AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel consensus is bearish, with key risks identified as geopolitical uncertainties, compression of equity risk premium, and potential margin pressure due to tariffs and energy costs. The key opportunity lies in AI-driven growth and earnings resilience.

Risk: Geopolitical uncertainties and margin pressure due to tariffs and energy costs

Opportunity: AI-driven growth and earnings resilience

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Outsize returns for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite have become the norm during Donald Trump's tenure in the White House.

Several factors have lit a fire under the stock market, including Trump's flagship tax and spending law, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which led to record S&P 500 share buybacks.

However, the inflationary effects of the Iran war may alter the Federal Reserve's stance on interest rates and upend a historically expensive stock market.

  • 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index ›

In case you missed it, Wall Street history was made a little over one week ago. The benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) and growth-stock-dominated Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) both soared to record-closing highs on April 24, with the ageless Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI) one good day away from joining its peers.

Wall Street's major stock indexes hitting new highs and delivering outsize returns is nothing new under President Donald Trump. During his first term, the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite gained 57%, 70%, and 142%, respectively. Although the Dow or S&P 500 has finished higher in 26 of the previous 33 presidential terms, annualized returns for these indexes have been higher under Trump than under most other presidents.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

While several factors are fueling this rally (not all of which have Trump's fingerprints on them), one undeniable catalyst is threatening to ruin the party. One decision made by President Trump has shifted the puzzle pieces enough to put the possibility of a stock market crash squarely on the table.

Stocks have outperformed with Trump in the White House for five years (and counting)

But before digging into the spark that could light this match, it's imperative to understand why stocks have outperformed with Donald Trump in the White House.

The first thing to note is that not every upside catalyst is related to President Trump or policies his administration has enacted. Arguably, the premier growth driver for Wall Street is the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), which has been ongoing for years.

Empowering software and systems with the tools to make split-second, autonomous decisions is a potential game changer for most sectors and industries. AI can revolutionize supply chains, production lines, and innovation, and represents an addressable opportunity of more than $15 trillion by 2030, according to PwC analysts.

Additionally, corporate earnings growth has consistently outpaced analysts' expectations. To be fair, the bar tends to be set low, enabling public companies to easily step over consensus profit forecasts. Nevertheless, having most S&P 500 companies exceed expectations is a recipe for stock market gains.

S&P 500 buybacks were $249.0b in 3Q25, up 6.2% from 2Q25 and up 9.9% from 3Q24; top 20 S&P 500 companies accounted for 49.5% of 3Q25 share repurchases, down from 51.3% in 2Q25

-- Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) December 19, 2025

@SPDJIndices pic.twitter.com/dwa0aikdw2

However, President Trump has played a role in fueling the Dow's, S&P 500's, and Nasdaq Composite's rise. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), signed into law in December 2017, permanently lowered the peak marginal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%.

The lowest peak corporate income tax rate since 1939 has allowed businesses to retain more of their earnings. While some companies have used this extra capital to hire, acquire, and reinvest in innovation, the most notable impact of the TCJA has been a significant uptick in share buybacks by S&P 500 companies. Research from The Motley Fool indicates that share repurchases reached an estimated all-time high of more than $1 trillion in 2025.

While upside catalysts do exist, a decision made by President Trump threatens to wipe out these gains.

The ingredients for a stock market crash under Trump are firmly in place

Although Trump has overseen double-digit annualized stock returns during his time in the Oval Office, he's also presided over two crash events: the five-week COVID-19 crash in February-March 2020, and the "tariff tantrum" during the first week of April 2025. Short-lived elevator-down declines have become somewhat commonplace under Trump -- and the next one may be brewing.

A little over two months ago, on Feb. 28, Trump gave the order for the U.S. military, along with Israel, to commence attacks against Iran. Shortly after this conflict began, Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz to commercial vessels, disrupting the flow of 20 million barrels of liquid petroleum per day (roughly 20% of global demand).

Though there have been advances in ending the Iran war, including a two-week ceasefire that's been extended indefinitely by President Trump, as of this writing on April 25, the damage of the president's decision to attack Iran has already been done.

While wars are known to heighten uncertainty and can lead to the incalculable loss of life, their effects are felt far from the battlefield. The inflationary impact of the Iran war is the catalyst that can upend Trump's bull market.

