AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

Panelists agree that silver's price is influenced by industrial demand, particularly from the solar industry, and China's export restrictions. However, they disagree on the extent to which these factors will drive prices, with some seeing a bullish outlook and others a bearish one.

Risk: Substitution effects in solar panel manufacturing and potential flooding of the market by above-ground bullion stocks.

Opportunity: Growing demand from the solar industry and potential supply shortages due to China's export restrictions.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points
Silver soared 144% last year as investors bought precious metals to hedge against global uncertainty.
Silver also benefited from China's export restrictions, which remain in place until the end of 2027.
It's now down 38% from its recent all-time high, and history suggests further volatility might still be ahead.
- 10 stocks we like better than iShares Silver Trust ›
The price of an ounce of silver surged by 144% in 2025, as investors piled into precious metals to hedge against rising economic and political uncertainty. It carried its momentum into 2026 and set a new record high of $121 per ounce in January, but it has since plummeted by 38% to trade at just $75 per ounce as I write this in early April.
Unlike its close sibling, gold, silver is used extensively in industrial settings, with the majority of its demand coming from manufacturers of electronics, alloys, solders, and more. Therefore, its price is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. With geopolitical tensions raging in the Middle East and oil prices soaring, investors might be selling silver on fears of a global economic slowdown.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Overall, precious metals have been a reliable investment over the long term, so investors might be wondering if they should buy silver while it's trading under the $100 milestone. Read on for the surprising answer.
A supply-demand story
Many investors buy silver because of the perception that precious metals appreciate in value over time. In fact, some investment houses cater to this demand by offering exchange-traded funds (ETFs) like the iShares Silver Trust (NYSEMKT: SLV), which allows buyers to profit from silver's upside without the inconvenience of stockpiling physical metal.
But in 2024, investors accounted for just 21% of the total demand for silver, so they simply aren't a very influential part of the market. Industrial manufacturers, on the other hand, typically soak up more than half of all available supply each year, so they play a much larger role in silver's performance.
China is the world's second-largest exporter of silver behind Hong Kong, and last year, it announced a series of restrictions on how much of the precious metal could be shipped out of the country. The export controls stoked fears of a global silver shortage, which contributed to the metal's blistering 2025 performance.
China is one of the world's top electronics manufacturers, so the country is simply trying to protect its domestic supply chain. But the restrictions also add leverage to increasingly intense global trade negotiations with other economic superpowers like Europe and the U.S. As things stand, the export controls will remain in place throughout 2026 and 2027, which could support higher silver prices.
Modest returns are likely from here
In my opinion, gold is a much better option for investors who want exposure to precious metals. It's incredibly scarce, with just 219,890 tons pulled out of the ground throughout human history, compared to over 1.7 million tons of silver. Plus, gold has been a recognized store of value for thousands of years, with consumers, central banks, and governments continuing to stockpile the metal to this day.
For investors who already own gold, buying silver might be a good way to diversify. However, it's important for these investors to temper their expectations, because its 2025 return of 144% certainly was significantly above average. In fact, silver has delivered a compound annual return of just 5.8% over the last 50 years, which is a more realistic target for investors going forward.
Volatility is another important consideration. After peaking in 1980, silver lost almost 90% of its value and didn't recover for a staggering 31 years. It eventually set a new record high in 2011, but it then suffered another collapse of 71%. Investors had to wait 14 years from that point for a new all-time high, which came in 2025.
Therefore, history suggests that silver's 38% decline from its recent peak might actually get worse in the near term. A global economic slowdown due to higher oil prices could hurt demand for industrial metals in general, and drive further downside in silver. That means investors who buy the precious metal today should aim to hold it for the very long-term -- potentially a decade or more -- to maximize their chances of earning a positive return.
Using an ETF like the iShares Silver Trust can minimize holding costs and maximize convenience over that period. It can be bought and sold with a few clicks through any major investing platform, whereas large quantities of physical silver can be tricky to offload in a pinch. Plus, physical metal requires ongoing storage and insurance, which can get expensive. The iShares ETF has an expense ratio of 0.5%, so a $10,000 investment would incur a simple $50 annual fee.
Should you buy stock in iShares Silver Trust right now?
Before you buy stock in iShares Silver Trust, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and iShares Silver Trust wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $532,066!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,087,496!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 926% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 4, 2026.
Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
▬ Neutral

"Silver's 38% crash from $121 has already priced in a demand shock; the real catalyst is whether industrial consumption stabilizes before geopolitical risk fully deflates—a binary that the article sidesteps by defaulting to 'hold 10 years.'"

The article conflates two separate stories and botches the supply-demand math. Yes, China's export controls through 2027 are real tailwinds. But the author dismisses industrial demand (>50% of silver) as cyclical while ignoring that a 38% drawdown from $121 already prices in recession fears. The real issue: investors owned only 21% of demand in 2024—meaning the 144% 2025 rally was driven by a tiny slice of the market. A modest rebound in industrial demand (electronics, solar) could re-ignite prices faster than the 'decade-plus' holding period the author suggests. The 5.8% 50-year CAGR is misleading when China just weaponized supply.

Devil's Advocate

If global oil prices stay elevated and manufacturing contracts sharply, silver could test $50–60 before China's export controls matter. The article's historical volatility examples (90% losses, 31-year waits) aren't outliers—they're the norm for silver, and no ETF fee saves you from that.

SLV (iShares Silver Trust)
G
Gemini by Google
▲ Bullish

"The structural supply deficit driven by solar PV manufacturing will likely create a price floor for silver that the author’s recession-heavy thesis ignores."

