By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on PayPal, with key risks including margin compression due to competitive pressure, slow TPV growth, and the potential erosion of PayPal's unique value proposition in the face of 'Buy Now, Pay Later' services. Despite some optimism about Venmo monetization and strategic tech investments, the panel agrees that these factors may not be enough to offset the headwinds, leaving the 8.4x forward P/E multiple vulnerable.
Risk: Erosion of PayPal's unique value proposition due to 'Buy Now, Pay Later' services
Opportunity: Potential monetization of Venmo
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
The digital payment service posted 2% growth in the first quarter after a 1% gain in Q4 2025.
While it is a leading player, the market might be concerned about competitive forces.
This fintech stock is cheap, but it's difficult to argue that it's a smart buy.
PayPal Holdings (NASDAQ: PYPL) has long been one of the leaders in the payments industry. It's a scaled platform, with 439 million active accounts and $464 billion in total payment volume (TPV) during the first quarter.
But this fintech stock has tanked 24% in 2026 (as of May 21), while the broader S&P 500 index is up 9%. And it trades a gut-wrenching 86% below its record from July 2021, as investors grapple with what is now a slower-growth business.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Should you buy, sell, or hold PayPal stock?
Since PayPal reported its financial results for Q1 on May 5 before the market opened, shares have dipped 12%. The market might not be happy with 2% TPV growth in Q1 for online branded checkout. This is a critical segment for PayPal, as it helps to differentiate the company from competitors and can be more profitable than other parts of the business.
The first quarter's results come after a disappointing showing for the last three months of 2025, when online branded checkout posted just 1% growth.
And speaking of earnings, they have come under pressure. CEO Enrique Lores, who took over from Alex Chriss on March 1, will focus on heavy investments to bolster PayPal's technological infrastructure. The company's adjusted operating margin was 18.4% in the first quarter, down from 20.7% in the year-ago period.
Adjusted operating income fell 5% year over year to $1.5 billion. The leadership team expects adjusted earnings per share to decline 9% in the current quarter.
PayPal's valuation has become extremely difficult to overlook. Investors have the opportunity right now to buy shares at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 8.4. This is at a time when the S&P 500 index trades at a multiple of 22.2. From a relative perspective, PayPal looks like an absolute bargain.
This business has a network effect, thanks to its two-sided ecosystem consisting of merchants and consumers. And it generates positive free cash flow.
But I don't think the stock is a smart buy today. While it pioneered digital payments, PayPal is operating in what has become an intensely competitive industry with compelling offerings from rivals that cater to both merchants and consumers. The company's slower growth and weaker margins point to a new reality.
For existing shareholders, I view the stock as a hold. Because of the cheap valuation, the downside appears to be protected, so investors who are sitting on huge losses might simply choose to remain patient. And unless you need to free up liquidity for another buying opportunity, it's not necessarily a good idea to sell.
Before you buy stock in PayPal, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and PayPal wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $477,813! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,320,088!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 25, 2026. *
Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends PayPal. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short June 2026 $50 calls on PayPal. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"PYPL's valuation floor holds only if Q2 confirms TPV stabilization rather than further deceleration."
PYPL's 2% Q1 TPV growth and 18.4% operating margin signal structural pressure from rivals, yet the 8.4x forward P/E against positive FCF and 439M accounts creates a valuation floor not fully tested by the market. CEO Lores' infrastructure spend could stabilize the branded checkout segment that fell from 20.7% margins, but sustained 9% EPS declines risk further multiple compression. The 24% YTD drop already prices in much of the slowdown, leaving the stock range-bound unless network effects prove durable against embedded payments.
Even at 8.4x, accelerating share loss in checkout could turn the FCF yield into a value trap as merchants migrate to lower-cost alternatives, erasing the apparent downside protection.
"PYPL's valuation is cheap because growth is genuinely slowing and margins are under structural pressure, not because the market is irrationally pessimistic."
PYPL is trading at 8.4x forward P/E versus S&P 500's 22.2x, but the article conflates cheapness with value. The real issue: TPV growth has decelerated to 2% (Q1) from already-weak 1% (Q4), operating margins compressed 230bps YoY, and management guided EPS down 9% next quarter. The new CEO's infrastructure investments signal management believes the moat has eroded. However, the article omits PYPL's $464B TPV scale and positive FCF generation—at 8.4x, you're pricing in near-zero growth forever. The question isn't whether it's cheap; it's whether 2% growth justifies even that multiple if competitive pressure persists.
