The panel is divided on the sustainability of current inflation rates and their impact on equities. While some argue that structural factors like energy costs and wage-price spirals could persist, others believe that productivity gains and potential Fed pivots could mitigate these risks.
Risk: Permanently elevated energy insurance premiums and sustained wage-price spirals that prevent the Fed from pivoting.
Opportunity: AI-enabled productivity gains that allow firms to absorb higher costs and maintain margins.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Key Points
- Although the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite have soared under President Donald Trump, persistently elevated inflation threatens these gains.
- Two of President Trump’s policies have been pushing consumer prices higher throughout 2026.
- Evidence is mounting that Trumpflation (inflation driven by President Trump’s policies) is evolving.
- The more entrenched Trumpflation …
Read more
Key Points
- Although the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite have soared under President Donald Trump, persistently elevated inflation threatens these gains.
- Two of President Trump’s policies have been pushing consumer prices higher throughout 2026.
- Evidence is mounting that Trumpflation (inflation driven by President Trump’s policies) is evolving.
- The more entrenched Trumpflation becomes, the worse the outlook for equities.
- 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index ›
Despite short-lived periods of historic volatility under President Donald Trump, few presidents over the last 130 years have overseen higher annualized stock market returns. During Trump's first term (Jan. 20, 2017-Jan. 20, 2021), the mature-stock-driven Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI), benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC), and tech-propelled Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC) soared 57%, 70%, and 142%, respectively.
Since the start of his second term (Jan. 20, 2025), these outsize gains have continued, with the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq rising by 19%, 29%, and 39%, respectively, through the closing bell on Sept. 22.
Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
While everything has been going swimmingly for the U.S. economy and stock market, cracks appear to be forming in their foundations, courtesy of persistently elevated inflation. Although modest inflation is normal in a growing economy -- i.e., businesses should possess some degree of pricing power over their goods and services -- what we've witnessed in 2026 goes beyond "modest."
Trumpflation comes with unintended consequences. Image source: Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok.
In May, trailing 12-month (TTM) inflation reached a three-year high of 4.2%, more than double the Federal Reserve's long-term inflation target of 2%. The catalyst fueling well-above-average inflation is none other than Trumpflation (inflation specifically driven by President Donald Trump's policies).
Unfortunately for Wall Street and the Fed, Trumpflation is evolving and becoming more entrenched in the U.S. economy.
President Trump's policies are having unintended consequences on the prevailing inflation rate
Although the headline TTM inflation rate for August pared to 3.4% from the aforementioned three-year high of 4.2% in May, two of President Trump's policies are having a direct impact on consumer prices: tariffs and the Iran war.
BREAKING: August CPI inflation comes in at 3.4%, in-line with expectations of 3.4%
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) September 11, 2026
Core CPI inflation falls to 2.4%, also in-line with expectations of 2.4%.
Month-over-month CPI inflation rose +0.4%, the biggest increase since May 2026.
Treasury yields are rising on the news.
Tariffs have been modestly affecting consumer prices for more than a year. In April 2025, Trump unveiled his "Liberation Day" tariffs, consisting of a sweeping global tariff and higher reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries deemed to have unfavorable trade balances with the U.S. President Trump imposed these tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court voted 6-3 against Trump's use of tariffs under IEEPA, invalidating them. This court defeat was followed by Trump imposing a 150-day, 10% global import duty under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 that expired on July 24. Finally, in late July, the Trump administration instated global tariffs on more than 80 countries, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
While tariffs are designed to protect American jobs and enable domestic goods to be price-competitive with those brought in from overseas, they can also raise domestic production costs. Adding duties to unfinished goods/raw materials often leads to higher expenses being passed on to consumers.
JUST IN 🚨: Diesel hits $6.50/gallon for the first time in history 📈 📈 pic.twitter.com/xBSpi6hYcW
— Barchart (@Barchart) September 21, 2026
Meanwhile, the Iran war has had a clear impact on energy prices.
Shortly after Trump gave the go-ahead to attack Iran on Feb. 28, the latter shut down the Strait of Hormuz to virtually all maritime traffic. This action halted the daily movement of approximately 20 million barrels of petroleum liquids.
Removing a fifth of the world's crude oil supply at the drop of a hat had immediate consequences for the U.S. energy market. Gas prices soared at the fastest pace in three decades, while diesel prices recently climbed to an all-time high.
Vacillating energy commodity prices have been at the center of the wild swings we've witnessed in headline inflation since February.
Image source: Getty Images.
The next phase of Trumpflation is here
If there was a potential silver lining to Trumpflation, it was the belief that Trump's policies would have a relatively short-lived impact on consumer prices. The pass-through effects of tariffs were expected to wane in 2027, while energy supply disruptions have historically been short-lived.
