By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on EPD, O, and PEP, warning of risks in their high-yield strategies. Key concerns include volume declines, leverage, occupancy risk, and limited capital appreciation potential.
Risk: Volume declines and increased leverage in EPD, occupancy risk and refinancing pressure in O, and structural headwinds and limited pricing power in PEP.
Opportunity: None identified
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
It is a difficult time to find attractive stocks if you are a dividend investor. The S&P 500 index (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is trading near all-time highs and offering a historically tiny dividend yield of roughly 1%. That's simply too low a number to be interesting.
Don't fear, if you do a little digging, you can still find attractive high-yield stocks. Three strong investment candidates today are Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD), Realty Income (NYSE: O), and PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP). Here's why these high-yielders, with yields of up to 5.9%, should be on your radar today.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Enterprise Products Partners may seem like an odd suggestion, given that it operates in the energy sector. The geopolitical conflict in the Middle East has upended that sector. However, the master limited partnership's (MLP's) lofty 5.9% yield is backed by a toll-taker business, not high energy prices. The cash flows backing the distribution come from the fees it collects for moving energy around the world. The price of what is being moved isn't really all that important to the MLP or its ability to cover its distribution.
Notably, the distribution has been increased annually for 27 years despite oil prices rising and falling dramatically over that span. Moreover, Enterprise's distributable cash flow covers its distribution by a very healthy 1.7x. There's little reason to worry about a distribution cut, since the MLP's $5.3 billion in capital investment plans suggest that more slow-and-steady growth is highly likely. And that, in turn, should mean more distribution increases.
Realty Income is a large net-lease real estate investment trust (REIT). It predominantly owns single-tenant retail properties for which the tenant is responsible for most property-level costs. While any single property is high risk, since there's only one tenant, the overall portfolio risk is very low, given the over 15,500 properties Realty Income owns. The diversification story gets even better when you consider that the REIT owns assets across North America and Europe. It is built from the ground up to be a reliable dividend stock.
So dividend investors considering the stock's lofty 5.4% yield shouldn't eye the dividend with trepidation. In fact, the dividend has been increased annually for 31 years. And while the adjusted funds from operations payout ratio may sound high at roughly 70%, that's actually a strong figure for a net-lease REIT. By law, REITs must pay out 90% of their taxable earnings to avoid corporate-level taxation. Essentially, REIT's like Realty Income are designed to transfer large sums of cash to shareholders.
When it comes to reliable dividend stocks, the creme de la creme are Dividend Kings. Only companies that have increased their dividends annually for 50+ years get to claim the crown. PepsiCo, one of the world's largest consumer staples companies, is a Dividend King, and it offers a well-above-market yield of 4.1%.
PepsiCo is out of favor right now because growth has been slow, and changing buying habits and food guidelines have investors worried about the future. However, the Dividend King has adjusted to shifting market dynamics before, and there's no reason to believe it won't do so again this time around. Meanwhile, its price-to-sales, price-to-earnings, and price-to-book ratios are all below their five-year averages. This reliable, high-yield dividend stock looks like a bargain.
Every investment comes with risk, but on the risk spectrum, Enterprise, Realty Income, and PepsiCo all come in at the low end. And yet they still offer yields that are dramatically higher than the market. If you are looking for dividend stocks in today's low-yield market, you should consider putting each of these three stocks on your short list.
Before you buy stock in Enterprise Products Partners, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Enterprise Products Partners wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $398,052! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,181,688!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 892% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 205% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of June 27, 2026. *
Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in PepsiCo and Realty Income. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Realty Income. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"High yields are not a free lunch: distribution risk, rate sensitivity, and cyclicality can erode total returns even when headline yields look attractive."
The article touts 5.9% (EPD) and 5.4% (O) with 4.1% for PepsiCo as easy income in a 1% yield world. In reality, this glosses over risks: EPD’s MLP model depends on throughput; 1.7x distributable cash flow coverage could fall if volumes slip, and large capex ($5.3B) heightens balance-sheet sensitivity. Realty Income’s 70% FFO payout is solid but single-tenant exposure adds recession risk; PepsiCo’s growth may be muted and a valuation below five-year norms signals growth disappointment. In a rising-rate environment, these yields risk compressing via multiple re-rating or payout cuts, not just price appreciation.
Strong cash flows in staples and infrastructure can shield payouts even in a mild downturn, so the yield attractiveness could persist. If rates move higher or growth slows, however, these stocks may still suffer multiple compression and payout pressure.
"High-yield defensive stocks are currently priced for stagnation, and investors should prioritize total return potential over the psychological comfort of a dividend yield."
