By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish, with the key risk being the company's cash burn and working capital issues, and the single biggest opportunity flagged is the potential for margin improvement if AI server demand proves durable and component input costs decrease.
Risk: Cash burn and working capital issues
Opportunity: Potential margin improvement
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Server maker Super Micro Computer (NASDAQ: SMCI) shared the kind of update on Tuesday evening that growth investors usually celebrate. The company said it has received approximately $39 billion in orders for its advanced artificial intelligence (AI) servers from more than 20 customers in recent weeks. That's more than its total revenue over the past four quarters combined.
But the news came with a catch. To buy the components needed to build those servers, Super Micro plans to raise $7 billion by selling a combination of common stock and convertible preferred shares. Investors focused on the bill rather than the orders, sending shares down about 28% on Wednesday. In total, shares are now down about 37% over the last five trading days alone.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
It's quite the reversal. The stock jumped 68% in May, and it has now given back a big piece of that gain in a single trading session. And the size of the financing helps explain the reaction: $7 billion equals more than a third of the company's entire market value of about $20 billion as of this writing.
Here's a closer look at the financing, why the company's thin margins make it so controversial, and whether the sell-off makes the stock worth buying.
The financing now includes $5 billion of priced underwritten offerings: about $1.25 billion of common stock and about $3.75 billion of depositary shares (each representing a fraction of preferred stock that will automatically convert into common shares in 2029), before underwriters' options.
On top of that, Super Micro has entered into an at-the-market program that would let it sell up to $1.25 billion of additional stock over time, beginning as early as the third quarter. Notably, the company also cautioned that the $39 billion in orders don't constitute firm commitments and remain subject to cancellation and delays.
So why does a company with this much demand need to sell stock at all? Because building AI servers ties up enormous amounts of cash long before customers pay for the finished product. In its fiscal third quarter of 2026 (the period ended March 31), Super Micro used $6.6 billion of cash in operations and finished the period with just $1.3 billion of cash on hand. And after accounting for capital spending, the company's free cash flow for the quarter was negative by about $6.7 billion.
That cash intensity helps explain why management is turning to the equity market rather than waiting for profits to fund the build-out.
The financing might be less controversial if Super Micro earned more on each dollar of sales. The company's gross margin was 9.9% in fiscal Q3, up from 6.3% in the prior quarter. But the figure has been volatile, sliding from 9.3% in the fiscal first quarter to 6.3% in the second before recovering.
At last quarter's level, about 90 cents of every dollar of revenue went to component and manufacturing costs. Apply that to the order book, and $39 billion in orders may translate into less than $4 billion in gross profit -- while requiring tens of billions of dollars in spending to fulfill.
That math may be a big part of what spooked investors this week.
Management, for its part, believes profitability will rise over time.
"We are committed to achieving a sustainable double-digit gross margin model," said founder and CEO Charles Liang during the company's fiscal third-quarterearnings calllast month.
In the near term, however, the company expects the figure to move the other way, guiding for a fiscal fourth-quarter gross margin of 8.2% to 8.4%.
None of this means there isn't a real growth story here. Super Micro's fiscal Q3 revenue of $10.2 billion rose 123% year over year, and non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share more than doubled. Indeed, the order book may say more about the strength of AI infrastructure spending broadly than any single data point this year.
So, what does all of this mean for the stock?
Even after Wednesday's plunge, shares trade at a price-to-earnings ratio of about 18. That may not sound demanding for a company growing this fast. But the multiple is attached to a business with gross margins below 10% and billions of dollars of negative free cash flow. And a wave of new shares is on the way.
I'd stay on the sidelines here. The orders say remarkable things about AI server demand. But until Super Micro shows it can turn that demand into consistent profits without leaning on shareholders to fund it, the stock looks too risky to me -- even at this lower price.
Before you buy stock in Super Micro Computer, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Super Micro Computer wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $442,220! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,230,114!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 926% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 203% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of June 11, 2026. *
Daniel Sparks and his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The equity dilution and near-term cash-burn risk overwhelm the potential upside from an amorphous order book unless profits materialize quickly."
Headline orders are truly large, but they’re not a revenue guarantee and require enormous working capital. Q3 cash burn was $6.6B with just $1.3B cash on hand, and 9.9% gross margin means the $39B order book may yield far less gross profit than appears. The planned $7B equity raise dilutes shareholders, and orders aren’t firm commitments. Near-term margins are expected to compress (Q4 guide 8.2-8.4%). The upside hinges on AI server demand proving durable and on cost relief in component inputs; otherwise the stock could stay sensitive to cash-flow risk and dilution.
The strongest bull case is that the order book can translate into multi-year revenue visibility and margin improvement as scale reduces unit costs, and the equity infusion funds growth without debt, improving refinancing risk.
"The market is conflating a necessary capital raise for growth with a fundamental business failure, creating a mispriced entry point for a company with $39 billion in potential revenue."