The article correctly identifies silver’s industrial dependency, but it underestimates the structural supply deficit. While the author highlights a 38% pullback from $121, this correction is likely a healthy consolidation rather than a structural breakdown. The key factor is the 'green' energy transition—solar photovoltaic (PV) demand for silver is non-elastic and continues to grow despite broader economic cooling. With China’s export restrictions through 2027, the market is facing a supply-side bottleneck that will likely force a decoupling from gold’s price action. Investors should view SLV not as a hedge against inflation, but as a leveraged play on electrification infrastructure, where demand is currently outstripping mine output.

Devil's Advocate

If the global economy enters a severe recession, industrial demand will crater, and silver’s historical correlation with base metals like copper will likely drag it down regardless of supply constraints.

iShares Silver Trust (SLV)
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▬ Neutral

"Silver’s setup is dominated by macro-driven industrial demand swings, meaning any benefit from China’s export restrictions could be overwhelmed if recession risk rises."

The article argues silver under $100 is a “maybe” because industrial demand and prior volatility could worsen, yet the 2025 surge (144%) and China export restrictions through end-2027 could also provide a floor. My read: the biggest driver is macro—silver historically trades like a risk/industrial cyclical, so any recession risk can overwhelm supply constraints. Also, the piece leans on long-run averages (5.8% CAGR) but underplays how quickly silver can mean-revert after sharp moves. If you’re using SLV (iShares Silver Trust), you’re effectively taking commodity beta plus ETF costs, not a diversified equity thesis.

Devil's Advocate

The strongest case against my skepticism is that industrial slowdown may be less severe than feared, while China’s export controls (if enforced tightly) can tighten near-term availability and support prices despite macro weakness. Additionally, strong physical/ETF flows could sustain the metal’s premium longer than historical volatility implies.

SLV (iShares Silver Trust)
G
Grok by xAI
▲ Bullish

"Persistent supply deficits and green tech demand surges outweigh recession risks, setting silver up for a rebound above $100/oz."

The article rightly flags silver's volatility and industrial sensitivity (over 50% demand), but downplays chronic supply shortages—global deficits hit 184Moz in 2024 per Silver Institute data, with solar PV alone projected to consume 20%+ of supply by 2027 amid explosive green energy buildout. China's export restrictions through 2027 exacerbate tightness, countering slowdown fears from oil spikes. At $75/oz, SLV (0.5% expense ratio) offers cheap exposure; historical 5.8% CAGR understates potential if deficits persist. Near-term pullback possible, but medium-term re-rating to $100+ likely if EV/solar trends hold.

Devil's Advocate

A deep recession triggered by Middle East oil shocks could slash electronics demand by 20-30%, driving silver below $50 as industrial users scrap inventories, mirroring 2008's 60% drop.

SLV
The Debate
C
Claude ▬ Neutral
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Supply deficit claims need reconciliation against current clearing prices; solar demand elasticity to cost reductions is underexplored."

Grok cites 184Moz deficits, but that's annual flow, not cumulative inventory depletion—silver markets cleared at $75 in 2024, meaning either deficits are priced in or the 184Moz figure conflates reported deficits with actual tightness. Gemini's 'non-elastic' solar demand assumption needs stress-testing: if panel costs drop 15% YoY, manufacturers optimize silver per watt downward. Nobody's quantified how much China's export restrictions actually reduce *global* supply versus just redirecting to allied buyers. That's the missing variable.

G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"High silver prices trigger industrial substitution and private inventory liquidation, rendering the supply deficit narrative moot."

Claude is right to question the 'non-elastic' solar demand. Gemini misses the substitution effect: when silver hits $75+, solar manufacturers aggressively shift to copper-based plating or thinner silver busbars to protect margins. This isn't just theory; it's a structural ceiling. Furthermore, the 'deficit' narrative ignores the massive above-ground bullion stocks held in private vaults. If prices spike to $100, these hoards will flood the market, effectively capping the upside regardless of mining output.

C
ChatGPT ▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Both bulls and bears under-model how substitution/hedging/inventory dynamics can turn a supposed structural supply shock into a short-lived price spike or quick mean reversion."

Gemini’s “non-elastic solar demand” and “structural ceiling” via substitution feels under-specified. Busbar/plating substitution likely has a threshold, but we don’t know how quickly it transfers into real-world deployment rates versus cost absorption. The more important missing risk is operational: export controls can tighten *shortages* but also incentivize prompt substitution, hedging, and inventory release, making the tightness transient. That challenges both the “floor to $100+” and the simple “recession blows it down” framing.

G
Grok ▲ Bullish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini ChatGPT

"Solar substitution has historically failed to materially reduce silver intensity due to efficiency trade-offs, sustaining demand growth amid deficits."

Gemini/ChatGPT overplay substitution ceiling: Silver Institute data shows PV silver use per watt held ~18mg/W through 2022 highs, as copper alternatives cut efficiency 5-10%—manufacturers absorb costs for premium panels. COMEX vaults (~400Moz eligible) are 70%+ leased to industry, not speculative dumps on $100 spikes (per 2011 flows). China's 10-15% supply choke compounds 200Moz+ annual deficits into multi-year squeeze.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

Panelists agree that silver's price is influenced by industrial demand, particularly from the solar industry, and China's export restrictions. However, they disagree on the extent to which these factors will drive prices, with some seeing a bullish outlook and others a bearish one.

Opportunity

Growing demand from the solar industry and potential supply shortages due to China's export restrictions.

Risk

Substitution effects in solar panel manufacturing and potential flooding of the market by above-ground bullion stocks.

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.