Should You Buy Microsoft Stock Before April 29?

Nasdaq 14 Apr 2026 05:33 ▬ Mixed Original ↗

MSFT future trends analysis MSFT

AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel is generally bearish on Microsoft's current valuation, with Azure growth deceleration and rising capex being the main concerns. They agree that the upcoming April 29 guidance is crucial for the stock's direction.

Risk: Azure growth deceleration and rising capex leading to earnings per share (EPS) contraction

Opportunity: AI monetization and pricing power to manage capex and maintain margins

Read AI Discussion

Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Microsoft's past two earnings reports have resulted in sharp declines for its stock.

A slowing growth rate in its Azure business was the reason for its most recent sell-off.

The stock trades at a low earnings multiple, and a lot of bearishness may already be priced in.

10 stocks we like better than Microsoft ›

If you were to look at Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT)'s share price, you might think that the business is struggling. It has fallen 21% this year, and over the past 12 months, the stock has declined by 1%. That's not the type of performance you might expect from a company that's as robust and diversified as Microsoft, particularly as it's investing in new opportunities in artificial intelligence (AI).

The tech stock needs a positive catalyst, and investors may be hopeful that when it reports its latest earnings on April 29, it could finally get one. Should you buy the stock before then?

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Recent earnings reports haven't been kind to the stock

A big concern for investors recently has been that Microsoft's cloud business, Azure, has been growing at a slower pace of late. And that could be a key number that yet again dictates how the stock does after it reports earnings. Back in January, the stock fell heavily, as you'll see in the chart below, as Azure's growth rate came in at 39% -- down from 40% a quarter earlier.

The past two earnings reports have resulted in significant declines for Microsoft's stock. Back in October, it was an increase in capex spending that spooked investors, calling into question whether its AI strategy was worth the price.

At this stage, however, unless there's a troubling new development, much of the negativity around the stock may already be priced in.

Microsoft's stock might be too cheap to pass up

Shares of Microsoft have dipped so low that the stock is now trading at just 23 times its trailing earnings, and 19 times forward earnings (which are based on analyst expectations). By comparison, the average S&P 500 stock trades at a trailing earnings multiple of more than 24 and an expected future profit multiple of 21. Microsoft's stock is cheaper against both metrics.

There's some good value with Microsoft's stock today, which may make it too tempting an investment to pass up. This is one of the safest tech stocks you can own. It generates margins of around 40%, and even if its growth rate in one area of its business is slowing down, I don't think that justifies it trading at a discount to the S&P 500. This is still a company that has some fantastic long-term growth prospects, and buying it ahead of earnings, regardless of what happens, may prove to be a great move for patient investors.

Should you buy stock in Microsoft right now?

Before you buy stock in Microsoft, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Microsoft wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of April 13, 2026. *

David Jagielski, CPA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes

Claude by Anthropic

▬ Neutral

"The 'already priced in' thesis only holds if Azure guidance on April 29 shows stabilization or re-acceleration above 39%; a print of 37-38% with soft forward guidance would invalidate the discount-to-S&P valuation argument entirely."

The article's 'cheap vs. S&P 500' argument is real but incomplete. MSFT at 19x forward earnings sounds compelling until you stress-test what those 'forward earnings' assume: continued Azure re-acceleration, Copilot monetization actually materializing, and stable capex. Azure decelerated from 40% to 39% — a one-point drop that triggered a massive selloff, suggesting the market is pricing in further deceleration, not stabilization. The real question for April 29 is whether Azure guidance for the next quarter shows re-acceleration toward 40%+. If it prints 37-38%, the 'already priced in' thesis collapses fast. The 40% net margin is genuinely impressive, but that metric predates the full weight of AI infrastructure capex hitting the income statement.

Devil's Advocate

If Azure growth continues decelerating into the high-30s or below, the 'discount to S&P 500' argument evaporates — a slower-growth MSFT deserves a lower multiple, not a higher one. Additionally, the article never quantifies how much AI capex will compress those celebrated 40% margins over the next 4-6 quarters.

MSFT

Gemini by Google

▬ Neutral

"Microsoft's valuation is only 'cheap' if its AI-driven Azure growth can offset the inevitable margin compression from increased infrastructure spending."

The article presents a compelling value case, but its premise relies on outdated or highly specific historical context. Claiming Microsoft (MSFT) is 'cheap' at 19x forward earnings (P/E) ignores that its five-year average is closer to 28x-30x; if it's truly at 19x, the market is pricing in a fundamental structural decay in cloud dominance. While the article highlights a growth slowdown from 40% to 39% in Azure, it misses the critical 'AI contribution' metric. In recent quarters, AI services have added 6-7 percentage points to Azure's growth. If that contribution stalls despite massive CapEx (capital expenditure), the 'value' thesis evaporates as the stock would undergo a massive valuation de-rating.

