AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel consensus is that Kenny Glick's VWAP trading strategy, while potentially profitable in current market conditions, is likely overhyped and carries significant risks. The main concerns are survivorship bias, the non-predictive nature of VWAP, and the risk of front-running by high-frequency traders (HFTs).

Risk: Front-running by HFTs exploiting retail clusters on VWAP, leading to repeated negative slippage and compounding losses.

Opportunity: Potential short-term gains from exploiting retail 'gap-and-go' momentum in the current market regime.

Read AI Discussion

This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →

Full Article Yahoo Finance

This one went a little faster than some of my other Q&As, because my good friend Kenny is professionally trained to speak in monologues.

There were a couple of natural pauses where I interjected, mostly to try and trick him into giving me a textbook definition of volume-weighted average price (VWAP) — his area of expertise.

I should have known better, and I was rebuffed.

It’s not until 19:30 in my transcript, when I asked if VWAP has ever betrayed him, that we get to the real meaning of volume-weighted average price:

Kenny Glick: No, no, it's the only truth left — not just in trading, in life. Really, it doesn't lie, because it is what it is. It's telling you institutional strength, especially late in the day.

One of the OG trades, my OG VWAP trade —

So we're still recording? This is important.

Elizabeth Volk: Recording everything.

Kenny Glick: When I first got into VWAP, I was like, “Why does this matter?” And when it was explained to me, this was the first explanation, and it’s still the most important explanation: It's an institutional guide to whether the trader themselves did a good job for the day.

So let's say you work for me, and I give you an order for 300,000 shares of XYZ. At the end of the day, 4:00 PM, that prints the VWAP. Let's say XYZ’s final VWAP is 63.85, and I told you to buy 300,000 shares. For me, your average price needs to beat the VWAP, and then you get a bonus. Or if you keep failing to beat the VWAP, you're fired, right?

Think of it this way. If you're the trader doing the buying, maybe you have 200,000 shares so far, and you still got to buy 100,000 more. Now the stock is breaking above VWAP at the end of the day, and you have to actually start chasing your own idea. So that late-day VWAP break, all the institutional traders are chasing the stock because they all have to beat the VWAP, too.

When you see a stock that's under VWAP predominantly the whole day, and then you get a late-day break, it’s because now they're all buying in a frenzy to keep that average price of what they're trying to accumulate below VWAP. And that really made a lot of sense to me.

Now, 12 or so years later, using it exclusively, to me it's just algorithmic. That's the way it is. And when you see the stocks ebb and flow to these price levels, it's not a coincidence that sometimes they stop on the exact VWAP level, and that's where you'll see some sellers.

But what's important is when you hit the VWAP and you break over it and hold it. You know, that’s when you got a trend reversal.

We’ll be talking a lot more about those trend reversals. Or, more accurately, he will.

Also, how Kenny defied his old manager’s low expectations; why VWAP plugs you straight into the matrix; the truth about managing risk in day trades; and even why Xanadu Quantum is his favorite stock he doesn’t own.

But before I let him take over, a quick note to clarify: VWAP has never betrayed Kenny Glick, even though Kenny Glick has occasionally betrayed VWAP with his own lack of discipline.

First, click to get your very own VWAP chart setup so you can play along at home. Now here’s all the rest, in his own words.

‘VWAP Saved My Life’

COVID really just brought day trading back because everybody was trapped in their house.

That's why we went from “Oh my God, the world's coming to an end,” when Tom Hanks got COVID to the greatest market rally since ever, until this last one.

It's just insane. But you know, VWAP crystallizes it for you. That's why I say VWAP saved my life.

I'm a bearish guy, and I always used to think at moments like this — with Iran, and the price of oil going up, and the uncertainty about the political world — I would always think that would be bearish.

But nobody cares.

No, the market doesn't give a s*** about anything. It's programmed, and the program is VWAP. That's why I want to — man, if you're trying to trade any timeframe now without it, at least have it on your screen.