If Lores' infrastructure capex unlocks operating leverage in 2027-2028 and TPV growth re-accelerates to 8-10%, this 8.4x multiple becomes a screaming bargain; the article assumes margin compression is permanent rather than cyclical.
"PayPal's low valuation is a reflection of structural obsolescence in branded checkout rather than a temporary market mispricing."
The article correctly highlights PayPal's valuation trap, but misses the structural rot. A forward P/E of 8.4x is not a 'bargain' if the core branded checkout business is experiencing terminal deceleration. The 2% TPV growth figure is the real canary in the coal mine; it suggests that PayPal is losing share in its highest-margin segment to Apple Pay and integrated merchant solutions like Stripe. With operating margins contracting from 20.7% to 18.4% and a new CEO pivoting to heavy infrastructure spend, the 'value' thesis is undermined by a multi-year margin compression cycle. I see no catalyst for a re-rating until they stabilize checkout volume growth.
If the new CEO successfully pivots PayPal toward B2B payment orchestration and stabilizes the checkout experience, the stock could see a massive multiple expansion as the market realizes the cash flow generation remains elite.
"PayPal's cheap valuation hinges on an elusive growth/margin recovery; without a material re-acceleration, the stock is unlikely to deliver upside."
PayPal looks cheap on a forward P/E around 8.4x vs 22x for the S&P, but the article understates real earnings risk. Q1 TPV growth at 2% and a margin drop to 18.4% (from 20.7%) signal a mature, price- and volume-constrained ecosystem amid intensifying competition (merchant services, BNPL players, card networks). Strategic tech investments may boost optionality, but they pressure near-term profitability and cash flow. With investor skepticism anchored by slowing growth and monetization headwinds for Venmo, the risk is a prolonged multiple compression unless a meaningful earnings/TPV reacceleration materializes.
Against this bearish read, a counterpoint is that the stock may already discount the worst-case path; a stronger-than-expected revival in TPV or Venmo monetization could trigger a sharp multiple re-rating.
"Infrastructure spend could stabilize monetization via B2B even without TPV rebound."
Gemini's terminal deceleration claim overlooks how Claude's $464B TPV scale and Grok's positive FCF could still support buybacks even if checkout share keeps eroding. The infrastructure pivot might shift mix toward lower-margin B2B orchestration faster than margins compress, creating a floor the 8.4x multiple already prices in. No one has quantified whether Venmo monetization alone could offset the 9% EPS guidance cut next quarter.
"Buyback support only works if FCF doesn't deteriorate; Venmo monetization is the unquantified variable everyone's skirting."
Grok's buyback argument assumes FCF remains stable despite margin compression—but if checkout erosion accelerates, FCF yield could deteriorate faster than multiple compression offsets it. More critically: nobody's quantified Venmo's monetization runway. ChatGPT flagged it as a headwind, but we need specifics—what's the TAM, current ARPU, and realistic path to material contribution? Without that, we're debating PayPal's future on incomplete data.
"The erosion of PayPal's branded checkout primacy by integrated BNPL solutions is a terminal threat that makes monetization of secondary products like Venmo irrelevant."
Claude, your focus on Venmo monetization misses the bigger structural risk: the 'Buy Now, Pay Later' (BNPL) cannibalization of PayPal’s own checkout. As BNPL becomes a standard checkout feature, PayPal loses its unique value proposition. Even if they monetize Venmo, it’s a low-margin, high-churn game. The real risk isn't just margin compression; it's the erosion of the 'Pay with PayPal' button as a default consumer habit. That's a terminal threat to their moat, not just a cyclical headwind.
"BNPL cannibalization may not be a terminal moat erosion; it can become upside if it grows volume and monetization, but the real test is whether Lores' capex unlocks true operating leverage to offset margin pressure."
Gemini overstates BNPL as a terminal moat erosion. If BNPL adoption actually raises total checkout volume and merchant acceptance, PayPal could lift its take rate and scale Venmo monetization, turning cannibalization into volume-driven upside. The real question is whether Lores’ capex can unlock true operating leverage by 2027-2028; if not, 2% TPV growth stays a headwind and the 8.4x multiple remains vulnerable regardless of BNPL dynamics.
The panel consensus is bearish on PayPal, with key risks including margin compression due to competitive pressure, slow TPV growth, and the potential erosion of PayPal's unique value proposition in the face of 'Buy Now, Pay Later' services. Despite some optimism about Venmo monetization and strategic tech investments, the panel agrees that these factors may not be enough to offset the headwinds, leaving the 8.4x forward P/E multiple vulnerable.
Potential monetization of Venmo
Erosion of PayPal's unique value proposition due to 'Buy Now, Pay Later' services