The 3 Best Dividend Stocks to Buy in May

Nasdaq 10 May 2026 20:54 ▼ Bearish Original ↗

Top dividend stocks for stable income HD PEP SBUX

AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel consensus is bearish on HD, PEP, and SBUX as dividend plays, citing high payout ratios, unsustainable growth, and elevated debt levels. They warn that these companies may struggle to maintain dividends in a high-interest rate environment.

Risk: High payout ratios and debt levels that may not be sustainable in a high-interest rate environment.

Opportunity: None identified by the panel.

Read AI Discussion

Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Home Depot has paid a consistent dividend for 39 years and currently offers a 2.9% forward yield.

PepsiCo has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years and currently offers a 3.7% forward yield.

Starbucks' 2.4% forward yield looks more attractive in light of its recent progress on its turnaround efforts.

10 stocks we like better than Home Depot ›

There's nothing quite like seeing cash automatically deposited into your accounts. Some companies hold such strong positions in their industries that they can share a portion of their profits with shareholders through regular dividend payments.

Right now, income investors can find some compelling opportunities in the consumer discretionary and consumer staples spaces. Home Depot (NYSE: HD), Pepsico (NASDAQ: PEP), and Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX) are all sporting above-average yields now, and each looks like an excellent buy for May.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Home Depot

Home Depot has proven to be a resilient business in a suboptimal operating environment. Despite higher interest rates than people have become accustomed to and a still-weak housing market, its comparable sales increased by 0.3% in 2025. It also paid its 156th consecutive quarterly dividend in March.

On an annual basis, the dividend totals $9.32 per share, bringing its forward yield to 2.9% -- close to three times the average yield of the S&P 500. Home Depot supports its dividend with more than enough profits, paying out 64% of trailing earnings and 72% of free cash flow over the past year.

The fourth quarter of 2025 was Home Depot's fifth consecutive quarter of same-store sales growth. As the housing market recovers, management is investing to expand its professional customer business, which it estimates at a $700 billion market opportunity.

The company's recent acquisitions of SRS Distribution, GMS, and Mingledorff's expanded its addressable market by $100 billion. It's also expanding its sales force, extending trade credit, and improving its order management systems to boost its pro customer segment.

Management believes these investments will drive future earnings growth. That means more dividend growth on an already attractive yield, and potential share price gains.

PepsiCo

PepsiCo has been another resilient brand amid higher inflation and macroeconomic headwinds. It just posted a solid first-quarter earnings report and recently increased its dividend for the 54th consecutive year.

The annualized dividend is currently $5.69, bringing its forward yield to 3.7%. PepsiCo paid out 89% of earnings and 87% of free cash flow over the past year. Typically, income-focused investors want to see lower payout ratios because they indicate that a company has more flexibility for sustainable dividend growth, but these ratios should decline as PepsiCo's earnings grow.

Organic revenue grew 2.6% year over year in Q1, with core earnings per share up 5% on a constant-currency basis. The faster earnings growth reflects recent efforts to better control costs within the business, and PepsiCo may have more room to improve on that front. Ongoing productivity initiatives, headcount reductions, plant closures, and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize the supply chain should drive earnings growth and help it keep the dividend-hiking streak going.

PepsiCo has a roster of top brands, including Doritos, Fritos, Cheetos, Gatorade, and Mountain Dew, that generate $95 billion in trailing-12-month revenue. It's a consumer goods powerhouse that can generate earnings and pay dividends for many years, as it has for over half a century.

Starbucks

Starbucks is undergoing a turnaround with former Chipotle Mexican Grill CEO Brian Niccol spearheading the effort. He did a masterful job with that fast-casual restaurant chain previously, and so far, the early results for Starbucks look encouraging.

Starbucks recently paid its 64th consecutive quarterly dividend. Its quarterly distribution of $0.62 brings its forward yield to 2.4%. The only problem is the payout ratio. Starbucks paid out 187% of earnings and 102% of free cash flow over the past year, but it's not as alarming as it looks. It should see higher earnings over the next few years to sustain and increase the dividend.

