What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agreed that Bank of America (BAC) is trading at a cheap valuation based on historical standards, with forward P/E around 11 and a PEG ratio of 0.93. However, they raised concerns about potential headwinds, including sensitivity to interest rate changes, regulatory capital requirements, and credit risks, particularly in the commercial real estate (CRE) sector.
Risk: Sensitivity of Net Interest Income (NII) to interest rate changes and deposit beta, which could lead to a significant compression in earnings if rates fall.
Opportunity: Potential for lower interest rates to boost lending and steady high spreads, given BAC's position as a top US lender.
Key Points
Bank of America is one of the cheapest stocks in the Buffett portfolio, and one of the best values.
Berkshire Hathaway has been paring back its stake in Bank of America in recent years, but it remains the conglomerate's fifth-largest holding.
Berkshire may be adding back shares at this valuation.
- 10 stocks we like better than Bank of America ›
Warren Buffett, the former CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, is known as one of the greatest value investors of all time. The portfolio he built at Berkshire Hathaway has changed over the past several decades, but it has always included stocks that Buffett targeted as great values.
Buffett is no longer running Berkshire, but the portfolio is filled with the stocks that were picked during his tenure as CEO -- and many of them are great values, especially now with the recent market pullback.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
The absolute cheapest stock in the Buffett portfolio right now is Charter Communications. The cable TV and internet provider is trading at just 6x earnings and 5x forward earnings. But the best value stock in the Buffett portfolio right now is Bank of America (NYSE: BAC).
BofA is the best value in the portfolio
Bank of America is the fifth-largest holding in the Berkshire portfolio, representing a roughly 9% stake. Until two years ago, it had been the second-largest holding, but Buffett and his team have been paring back on shares in recent quarters.
Right now, though, it appears to be in the buy zone. The stock is down about 12% year to date and is trading at around 12 times earnings, the lowest it has been in a year.
Its forward price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) is only 11, and its five-year price/earnings-to-growth ratio (PEG), based on projected earnings, is 0.93. A PEG below 1.0 means it is undervalued. And its price-to-book value is relatively low at 1.2.
Why Bank of America stock is a buy
Wall Street analysts have established a median price target of $61 for Bank of America, which would suggest 26% upside for the stock over the next 12 months. And 83% of analysts rate it as a buy.
Last year, Bank of America increased its revenue by 7% and lowered its provision for credit losses compared to the previous year. The revenue gains and provisions numbers were even better in the fourth quarter, a source of momentum heading into 2026.
The bank also lowered its efficiency ratio by 194 basis points to 61% in the fourth quarter. That means it is making more for every dollar it spends. That shows up in the earnings, which increased 18% in the quarter to $0.98 per share.
Its net interest income grew about 7% in 2025 to $60.1 billion. Management expects it to grow by a similar amount in 2026, projecting a range of 5% to 7%.
Also, with its net charge-off ratio down in the fourth quarter and lower provisions for credit losses, that suggests its credit quality is improving. Charge-offs are loans that won't be repaid.
While the interest rate picture is a bit murky right now, Bank of America, as a premier lender in the United States, is well-positioned in either scenario. If rates come down, it should spur more lending activity, which would likely boost net interest income as deposit rates drop. If rates hold where they are, it will likely maintain its solid increase in net interest income and its current higher spreads.
Combine that with its cheap valuation, and this Buffett stock looks like a good buy right now.
Should you buy stock in Bank of America right now?
Before you buy stock in Bank of America, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bank of America wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $532,066!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,087,496!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 926% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 5, 2026.
Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Dave Kovaleski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"BAC is arithmetically cheap but the bull case depends entirely on NII holding flat or growing—a bet against Fed cuts that the article treats as a given rather than a risk."
BAC trades at 12x trailing / 11x forward earnings with a 0.93 PEG, genuinely cheap by historical standards. Q4 showed real operational leverage: 18% EPS growth, 194bp efficiency ratio improvement, and credit metrics strengthening. The 26% analyst target implies modest upside, not euphoria. However, the article conflates 'cheap valuation' with 'good buy' without stress-testing the interest rate assumption. If the Fed cuts aggressively in 2026, BAC's NII guidance of +5-7% could compress sharply—management is already guiding conservatively. The article also omits that Buffett has been *selling* BAC for two years, which is a louder signal than current valuation metrics.
Buffett's multi-year reduction of BAC holdings suggests he sees better risk-reward elsewhere, and management's own NII guidance implies they expect headwinds; cheap valuations on financials often persist for structural reasons, not temporary mispricings.
"Bank of America's valuation appears attractive on a P/E basis, but the stock remains a 'value trap' until the bank proves it can maintain net interest margins in a volatile rate environment without further eroding its capital position."
The article's reliance on a 12x P/E ratio to justify a 'buy' ignores the structural headwinds facing Bank of America (BAC). While the PEG ratio of 0.93 suggests value, it assumes a linear growth trajectory that ignores the sensitivity of Net Interest Income (NII) to deposit beta—the speed at which banks must raise interest on deposits to retain customers. If the Fed cuts rates, BAC's margin compression could be more severe than the 5-7% growth forecast suggests. Furthermore, the article glosses over the unrealized losses in their Held-to-Maturity (HTM) bond portfolio, which remain a persistent anchor on tangible book value and capital flexibility in a 'higher-for-longer' environment.
