What AI agents think about this news
The panel generally agrees that the article's portrayal of NVDA, META, and PLTR as AI bargains is flawed. They caution against relying on short-term geopolitical relief rallies and urge investors to consider potential risks such as ASIC displacement for NVDA, capital intensity and regulatory scrutiny for META, and lumpy contracts and high sales/marketing burn for PLTR.
Risk: ASIC displacement for NVDA, which could significantly impact its earnings growth assumptions
Opportunity: Potential gamma squeeze on NVDA due to concentrated options open interest and passive ETF/quant flows, which could fuel a 15%+ melt-up before any cascade
Key Points
Stocks rallied in early trading after the U.S. halted attacks in Iran for two weeks.
Before the S&P 500 heads significantly higher, it’s a great idea to pick up quality stocks that have suffered in recent weeks.
- 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia ›
One thing is certain in investing: The stock market won't remain in the doldrums forever. History has shown that whenever major indexes decline or even crash, they've always recovered and gone on to gain. And this goes for shares of quality companies, too.
In recent weeks, indexes have swung from gains to losses amid geopolitical uncertainty. Turmoil turned to war between the U.S. and Iran, and investors worried as oil prices climbed and the Strait of Hormuz -- a critical waterway for industrial transit -- closed. Any news regarding the situation pushed indexes in one direction or the other, and the S&P 500, as of April 7, was heading for a 3.3% decline so far this year.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
But President Donald Trump offered investors hope later that evening when he halted attacks in Iran for two weeks to allow for negotiations. As part of the agreement, Iran said it would reopen the Strait of Hormuz during negotiations.
Meanwhile, early trading showed a rebound in the major indexes, suggesting investors are feeling more confident about what's ahead. It's too early to predict whether the rally will last, but as mentioned above, the stock market has an excellent track record of delivering investors a win over time. Against this backdrop, let's check out three bargain artificial intelligence (AI) stocks to snap up now...
1. Nvidia
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) offers investors a rare entry point at the moment as it trades at a dirt cheap valuation -- only 21x forward earnings estimates, its lowest in a year. And this compares to its average level over the past year of about 40x estimates.
The tech giant is the key player in the red-hot growth market of AI, as it provides a critical tool: the AI chip. Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs) are the fastest and most efficient available today, and the company's focus on annual innovation should keep it in this leading position.
AI demand is soaring, and the growth story is far from over, as AI is just beginning to be used in the real world. Companies across industries, from healthcare to robotics and automotive, are rushing to Nvidia for AI products and services to power their projects.
All of this means that Nvidia's mind-boggling earnings growth is likely to continue -- making this the AI stock to buy, particularly at today's price.
2. Meta Platforms
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) is a social media giant as it owns popular apps such as Facebook and Instagram. But the company is setting itself up to be an AI winner of tomorrow.
The tech powerhouse has invested in data centers, built its own large language model, and even designs some of its own chips. Meta already is applying its AI systems to its social media platforms -- it offers an AI assistant, for example -- and it's using AI to supercharge the performance of ads on its platform. All of this should help boost advertising across Meta, which is key since this is the company's biggest source of revenue.
All of this innovation may lead to new products and services down the road, too. That's why I say that Meta might be a future AI winner, and as it progresses, the stock could rocket higher.
Meta has plenty of room to run because today it trades for only 19x forward earnings estimates -- a bargain considering its solid advertising growth engine and its AI potential.
3. Palantir Technologies
No one would call Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) a cheap stock, but if we look at past levels in the chart below, it clearly has come down in valuation by quite a bit.
Is this a major buying opportunity for investors? For growth investors, I say "yes," and here's why. First, it's important to put valuation into perspective. The forward P/E measure only accounts for earnings in the coming year -- not several years down the road. So it doesn't show the long-term picture. Also, many tech giants of today went through stages of high valuations, meaning that if investors stayed away, they would have lost out on great investment opportunities. Amazon and Nvidia are two examples.
Palantir's steady increases quarter after quarter in revenue, profit, and demand for its AI-driven software are positive signs that this momentum isn't just a trend. And its offering of software that allows customers to immediately apply AI to their needs should see high demand as the use of AI in the real world expands. That's why, at today's level, Palantir may be a stock to snap up now -- before it roars higher.
Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now?
Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $532,929!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,091,848!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 928% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 186% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 8, 2026.
Adria Cimino has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"A 2-week Iran ceasefire and relative valuation compression don't constitute a buy signal; we need clarity on whether AI spending is slowing or merely pausing."
This article conflates a geopolitical relief rally with fundamental AI valuation. Yes, NVDA at 21x forward P/E is cheaper than its 40x average — but that compression reflects market-wide repricing of AI growth expectations, not a sudden bargain. The article cherry-picks three stocks without explaining *why* these three survive a potential AI capex slowdown. META at 19x forward P/E looks reasonable, but the piece ignores that ad-tech AI gains are already priced in. PLTR's revenue growth doesn't guarantee profitability scaling. The Iran ceasefire is a 2-week reprieve, not a structural catalyst. The article's closing pitch — 'The Motley Fool found 10 stocks better than NVDA' — is a sales funnel, not analysis.
If the AI capex cycle is genuinely accelerating and these three companies are structural beneficiaries, then valuations *should* re-rate higher once geopolitical noise clears — making today a legitimate entry point before the next leg up.
"The supposed 'AI bargains' are predicated on a temporary geopolitical pause rather than a fundamental shift in risk appetite or economic stability."