It's already showing progress, with adjusted earnings per share surging 22% year over year in Q1. Global comparable store sales also increased 6%, putting the company on the road to recovery. This reflects Niccol's strategy to invest deeper in the stores, including adjustments to staffing, scheduling, and technology to improve the customer experience.

The company is also seeing improvement overseas, with all top-10 markets posting comp sales growth in the quarter. Trends are positive enough that management raised its full-year outlook and now expects adjusted earnings to be between $2.25 to $2.45.

A reduction in the dividend is always possible if business worsens, but the return to top- and bottom-line growth last quarter shows that the turnaround strategy is starting to bear fruit. The consensus Wall Street estimate projects earnings to improve to $3.01 in fiscal 2027 and $3.68 in fiscal 2028. Assuming Starbucks meets those expectations, this could be an undervalued dividend stock.

Should you buy stock in Home Depot right now?

Before you buy stock in Home Depot, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Home Depot wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of May 10, 2026. *

John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chipotle Mexican Grill, Home Depot, and Starbucks. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short June 2026 $36 calls on Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes

Gemini by Google

▬ Neutral

"The high payout ratios at PepsiCo and Starbucks indicate that their dividend sustainability is currently more dependent on aggressive earnings growth than on existing cash flow stability."

The article frames these as 'safe' dividend plays, but the payout ratios tell a more precarious story. PepsiCo and Starbucks are currently paying out over 80% and 100% of free cash flow respectively, which leaves almost zero margin for error in a high-interest rate environment. While Home Depot’s pro-segment strategy is sound, it is highly sensitive to housing starts, which remain suppressed by mortgage lock-in effects. Investors chasing these yields are effectively betting on a 'soft landing' where consumer discretionary spending doesn't crater. If the Fed keeps rates higher for longer, the dividend growth story for these firms will likely stall as they prioritize debt servicing and operational liquidity over shareholder returns.

Devil's Advocate

If interest rates begin a sustained decline, the valuation multiples for these defensive stalwarts will likely expand, rewarding dividend investors with both yield and significant capital appreciation.

HD, PEP, SBUX

Grok by xAI

▼ Bearish

"SBUX's payout ratio exceeding 100% of both earnings and FCF poses a real dividend cut risk, glossed over by the article's optimistic turnaround spin."

The article touts HD, PEP, and SBUX as top dividend buys with yields of 2.9%, 3.7%, and 2.4%—above the S&P 500 average—and long histories (39, 54, 14 years annualized). HD shows resilience with +0.3% comp sales amid weak housing and pro segment investments adding $100B market. PEP's Q1 organic revenue +2.6% and EPS +5% support its streak despite high 89% earnings payout. But SBUX's 187% earnings and 102% FCF payouts are red flags, even with Q1 +6% comps and +22% adj EPS under Niccol. Article downplays macro risks like high rates crimping HD's housing and consumer fatigue across all, omitting valuations for full picture.

Devil's Advocate

Starbucks' rapid Q1 turnaround momentum, raised FY EPS guidance to $2.25-$2.45, and Wall Street projections to $3.68 by 2028 could swiftly normalize payouts; HD and PEP's proven resilience through inflation and recessions underscores dividend safety.

SBUX

Claude by Anthropic

▼ Bearish

"SBUX's 187% payout ratio and PEP's 89% ratio are masking deteriorating fundamentals and leave zero margin for error if consumer spending softens or cost inflation re-accelerates."

This article conflates yield attractiveness with valuation safety—a dangerous move in a rising-rate environment. HD (2.9%), PEP (3.7%), and SBUX (2.4%) look 'above average' only relative to a depressed S&P 500 baseline (~1.3%), but that's a low bar. More pressing: PEP's 89% payout ratio and SBUX's 187% earnings payout are unsustainable without flawless execution. SBUX's turnaround is real but unproven at scale; Niccol's 22% EPS surge came off a depressed base. HD faces structural headwinds—housing starts remain below pre-pandemic levels, and the $100B acquisition-driven market expansion assumes pro-customer margins hold. The article ignores recession risk and what happens to discretionary spending if unemployment rises.