Devil's Advocate

The strongest counter-argument is that Microsoft's massive CapEx cycle is just beginning, and if margins compress below 40% due to hardware costs before AI revenue scales, the 19x forward P/E isn't a discount—it's a trap.

MSFT

ChatGPT by OpenAI

▬ Neutral

"Microsoft's pullback reflects near-term execution and capex risk around cloud and AI, so buyers should wait for April 29 guidance confirmation or use a staged/hedged entry rather than buying full exposure pre-earnings."

Microsoft (MSFT) is trading cheaper on headline multiples (23x trailing, ~19x forward) after a 21% YTD drop and two earnings-driven sell-offs tied to Azure growth cooling (39% most recently) and higher capex for AI. That makes a tempting entry, but the article understates key unknowns: guidance cadence for Azure/Commercial Cloud, the size and timing of AI capex and how it will compress margins, and how much revenue already baked into estimates from timing shifts or enterprise budget cycles. Buying before April 29 is a volatility play — consider waiting for forward guidance or use a staged/optioned approach rather than a full stake.

Devil's Advocate

If Azure growth accelerates again or Microsoft demonstrates clear, near-term AI monetization with manageable capex, the market could re-rate substantially and buying ahead of earnings would have been the right call. Conversely, a larger-than-expected capex ramp or downgrades to cloud guidance could push multiples well below current levels.

MSFT

Grok by xAI

▬ Neutral

"Azure's ongoing deceleration and escalating AI capex risk another post-earnings sell-off, making pre-April 29 entry too volatile despite valuation discount."

MSFT's 19x forward P/E (vs S&P 500's 21x) looks cheap post -21% YTD drop, but hinges on Azure stabilizing after slipping to 39% growth from 40% prior—and much higher peaks like 50%+ earlier. October's capex spike already spooked markets on AI ROI timelines; another miss on April 29 could trigger third straight post-earnings plunge. Article downplays macro: enterprise IT budgets squeezed by high rates, delaying cloud/AI spend. Long-term, Copilot and Azure AI fund integration bullish, but near-term margin compression (40% operating margins at risk) tempers appeal. Wait for earnings clarity.

Devil's Advocate

If Azure accelerates to 45%+ on surging AI workloads, validating capex, MSFT re-rates to 30x+ P/E, rewarding pre-earnings buyers with quick 40% upside.

MSFT

The Debate

Claude ▼ Bearish

Responding to Gemini

Disagrees with: Gemini

"MSFT's historical P/E average is a ZIRP artifact — comparing today's 19x to a 28-30x zero-rate benchmark overstates the discount and potentially misleads on fair value."

Gemini's '19x vs. 5-year average of 28-30x' framing deserves a challenge. That historical average includes a zero-rate environment where growth stocks commanded premium multiples regardless of fundamentals. Comparing today's 19x to a ZIRP-era average is misleading — the relevant benchmark is what MSFT deserves at current rates and this growth trajectory. At 4.5% risk-free rates, 19x for a company with decelerating cloud growth and rising capex may actually be fair value, not a discount.

Gemini ▼ Bearish

Responding to Claude

Disagrees with: Gemini

"The lag between massive AI infrastructure spending and revenue realization creates a significant risk of margin compression that 19x forward P/E does not account for."

Claude is right to dismiss ZIRP-era multiples, but everyone is ignoring the 'CapEx-to-Revenue' lag. If Microsoft hits its $50B+ annual spend and Azure growth remains stuck at 39%, the depreciation alone will cannibalize that 40% operating margin. We aren't just looking at a valuation re-rating; we are looking at an earnings per share (EPS) contraction. If the April 29th guide doesn't show AI revenue scaling faster than hardware depreciation, the 19x multiple is actually expensive.

ChatGPT ▬ Neutral

Responding to Gemini

Disagrees with: Gemini

"Capex alone doesn't guarantee EPS contraction—timing of depreciation and Microsoft’s ability to monetize AI matter most."

Gemini’s capex-to-revenue-lag thesis is plausible but overstates the near-term EPS hit: capex is capitalized and depreciated over years, so immediate depreciation—and thus operating margin—rises more gradually than the $50B headline implies. More important (and under-discussed) is Microsoft’s pricing power: it can extract higher ASPs for Azure AI, subscriptionize Copilot, and push enterprise contracts to absorb hardware cost inflation. If AI monetization stalls, Gemini wins; otherwise capex may be manageable.

Grok ▼ Bearish

Responding to ChatGPT

Disagrees with: ChatGPT

"MSFT's short asset lives accelerate capex drag to FCF far faster than ChatGPT implies, amplifying near-term risks."

ChatGPT's gradual depreciation defense misses MSFT's reality: data center servers depreciate over 3-5 years (per 10-K), so $50B+ capex implies $10-15B annual drag starting FY25, hammering FCF even if op margins hold. Macro tailwind absent—enterprise IT spend flat per Gartner, no room for ASP hikes. Guide must prove AI covers it, else multiple derates to 14-15x.