You swear by moving averages, you like stochastics and Bollinger bands, which is all voodoo to me — now, just add the VWAP to your chart, and you'll see how it works together with everything.

Dialing in the Gap Fade

Well, as a short seller, the first thing I noticed was that stocks do not like to stay down when they get back over VWAP.

And you know, if I had discovered the power of it in 2012, 2013, 2014, where I just became addicted to trying to outsmart the market, I would have saved myself a lot of money and a lot of grief, and I would have saved myself a lot of time.

So from that learning experience, I was like, “You know what? Let me see which trades work the best.” So I went back to a trade that was working for me, which is the gap fade.

And obviously, looking at it from the short side, anytime a stock was gapped down, and if it broke below the opening range, but then it got back above VWAP — nine out of 10 times, it would change the trend of the stock. So I just started doing that trade.

I went from being a victim as a shorter to knowing when to cover and then go long, and it just changed the game for me. And then I just started concentrating on that one trade. Fast forward 11 years later, and I’m still doing it now.

It’s just a gap fade. But the trade that I was doing back in, let's say 1997–1998, when I was fading the gap, I was using the high of the day as a stop, or buying it near the lows and hoping it wouldn't break down.

Now, with VWAP, I'm getting in at a better price ahead of the curve, with less risk and more reward.

Becoming the Matrix

Going back to 30 years ago, everybody knew VWAP. You never traded it. It was just a number.

But as this evolution has happened in the world of trading, where the algorithms are taking over, now people are using it in their formulas to program. So you’ve got more and more quants that drive this high-frequency trading using the VWAP as their go-to price to start putting on trades.

It's a self-fulfilling prophecy. The more and more people that are using it, the more it's working. And that has to be the reason that, fast forward all of these years, I've never seen anything work so accurately.

One of the best parts is that every time you put a trade on around VWAP, you're getting in at a price where even if the trade doesn't work, it's a small loss, and when it works, it's medium, large, and extra-large wins. So it instills the discipline and the money management all in one simple line, and if you obey it and use it seriously — no matter what, even when you're having a couple of bad trades — there's small losses.

And in trading, that's the whole nature of the game. You're allowed to take losses. You just have to avoid the catastrophic loss.

So with volume weighted average price, it's letting you know where the institutional order flows are going in. Instead of fighting the market, you are the market; you're piggybacking the institutional order flow. You're joining in when it's the best time to be involved in a trade.

And again, back to the whole programming. It's definitely the way that this market is being programmed now, and you're just joining in on the algorithm. So, as a human being doing this, you're an AI now.

All of the headlines are about AI and bots doing the work for you — what do you think they're trading? They're trading VWAP. So with this trade, now you're basically an AI bot joining in on the fun.

Kenny Says You’re a Great Person

Over the last decade or so, since I've been doing this exclusively, there used to be maybe two or three opportunities a day to find these gap reversions around VWAP. Now you're getting what seems like 30, 40, 50 trades a day, where you have an opportunity to make money.

So as a day trader, just trying to get paid every day — if you're not using VWAP as a day trader, you’re a loser. No, not meaning you're — you could be a great person. You're a loser trader because you're not using the most thorough, handy, institutional tool for free.

It's not like this is proprietary anymore. It used to be hard to find VWAP. It's everywhere now, especially with platforms like Barchart, they're even adding anchored VWAP.

I don't want to get into that right now, but multiple time frame VWAP, that's just basically showing you the ebb and flow of a market.

Today's VWAP meets prior day VWAP, and with just those two little lines, you have the whole world of what the stock is going to do, probably — on the day, throughout the rest of the day, and even the next day.

So you're getting so much information on just two lines of data, and that's why I swear by it.

Are You Sure You Don't Want to Get Into Anchored VWAP Right Now?

Let's get into it. Here's the craziest thing in the world I've discovered.