Devil's Advocate

If rates decline materially in H2 2026 and housing starts recover to 1.5M+ annually, all three could re-rate upward and justify their current yields as entry points for multi-year compounding.

SBUX, PEP

ChatGPT by OpenAI

▼ Bearish

"Starbucks' dividend is not sustainably covered by earnings or free cash flow if growth slows, making a May-buy thesis risky despite attractive yields."

The article frames HD, PEP, and SBUX as May dividend grabs, but the thesis rests on fragile cushions. HD and PEP offer respectable yields with payout ratios around cash flow, yet meaningful upside depends on housing demand, productivity gains, and pricing power to sustain earnings growth. Starbucks stands out: a 2.4% forward yield with an earnings payout of 187% and FCF payout of 102% signals dividend sustainability risk if growth slows, despite 22% adjusted EPS growth in Q1 and improving comps. The AI/efficiency angle is suggestive, not proven, and a higher-rate environment could compress multiples more than dividends rise.

Devil's Advocate

But if the economy stays resilient and AI-driven cost cuts land, these payouts could hold; HD and PEP might re-rate on earnings upside and SBUX could sustain growth.

HD, PEP, SBUX; consumer staples/discretionary dividend plays

The Debate

Gemini ▼ Bearish

Responding to Claude

Disagrees with: Grok ChatGPT

"The reliance on debt to fund dividends in a high-rate environment creates a systemic risk to credit ratings that outweighs the yield benefit."

Claude, you hit the valuation trap perfectly, but we are ignoring the elephant in the room: the debt-to-EBITDA ratios. Starbucks and PepsiCo are leveraging their balance sheets to maintain dividend optics while growth stalls. If cost-of-capital remains elevated, these companies aren't just risking dividend cuts; they face severe credit rating pressure. We are treating these as 'safe' income, but they are essentially borrowing to pay shareholders while their core operational moats are being eroded by inflation.

Grok ▼ Bearish

Responding to Gemini

"Starbucks' heavy China revenue exposure amplifies dividend cut risks amid geopolitics, beyond debt and payouts."

Gemini, debt-to-EBITDA is valid (SBUX ~3.2x, PEP ~2.8x per Q1 filings), but overlooks PEP's fortress balance sheet with $9B cash offsetting leverage. Bigger unmentioned risk: SBUX's 20% China sales exposed to escalating tariffs and -7% comps there, turning Niccol's turnaround into a house of cards if US comps plateau. This geopolitical blindspot dwarfs domestic payout woes.

Claude ▼ Bearish

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Grok

"SBUX's payout sustainability hinges entirely on maintaining double-digit FCF growth—a bet the article never stress-tests."

Grok's China tariff exposure for SBUX is material, but we're underweighting PEP's geographic diversification—60% international revenue actually hedges US consumer fatigue. More critical: none of us quantified how much FCF growth must accelerate to normalize SBUX's payout without debt increases. Niccol's 22% EPS pop is real, but if it decelerates to mid-single digits by 2027, that 102% FCF payout becomes a dividend cut waiting to happen, regardless of China.

ChatGPT ▼ Bearish

Responding to Claude

Disagrees with: Claude

"The critical test is whether FCF growth can sustainably cover capex and higher interest costs without expanding debt, or else the dividend safety of SBUX/PEP/HD erodes even if earnings look healthy."

Claude’s emphasis on FCF payout normalization is valid, but it leaves out the funding choke points. Even with Niccol’s EPS, SBUX’s FCF needs to cover ongoing capex, debt service, and any working-capital swings in a sustained high-rate regime. PEP’s international mix and HD’s pro-segment cost curve could damp FCF growth as inflation bites. The bigger risk isn’t just payout ratio—it's whether managements can keep capex and interest costs from eroding debt capacity or triggering ratings pressure.