By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel generally agrees that the 'Great Wealth Transfer' may not materialize as expected due to longer lifespans, rising long-term care costs, and structural shifts in wealth transfer dynamics. They suggest focusing on the 'Longevity Economy' and healthcare services rather than a consumption boom driven by inheritance.
Risk: The erosion of middle-tier estates due to long-term care costs and administrative expenses, potentially leaving heirs with steeper liquidity shortfalls.
Opportunity: Investing in healthcare REITs and specialized diagnostics firms to capitalize on the sustained demand for services in the 'Longevity Economy'.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
The so-called "great wealth transfer," the period when Baby Boomers die and pass on their roughly $110 trillion in wealth to their children and grandchildren, may not happen as soon as they expect, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Boomers are living longer and spending large amounts of their wealth on longevity, luxury travel and expensive retirement communities, reported the paper. What's more, some wealthy older Americans are already giving money to their children and grandchildren whether it is to help them buy homes, pay for college or for vacations.
Don't Miss:
That doesn't mean the "great wealth transfer" won't happen, but the timing and potential size of it are “misunderstood,” John Sabelhaus, a Brookings Institution economist, told the Journal.
Sabelhaus said the group with the greatest aggregate wealth in 2021 was between the ages of 55 and 64, which means they could have decades left to live. That is particularly true if they are part of the top 1% of earners. An analysis from Harvard economist Raj Chetty and other researchers found top earners tend to live well into their late 80s.
Adding to their lifespan, reported the Journal, is their focus on longevity. The wealthy are reportedly pouring billions of dollars into that area, spending money on personalized supplements, regenerative medicine and experimental gene therapies, among other things.
Even if Boomers continue to accumulate wealth, particularly if the stock market keeps increasing — the S&P 500 is up 8.1% year-to-date — they could spend some of their wealth on daily expenses and long-term care, which will leave less for their children and grandchildren.
Trending: More Than Half of Americans Aren't Prepared for Retirement — Including 62% of Gen Y
After all, long-term care isn't cheap. The national median annual cost for a private nursing home room was $129,575 in 2025, while the hourly rate for private duty nurses was $90 per hour, according to Genworth Financial.
Not to mention that when the boomers do die, they will pass their wealth on to their spouses first, which means their children and grandchildren will have to wait even longer for their inheritance.
That trend is already happening. Pointing to survey data from the Federal Reserve, the Journal reported that between 1998 and 2010 Americans in their late 50s were most likely to report receiving an inheritance. Between 2013 and 2022, that range increased to people in their mid-60s.
The good news for Gen X and millennials is that Boomers haven't figured out how to live forever, so they will eventually get their piece of the inheritance pie. They just may have to wait longer than anticipated to receive it.
As inheritance timelines become less predictable, some investors are turning to financial advisers to help build retirement plans that don't depend on receiving family wealth. Advisers can also help families navigate estate planning, taxes and long-term care considerations tied to generational wealth transfers.
**Read Next: **
Building Wealth Across More Than Just the Market
Building a resilient portfolio means thinking beyond a single asset or market trend. Economic cycles shift, sectors rise and fall, and no one investment performs well in every environment. That's why many investors look to diversify with platforms that provide access to real estate, fixed-income opportunities, professional financial guidance, precious metals, and even self-directed retirement accounts. By spreading exposure across multiple asset classes, it becomes easier to manage risk, capture steady returns, and create long-term wealth that isn't tied to the fortunes of just one company or industry.
Connect Invest
Connect Invest is a real estate investment platform that allows investors to access short-term, fixed-income opportunities backed by a diversified portfolio of residential and commercial real estate loans. Through its Short Notes structure, investors can choose defined terms (6, 12, or 24 months) and earn monthly interest payments while gaining exposure to real estate as an asset class. For investors focused on diversification, Connect Invest may serve as one component within a broader portfolio that also includes traditional equities, fixed income, and other alternative assets—helping balance exposure across different risk and return profiles.
Mode Mobile
Mode Mobile is changing the way people interact with their phones by letting users earn money from the same apps and activities they already use every day. Instead of platforms keeping all the advertising revenue, Mode Mobile shares a portion back with users who engage with content, play games, and scroll on their devices. Named one of Deloitte's fastest-growing software companies in North America, the company has built a large beta user base and is scaling a model that turns everyday smartphone usage into a potential income stream. For investors, Mode Mobile offers exposure to the expanding mobile advertising and attention economy through a pre-IPO opportunity tied to a new approach to user monetization.
rHealth
rHealth is building a space-tested diagnostics platform designed to bring lab-quality blood testing closer to patients in minutes rather than weeks. Originally validated in collaboration with NASA for use aboard the International Space Station, the technology is now being adapted for at-home and point-of-care settings to address widespread delays in diagnostic access.
Backed by institutions including NASA and the NIH, rHealth is targeting the large global diagnostics market with a multi-test platform and a model built around devices, consumables, and software. With FDA registration in progress, the company is positioning itself as a potential shift toward faster, more decentralized healthcare testing.