Once I started looking at anchored VWAP again, I noticed that if a stock trended back above VWAP and the prior day VWAP, almost 100% of the time — which is absurd to even say out loud, because nothing works every time — it'll provide you a winning trade. And this is based on careful experimentation over the last three or four years, and it’s only when you have a very specific setup.

So if you get a gap down stock on earnings, where you already have a gap reversion, you want to play that gap reversion. That’s if you get over today's VWAP, which is the one-minute, and then an anchored VWAP — what I call the multi-day. It's more than one day's worth of VWAP.

It's been like four years now, and it's like 1,400 trades in a row, which is absurd. Because if I say these numbers, people are like, “What the f*** are you talking about? Nothing works every time.”

But again, it's very specific, because you need a stock that's reported earnings; it needs to be gapped; and the gap needs to be either sold into or bought. And if you get over today's VWAP and prior day VWAP, 100% of the time, it'll provide you a winning trade.

That's a very specific statement in itself because it provides you a winning trade.

If you buy a 14-dollar stock — let's just assume VWAP is 14.20; multi-day VWAP, that's 14.50. Say you get through 14.20, you usually go to 14.50. You go over 14.50, 100% of the time your stock's probably gonna go to at least, let's say, 14.75 or 15. That doesn't mean you can just sit there and not actively trade it.

It's an active trading setup, because at the end of the day, stocks could roll over. At the end of the day, you could wind up being down 8 bucks again. If you let a winning trade become a loss, you're the loser, not the trade. And again, it's just — for someone who's getting into day trading, you have to use VWAP.

Anchored VWAP for Swing Traders

Now what I've discovered is that you can extend it, the anchored VWAP. You can anchor it to as many days as you want. So if you're a swing trader, now you're getting a pretty damn good picture of institutional order flow over a certain amount of days, and that's what swing trading is all about.

For instance, in the market we're in right now, this has been the sickest five weeks in the history of the market. Like, stop right there. I've been doing this for 30 years and never seen anything like it. And the reason is that anybody could bang their head on the keyboard right now, hit the buy button on that symbol, and as long as your stock doesn't break anchored VWAP, you're good.

And that's what's sick about this move. Even when we get into pullbacks, you're not breaking the prior day VWAP. So it's telling you to stay in — and that's the hard part about trading. You buy a stock at 180 and it goes to 210, you chomp at the bit, you want to take your profits, but anchored VWAP is telling you, just let it ride.

You'll sell a little bit along the way to take some profits, but as long as the anchored VWAP is telling you the trend’s still intact for your swing trade, boom, you're still in.

For me, that's it. It's just price action meets institutional order flow, whether you’re looking at it daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly. I even use it over decades now, because it's grabbing whatever data set you peg it to. So you can anchor it to — OK, I haven't anchored to three years ago. But what I love is that it does work quarterly.

Earnings, what I like to do is I look at the one-minute, look at the prior day, and now I also look at the three-month, because every three months is when companies report. So you're getting the institutional VWAP of the last quarter of this stock's life — what the institutions were thinking three months ago, where we are today — anchored VWAP puts it all on the chart, and you pretty much have a roadmap to success.

On Day Trading and Risk

Well, you can go back to when I was first interviewed [by “48 Hours”] when I was 27, which is a long time ago now.

The reason I was on TV in the first place was that some trader lost all his money and started shooting up the place, right? So they started coming around with all the TV cameras, going down the list, looking for the next guy to go postal. And my — the guy that ran the firm, he's like, “Yeah, Kenny's your guy.”

They made us all out to be degenerate gamblers, which we are, but we're doing it like anyone else. They were framing us as the gamblers of this industry. Meanwhile, anytime you buy a stock, it's an unknown; it's a gamble. Every single time.

People thought it was more extreme, what we were doing. And I was defending the whole thing, because it really came down to one thing. I have a better chance to predict or know where a stock is going to be a half an hour from now than you do three weeks from now or three months from now.

Granted, long-term investing, you don't need to predict. The market only goes up over any like five- to seven-year period of about the last 100 years. You don't need to predict, right?

