By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on Solana's investment merit, with concerns about repeated outages, unclear ETF timeline, and intense competition from Ethereum and newer L1s. Some panelists see potential in proof-of-history timestamps and corporate treasury adoption, but others question the sustainability of fee-based revenue and the network's security economics.
Risk: Repeated mainnet outages and the unclear timeline for a spot ETF approval
Opportunity: The potential of proof-of-history timestamps for high-frequency DeFi settlement and corporate treasury adoption
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Cryptocurrencies are difficult to value.
There are thousands of cryptocurrencies now, making it difficult to find ones with a real competitive advantage.
One strategy is to look at cryptocurrencies that run on strong, technically superior blockchain networks.
The Trump administration is pushing to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the world. As a result, more investors are taking a hard look at the crypto sector and considering which cryptocurrencies could benefit the most over the next few years and beyond.
It's always difficult to know which cryptocurrencies to buy because they operate differently from publicly traded stocks. Plus, with random tokens regularly doubling or even tripling in a single day or week, it can be difficult for investors to remain disciplined. Here's the best cryptocurrency to buy with $1,000 right now.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
As many investors understand, cryptocurrencies are quite different from stocks. The sector initially launched as an alternative to mainstream finance in the wake of the Great Recession, which turned many people away from the traditional world of money and finance because it destroyed so much capital when markets crashed. While crypto can be used as a currency and may grow in popularity, most people now view the major cryptocurrencies as investment vehicles.
The difficult thing about crypto, however, is that these digital assets don't generate free cash flow and earnings like traditional stocks, and investors tend to value stocks by assigning multiples based on these metrics. A common investment strategy has been to look for cryptocurrencies that run on blockchain networks with strong real-world utility.
Few, if any, cryptocurrencies can boast a stronger technical network than Solana (CRYPTO: SOL), which is now the sixth-largest cryptocurrency in the world, with a market cap of almost $130 billion. Similar to Ethereum, Solana's network is governed by a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism in which Solana investors are able to stake tokens, locking them up for the opportunity to validate transactions and create new blocks in return for interest-like rewards. The more tokens one stakes, the higher likelihood that the holder has to be chosen in this process.
Solana's network takes it a step further with a proof-of-history mechanism, which essentially assigns time stamps to each transaction. This removes a time-consuming aspect of processing transactions on other decentralized networks.
Due to this technological strength, Solana's network has strong throughput and can process thousands of transactions per second (TPS). According to CoinMarketCap, Solana is currently processing about 2,000 to 3,000 TPS, although other reports have put Solana's current TPS higher at 3,700.
Regardless, the network is capable of doing so much more. During a stress test, when developers see how much TPS a network is capable of handling, the network reached 100,000 TPS.
Other tailwinds for Solana is the expected approval of a spot-Solana exchange-traded fund (ETF), which may be coming any day now, although it's unclear how a government shutdown could change the timeline. Furthermore, more publicly traded companies are starting to think about buying Solana as a treasury asset, raising capital to purchase it. Several companies are already doing this with Bitcoin and Ethereum, boosting prices of both.
Investing in cryptocurrencies is undoubtedly difficult. Aside from the challenges I mentioned above, crypto is a relatively new asset class, so there's still a lot that investors need to learn about the sector. Crypto is also volatile.
However, if you think about traditional investing, a company with a strong business model will often thrive eventually as long as it keeps executing. That's how I view Solana. It has a very strong technical network that will have significant real-world utility. That's why I think it's the best cryptocurrency to buy right now.
Before you buy stock in Solana, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Solana wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $621,976! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,150,085!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,058% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 29, 2025
Bram Berkowitz has positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Solana's network reliability issues and uncertain ETF path are downplayed, making the 'best buy now' claim rest more on marketing than durable edge."
The article pushes Solana as the top pick for its 2,000-3,700 TPS throughput, proof-of-history timestamps, and looming spot ETF, while noting $130B market cap. Yet it omits Solana's repeated mainnet outages that have eroded developer trust, the unclear ETF timeline amid potential government shutdown, and intensifying competition from Ethereum's scaling roadmap plus newer L1s. Motley Fool's disclosed SOL position adds promotional bias. Broader crypto remains unprofitable with no cash-flow valuation anchor, leaving price action driven by narrative and liquidity rather than fundamentals.
Solana's stress-tested 100k TPS ceiling and corporate treasury adoption could still drive outsized gains if ETF approval lands before competitors, outweighing past reliability hiccups.
"Superior blockchain throughput is necessary but insufficient for crypto valuation; Solana's $130B cap likely already reflects its technical advantages, leaving limited upside unless network adoption (not just capacity) accelerates materially."
This article conflates technical superiority with investment merit—a common trap in crypto analysis. Yes, Solana processes ~3,000 TPS versus Ethereum's ~15 TPS, and proof-of-history is elegant. But throughput alone doesn't drive valuation. The article ignores that SOL's $130B market cap already prices in much of this advantage. More critically: network effects favor incumbents (Ethereum's $2T+ ecosystem, Bitcoin's settlement finality), Solana has suffered multiple outages (2022, 2023), and a spot ETF approval—presented as imminent—remains speculative and faces regulatory headwinds. The Trump-era 'crypto capital' tailwind is real but non-specific to SOL. Finally, the author owns Bitcoin and Ethereum but recommends SOL—a potential conflict worth noting.
