By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel generally agrees that SpaceX (SPCX) faces significant supply pressure and valuation concerns, with the upcoming lockup expiration and high revenue multiple being key issues. However, they differ on the nature of the AI segment's losses and the potential impact on the company's valuation.
Risk: The persistent profitability gap in the AI segment and the potential for dilution if the AI segment fails to produce a commercial moat, regardless of Starlink's success.
Opportunity: The potential for Starlink's cash flow to subsidize the R&D burn and justify the lofty valuation.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) can't seem to catch a break. On Thursday, the company aborted the second launch attempt of its upgraded Starship rocket moments after ignition, hours after the stock had slid 3% to about $131 -- an all-time low for its brief public life, and below the $135 price at which it went public in June, in an initial public offering (IPO) that raised $85.7 billion.
But a scrubbed launch is a passing headline. The heavier weight on the stock is a calendar item. SpaceX's IPO lockup releases begin in August, and the biggest early tranche could put more shares on the market than the IPO itself did.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Here's how the supply wave works, and what it means for anyone eyeing the beaten-down stock.
SpaceX's June 12 IPO put less than 5% of the company's roughly 13.2 billion shares into public hands. Nearly everything else is locked up, for now.
The earnings-linked release could come first. Under the lockup terms in SpaceX's IPO prospectus, up to 911.5 million shares become sellable on the second full trading day after the company's first earnings report as a public company (a report the company hasn't formally scheduled yet). That single tranche alone is bigger than the entire IPO, and it is worth more than $115 billion at the current share price.
Another 455.8 million shares would be released alongside them if the stock closes at least 30% above its IPO price, or $175.50, on five of the 10 trading days running into the report. At about $131 as of this writing, that trigger is nowhere in sight.
And the calendar keeps going. Smaller slices, each about 7% of the shares subject to the standard lockup, unlock roughly every two to three weeks from late August through late October. Another 28% becomes sellable after the company's third-quarter report, and the standard lockup winds down entirely in early December. Elon Musk's own shares stay locked until next June.
Lockup expirations matter most when a stock is already weak, because they add supply exactly when demand is shaky. SpaceX fits the description. Shares have fallen about 42% from their post-IPO peak of $225.64.
And the fundamentals give potential sellers reasons. The company's Starlink-driven connectivity segment is a standout. It generated $11.4 billion of revenue and $4.4 billion of operating income in 2025, with segment operating income more than doubling year over year, and it added $3.3 billion of revenue in the first quarter of 2026. But the company's newly acquired artificial intelligence (AI) segment lost $6.4 billion from operations in 2025, and it posted a $2.5 billion operating loss in the first quarter of 2026 alone, and the space segment itself lost money in both periods, too.
Even at its lows, meanwhile, SpaceX carries a market value of about $1.7 trillion. That is nearly 90 times the revenue the business generated over the past 12 months, for a company losing billions of dollars a year.
There's also precedent for lockup pain. Meta Platforms, back when it was known as Facebook, saw its first post-IPO lockup expire in August 2012, freeing about 271 million shares. The stock fell more than 6% that day to what was then an all-time low, roughly half its IPO price. (Facebook, it's worth remembering, turned out fine.)
Of course, there's a counterargument: everyone can see this coming. The lockup schedule has been public since the prospectus, and some of the stock's roughly 35% slide over the past month likely reflects investors selling ahead of the supply. Insiders don't have to sell, either. And with shares at an all-time low, some may prefer to wait.
Still, the setup argues for patience. That first release will show where demand for SpaceX shares actually meets supply, and the tranches that follow will keep testing it into December. If the stock absorbs that first wave without breaking to new lows, that itself could be evidence the selling pressure is already priced in. Investors who believe in the long-term story of Starship, Starlink, and Musk's AI ambitions will get plenty of information over the next several months -- and, quite possibly, plenty of chances to buy.
I wouldn't buy the stock in front of that wave. Personally, I'm content to let the lockups play out before I'd even consider it. The stock's valuation simply looks too expensive anyway, in my opinion.
Before you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Space Exploration Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $371,842! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,244,783!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 900% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of July 19, 2026. *
Daniel Sparks and his clients do not have positions in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The August earnings-linked lockup release of >900M shares into already-weak demand at 90x revenue will likely drive SPCX to fresh lows before any sustainable rebound."
The article correctly flags massive supply pressure: 911.5M shares (larger than the IPO) unlock post-first earnings, with further tranches through Dec 2026, against a stock already at $131 (42% off highs) and trading at ~90x trailing revenue while burning billions. Starlink's $11.4B rev / $4.4B op. inc. in 2025 is real, but the $6.4B AI op. loss and space-segment red ink dominate. Pre-announced lockups may already be discounted, yet weak demand at all-time lows risks cascading sales. Musk's June 2027 unlock adds later overhang. Valuation leaves little margin of safety absent rapid profitability inflection.
Strongest counter: Starlink subscriber momentum plus any positive Starship milestone or AI pivot could spark institutional buying that absorbs the float; history shows Meta absorbed its 2012 lockup and re-rated 10x higher. The article underplays how many insiders may simply hold given the long-term optionality priced at a 'low' $1.7T market cap.
"The impending lockup release will serve as a brutal valuation reset because the current 90x revenue multiple is predicated on speculative growth rather than the reality of the company's massive operational losses."