Direxion
Direxion specializes in leveraged and inverse ETFs designed to help active traders express short-term market views during periods of volatility and major market events. Rather than long-term investing, these products are built for tactical use—allowing investors to take magnified bullish or bearish positions across indices, sectors, and single stocks. For experienced traders, Direxion offers a way to respond quickly to changing market conditions and act on high-conviction views with greater flexibility.
Immersed
Immersed is a spatial computing company building immersive productivity software that enables users to work across multiple virtual screens inside VR and mixed-reality environments. Its platform is used by remote workers and enterprises to create virtual workspaces that reduce reliance on traditional physical hardware while improving focus and collaboration. The company is also developing its own lightweight VR headset and AI productivity tools, positioning itself in the future-of-work and spatial computing space. Through its pre-IPO offering, Immersed is opening access to early-stage investors looking to diversify beyond traditional assets and gain exposure to emerging technologies shaping how people work.
Arrived
Backed by Jeff Bezos, Arrived Homes makes real estate investing accessible with a low barrier to entry. Investors can buy fractional shares of single-family rentals and vacation homes starting with as little as $100. This allows everyday investors to diversify into real estate, collect rental income, and build long-term wealth without needing to manage properties directly.
Masterworks
Masterworks enables investors to diversify into blue-chip art, an alternative asset class with historically low correlation to stocks and bonds. Through fractional ownership of museum-quality works by artists like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso, investors gain access without the high costs or complexities of owning art outright. With hundreds of offerings and strong historical exits on select works, Masterworks adds a scarce, globally traded asset to portfolios seeking long-term diversification.
Public
Public is a multi-asset investing platform built for long-term investors who want more control, transparency, and innovation in how they grow wealth. Founded in 2019 as the first broker-dealer to offer commission-free, real-time fractional investing, Public now lets users invest in stocks, bonds, options, crypto, and more—all in one place. Its latest feature, Generated Assets, uses AI to turn a single idea into a fully customized, investable index that can be explained and backtested before committing capital. Combined with AI-powered research tools, clear explanations of market moves, and an uncapped 1% match for transferring an existing portfolio, Public positions itself as a modern platform designed to help serious investors make more informed decisions with context.
AdviserMatch
AdviserMatch is a free online tool that helps individuals connect with financial advisors based on their goals, financial situation, and investment needs. Instead of spending hours researching advisors on your own, the platform asks a few quick questions and matches you with professionals who can assist with areas like retirement planning, investment strategy, and overall financial guidance. Consultations are no-obligation, and services vary by advisor, giving investors a chance to explore whether professional advice could help improve their long-term financial plan.
Accredited Debt Relief
Accredited Debt Relief is a debt consolidation company focused on helping consumers reduce and manage unsecured debt through structured programs and personalized solutions. Having supported more than 1 million clients and helped resolve over $3 billion in debt, the company operates within the growing consumer debt relief industry, where demand continues to rise alongside record household debt levels. Its process includes a quick qualification survey, personalized program matching, and ongoing support, with eligible clients potentially reducing monthly payments by 40% or more. With industry recognition, an A+ BBB rating, and multiple customer service awards, Accredited Debt Relief positions itself as a data-driven, client-focused option for individuals seeking a more manageable path toward becoming debt-free.
Finance Advisors
Finance Advisors helps Americans approach retirement with greater clarity by connecting them to vetted, fiduciary financial advisors who specialize in tax-aware retirement planning. Rather than focusing on products or investment performance alone, the platform emphasizes strategies that account for after-tax income, withdrawal sequencing, and long-term tax efficiency—factors that can materially impact retirement outcomes. Free to use, Finance Advisors gives individuals with meaningful savings access to a level of planning sophistication historically reserved for high-net-worth households, helping reduce hidden tax risk and improve long-term financial confidence.
Image: Shutterstock
This article Sorry Gen X And Millennials — You May Have To Wait Longer To Get A Piece Of The $110T Wealth Transfer originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Extended Boomer lifespans and equity allocations will likely sustain market demand and valuations longer than the headline delay narrative suggests."
The delayed wealth transfer implies Gen X and Millennials must accelerate independent retirement saving and estate planning, increasing demand for advisory services and alternatives like real estate or private credit. Boomers aged 55-64 hold peak aggregate wealth and continue allocating to equities and longevity tech, which could extend equity demand and support valuations through the 2030s. Long-term care costs at $129k annually may erode middle-tier estates but leave top-1% portfolios largely intact given their longer lifespans and market exposure. This shifts pressure onto current consumption and savings rates rather than future windfalls.
Boomer wealth concentration could trigger larger lifetime gifts or philanthropy that permanently bypasses heirs, while accelerating healthcare inflation might erode even top-quartile estates faster than projected equity gains.
"The wealth transfer is delayed and partially eroded, not cancelled—but the article overstates the erosion risk for high-net-worth households while understating how much wealth is still *accumulating* in the interim."
The article conflates two separate dynamics—delayed inheritance timing and reduced inheritance size—without quantifying either. Yes, Boomers live longer and spend on longevity; yes, long-term care is expensive. But the article ignores that top 1% earners (who hold most of the $110T) have Medicare + supplemental coverage, not catastrophic care risk. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 up 8.1% YTD means wealth is *growing* faster than it's being spent. The real risk isn't the transfer disappearing—it's that Gen X/Millennials' *expectations* were inflated, not their actual outcomes.