But when you start talking about short-term swings, I got a better shot at telling you where the stock’s gonna be an hour from now, or staying with that trend for the day, than I do knowing what's gonna happen tomorrow, right? So that's been the whole premise of day trading.

As far as risk, again, if this is what you do, it’s not just a hobby where you hope you buy something at 9:30 for half an hour and it goes up, and you're like, “Oh, look at me.”

If this is what you do, you're at the desk from 8 to 5, like we are, managing the trade, and you're in control. If the stock starts going against you, you’re out.

Finding Opportunity in Disaster

You know, somebody's disaster was my opportunity today. So the company called Xanadu Quantum, who the f*** knows what this company does? Doesn't matter, right? The word “quantum” is in it. Stock’s been ripping; it's all you need to know.

So today, last night — whenever they said something negative — the stock was down like 80%. You thinking about selling it? No, you just wait for it to break above VWAP on the reversal. Then you're in, and you get a stock that goes from 12 to 16, and those four points, that's a solid trade right there.

Then I sold it. I don't care about quantum anymore. I d

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Grok by xAI
▬ Neutral

"VWAP's reliability as presented rests on unverified trader anecdotes rather than transparent, risk-adjusted backtests across market regimes."

The article hypes VWAP as an infallible 'truth' and institutional order-flow proxy that day traders can exploit via gap fades and anchored setups for outsized edges in the current volatile market. Yet it presents no audited performance data, slippage assumptions, or drawdown statistics to support the 100% win-rate claims on 1,400 trades. This risks survivorship bias and ignores that VWAP is a widely available lagging metric whose self-fulfilling nature can break during liquidity shocks or when algos adapt. Retail adoption may also compress the very edges Kenny describes.

Devil's Advocate

Even if the specific earnings-gap anchored-VWAP setups have worked recently, the article glosses over how HFT market-makers can detect clustered retail entries around VWAP and widen spreads or reverse the move intraday, turning the 'small loss' discipline into repeated slippage costs.

broad market
C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"VWAP is a useful institutional flow indicator in trending markets, but marketing it as 'the only truth' and citing unverified 1,400-trade win streaks conflates a lucky regime with timeless edge — a dangerous setup for retail traders who will blow up when volatility regime shifts."

This is a masterclass in survivorship bias dressed up as trading wisdom. Kenny Glick's VWAP framework works brilliantly in *this* market — a five-week rip where 'bang your head on the keyboard' long trades print money. But the article conflates a bull-market setup with universal truth. His 1,400-trade 'almost 100% win rate' on post-earnings gap reversals is unverified and suspiciously round. More critically: VWAP is descriptive, not predictive. It shows where institutions *did* trade, not where they *will*. In chop, reversals, or vol spikes, it becomes noise. The real risk: retail traders reading this will treat VWAP as a holy grail, size up on false confidence, and get demolished when the market regime shifts — which it always does.

Devil's Advocate

VWAP *is* genuinely useful as a crowded institutional anchor in algo-driven markets, and Glick's discipline around position sizing (small losses, medium-to-large wins) is sound risk management that most retail traders lack entirely.

retail day traders; broad market (specifically risk of retail overconfidence in current bull regime)
G
Gemini by Google
▬ Neutral

"VWAP is a valuable execution tool for institutional efficiency, but treating it as a predictive signal for retail day traders creates a false sense of security that ignores market volatility and algorithmic front-running."

Kenny Glick’s reliance on VWAP (Volume-Weighted Average Price) is a classic example of 'survivorship bias' masquerading as a universal law. While VWAP is an essential benchmark for institutional execution—ensuring large orders don't move the market against the desk—it is not a predictive oracle. Glick claims '1,400 trades in a row' with a 100% win rate on specific setups; this is statistically impossible in efficient markets and likely ignores slippage, commissions, and the 'hidden' cost of being stopped out on false breakouts. VWAP is a measure of historical average cost, not future value. Relying on it exclusively ignores fundamental catalysts, liquidity traps, and the reality that algorithms are designed to front-run exactly these predictable retail patterns.

