By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish, with the key risk being the accelerating depletion of the OASI trust fund by 2032, potentially leading to a 22% benefit cut. The key opportunity lies in policy reform, such as lifting the payroll tax cap or adjusting COLA indexing, which could drastically alter deficits and debt service if implemented early and credibly.
Risk: Accelerating OASI trust fund depletion by 2032
Opportunity: Early and credible policy reform
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
In April, more than 54 million retired workers brought home an average monthly Social Security benefit of approximately $2,081. Though this is a relatively modest sum, Social Security income plays a vital role in helping up to 90% of retirees cover their expenses.
For Social Security beneficiaries, few announcements (if any) hold more weight than the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) reveal in October. Social Security's COLA is effectively a raise passed on to recipients that's designed to offset inflation (rising prices) and keep beneficiaries from losing buying power.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Based on independent estimates, Social Security's 2027 COLA is on track to be historic -- one of the largest raises over the last 36 years. But this projected cost-of-living adjustment, which is being fueled by Trumpflation, comes at a potentially steep cost to America's leading retirement program.
Although President Donald Trump's tariff and trade policy continues to impact prices within the goods sector, the lion's share of America's recent inflationary surge can be traced to the Iran war.
Shortly after Trump gave the order for the U.S. military to attack Iran on Feb. 28, the latter essentially closed the Strait of Hormuz to commercial vessels. In doing so, Iran halted the daily flow of approximately 20 million barrels of petroleum liquids, sending fuel prices soaring. Gas prices rose at the fastest pace in over three decades, while diesel prices jumped at an even steeper percentage.
Even if the Iran war ends fairly soon, the staggered effects of the largest energy supply disruption in modern history will continue to be felt for several quarters. As businesses contend with rising transportation and production costs and inflation spills into the broader economy (i.e., beyond the energy industry), prices can rise further.
This Trump-driven price surge ("Trumpflation") has boosted trailing 12-month inflation from a modest 2.4% in February to 4.2% in May. It's also rapidly increased independent estimates for Social Security's 2027 COLA.
BREAKING: May CPI inflation rises to 4.2%, the highest level since April 2023.
-- The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) June 10, 2026
Core CPI inflation also rises to 2.9%, the highest since September 2025.
Inflation in the US is officially back above 4% and more than double the Fed's target.
Odds of Fed rate hikes are rising.
Nonpartisan senior advocacy group The Senior Citizens League edged its 2027 COLA projection lower to 3.8% from 3.9% after the May inflation report was released. However, its 3.8% forecast is up from 2.8% following the February and March inflation reports.
The high-water mark comes from independent Social Security and Medicare policy analyst Mary Johnson, who now sees Social Security checks soaring by 4.7% in 2027. For context, Johnson's COLA forecast was just 1.7% a few months ago. A 4.7% COLA would be the fourth-largest percentage raise for Social Security benefits since 1992, exceeded only by increases of 5.8% in 2009, 5.9% in 2022, and 8.7% in 2023.
If Johnson's estimate hits the nail on the head, the average retired-worker beneficiary would see their monthly payout climb by roughly $98 in 2027. Meanwhile, the typical worker with disabilities and survivor beneficiary would receive "Trump bumps" equivalent to $77/month and $76/month next year, respectively.
While it's fair to say that nearly every Social Security beneficiary dreams of a nominally larger payout each year, there's a steep price to pay for progressively larger cost-of-living adjustments.
Earlier this month, the Social Security Board of Trustees published its annual report detailing the program's financial health. Social Security's projected long-term (75-year) funding shortfall ballooned to $29.3 trillion in the latest report from an estimated $25.1 trillion last year.
But what's more worrisome is the projected asset reserve depletion of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund (OASI), which pays monthly benefits to 54.3 million retired workers and 5.8 million survivors of deceased workers. While the OASI is in no danger of bankruptcy, insolvency, or halting payouts, the sustainability of the existing benefit schedule, including annual COLAs, is very much in question.