SMCI’s 28% drop is a classic liquidity-induced repricing, not just a fundamental shift. The $7 billion raise is massive—equating to over 30% dilution—but it’s a necessary evil to bridge the working capital gap inherent in their 'just-in-time' assembly model. The market is rightfully punishing the sub-10% gross margins, which suggest SMCI is a low-moat assembler rather than a high-margin technology vendor. However, the $39 billion order book acts as a massive revenue floor. If they can optimize supply chain logistics to hit double-digit margins, the current 18x forward P/E is a deep-value entry point for a company growing revenue at triple-digit rates.
The order book is explicitly non-binding, meaning SMCI is essentially diluting shareholders to fund inventory for orders that could evaporate if AI capital expenditure cycles cool off.
"SMCI is selling equity to fund negative-margin revenue growth, and the $7B raise at 35% dilution is a red flag, not a buying opportunity—unless management proves margins expand materially within two quarters."
The $39B order book is real demand signal, but the article buries the actual problem: SMCI is burning $6.7B free cash flow per quarter while gross margins collapse to 8.2-8.4% guidance. At 9.9% gross margin, $39B in orders yields ~$3.9B gross profit against $70B+ in component spend. The $7B raise dilutes existing shareholders by ~35% while funding a business model that loses money on scale. Revenue growth means nothing if unit economics are broken. The stock fell 28% because the math is genuinely bad, not because of irrational panic.
If SMCI can execute on Liang's 'double-digit margin' commitment and gross margins mean-revert to 12-15% within 12-18 months as scale improves and supply chain normalizes, the $39B backlog becomes a $5-6B gross profit engine that justifies current valuation and makes the dilution a non-event.
"The $7B raise and sub-10% margins signal that fulfilling the order book will require repeated shareholder dilution before any sustainable profits materialize."
SMCI's $39B order book exceeds trailing revenue but comes with $7B equity dilution (over 35% of $20B market cap), 9.9% gross margins, and -$6.7B Q3 FCF. Management's 8.2-8.4% Q4 margin guide and non-binding orders suggest the cash raise funds working capital that may never convert to double-digit profits. Shares already down 37% in five days price in some dilution risk, yet the business remains structurally cash-intensive even as revenue grew 123% YoY. This setup favors suppliers with pricing power over assemblers reliant on Nvidia GPUs.
If AI capex from the 20+ customers accelerates beyond current forecasts, SMCI could lock in volume discounts and push margins above 12% faster than the market expects, making the $7B raise accretive rather than dilutive.
"Backlog profitability hinges on durable demand and better working capital, not just margin expansion; margin uplift alone won't fix the cash burn or dilution risk."
Claude nails the idea of margin uplift, but the bigger risk is cash burn and working capital. Even with gross margin improving to 12–15%, Q3 FCF was -$6.7B and the 39B backlog sits behind a non-binding, just-in-time model. The $7B equity raise would still dilute ~30–35%, and demand durability is not assured. Without durable AI capex and healthier working capital, the backlog may not become a profit engine.
"SMCI's sub-10% margins and lack of pricing power make their massive backlog a structural liability rather than a valuation floor."
Gemini, your 'deep-value' thesis at 18x forward P/E ignores the fundamental accounting risk: SMCI is essentially a pass-through entity for Nvidia. When gross margins are sub-10%, any volatility in component pricing or logistics costs wipes out the bottom line. You are valuing them as a tech vendor, but they are operating as a low-margin commodity assembler. Without pricing power over their own supply chain, that $39B backlog is a liability, not an asset.
"The $7B raise buys time for margin recovery, but not enough time if gross margins stay sub-10% through 2025."
Claude and Gemini are both right that margins are the crux, but nobody's addressed the timing mismatch: the $39B backlog is multi-year revenue, yet SMCI needs cash *today*. The $7B raise funds Q4-Q1 working capital, not the full backlog conversion. If margin improvement takes 18+ months but cash burn continues at $6-7B quarterly, SMCI exhausts the raise before proving the 12-15% thesis. That's the real dilution trap—not the equity percentage, but the timing of when profits actually materialize.
"The raise funds inventory for orders that could still cancel, turning dilution into a permanent loss rather than temporary bridge."
Claude's timing mismatch is accurate, but it misses how the just-in-time model locks SMCI into funding non-binding orders with the $7B before any multi-year conversion. If AI capex from those 20+ customers pauses even briefly, components already purchased become stranded inventory, converting the equity raise into permanent dilution with no offsetting cash flows. This risk compounds the 9.9% margins rather than resolving them.
The panel consensus is bearish, with the key risk being the company's cash burn and working capital issues, and the single biggest opportunity flagged is the potential for margin improvement if AI server demand proves durable and component input costs decrease.
Potential margin improvement
Cash burn and working capital issues