By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is overwhelmingly bearish on SpaceX's $1.8T IPO valuation, citing execution risks, regulatory hurdles, and governance concerns.
Risk: The primary capital structure risk is the 'Musk Premium' becoming a liquidity trap, with fiduciary oversight potentially hampering cross-pollination of capital between Starship, Starlink, and xAI once public.
Opportunity: The single biggest opportunity flagged is the potential for Starlink to become a legitimate cash-flow engine, given its current status as a viable business.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Investors are looking for ways to get in on the SpaceX IPO.
The company's fundamentals are a mixed bag right now.
If the stock enters the public markets at its reported valuation, the stock will trade at an extreme premium.
History will be written this month with the SpaceX initial public offering (IPO). It is expected to be the largest IPO in history in terms of both valuation and capital raised, immediately putting the space and artificial intelligence (AI) company as one of the largest megacap stocks in the world.
Does that mean you should buy the stock on the day of its IPO? Or should smart investors take a "wait and see" approach with this blockbuster IPO? Here's what the data says is the intelligent move.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Over the past few years, SpaceX has transformed from a rocket launch company into a sprawling conglomerate offering a range of services and projects. The space segment -- which mainly includes launching payloads into orbit and other space-related missions -- hit $4 billion in revenue in 2025, although it currently operates at a loss because of the development of the larger Starship rocket.
Where the profits come in is the connectivity division, housing the fast-growing Starlink satellite internet service. It generated $11.4 billion in revenue in 2025, up from $7.6 billion in 2024, with $4.4 billion in operating income. This is a fantastic business with a long runway for growth.
Right now, Starlink has just over 10 million subscribers and is expanding into direct-to-device satellite internet and new geographies around the world. Expect further growth from Starlink in the years ahead.
A less-flattering part of SpaceX's business story is its AI initiatives from the acquisition of another Musk-controlled entity, xAI (which also controls the platform formerly known as Twitter). In 2025, the AI business generated just $3.2 billion in revenue, putting it well behind the premier labs like OpenAI or Anthropic. It also lost $6.4 billion, wiping out all of Starlink's earnings for the year.
At the IPO, it is now rumored that SpaceX will be selling shares at an approximate valuation of $1.8 trillion. This gives it a nice round number when looking at its 2025 revenue of $18.7 billion. A $1.8 trillion market cap would put the stock at a trailing price-to-sales ratio (P/S) of 100, making SpaceX one of, if not the most expensive, large-cap companies in existence today.
You cannot make a logical argument that SpaceX should be valued at $1.8 trillion based on its 2025 figures. Value comes from trusting Musk's vision to build a vertically integrated AI and space flight company. He aims to greatly scale up the Starlink business by shuttling tons of satellites (literally) into space with the giant Starship vehicle under testing. In the long run, he wants to connect his AI endeavors with spaceflight by building AI data centers in orbit to reduce computing costs.
This may all seem far-fetched today, but Musk has a long track record of making magic happen. If successful, the company sees an addressable market in the trillions. To be properly valued like a megacap technology provider, SpaceX will have to quickly start generating revenue in the hundreds of billions, like Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon. Otherwise, the stock is liable to fall back to Earth, and quickly.
If you are reading this article, the odds are more likely than not that you want to get a piece of that sweet SpaceX stock at the IPO. Demand is off the charts, which is why the company is potentially going to sell $75 billion worth of stock at a P/S ratio of 100.
Odds are also high that the stock will underperform the broader market over the next few years. IPO stocks are almost always priced to perfection so the company can maximize its capital raise. Looking at the historical performance of IPOs shows that returns can look good in the first days of trading, but stocks generally lag the market over the next three years. Three years after an IPO, 64% of stocks are trailing the indexes by more than 10%, while only 29% are outperforming.
Can SpaceX be one of the select few IPO stocks that keep on winning? Maybe. But the odds are stacked against it with its audacious starting P/S ratio of 100, no matter how grand Elon Musk's vision is.
When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 995%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 212% for the S&P 500.
They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.
**Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2026. *
Brett Schafer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The valuation is absurd on 2025 numbers but rational only if you believe Starship reduces launch costs by 10x AND Starlink scales to 500M+ subscribers—neither guaranteed."
The article's P/S of 100x is mathematically indefensible on current fundamentals, but that framing obscures the real question: is this a venture-scale bet on a 2035+ payoff, not a 2026 earnings story? Starlink alone ($11.4B rev, $4.4B operating income) trades at ~15-20x in isolation—reasonable for satellite internet. The $1.8T valuation is entirely a bet on (a) Starship economics enabling 100x Starlink scale, and (b) xAI becoming a $500B+ enterprise. The article correctly notes IPOs underperform, but that's backward-looking data on companies with modest ambitions. SpaceX's real risk isn't valuation—it's execution: Starship reliability, regulatory approval timelines, and whether Musk's attention remains focused.
If Starship fails to achieve reusability economics or xAI remains a money-losing vanity project, this stock could crater 60%+ within 18 months regardless of Starlink's strength—and the article's IPO underperformance stat becomes predictive, not cautionary.
"SpaceX's 100x P/S at IPO embeds flawless execution that Starship delays or regulatory blocks are likely to violate within 24 months."