If the OASI depletes its asset reserves by the fourth quarter of 2032, as currently forecast, retired workers and survivors could see their benefits slashed by up to 22%!
BREAKING: The Social Security trust fund is on track to run out of money in late 2032, its trustees said.
-- unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) June 9, 2026
It's three months sooner than projected last year.
Several of President Trump's decisions may worsen Social Security's financial outlook and accelerate this timeline to sweeping benefit cuts.
For example, the annual Trustees Report relies on modest forward-looking COLA projections. If next year's Trump bump clocks in at 4.7% (or higher), it threatens to drain the OASI's asset reserves even faster.
Furthermore, the president's flagship tax and spending law, the "Big, Beautiful Bill," introduced several temporary tax breaks from 2025 through 2028 that are expected to adversely impact Social Security. While the senior deduction, no tax on tips, and no tax on overtime provisions enable some Americans to retain more of their income, it shrinks the pool of earned income (wages and salaries, but not investment income) subject to the 12.4% payroll tax. The payroll tax is Social Security's primary funding source, accounting for more than 91% of its income in 2025.
According to a projection from the Social Security Administration's Office of the Actuary (OACT), Trump's tax and spending law will increase program costs by $168.6 billion from tax years 2025 through 2034. The OACT also estimated that the Big, Beautiful Bill would shorten the timeline to the OASI's asset reserve depletion by three months.
While a larger monthly benefit probably sounds great on paper, it comes with serious consequences for Social Security's financial health.
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.
One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"A potentially large 2027 COLA is a symptom of inflation, not a death knell for Social Security—its solvency hinges more on demographics and policy choices than on the COLA number alone."
Even with a potentially large 2027 COLA, the headline risk to Social Security is overstated in this piece. COLAs are automatic, but they are funded by payroll tax receipts that rise with wages; if inflation stays elevated, wage growth can accompany it, boosting revenue and softening the long-run funding gap. The 75-year shortfall and 2032 reserve depletion are projections sensitive to assumptions about birth rates, work by women, immigration, retirement age, and policy tweaks (e.g., taxing benefits, payroll tax expansion). The Iran/trade narrative and ‘Trumpflation’ claims also risk misattributing inflation spikes to a single policy. The real market impulse is policy trajectory, not a single COLA number.
Against neutrality: a bigger COLA is not revenue-neutral; it raises outlays immediately and can accelerate trust-fund depletion if wage growth lags, potentially forcing sooner policy fixes. In other words, the market’s major risk is policy timing, not the COLA headline alone.
"The erosion of the payroll tax base through legislative tax cuts, combined with inflationary COLA adjustments, is creating a fiscal feedback loop that pulls forward the date of mandatory Social Security benefit cuts."
The article conflates short-term inflationary mechanics with long-term structural insolvency. While a 4.7% COLA provides a temporary nominal boost to retirees, it is a lagging indicator of purchasing power erosion, not a net gain. The real story isn't the 'Trump bump'—it's the accelerating depletion of the OASI trust fund, now moved up to 2032. By shrinking the payroll tax base through the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' the administration is effectively cannibalizing the program's primary funding mechanism to subsidize current consumption. Investors should expect increased volatility in Treasury yields as the market prices in the fiscal strain of funding these deficits, potentially pressuring long-duration assets.
A 4.7% COLA could stimulate consumer spending, providing a short-term demand-side tailwind for the S&P 500's consumer discretionary sector that outweighs the long-term fiscal drag.
"The 2027 COLA bump is a red herring; the actual crisis is demographic insolvency in 2032, which requires legislative reform regardless of whether COLAs are 2.8% or 4.7%."