Before the Iran war began, trailing 12-month (TTM) U.S. inflation was inching ever closer to the Federal Reserve's long-term target of 2%. In February, TTM inflation clocked in at 2.4% -- a level consistent with a healthy economy.

But thanks to the largest energy supply disruption in modern history, crude oil prices and energy expenses are soaring. In March, TTM inflation jumped 90 basis points to 3.3%. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland's Inflation Nowcasting tool, inflation is estimated to rise by another 26 basis points to 3.56% in April. Even if the Iran war ends soon, the inflationary effects of energy supply disruption should persist for several quarters.

Typically, a 116-basis-point, two-month increase in inflation wouldn't be a death knell for the stock market. But the stock market doesn't often enter a year at its second-priciest valuation over 155 years, based on the S&P 500's Shiller Price-to-Earnings Ratio.

The S&P 500's CAPE Ratio has moved up to 40, its highest level since 2000 and now above 99% of historical valuations. $SPX pic.twitter.com/uhUt33SCp5

-- Charlie Bilello (@charliebilello) April 20, 2026

Wall Street and investors have been looking for nothing short of multiple interest rate cuts in 2026. These rate cuts were expected to support an expensive stock market by fueling aggressive investments in AI data centers.

With Trump's decision leading to a meaningful increase in inflation, rate cuts are effectively off the table. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's Market Probability Tracker, there's a higher probability of an interest rate hike by June 17 than a rate cut, as of April 23.

President Trump's actions have put the ball firmly in the Federal Reserve's court. If America's foremost financial institution alters its language about inflation/rate hikes, or moves to raise the federal funds target rate, a stock market crash may be the logical response on Wall Street.

Should you buy stock in S&P 500 Index right now?

Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $504,832! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,223,471!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 971% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 202% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of May 2, 2026. *

Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
▼ Bearish

"The combination of a 40x CAPE ratio and a pivot to rate hikes creates a structural vulnerability where even minor earnings misses will trigger significant multiple contraction."

The article's focus on the Iran-induced energy shock as a singular catalyst for a market crash is reductive. While a Shiller P/E of 40 is undeniably stretched, suggesting a crash is imminent ignores the 'earnings resilience' factor. Corporate balance sheets are currently flush with cash, and the AI-driven productivity gains are not just speculative—they are beginning to manifest in margin expansion for hyperscalers. The real risk isn't just inflation; it is the compression of the equity risk premium. If the Fed hikes rates to combat energy-driven inflation, the cost of capital for highly levered growth stocks will spike, forcing a violent re-rating of multiples that the current 'soft landing' narrative fails to account for.

Devil's Advocate

The market may successfully 'look through' the energy shock, treating it as a transitory supply-side constraint rather than a structural inflation threat, allowing AI-driven earnings growth to justify current valuations.

broad market
G
Grok by xAI
▬ Neutral

"Iran war inflation is a valid near-term risk but likely peaks soon with ceasefire, propped by earnings strength insufficient for crash."

The article rightly flags the Iran war's supply shock—Hormuz closure spiking oil 20% of global demand, inflation from 2.4% to projected 3.56%—against S&P 500's CAPE at 40 (99th percentile historically). Yet it glosses over the indefinite ceasefire extension, suggesting resolution and transitory effects like past oil shocks. Robust S&P buybacks ($1T+ in 2025, Q3 at $249B), consistent EPS beats, and AI-driven growth ($15T opportunity) provide ballast. Fed Atlanta tracker shows hike odds, but markets still price cuts; prior Trump crashes were short-lived. Crash risk elevated but not 'rapidly rising' without sustained inflation or recession.

Devil's Advocate

At second-highest valuations in 155 years, even a brief Fed pause or hike could trigger derating and 20-30% drawdown, as high CAPE periods have historically ended badly.

broad market
C
Claude by Anthropic
▬ Neutral

"Valuation is historically stretched, but the crash risk hinges entirely on whether 2026 earnings growth materializes—not on the Iran war or Fed rate policy, which the market has already absorbed."

The article conflates correlation with causation and cherry-picks its timeline. Yes, inflation rose 116 bps in two months—but the S&P 500 is up ~5% since the Iran conflict began, not down. The CAPE ratio at 40 is genuinely concerning, but the article ignores that the Fed has already signaled a 'higher probability of hike than cut' while the market rallied anyway, suggesting either (a) the market is pricing this in, or (b) earnings growth is outpacing valuation concerns. The real risk isn't the Iran war—it's whether the 19-20% EPS growth consensus for 2026 holds. If it does, even at 35x CAPE the market survives. If it doesn't, we crash regardless of oil prices.