The article rightly highlights SpaceX's $1.8T IPO valuation equating to 100x 2025 revenue of $18.7B, with Starlink's $4.4B operating income erased by xAI's $6.4B loss. Historical IPO underperformance data (64% lag indexes by >10% at three years) applies here given the premium pricing. Missing from the piece are concrete risks around Starship's repeated test failures, spectrum allocation delays for direct-to-device, and potential antitrust scrutiny on Musk's vertically integrated empire. These could cap subscriber growth well below the implied trillions TAM.
Musk has beaten timelines before at Tesla and SpaceX; a single successful Starship orbital flight plus 2x Starlink ARPU from enterprise deals could justify the multiple faster than skeptics expect.
"A 100x P/S ratio forces investors to subsidize massive R&D burn and speculative AI ventures under the guise of a mature infrastructure play."
The $1.8 trillion valuation at a 100x P/S ratio is fundamentally detached from current reality, pricing in a decade of flawless execution before a single public share trades. While Starlink is a legitimate cash-flow engine, the article conflates SpaceX with xAI—a move that introduces significant governance risk and capital dilution. Investors are essentially paying for a venture-capital-style 'moonshot' at a public-market scale. Without a clear path to decoupling Starlink's profitability from the heavy R&D burn of Starship and the speculative AI integration, this IPO is a liquidity event for early insiders rather than a value-creation opportunity for retail participants.
If Starship achieves full reusability, launch costs collapse, potentially turning SpaceX into the 'AWS of space' and rendering current P/S multiples irrelevant.
"A realistic SpaceX valuation requires clear cash-flow visibility from Starlink and xAI; without it, 1.8T is a bet on Musk’s vision rather than fundamentals."
The SpaceX IPO story hinges on an aggressive valuation far from the company’s current cash flow reality. At about $1.8 trillion on 2025 revenue of $18.7B and a P/S near 100, the market would be pricing in Starlink’s monetization and orbit-based AI infrastructure far beyond today’s earnings power. Starlink is asset-intensive with regulatory and competitive risks; xAI’s losses add to the risk. Public-market skepticism about IPOs typically matters, and a higher discount rate could force a material multiple re-rating if growth stalls or capex intensifies. The upside depends on durable moat expansion and clear near-term profitability, not just ambitious long-run vision.
Strongest counter: if investors buy into Musk’s ecosystem, Starlink’s moat and AI ambitions could sustain premium multiples even with near-term losses; the risk is that capex and regulation could erode those premiums faster than expected.
"The panel assumes Starship execution; nobody's stress-tested what happens if launch cadence stalls at current levels while xAI continues burning $6B+ annually."
Claude and Grok both assume Starship reusability is achievable; nobody's quantified the delta between current test cadence and the 100+ launches/year needed to justify $1.8T. Gemini flags governance risk correctly, but underestimates how much of the valuation already prices in Starlink's cash flow—the real question is whether xAI's $6.4B burn becomes a permanent drag or a one-time integration cost. ChatGPT's 'discount rate re-rating' is the sharpest observation: if Fed rates stay elevated, even venture-scale bets compress faster than growth accelerates.
"xAI losses could trigger spectrum leasing that invites regulatory delays tying antitrust and governance risks together."
Claude flags the Starship cadence mismatch accurately, yet the discussion overlooks how sustained xAI losses might force SpaceX to monetize Starlink spectrum via leasing deals, inviting FCC challenges that delay direct-to-device rollout by years. This connects Grok's antitrust note to Gemini's dilution concern, potentially compressing multiples before any 2030 payoff materializes.
"The transition to a public entity will force a regulatory decoupling of SpaceX's profitable assets from its speculative AI ventures, likely triggering a massive valuation reset."
Claude and Grok are missing the primary capital structure risk: the 'Musk Premium' is actually a liquidity trap. If SpaceX goes public, the cross-pollination of capital between Starship, Starlink, and xAI becomes subject to fiduciary oversight that doesn't exist in a private entity. Gemini is right about governance; once public, the SEC won't tolerate the 'vanity project' burn of xAI if it cannibalizes Starlink’s core profitability. The valuation isn't just high; it's legally fragile.
"Without decoupling profitability from Starship/xAI, the $1.8T could be a perpetual option, not a value."
Responding to Gemini: the liquidity trap angle is fair, but the bigger unremarked risk is path dependency: even if Starship hits 100+ flights/year and Starlink accelerates ARPU, you still need regulatory approvals, spectrum monetization, and durable AI moat to translate into profits. The market pricing in a 2035 payoff ignores real-world bottlenecks (FAA/ITU delays, anti-trust concerns, capex burn). Without decoupling profitability from Starship/xAI, the $1.8T could be a perpetual option, not a value.
The panel consensus is overwhelmingly bearish on SpaceX's $1.8T IPO valuation, citing execution risks, regulatory hurdles, and governance concerns.
The single biggest opportunity flagged is the potential for Starlink to become a legitimate cash-flow engine, given its current status as a viable business.
The primary capital structure risk is the 'Musk Premium' becoming a liquidity trap, with fiduciary oversight potentially hampering cross-pollination of capital between Starship, Starlink, and xAI once public.