Devil's Advocate

If VWAP is truly the 'only truth' used by high-frequency algorithms, then ignoring it is essentially trading with a blindfold, regardless of whether the indicator is predictive or merely reactive.

broad market
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▬ Neutral

"VWAP can offer a tradable edge, but the article’s near-perfect success claims are implausible and the edge will erode as usage increases and market regimes change."

VWAP can be a powerful guide to price action and institutional flow, but the article leans on anecdotes and near-mythic success claims. In live markets, VWAP is a lagging snapshot; it can mislead during gaps, earnings, or rapid moves, and anchored VWAP blends current data with older days, diluting relevance when regimes shift. The stated 1,400-trade win-streak and 100% success are almost certainly overfit or misrepresented and invite hindsight bias. As more traders chase VWAP, execution risks, latency, and front-running pressure rise. The practical risk: an edge that is crowded, fragile, and likely to erode in volatile or illiquid names.

Devil's Advocate

The strongest counter is that the piece cherry-picks success anecdotes (even claiming 100% win rates) which screams backtest/selection bias; in real time, crowded VWAP trades whip and fail on gaps, so you cannot extrapolate a few weeks of results into a universal edge.

broad U.S. equities
The Debate
G
Grok ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude

"HFT front-running turns disciplined small losses into systematic slippage costs no one quantified."

Claude correctly flags regime-shift risk, yet the bigger unmentioned flaw is adverse selection: when retail clusters on anchored VWAP post-earnings, HFT desks using the same benchmark can detect the flow via order-book imbalances and front-run the stop clusters, converting Glick's 'small loss' rule into repeated negative slippage that compounds faster than any win-rate statistic captures.

C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok

"The real edge is earnings-driven mean reversion, not VWAP; remove that catalyst and the framework becomes a lagging indicator in a choppy market."

Grok's front-running thesis is sharp, but it assumes HFT can reliably detect retail VWAP clusters in real time—a tall order when orders are fragmented across venues and dark pools. More pressing: nobody's addressed that Glick's edge might simply be *timing* (earnings volatility compression post-gap) rather than VWAP itself. Strip away the earnings calendar and the setup collapses. That's the regime shift Claude mentioned, but it's narrower and more lethal than just 'bull market ends.'

G
Gemini ▬ Neutral
Responding to Claude

"The supposed VWAP edge is actually a retail liquidity trap where Glick profits from the exhaustion of momentum traders."

Claude is right about earnings volatility, but misses the structural point: Glick is likely trading mean reversion against retail 'gap-and-go' momentum. The '100% win rate' isn't a strategy; it's a byproduct of liquidity provision. When retail chases the gap, they provide the liquidity for Glick’s fade. The edge isn't the VWAP line itself, but the predictable exhaustion of retail order flow at key technical levels. Without that specific retail behavior, the setup is just noise.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"The edge based on retail VWAP crowd behavior is fragile and likely to erode as participation crowds and HFTs adapt."

Gemini's 'retail crowd exhaustion' thesis is plausible but dangerously fragile. If more traders copy the anchored VWAP approach, HFTs will adapt, spreads tighten, and the edge erodes via faster, costlier slippage. The real risk is regime shifts: a longer earnings quiet period, or a shift to algo-driven retail participation that neutralizes the crowd effect. In that world, the claimed 1,400 trades with 100% win rate is not robust.

Panel Verdict

Consensus Reached

The panel consensus is that Kenny Glick's VWAP trading strategy, while potentially profitable in current market conditions, is likely overhyped and carries significant risks. The main concerns are survivorship bias, the non-predictive nature of VWAP, and the risk of front-running by high-frequency traders (HFTs).

Opportunity

Potential short-term gains from exploiting retail 'gap-and-go' momentum in the current market regime.

Risk

Front-running by HFTs exploiting retail clusters on VWAP, leading to repeated negative slippage and compounding losses.

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.