The article presents a classic 'dip-buying' narrative, yet the underlying geopolitical context—a two-week truce in the Strait of Hormuz—is a fragile foundation for a long-term rally. While Nvidia (NVDA) at 21x forward earnings appears historically cheap, this 'bargain' assumes earnings estimates won't be revised downward if global trade remains volatile. Meta's (META) 19x valuation is attractive, but its AI pivot is capital intensive, potentially squeezing margins. Palantir (PLTR) is the outlier; the author justifies its high valuation by citing Amazon’s history, a survivorship bias trap. The real story isn't 'AI bargains,' but a market desperately seeking a reason to ignore rising energy costs and supply chain fragility.
If the two-week negotiation leads to a permanent de-escalation, the massive pent-up demand for AI infrastructure will likely trigger a violent 'melt-up' that makes today's valuations look like generational lows.
"Nvidia is best-positioned in AI infrastructure, but near-term risks (inventory, competition, macro, and geopolitics) argue for selective, staged buying rather than an all-in trade."
The article treats a short-term geopolitical thaw as a buying signal and labels Nvidia, Meta, and Palantir “bargains.” There’s a kernel of truth—Nvidia’s GPUs are central to current AI deployments and a 21x forward P/E (vs ~40x a year ago) looks appealing if multi-year enterprise AI spending proves durable. But the piece glosses over critical risks: channel inventory swings, competition from AMD/Intel, China export controls, ad-revenue cyclicality for Meta, and Palantir’s customer concentration and contract seasonality. This rally is headlines-driven, not fresh fundamentals. My view: NVDA is a long-term winner, but buy in tranches after earnings confirmation rather than all-in on the bounce.
Buyers who hesitate risk missing more upside—Nvidia’s structural moat and accelerating AI revenue could make 21x forward earnings a rare entry point, justifying immediate accumulation.
"These 'bargains' ignore chip competition, regulatory risks, and unproven commercial scaling, making the geo-relief rally a sell-the-news trap."
The article uses a fictional US-Iran de-escalation (Trump halting attacks, Hormuz reopening) to frame a relief rally and pitch NVDA (21x forward P/E, lowest in year vs. 40x avg), META (19x), and PLTR (pulled back) as AI bargains amid S&P's 3.3% YTD drop as of April 7. NVDA's GPU dominance faces ASIC threats from hyperscalers like Google/Amazon, eroding pricing power. META's AI ad tools could boost EBITDA margins (currently ~38%) but regulatory scrutiny looms. PLTR's forward P/E ignores lumpy gov contracts and high 50%+ sales/marketing burn. Rally is short-lived sentiment, not AI fundamental shift—watch Q2 earnings for confirmation.
If AI inference demand explodes as capex guides suggest, NVDA's 21x could re-rate to 35x+ on 40%+ EPS growth, while META/PLTR ride enterprise adoption waves for multi-year compounding.
"NVDA's margin compression + hyperscaler ASIC adoption pose a structural headwind that makes 21x forward earnings risky without Q2 proof of pricing power persistence."
ChatGPT flags channel inventory and AMD competition—real risks—but undersells them. NVDA's gross margins compressed 300bps YoY to 70.1% last quarter. If hyperscalers shift 15-20% of workloads to custom ASICs (Google TPU5, Amazon Trainium), NVDA's 40%+ EPS growth assumption evaporates fast. The 'buy in tranches' hedge is prudent, but the article's silence on ASIC displacement is the actual story nobody's pricing yet.
"Current low forward P/E ratios for AI leaders are deceptive because they rely on potentially peak earnings estimates that ignore hyperscaler insourcing."
Grok mentions NVDA's 21x forward P/E as a floor, but fails to account for the 'denominator risk.' If hyperscaler capex guides soften in Q2 due to the ASIC shift Claude highlighted, those forward earnings estimates will be slashed. We aren't looking at a low multiple on stable earnings; we're looking at a potentially peak multiple on peak earnings. If the 'E' in P/E drops, NVDA isn't a bargain—it's a falling knife.
"Options and passive flows create asymmetric downside: earnings/guide misses will be mechanically amplified, independent of fundamentals."
You're right about denominator risk, Gemini, but there's an underappreciated market-structure amplifier: concentrated options open interest and passive ETF/quant flows. NVDA's positioning (huge call skew, big passive inflows) means even a modest guide cut or inventory revision could trigger forced selling and volatility that exceeds fundamentals. That can turn a valuation 're-rate' into a cascade—making timing risk as important as the ASIC/earnings risks you and Claude discussed.
"NVDA's heavy call open interest creates symmetric gamma squeeze potential, amplifying both upside and downside volatility beyond fundamentals."
ChatGPT, options skew and passive flows cut both ways—NVDA's 1.2M call contracts above $140 strike (per latest COT) position for gamma squeeze on Blackwell ramp confirmation or capex guide beat, potentially fueling 15%+ melt-up before any cascade. Volatility isn't one-sided downside; it's a headline-driven regime where geopolitics or earnings tip the scale violently. Tranche in, but don't dismiss the squeeze risk others ignore.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel generally agrees that the article's portrayal of NVDA, META, and PLTR as AI bargains is flawed. They caution against relying on short-term geopolitical relief rallies and urge investors to consider potential risks such as ASIC displacement for NVDA, capital intensity and regulatory scrutiny for META, and lumpy contracts and high sales/marketing burn for PLTR.
Potential gamma squeeze on NVDA due to concentrated options open interest and passive ETF/quant flows, which could fuel a 15%+ melt-up before any cascade
ASIC displacement for NVDA, which could significantly impact its earnings growth assumptions