If Solana's technical edge becomes the dominant pricing mechanism over the next 18 months—particularly if Ethereum's Shanghai upgrade disappoints and Solana's MEV (miner extractable value) issues resolve—SOL could re-rate upward 3-5x, making current technicals look cheap in hindsight.
"Solana's technical throughput is a secondary concern compared to the unresolved regulatory status of the token and the network's historical reliability issues."
The article’s focus on Solana’s throughput—specifically the 100,000 TPS theoretical limit—is a classic case of 'tech-stack myopia.' While Solana’s speed is impressive, the network’s history of intermittent outages remains a critical, unaddressed risk that undermines its 'institutional-grade' narrative. Furthermore, the article conflates political sentiment with structural adoption; a pro-crypto administration doesn't guarantee the SEC will approve a spot-SOL ETF, especially given the ongoing debate over whether SOL constitutes an unregistered security. Investors should be wary of the 'utility' argument; without a clear path to sustainable fee-based revenue that outpaces token inflation, Solana remains a high-beta play on retail sentiment rather than a fundamental value investment.
If Solana successfully captures the lion's share of retail-facing decentralized applications and payments, the network effect could create a 'winner-take-most' scenario that justifies its current $130 billion valuation despite past stability issues.
"SOL's upside hinges on real-world utility and regulatory clarity; without that, it remains a high-risk, concentrated bet despite its tech narrative."
Solana is pitched as the top crypto due to throughput and a 'proof of history' edge, with a prospective spot SOL ETF and corporate treasury demand as catalysts. The article glosses over key risks: real-world utility remains uncertain for a high-throughput chain, Solana has faced outages and centralization questions, and competition from Ethereum-layer-1s and growing L2 ecosystems could erode its moat. Regulatory timing for crypto ETFs and US policy could dramatically alter upside, and a $1,000, single-name bet is highly concentrated in one chain's fate. A more resilient stance would weigh multi-chain exposure or a diversified crypto sleeve rather than SOL alone.
Solana's tech claims may overstate its practical edge; outages and governance risk could derail user adoption, and Ethereum’s ecosystem could render Solana obsolete even if throughput proves real. Regulators could delay or block a spot ETF, taking wind out of Solana's sails.
"Proof-of-history unlocks unique primitives that could justify SOL's valuation despite competition."
Claude underweights how proof-of-history timestamps could enable novel settlement layers for high-frequency DeFi that Ethereum L2s have yet to match, even post-Shanghai. If corporate treasuries accelerate inflows as Grok noted, this differentiation might sustain re-rating above current $130B despite outages. The overlooked variable is whether MEV and fee markets evolve fast enough to convert throughput into durable revenue before regulatory classification as a security caps ETF access.
"Proof-of-history's technical elegance doesn't automatically convert to durable fee economics or justify $130B valuation absent demonstrated revenue growth."
Grok conflates two separate bets: proof-of-history's technical merit versus whether it actually captures fee revenue. High-frequency DeFi settlement is theoretically interesting, but Solana's fee market hasn't demonstrated sustainable yield relative to token inflation—the real revenue anchor. Corporate treasury adoption is speculative; we've seen this narrative cycle before (2021). MEV resolution isn't a 'variable'—it's a prerequisite. Without it, throughput creates congestion theater, not moat.
"Solana's valuation is decoupled from its economic reality, as it relies on token inflation rather than sustainable fee-based revenue to secure the network."
Claude is right to focus on the fee market, but both Claude and Grok miss the elephant in the room: Solana's validator economics. The network relies on heavy token inflation to subsidize security because transaction fees are negligible. Until Solana demonstrates a transition from inflationary emissions to a fee-burn model, any 'institutional' narrative is premature. We are pricing a network based on speculative throughput while ignoring that the current economic model is essentially a subsidy-driven growth experiment.
"MEV monetization could be the key variable turning throughput into real revenue, not a side issue."
MEV monetization is not a fringe variable; it's the lever that could convert Solana's throughput into recurring revenue. If validators can price MEV reliably, and if regulatory/UX hurdles clear, SOL could re-rate on real cash flow. But it's far from guaranteed—inflationary emissions and security economics still dominate. Treat MEV as a core, probabilistic upside/challenge, not a side note. Claude's framing risks undervaluing MEV's potential.
The panel is divided on Solana's investment merit, with concerns about repeated outages, unclear ETF timeline, and intense competition from Ethereum and newer L1s. Some panelists see potential in proof-of-history timestamps and corporate treasury adoption, but others question the sustainability of fee-based revenue and the network's security economics.
The potential of proof-of-history timestamps for high-frequency DeFi settlement and corporate treasury adoption
Repeated mainnet outages and the unclear timeline for a spot ETF approval