But things haven't gone as planned. The rollout of a new round of global tariffs in July further pushes out the year-over-year impact of duties on consumer prices. Perhaps more importantly, the effects of Trumpflation on the U.S. economy concerning the Iran war have entered a new phase.
While the impact on energy prices is front and center for consumers, evidence is mounting that the inflationary effects of the Iran war have become entrenched in the broader economy. In other words, we're no longer talking about an event that's just impacting the energy sector.
1/6
— Jim Bianco (@biancoresearch) September 16, 2026
A popular narrative is the Fed will make a mistake by hiking into a supply shock ("The Fed cannot print oil!")
Wrong metric!
Core PCE has run above 2% for 65 months.
This suggests something bigger is happening and focusing on near-term oil/diesel spikes misses it.
🧵 pic.twitter.com/SK4Ral3zCQ
Although this is far from a comprehensive list, the Iran war has had several effects on the broader economy:
- Petroleum-based goods, such as plastics, synthetic polymers, and tires, are now pricier.
- Some businesses have been forced to alter transportation methods, shift shipping routes, or change suppliers to adjust for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher transportation costs are being passed on to retailers and wholesalers, who then pass them on to consumers.
- Approximately one-third of the world's fertilizer passes through the Strait of Hormuz, leading to global shortages, lower crop yields, and higher produce prices.
By examining Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), which excludes volatile food and energy costs, we can tell that Iran-war-driven inflation has reached the broader economy. Whereas headline inflation fell from 4.2% to 3.4% between May and August, Core PCE hardly budged: 3.5% in May to 3.3% in June and July. The price stickiness of Core PCE confirms that Trumpflation has entered its next phase.
Entrenched inflation is a huge problem for Fed Chair Kevin Warsh and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). It typically takes considerable time and a rate-hiking cycle to purge entrenched inflation. In short, there's no easy fix to a prevailing inflation rate that's spent 66 consecutive months above the Fed's long-term 2% target.
Stock Market Shiller PE Ratio on the verge of taking out its Dot Com Bubble all-time high 🚨 🤯 👀 pic.twitter.com/CtCmSgWnLt
— Barchart (@Barchart) July 11, 2026
At the same time, the consequences of entrenched Trumpflation are possibly dire for the second-priciest stock market in history. Wall Street's artificial intelligence (AI)-powered rally needs everything to go perfectly. If the FOMC delivers several additional rate hikes beyond the quarter-point interest rate increase on Sept. 16, it could slow the AI infrastructure build-out and force investors to rethink the otherworldly valuations assigned to AI stocks.
The more entrenched Trumpflation becomes, the worse the consequences for Wall Street.
Should you buy stock in S&P 500 Index right now?
Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $383,680! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,382,954!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 937% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of September 27, 2026. *
Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“The shift of energy-driven costs into core services confirms that inflation is no longer a temporary supply shock but a permanent drag on equity valuations.”
The article correctly identifies the transition from transitory supply-side shock to structural, embedded inflation, but it underestimates the fiscal dominance at play. With the Shiller P/E ratio approaching dot-com bubble extremes, the market is pricing in a 'soft landing' that is mathematically incompatible with a 3.3% Core PCE print and a permanent energy risk premium. If the FOMC under Kevin Warsh continues to hike into a supply-constrained environment, we are looking at a classic policy error. The 'AI-productivity' narrative is the only thing masking the erosion of real corporate margins, and that valuation floor is exceptionally fragile if the cost of capital remains elevated through 2027.
A massive, unanticipated surge in AI-driven labor productivity could offset higher input costs, allowing companies to maintain margins without further price hikes, effectively 'growing' out of the inflation.
“Entrenched inflation is real, but the article overstates its permanence and undersells the possibility that supply shocks (energy, fertilizer, shipping) resolve faster than the 66-month narrative implies, leaving the Fed room to pause before equity multiples crater.”
The article conflates three distinct inflation drivers—tariffs, Iran disruption, and broader economic momentum—into a unified 'Trumpflation' narrative without isolating their actual contribution to Core PCE. Core PCE at 3.3% in July is elevated but not alarming; the real tell is whether it's sticky due to entrenched wage-price spirals or temporary supply friction. The Shiller PE comparison to dot-com is inflammatory—today's AI cohort has actual revenue and margin expansion, unlike 2000. The article assumes the Fed must hike aggressively into this, but if Core PCE rolls over by Q4 (plausible if Strait of Hormuz reopens or tariff pass-through moderates), the rate-hike doom case collapses entirely.
If Core PCE remains above 3% through 2027 and wage growth stays elevated, the Fed genuinely does face a policy bind—rate hikes compress AI capex multiples precisely when valuations are most vulnerable. The article's timeline risk is real.
“Persistent core PCE above 3% after 66 months raises the probability of sustained higher rates that compress multiples across the S&P 500.”