Investors chasing yield in EPD, O, and PEP are essentially performing a 'duration trade' on stability. EPD (5.9% yield) is a master limited partnership, which introduces K-1 tax complexity—a significant friction for retail portfolios. Realty Income (O) faces a persistent headwind from the 'higher-for-longer' interest rate environment, which compresses the spread between their cost of capital and cap rates on new acquisitions. PepsiCo (PEP) is the most concerning; while it is a Dividend King, its 4.1% yield is a symptom of stagnant growth and volume declines. Investors are buying these for income, but they are ignoring the lack of capital appreciation potential in a market currently rewarding high-growth tech beta.
These stocks are not meant to outperform the S&P 500; they are defensive anchors designed to provide non-correlated cash flow that protects against a potential equity market drawdown.
"High yields today reflect repricing for persistent higher rates, not hidden value; buying for yield in a 4.5%+ rate environment is a duration bet masquerading as income investing."
The article conflates yield with value, a dangerous move when rates remain elevated. Yes, EPD (5.9%), O (5.4%), and PEP (4.1%) beat the S&P 500's 1%, but that's partly *because* these stocks have repriced lower as discount rates rose. The article emphasizes distribution coverage (EPD's 1.7x DCF, O's 70% FFO payout) as safety, which is fair for MLPs and REITs. But it ignores duration risk: if rates stay high or rise further, these yields won't compress to historical norms—the stocks will. PEP's valuation metrics being "below five-year averages" is presented as bullish; it's actually a warning that the market has repriced the growth/yield tradeoff. The article also sidesteps tax efficiency: MLP distributions are ordinary income, not qualified dividends.
If inflation moderates and the Fed cuts rates as markets currently price, all three stocks re-rate higher simultaneously—the article's "low-end risk" thesis could deliver outsized returns precisely because yields compress.
"Realty Income's payout ratio and long streak mask material NAV risk from sustained higher rates that the article does not quantify."
The article positions EPD, O, and PEP as low-risk yield plays at 5.9%, 5.4%, and 4.1% versus the S&P 500's 1%, citing long dividend streaks and coverage ratios. Yet it underplays sector-specific vulnerabilities: O's net-lease model faces refinancing pressure and occupancy risk if retail tenants weaken; EPD's MLP structure adds K-1 tax complexity and sensitivity to volume declines despite fee-based cash flows; PEP's below-average multiples reflect structural headwinds in beverages and snacks that prior adaptations may not fully offset. Distribution growth alone does not guarantee total returns when capital appreciation is limited.
Interest-rate cuts could compress O's cap rates and lift valuations across all three, validating the yields as sustainable without the downside the analysis flags.
"Volume and capex shocks can erode cash-flow coverage and trigger multiple contraction, making these yields less protective than the article implies."
Gemini is right on K‑1 friction and rate sensitivity, but the bigger flaw is assuming yields stay ballast in a growth‑constrained regime. If EPD volume declines or capex raises leverage, 1.7x DCF can shrink quickly, not just drag on price via multiple. Realty Income and PEP rely on occupancy and pricing power; in a recession, tenant weakness or volume erosion can compress cash flow and drive multiple downside, even if rates stay elevated.
"PepsiCo's valuation compression reflects a fundamental loss of pricing power rather than just interest rate sensitivity."
Claude hits the nail on the head regarding the 'valuation trap' in PEP. While others focus on rates, they miss the fundamental deterioration in PEP’s organic volume growth. If the market is rerating PEP lower, it’s not just because of discount rates—it’s because the pricing power that fueled dividends for years is hitting a ceiling. I disagree with the 'defensive anchor' narrative; in a stagflationary scenario, these names offer the worst of both worlds: equity-like downside and bond-like stagnation.
"Rate-cut scenarios invalidate the yield-as-safety narrative because yields compress while growth stocks outrun these names."
Gemini's stagflation concern is real, but it assumes PEP has no pricing power left—the data doesn't support total collapse. More pressing: nobody's flagged that if rates *do* cut as priced, all three stocks compress yields simultaneously while equities rally hard. The 'defensive anchor' thesis only works if equities crater. If they don't, you're left holding stagnant cash flows at lower yields. That's the actual trap.
"Rate cuts won't deliver uniform re-rating for EPD, O, and PEP due to divergent fundamentals."
Claude overlooks how rate cuts might not uniformly benefit these names. EPD's fee-based model still requires sustained energy volumes that could lag in a soft landing, while O's single-tenant retail exposure faces structural shifts from e-commerce that lower cap rates won't fix. PEP's pricing power erosion, as Gemini noted, compounds this. The trap is assuming all three re-rate together when fundamentals diverge.
The panel consensus is bearish on EPD, O, and PEP, warning of risks in their high-yield strategies. Key concerns include volume declines, leverage, occupancy risk, and limited capital appreciation potential.
None identified
Volume declines and increased leverage in EPD, occupancy risk and refinancing pressure in O, and structural headwinds and limited pricing power in PEP.