If Boomers truly live into their late 80s and spend aggressively on healthcare + travel, a 10-20 year delay plus 30-40% erosion from care costs could materially shrink the pie. Estate planning failures (no will, poor tax strategy) could add another 20-30% tax drag.
"The rising cost of long-term care and increased life expectancy are effectively neutralizing the anticipated liquidity injection into the younger generations, shifting capital from inheritance to the healthcare services sector."
The 'Great Wealth Transfer' narrative is increasingly a mirage for Gen X and Millennials. We are seeing a structural shift where longevity risk is being transferred from the state and insurance providers directly onto the balance sheets of aging Boomers. With the median cost of long-term care now exceeding $129,000 annually, the 'inheritance pie' is being cannibalized by healthcare providers and private equity-backed nursing home operators long before death. Investors should pivot away from expecting a consumption boom driven by inheritance and instead focus on the 'Longevity Economy'—specifically healthcare REITs like Welltower (WELL) and specialized diagnostics firms. The capital is staying in the hands of the elderly, fueling a sustained demand for services, not a liquidity event for their heirs.
If the equity markets continue to compound at historical rates, the growth of the underlying assets may outpace the rising costs of long-term care, leaving a larger residual estate than current projections suggest.
"Total intergenerational wealth remains large, but the timing is uncertain and heavily influenced by estate planning, liquidity, and policy, not just Boomer lifespans."
The piece flags longer lifespans and rising long-term care costs as headwinds to a rapid wealth transfer, which is plausible. Still, it misses several forces that could shift timing or composition. Much wealth sits in illiquid assets (real estate, private businesses) that transfer via lifetime gifts or dynastic trusts, not just at death. Estate planning tools and donor-advised funds can accelerate movement even in a slow macro backdrop. Market gains could enlarge the pie while easing liquidity constraints; policy shifts on taxes or charitable giving could also alter urgency. In short, timing is uncertain and not just a function of age.
Against my stance: If policy changes raise estate taxes or move to more aggressive gifting incentives, wealthy households may accelerate transfers, making the apparent delay disappear or reverse. In that case, the real risk is mispricing liquidity and tax risk in heirs' portfolios.
"Medicare gaps plus PE consolidation in care could erode estates faster than S&P gains replenish them."
Claude overlooks that even top-1% households face uncovered long-term care gaps beyond Medicare supplements, with private-pay costs often exceeding $150k yearly after two years. This links directly to Gemini's healthcare REIT thesis, implying nursing-home operators and PE-backed providers could capture more of the $110T than market growth offsets. Heirs face steeper liquidity shortfalls if rate hikes or policy shifts on Medicaid asset tests accelerate drawdowns.
"Long-term care costs are real but duration-limited; the wealth transfer squeeze is primarily a middle-class phenomenon, not a top-1% erosion event."
Grok conflates two distinct risks. Yes, long-term care costs erode estates—but the $150k/year figure assumes *sustained* institutional care, not universal. Most Boomers die within 2-3 years of LTC entry; median stay is 2.7 years. That's $300-400k total, material but not catastrophic for top-1% households with $5M+ net worth. The real squeeze hits middle-class Gen X ($500k-$2M estates), not the wealth-transfer thesis. Gemini's REIT play captures real cash flows, but it's orthogonal to whether heirs get less—it's who captures the spread.
"The administrative and liquidation costs of transferring illiquid assets during a health crisis are more destructive to middle-tier estates than the medical costs themselves."
Claude, your focus on the 2.7-year median stay misses the 'administrative' erosion of estates. It is not just the care costs; it is the legal, tax, and liquidation friction involved in moving assets out of private businesses and illiquid real estate during a crisis. For the middle-tier estates you mentioned, these 'hidden' costs—probate, capital gains realization, and forced asset sales—often exceed the medical bills themselves, permanently impairing the principal before heirs see a dime.
"Liquidity and administrative costs, not LTC alone, will determine how much of the estate actually transfers."
Claude's Medicare-insurance insulation for the top 1% overlooks serial friction: illiquid holdings, probate traps, basis step-ups, and aggressive state-level taxes that compress the after-inheritance value even if LTC costs plateau. If markets stall or rates rise, the 'pie' shrinks faster than payouts, and the shortfall hits senior families' ability to transfer wealth smoothly. The real risk is timing and liquidity drag, not just care costs.
The panel generally agrees that the 'Great Wealth Transfer' may not materialize as expected due to longer lifespans, rising long-term care costs, and structural shifts in wealth transfer dynamics. They suggest focusing on the 'Longevity Economy' and healthcare services rather than a consumption boom driven by inheritance.
Investing in healthcare REITs and specialized diagnostics firms to capitalize on the sustained demand for services in the 'Longevity Economy'.
The erosion of middle-tier estates due to long-term care costs and administrative expenses, potentially leaving heirs with steeper liquidity shortfalls.