The article correctly flags sticky core PCE at 3.3% through July 2026 after 66 months above the 2% target, driven by tariffs and Strait of Hormuz disruptions that now affect plastics, fertilizer, and logistics costs. This raises the odds of additional Fed hikes beyond the September 16 quarter-point move, which would pressure the second-highest Shiller PE in history. However, the piece underplays how quickly energy flows could normalize if the Iran conflict de-escalates and ignores that July tariffs under Section 301 are narrower than the invalidated IEEPA measures. Diesel at $6.50 and 3.4% headline CPI are real but may prove transitory rather than structural.
If the Strait reopens by year-end and reciprocal tariffs are rolled back in trade talks, the supply shock reverses faster than the 2027 timeline the article assumes, allowing core inflation to fall without further tightening.
“The market can remain resilient and even re-rate higher if earnings power and productivity gains from AI investments offset higher financing costs, despite the inflation scare highlighted in the article.”
While the piece argues that Trumpflation will quietly drag on the economy and crush equities, there are reasons to doubt that outcome. The market tends to price monetary and fiscal risks in advance, and this cycle has already embedded rate-hike expectations into multiples. If earnings growth from AI-enabled productivity persists and supply chains adapt to tariffs and energy shocks, aggregate demand can stay resilient even with higher rates. The Iran-war narrative could prove transitory if diplomacy improves or OPEC supplies respond. The article also blends policy causation with timing; even entrenched inflation can coexist with selective equity strength if investors rotate toward structurally secular growth.
However, if inflation proves stickier than expected and energy remains volatile, the Fed may need to keep rates higher for longer, and multiple compression could hit valuations. In that scenario, the supposed resilience could give way to meaningful drawdowns, especially for rate-sensitive growth names.
The Debate
Responding to Claude
“The structural increase in energy risk premiums and the higher cost of capital will permanently compress terminal value multiples regardless of short-term CPI fluctuations.”
Claude and Grok are dangerously optimistic about the Strait of Hormuz. Geopolitical risk premiums in energy are no longer just about current flow; they are about insurance and tanker availability, which remain permanently elevated even if shooting stops. This 'structural' cost floor is what Gemini correctly identifies as the threat to margins. The market is ignoring that even if inflation 'rolls over,' the cost of capital has reset to a higher baseline that permanently impairs terminal value calculations.
Responding to Gemini
“Structural energy costs are real, but terminal-value impairment only locks in if the Fed's rate regime is permanently higher—a bet on wage-spiral persistence, not just geopolitics.”
Gemini's 'structural cost floor' argument conflates two separate issues: energy insurance premiums (real but cyclical) versus terminal value impairment (which assumes rates stay elevated indefinitely). If the Fed cuts rates in 2027—plausible if inflation does roll over—that 'permanent' baseline evaporates. The market isn't ignoring the cost-of-capital reset; it's pricing optionality on Fed pivot timing. That's not complacency; it's rational. The real risk Gemini identifies but doesn't isolate: what if energy costs stay elevated AND the Fed can't cut because wage-price spirals persist? That's the genuine bind.
Responding to Gemini
“AI margins could absorb structural energy costs, allowing an earlier Fed pivot than Gemini's impairment thesis allows.”
Gemini's permanent cost-of-capital reset assumes energy insurance stays structurally high regardless of de-escalation, yet this ignores how AI productivity gains could let firms absorb those costs without sustained margin pressure. If wage-price spirals ease even modestly by 2027, the Fed gains room to pivot earlier than Gemini's terminal-value impairment scenario requires, preserving multiples for growth names rather than enforcing a broad reset.
Responding to Gemini
“Gemini's 'structural cost floor' is too deterministic; energy premiums can persist but optionality and AI productivity can restore valuations, so treat it as a scenario, not a thesis.”
Gemini overstates the permanence of a higher discount-rate floor. Even if energy insurance costs stay elevated briefly, the Fed's eventual pivot and wage dynamics could restore multiple expansion in AI-enabled capex. The key missing link is optionality: constructive productivity helps shield margins, not annihilate them; if oil supply widens again or diplomacy improves, risk premia compress and cycles reaccelerate. Treat the 'structural cost floor' as a scenario, not a thesis.
Panel Verdict
NEUTRAL No ConsensusThe panel is divided on the sustainability of current inflation rates and their impact on equities. While some argue that structural factors like energy costs and wage-price spirals could persist, others believe that productivity gains and potential Fed pivots could mitigate these risks.
AI-enabled productivity gains that allow firms to absorb higher costs and maintain margins.
Permanently elevated energy insurance premiums and sustained wage-price spirals that prevent the Fed from pivoting.
Related News
Stock Market Midday, Sept. 24: Stocks Slide as Treasury Yields Climb, Oracle Declares Force Majeure
European Shares Set To Open Lower As Investors Weigh Inflation Risks
Asian Shares Retreat On Inflation Fears
Inflation Concerns Weigh on Stocks
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.