This article conflates two separate crises and invents a third. Yes, the 2027 COLA will be elevated—that's mechanical, not catastrophic. The real issue is the OASI trust fund depletion timeline accelerating by 3 months to Q4 2032, which is a genuine solvency problem. But the article blames Trump's tax provisions for $168.6B in costs over 10 years—roughly $16.9B/year against a $23.3 trillion 75-year shortfall. That's noise. The actual driver of OASI depletion is demographic: fewer workers per beneficiary. Higher COLAs don't materially change that math; they're a symptom of inflation, not a cause of insolvency. The 'Iran war' framing for inflation is speculative and unsourced.
If inflation stays elevated through 2027, nominal COLAs compound the real burden on payroll tax revenues that are already shrinking as a share of income due to wage stagnation and demographic headwinds—so even 'noise' tax provisions could tip the timeline sooner than modeled.
"Elevated COLAs plus payroll-tax erosion will shorten OASI solvency by at least three months and raise the odds of 2032-era benefit cuts."
The article flags a projected 4.7% 2027 COLA—the fourth-largest since 1992—driven by May CPI at 4.2% from energy shocks and tariffs, plus the Big Beautiful Bill cutting payroll-tax revenue by $168.6 billion through 2034. This accelerates OASI depletion to late 2032 and a potential 22% benefit cut. What is missed is that sustained 4%+ inflation could force earlier Fed hikes, raising borrowing costs for the Treasury and indirectly pressuring the same trust fund via slower wage growth. Retiree spending from larger COLAs may also lift near-term GDP, masking solvency issues until after 2030.
If the Iran supply shock proves temporary and core CPI reverts below 3% by year-end, the 2027 COLA could settle near 2.5%, leaving the depletion timeline unchanged from last year's forecast.
"Policy timing and reform design are the missing second-order driver that will determine whether solvency improves or worsens, independent of COLA and inflation dynamics."
One flaw Grok overlooks: the solvency risk isn’t only about inflation and Fed hikes, but policy timing and design. A credible reform—lifting the payroll tax cap, adjusting COLA/indexing, or broadening revenue—could drastically alter deficits and debt-service, for better or worse. If reform comes late, rate volatility could spike as investors price in tail risk; if early, long-duration assets may rally on solvency improvements. This policy channel matters as much as COLA dynamics.
"The fiscal impact of tax cuts is secondary to the political paralysis they create, which prevents necessary long-term solvency reforms."
Claude dismisses the $168.6B tax cut as 'noise' compared to the $23.3 trillion shortfall, but this ignores the political economy of the trust fund. In a polarized environment, even minor revenue erosion provides the perfect excuse for gridlock on necessary reform. By shrinking the tax base now, we aren't just losing dollars; we are burning the political capital required to pass the painful, structural adjustments that could actually prevent the 2032 cliff.
"Revenue erosion today doesn't just delay reform—it compresses the window for painless fixes and raises the odds of crisis-driven policy."
Gemini's political economy argument is sharper than Claude's math dismissal. But it conflates two timelines: the $168.6B erodes revenue *now*, while the trust fund depletes in 2032. The real risk isn't gridlock—it's that early revenue loss forces *earlier* reform under worse conditions (higher rates, tighter fiscal space). Claude's 'noise' framing misses that timing matters more than magnitude.
"Revenue erosion plus delayed reform risks front-running higher yields that accelerate OASI depletion via slower wages."
Claude's timing argument misses the feedback from ChatGPT's policy channel: the $168.6B revenue cut now raises Treasury borrowing needs, and if reform waits until rates are higher, markets will price tail-risk yields earlier. That pushes wage growth lower via tighter credit, shrinking the payroll base and moving actual depletion inside the 2032 window even if demographics stay constant.
The panel consensus is bearish, with the key risk being the accelerating depletion of the OASI trust fund by 2032, potentially leading to a 22% benefit cut. The key opportunity lies in policy reform, such as lifting the payroll tax cap or adjusting COLA indexing, which could drastically alter deficits and debt service if implemented early and credibly.
Early and credible policy reform
Accelerating OASI trust fund depletion by 2032