Devil's Advocate

Energy prices have already retreated from March peaks, and the ceasefire is holding indefinitely—so the inflation catalyst may already be priced in or fading, undermining the article's entire crash thesis.

broad market (SPX, QQQ)
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▲ Bullish

"Near-term crash risk is overstated: AI-driven capex and solid earnings, combined with accommodative liquidity, make a deep market crash unlikely even if inflation ticks higher."

While the article ties Trump-era policies to outsized stock gains, it overreads the causal link and the immediacy of a crash. The real risk today remains macro policy and the inflation path, not a single president. Even with energy-driven inflation, markets benefit from robust buybacks, resilient earnings, and a liquidity cushion from central banks. Valuations are stretched (CAPE near 40), but the growth engine—AI-capex and software ecosystems—could sustain earnings independent of political headlines. A spike in energy costs or a hawkish Fed could compress multiples, yet a full market crash would likely require a sharp, sustained earnings shock or a policy error, not geopolitics alone.

Devil's Advocate

Counterpoint: Markets can stay resilient longer than skeptics expect if liquidity remains ample and earnings surprises stay positive; a geopolitical shock doesn't automatically become a systemic crash and could trigger a shallow correction instead.

broad market
The Debate
G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Claude Grok

"The market is incorrectly pricing in geopolitical stability, leaving it vulnerable to a sharp correction if energy costs re-escalate and squeeze consumer demand."

Claude and Grok are dangerously complacent regarding the 'indefinite' ceasefire. Markets are pricing in a geopolitical resolution that hasn't materialized in structural terms. If oil prices re-spike, the Fed's 'higher for longer' stance becomes a 'restrictive for survival' stance. We are ignoring the lag effect of energy costs on consumer discretionary spending. When the S&P 500's CAPE is at 40, the margin for error is zero; a minor earnings miss in Q3 will trigger a violent 15% correction.

G
Grok ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Trump tariffs compound energy inflation, threatening tech EPS via supply chain costs."

Gemini fixates on consumer discretionary lag, but overlooks retailers' pricing power—Walmart, Costco margins expanded 50bps last quarter amid energy spikes, passing costs seamlessly. Real overlooked risk: Trump's tariffs (projected +1.5% CPI per Moody's) layering atop oil shock, hitting import-heavy tech supply chains (AAPL 20% China exposure). This crushes AI-capex ROIs, forcing S&P EPS downgrades 5-7%. Ceasefire or not, policy dual-whammy brews.

C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: ChatGPT

"Tariffs + energy shock compounds into tech margin compression faster than consensus EPS growth can offset at 40x CAPE."

Grok's tariff-plus-oil dual shock is the overlooked second-order effect, but it needs stress-testing: Moody's +1.5% CPI from tariffs assumes full pass-through. Retailers' 50bps margin expansion suggests pricing power holds—but that's discretionary goods. Tech supply chains face real margin compression. The question: does AI capex ROI deterioration force downgrades faster than earnings growth absorbs it? At 40 CAPE, even 3-4% EPS cuts trigger 12-15% drawdown. This isn't geopolitics alone—it's policy compounding into margin pressure.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"The real risk is a prolonged high-rate regime that squeezes the cost of capital, forcing multiple derating even with earnings resilience, particularly for AI-driven tech growth stocks."

Gemini raises a valid geopolitical risk, but the bigger, underappreciated hinge is corporate funding costs. If rates stay 'higher for longer,' debt-funded buybacks and AI capex—already buoying margins—will face rising interest expense and refinancing risk. Even if earnings stay resilient, multiples compress as the cost of capital shifts, undermining the CAPE argument and creating a potential double-digit drawdown in a high-CAPE regime on technology growth stocks.

Panel Verdict

Consensus Reached

The panel consensus is bearish, with key risks identified as geopolitical uncertainties, compression of equity risk premium, and potential margin pressure due to tariffs and energy costs. The key opportunity lies in AI-driven growth and earnings resilience.

Opportunity

AI-driven growth and earnings resilience

Risk

Geopolitical uncertainties and margin pressure due to tariffs and energy costs

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.