The article correctly identifies the supply overhang, but it fundamentally misprices the 'Musk Premium.' Trading at 90x trailing revenue for a company bleeding cash in its AI and space segments is nonsensical by traditional valuation metrics, yet SpaceX isn't a traditional company; it's a venture-capital-style bet on Starlink's monopoly potential. The lockup expiration is a liquidity event, not a fundamental one. If the market absorbs 911 million shares without a collapse, it signals institutional conviction that Starlink's cash flow will eventually subsidize the R&D burn. However, until we see a clear path to GAAP profitability, this remains a high-beta proxy for Musk’s execution risk rather than a standard equity investment.
If Starlink's growth trajectory continues to double segment operating income as it did in 2025, the current valuation may actually be a discount for a company that effectively owns the orbital infrastructure of the future.
"Lockup expiration risk is real but priced in at $131; the true test is whether insiders hold or sell, which will signal management's confidence in the AI and space segments' turnaround."
The article frames lockup expiration as a mechanical headwind, but misses a critical detail: SpaceX's earnings report timing is undefined. Without a scheduled earnings date, the 911.5M share release has no trigger. Meanwhile, the 90x revenue multiple is misleading—it conflates a $6.4B AI loss (likely a one-time acquisition write-down or integration cost) with ongoing operations. Starlink alone justifies significant valuation. The real risk isn't supply; it's that insiders *don't* sell, signaling confidence and potentially squeezing shorts into year-end. Meta's 2012 lockup comparison is apples-to-oranges: Facebook was profitable; SpaceX's losses are concentrated in a newly acquired segment.
If SpaceX schedules earnings in August as expected and insiders dump aggressively (911.5M shares = ~7% dilution), the stock could break $110 before stabilizing—and retail investors may panic-sell into that wave regardless of long-term fundamentals.
"The core risk is that a multi-wave unlock at a richly valued SpaceX with ongoing losses could meaningfully pressure SPCX’s price unless clear cash-flow acceleration from Starlink or AI turns the corner before subsequent unlocks."
August unlocks and later tranches create a material supply wave for SPCX, but the real test is whether SpaceX’s Starlink growth and any path to profitability in AI and space can justify the lofty valuation. The first 911.5 million-share tranche is already larger than the IPO and comes as the stock trades near all-time lows; a weak earnings print or soft guidance could trigger meaningful downside. Conversely, if demand from long-term holders remains resilient and cash flow materializes, the unlocks could be a non-event. Missing in the article: timing of earnings, actual profitability signals, and how rate/DCF evolution affects valuation.
Insiders and long-only buyers may step in to support the stock, and unlocks are often priced in; the market could digest the first wave without a severe drop if investors perceive optionality in Starlink and Musk's AI initiatives.
"Dismissing the AI loss as one-time without data misprices the current 90x revenue multiple against persistent cash burn."
Claude's claim that the $6.4B AI loss is 'likely a one-time acquisition write-down' is pure speculation; the article frames it as ongoing operating losses dominating Starlink's $4.4B op. inc. Treating it as non-recurring without evidence inflates the case for current valuation. The lockup mechanics still matter: even without a firm earnings date, post-IPO selling patterns historically pressure multiples above 70x revenue absent immediate profitability.
"The AI segment's operating losses are likely structural, not one-time, creating a persistent drag on capital that necessitates future dilution."
Claude, your dismissal of the $6.4B AI loss as a potential one-time write-down is dangerous; SpaceX’s aggressive compute infrastructure build-out implies sustained, not transitory, OpEx. Grok, your focus on the 90x revenue multiple ignores that SpaceX is a capital-intensive utility, not a SaaS firm. The real risk is the 'Musk Discount': if the AI segment fails to produce a commercial moat, the cash-burn will force dilution, not just share-price volatility, regardless of Starlink’s success.
"Structural AI losses aren't optionality; they're a cash drain that Starlink's current profitability cannot absorb, making the 90x multiple indefensible absent a clear path to AI monetization."
Gemini's 'Musk Discount' framing sidesteps the core issue: if AI OpEx is structural, not transitory, then SpaceX isn't a venture bet—it's a cash-incinerator masquerading as one. Claude conflates 'optionality' with valuation; optionality is free only if the base business funds it. Starlink's $4.4B op. inc. doesn't cover $6.4B AI burn. That math doesn't improve without revenue, not confidence.
"The $6.4B AI loss is likely structural, not a one-time write-down, meaning SpaceX faces ongoing cash burn that could require Starlink cash flow or new financing to avoid dilution, even if unlocks are absorbed."
Grok's take on lockups is valid, but labeling the $6.4B AI loss as a one-time write-down ignores the scale of ongoing OpEx. If the AI burn remains structural, SpaceX isn't simply buffered by liquidity events—it's tethered to sustained cash flow from Starlink or external financing to avoid dilution. The real risk isn't just the unlocking cadence; it's a persistent profitability gap that unlocks could magnify.
The panel generally agrees that SpaceX (SPCX) faces significant supply pressure and valuation concerns, with the upcoming lockup expiration and high revenue multiple being key issues. However, they differ on the nature of the AI segment's losses and the potential impact on the company's valuation.
The potential for Starlink's cash flow to subsidize the R&D burn and justify the lofty valuation.
The persistent profitability gap in the AI segment and the potential for dilution if the AI segment fails to produce a commercial moat, regardless of Starlink's success.