‘Super’ El Niño could cause global food price shock lasting into 2028, analysts say
By Maksym Misichenko · The Guardian ·
By Maksym Misichenko · The Guardian ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on the impact of 'super El Niño' and 'climateflation' on markets, with Gemini taking a bearish stance due to potential structural impairment of soft commodity supply chains and sustained higher interest rates. Claude and ChatGPT argue that markets have already priced in El Niño expectations and that policy responses may mitigate the impact, while Grok's stance is unavailable.
Risk: Structural impairment of soft commodity supply chains and sustained higher interest rates (Gemini)
Opportunity: Policy responses may mitigate the impact of El Niño (Claude, ChatGPT)
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Economists are warning that a “super” El Niño weather cycle this year could cause a severe shock to global food prices lasting into 2028.
As the Iran war pushes up world food prices to the highest level in three years, economists said supply chains faced “two shocks at once” stoked by extreme weather linked to global heating.
Scientists have said the 2026-27 El Niño – which forms when changes in wind patterns allow warmer water to spread across the central and eastern equatorial Pacific – has a historically unprecedented chance of developing into a “very strong” event fuelling heatwaves, flooding and stormier weather.
Informally described as a “super” or “Godzilla” El Niño, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) confirmed last month warming conditions were taking hold in the Pacific andthat there was a 63% chance of sea surface temperatures exceeding 2C above normal later this year.
At a time when households around the world are already feeling the pinch from soaring living costs, experts say an extreme El Niño could add further to the pressure. The prospect of a renewed inflation shock is also rattling central banks, adding to concern that interest rates could be kept at elevated levels.
“El Niño puts ‘climateflation’ back on the agenda,” analysts at the Italian bank UniCredit wrote in a research note. “Europe’s recent heatwaves are a reminder that the climate baseline is already shifting. El Niño could add a new layer of pressure later this year, as it amplifies the effects of global warming.”
The naturally occurring phenomenon has a history of affecting harvests and the food supply network. More than a century ago, an El Niño that would probably have been the most severe on record prompted catastrophic droughts across China, southern Africa, Brazil, Egypt and India. Causing famine conditions in a situation worsened by colonial rule, millions were killed, including more than 6 million people in India in 1876-78.
El Niño events in 1981-82, 1996-97, 2015-16 and 2023-24 have been some of the strongest on record. However, NOAA projections indicate the 2026-27 cycle could be even more severe – elevating the risk of droughts and flooding hitting harvests, and food supply worldwide.
According to analysts at Goldman Sachs, the strength of this El Niño could cause a 15.8% surge in global food commodity prices. That would have a knock-on effect worldwide, including for consumers in Europe, where it predicted food prices could rise by 1.3% across the eurozone.
However, the full effect will take time because of how the cost of climate impact percolates through global food supplies. As a result, Goldman Sachs said the consequences could take until the second half of 2028 to be “fully realised”.
Most of the delay is down to the timing of extreme weather hitting food production, given the differing planting, growing and harvesting cycles for different types of crops. Logistical challenges – including water levels in canals and rivers used for key shipments – will also have an impact.
“El Niño does not affect agriculture uniformly. It reshapes global rainfall and temperature patterns, creating regional winners and losers,” analysts at UBS said. Some regions could stand to benefit from warmer weather conditions.
El Niño would compound disruption caused by the Iran war by adding food supply chain woes to already higher prices, and shortages of fertiliser and energy supplies, analysts say. “Even modest supply disruptions could trigger large price moves than historical patterns could imply,” the UBS analysts said.
Typically El Niños lead to elevated risks of drought in southern Africa and northern parts of South America, but flooding in southern Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay. Analysts say lower-income countries – already hit hardest by the Iran conflict – are likely to suffer most.
“El Niño has already begun to affect crops, driving a drier monsoon season in India, with some regions only experiencing 25% of their usual rainfall, and parts of central India only receiving 50%, which could affect supply for wheat, rice, and sugar cane,” the Goldman Sachs analysts wrote.
The impact is likely to to be felt across the world .
Analysts say droughts in south-east Asia could affect palm oil supply – a significant ingredient in processed food – while harvests of coffee and cocoa could be affected. Warmer, wetter conditions could also exacerbate the spread of disease, hitting crop yields in future years.
In North America, the impact of El Niño is strongest in the winter, and while conditions in Europe can be influenced by the weather event, analysts say other factors – such as the effect on global food prices – will be where it is felt.
Three years ago, the European Central Bank estimated that a strong El Niño could drive up global food commodity prices by up to 9%, with soya beans, corn and rice seeing the biggest spikes.
How prices reflect on shelves depends on mitigation strategies and domestic policies. Factors such as consumer demand and retail pricing also play a role.
According to UniCredit, the capacity for an extreme El Niño scenario does, however, remain high. This could lead to a 14.3% hit to global agricultural production – equivalent to $342bn (£254bn) in lost output, it said.
“Price shocks could reach 10% to 50% across core commodities, while the most exposed crops – including rice, palm oil, sugar and coffee – could rise by 50% to 100% or more,” the bank said. “The food system enters the second half of 2026 with buffers, but with little margin for error.”