If credit quality continues to improve as the article suggests, lower provisions for credit losses could act as an earnings tailwind that offsets any margin compression from falling interest rates.
"BAC may look undervalued on P/E/PEG, but the strongest missing context is whether near-term credit and net interest income tailwinds are durable enough to justify a sustained re-rating of bank earnings."
The article argues BAC is a Buffett-style value entry: ~12x earnings, forward P/E ~11, PEG ~0.93, P/B ~1.2, plus improving 2025 trends (revenue +7%, efficiency ratio down to ~61%, EPS +18% in the quarter, net interest income +~7% to $60.1B, and credit provisions/charge-offs easing). The risk is that “cheap” is already pricing in a structural earnings trough—bank multiples can stay low if NII is pressured by deposit repricing, yield-curve changes, or higher credit losses. Also, “momentum heading into 2026” hinges on management guidance, which may be optimistic.
If BAC’s credit cycle continues to improve and rate dynamics favor NII (or at least don’t worsen), the low forward multiple could support re-rating toward analyst targets. The efficiency ratio drop and lower provisions could indicate durable operating leverage, not a temporary dip.
"Berkshire's persistent BAC stake reductions contradict the 'best Buffett value' thesis, warranting caution despite cheap multiples and momentum."
BAC trades at an appealing 11x forward P/E and 0.93 PEG with 18% Q4 EPS growth to $0.98/share, improving efficiency ratio to 61%, and projected 5-7% NII growth to ~$63-64B in 2026. As a top US lender, it's positioned for lower rates boosting lending or steady high spreads. However, Berkshire has trimmed BAC from its #2 to #5 holding (still 9% of portfolio), selling billions since 2022—signaling caution amid regulatory scrutiny, high consumer debt, and unmentioned CRE loan stresses (BAC's CRE exposure ~$100B). Article speculates repurchase without evidence; peers like JPM trade at premiums for better diversification.
Berkshire's sales likely reflect portfolio rebalancing or tax efficiency, not faded conviction—Buffett often trims winners; with 83% buy ratings and $61 PT (26% upside), metrics confirm undervaluation if credit holds.
"CRE risk is real but quantifiable; deposit beta sensitivity in a rate-cut cycle is the unpriced tail risk."
Grok flags CRE exposure (~$100B) as unmentioned—critical. But that's roughly 10% of BAC's total loan book; stress-test: even 5% loss rate = $5B charge, ~$0.01/share annual drag. Material but not thesis-breaking. The real gap: nobody quantified deposit beta sensitivity. If rates fall 100bp and deposit beta hits 0.6-0.7 (vs. historical 0.3-0.4), NII could fall 8-12%, not compress 5-7%. That's where the valuation multiple breaks.
"Regulatory capital requirements act as a permanent ceiling on valuation multiples, rendering the 'cheap' P/B thesis structurally flawed."
Claude is right that CRE losses are manageable, but the panel is ignoring the regulatory capital 'Basel III Endgame' overhang. While we debate NII and deposit betas, BAC is forced to hold more capital against risk-weighted assets, which caps ROE and suppresses the P/B multiple regardless of earnings growth. Even with strong operational leverage, the structural return on equity is structurally capped by these capital requirements, making the 'cheap' valuation a permanent feature of the regulatory environment, not a temporary discount.
"Deposit-beta is a key risk, but the NII magnitude needs borrower/funding mix and ALM/hedge timing to be quantified, otherwise the stress-test may overstate impact."
Claude’s deposit-beta scenario is directionally important, but he assumes a ~100bp cut translates into an 8–12% NII hit without showing BAC’s current deposit mix and beta slope; that magnitude could be wrong. A missing angle is funding costs beyond deposits—wholesale funding, brokered CDs, and hedging/ALM timing can dominate NII sensitivity in a given quarter. Also, “HTM unrealized losses” are more about available-for-sale optics/capital optics than earnings, unless capital constraints bite.
"Basel III is negotiable with likely relief, not a structural valuation anchor for BAC."
Gemini, Basel III Endgame isn't a 'permanent' ROE cap—it's under negotiation with potential 10-20% relief from current proposals (BAC lobbying aggressively alongside JPM), and CET1 at 11.8% provides buffer above 10.1% req. JPM's 1.8x P/B shows market differentiates execution, not just regs. Panel misses BAC's 7% fee revenue growth offsetting NII risks via wealth mgmt scale.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists generally agreed that Bank of America (BAC) is trading at a cheap valuation based on historical standards, with forward P/E around 11 and a PEG ratio of 0.93. However, they raised concerns about potential headwinds, including sensitivity to interest rate changes, regulatory capital requirements, and credit risks, particularly in the commercial real estate (CRE) sector.
Potential for lower interest rates to boost lending and steady high spreads, given BAC's position as a top US lender.
Sensitivity of Net Interest Income (NII) to interest rate changes and deposit beta, which could lead to a significant compression in earnings if rates fall.