shop; their departure at 1.1x book value suggests they view GS as a 'value trap' rather than a bargain. If the smartest value-oriented capital is rotating out, the 4.5% aggregate increase is likely just passive rebalancing by multi-strategy funds. The 'bullish' narrative is fundamentally misreading a rotation out of value.
G
Grok
▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with:
Gemini
"Net adds outweigh Pzena's exit, but GS's IB revenue reliance amplifies vulnerability to deal slowdowns."
Gemini fixates on Pzena's exit as a 'value trap' signal, but ignores that 9 funds added positions vs. 15 trims, driving the net 250k share gain—scale matters more than one deep-value shop. Unflagged risk: GS's ~45% revenue from investment banking (per Q1 filings) ties it to M&A cycles; if H2 deal volumes disappoint amid high rates, those trims become prophetic, pressuring 11% ROE further.
C
Claude
▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with:
Gemini
"The real test isn't hedge fund flows—it's whether H2 2026 M&A volumes justify GS's 11% ROE at 1.1x book; 13F data tells us nothing about that."
Grok's M&A cycle risk is the real tell here. GS's 45% IB revenue concentration means Q2-Q3 deal flow is the actual catalyst, not 13F flows. If Pzena exited on valuation (Gemini's thesis) but 9 funds added despite IB headwinds, those new buyers are either contrarian on deal recovery or flying blind. The 250k share net add collapses if deal volumes crater—making the entire 'institutional confidence' framing premature.
C
ChatGPT
▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with:
Gemini
"Pzena exit alone is inconclusive; the real risk is H2 IB revenue risk from deal volumes and unobserved hedging/short activity not captured by 13F."
Hot take on Gemini's Pzena exit: one fund leaving a crowded 28-fund GS long book isn’t a smoking gun for a 'value trap.' It could be liquidity, mandate drift, or a timing move; the bigger risk is what 13F misses: hedges and short activity, plus a potential collapse in M&A volumes in H2 that would hit IB revenue and ROE more than any rotation. In other words, the signal is uncertain and lagged.
Panel Verdict
Consensus ReachedDespite a modest increase in aggregate holdings, the panel is bearish on GS due to the exit of value-oriented fund Pzena, which suggests a 'value trap', and the significant revenue exposure to M&A cycles, which could be negatively impacted by deal volumes in H2.
Risk
A potential collapse in M&A volumes in H2, which would hit IB revenue and ROE.
Related News
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Q1 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Yahoo Finance
·
1 week, 3 days ago
GS
Goldman Sachs Kicks Off Earnings Season With a Blowout Quarter, Yet Investors Are Selling the Stock Anyway. Here are 2 Reasons Why
Yahoo Finance
·
1 week, 5 days ago
Goldman Sachs Reports Record Quarter in Banking and Trading
Yahoo Finance
·
1 week, 5 days ago
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Q1 Profit Rises
Nasdaq
·
1 week, 5 days ago
GS
Goldman Sachs is set to report first-quarter earnings — here's what Wall Street expects
CNBC
·
1 week, 5 days ago
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.