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The 2026-27 super El Niño will force a structural re-rating of global food inflation, effectively ending the prospect of a sustained return to 2% inflation targets through 2028."
The market is underpricing the 'climateflation' tail risk embedded in this super El Niño. While consensus focuses on headline CPI, the real story is the structural impairment of soft commodity supply chains. A 15.8% surge in food commodities isn't just a transitory shock; it’s a margin-compressor for consumer staples (XLP) and a potential catalyst for social unrest in emerging markets. If Goldman's 14.3% hit to global agricultural output materializes, we are looking at a sustained period of 'higher-for-longer' interest rates, as central banks will be forced to prioritize inflation containment over growth, effectively killing the soft-landing narrative for 2027-28.
Agricultural markets are highly adaptive; record-high prices often trigger rapid shifts in planting patterns and trade flows that could mitigate supply deficits faster than historical models predict.
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
"El Niño is a real tail risk, but the article overstates immediacy by ignoring that futures markets have already incorporated this scenario, and a 37% probability of non-'very strong' conditions means the downside case is material and underexplored."
The article conflates two distinct risks—El Niño timing and Iran geopolitics—without adequately stress-testing either. Goldman Sachs' 15.8% commodity price forecast assumes 2026-27 severity, but NOAA's 63% probability for 'very strong' conditions means a 37% chance of disappointment. Critically, the article ignores that commodity futures markets have already priced in El Niño expectations; spot prices may not spike as dramatically as historical analogues suggest. The 2028 tail-end effect also reduces near-term portfolio impact. Finally, agricultural productivity gains since 1876 and strategic reserves are vastly superior to the colonial-era baseline the article invokes.
Commodity markets are forward-looking and have already incorporated El Niño probabilities into prices; the 'shock' may already be partially baked in. Additionally, if El Niño fizzles to moderate strength (well within the probability distribution), the article's entire bull case for food inflation collapses.
"The outcome hinges less on El Niño magnitude alone and far more on policy responses, regional crop mix, and substitution dynamics, meaning the price shock will likely be dispersed rather than uniform and may or may not translate into broad consumer inflation or corporate distress."
Reading this through a stress-test lens, the headline risk is real but not uniform. A 'super' El Niño could disrupt harvests and lift global food prices, with Goldman Sachs-like scenarios suggesting mid-teens price upticks and a delayed pass-through to consumers. Yet the effects will be highly regional and crop-specific, and policy tools (stockpiles, subsidies, tariffs, hedging) plus substitution and resilience investments can blunt the hit. The biggest missing piece is the speed and breadth of adaptation: irrigation tech, fertilizer supply, and transport bottlenecks may dampen or defer price shocks into 2027-28 rather than immediately terrifying inflation. Also watch energy linkages.
The strongest counter is that the shock could become regime-shifting if El Niño proves truly 'super' and coincides with ongoing geopolitical and energy constraints, leading to persistent inflation and tighter financial conditions, which would hit equities harder than a neutral view expects.
"Futures markets are failing to price in the non-linear, systemic risk of a super El Niño."
Claude, your reliance on 'forward-looking' futures markets is misplaced. Futures markets are excellent at pricing known variables, but they are notoriously inefficient at hedging against systemic, non-linear climate shifts that break historical correlation models. You are assuming the market has a perfect information set on a 'super' El Niño, but the volatility surface suggests otherwise. We are not just looking at a supply shock; we are looking at a potential regime shift in risk premia that futures cannot capture.
[Unavailable]
"Policy reflexivity, not climate regime shifts, is where futures markets actually fail on commodity shocks."
Gemini conflates two separate failures: futures mispricing volatility ≠ futures missing supply shocks entirely. Commodity futures have historically captured El Niño supply disruptions reasonably well (1997-98, 2015-16). The real gap isn't regime-shift blindness—it's that *policy response speed* is underpriced. If governments impose export bans or subsidies faster than futures markets model, spot dislocations spike. That's the non-linear risk, not market inefficiency on climate itself.
"Non-linear liquidity and volatility risks around climate shocks will drive the real impact, not the 'priced in' El Niño forecast."
Claude's 'priced in' line rests on a fragile assumption: that markets can hedge a regime shift. In crisis moments, liquidity dries up, margin spirals, and skew in volatility surfaces explodes even if spot futures look tame. The real danger isn't a clean supply shock but a non-linear tightening of financial conditions tied to climate risk; that could hit equities and credit much harder than any single forecast implies.
The panel is divided on the impact of 'super El Niño' and 'climateflation' on markets, with Gemini taking a bearish stance due to potential structural impairment of soft commodity supply chains and sustained higher interest rates. Claude and ChatGPT argue that markets have already priced in El Niño expectations and that policy responses may mitigate the impact, while Grok's stance is unavailable.
Policy responses may mitigate the impact of El Niño (Claude, ChatGPT)
Structural impairment of soft commodity supply chains and sustained higher interest rates (Gemini)