By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on Zscaler, citing decelerating growth, execution risks, and potential multiple compression due to competitor bundling and churn risks.
Risk: Churn acceleration and multiple compression due to competitor bundling
Opportunity: None identified
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Zscaler's stock plummeted on Wednesday after the company's guidance fell short of expectations.
The company didn't miss by much, but with a high valuation, it may have been ripe for a correction.
It possesses some attractive growth opportunities in cybersecurity due to new threats arising from artificial intelligence.
Zscaler (NASDAQ: ZS) reported its latest earnings numbers this week, and to say that investors weren't impressed would be a massive understatement. The stock plunged nearly 32% on Wednesday amid the release of its numbers and guidance.
When a stock tanks so much so quickly, it begs the question of whether or not the market has overreacted. While the stock could be heading even lower, there's the possibility that it might also have become a bargain buy in the process. Is Zscaler stock a good buy right now? Let's find out.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
At first glance, the cybersecurity company appeared to have delivered strong numbers for its third quarter, which ended on April 30. It beat expectations for revenue and adjusted earnings, with its top line looking particularly strong, rising by 25% year over year, to $850.5 million.
What discouraged investors was the outlook for the business, with Zscaler noting that it lost a couple of important salespeople and that, as a result, it would be taking a cautious approach with respect to its guidance; Zscaler's forecast for the next fiscal year is for its growth rate for annual recurring revenue to be between just 16% to 17%. And for the current quarter, Zscaler expects revenue of $875 million to $878 million, while analysts were projecting about $878.6 million.
It's not a huge miss, but the guidance was the big reason for the stock's freefall.
The massive sell-off yesterday means that Zscaler's stock is now down more than 40% since the beginning of the year, and it's now down 61% from its 52-week high of $336.99. Based on analyst projections, the stock is trading at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 27, which is higher than the S&P 500 average of about 22.
Zscaler's stock was looking overpriced before the sell-off, and this correction may give investors the opportunity to buy back in at a much more attractive price. While I wouldn't call it a bargain buy, it has the potential to be a good long-term investment given the opportunities in cybersecurity, especially with artificial intelligence introducing new threats for companies and individuals to worry about.
The stock has been rallying today, a sign that some investors may see an opportunity for a bounce back. If you're willing to hang on for the long haul, Zscaler's stock could be a good pick up at its current price.
Before you buy stock in Zscaler, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Zscaler wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,072! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,303,352!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 983% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 210% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 28, 2026. *
David Jagielski, CPA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Zscaler. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Guidance of 16-17% ARR growth at a still-elevated 27x forward P/E leaves ZS vulnerable to further de-rating if execution slips persist."
Zscaler's 32% drop after guiding ARR growth to just 16-17% next year reveals more than a temporary sales-team hiccup. Revenue growth already slowed to 25% while forward P/E remains 27x against the S&P 500's 22x, leaving little cushion if cybersecurity budgets tighten or competitors like Palo Alto and CrowdStrike capture share. The article underplays how losing key salespeople often signals rising churn or weaker pipeline health, risks that could compound if AI threats fail to translate into immediate Zscaler-specific demand. Today's bounce looks like short-covering, not conviction.
The 16-17% ARR guide could prove conservative if AI-driven attacks force faster zero-trust adoption, allowing Zscaler to re-accelerate within two quarters and justify a re-rating above 35x.
"A 32% sell-off on guidance that misses by <1% is justified if it signals structural deceleration and execution issues, not overreaction—and the article conflates valuation compression with opportunity without proving the growth story is intact."
The article frames this as a potential overreaction, but the 32% single-day drop on a 16-17% ARR guidance miss (down from prior expectations) is actually rational, not emotional. Here's why: ZS trades at 27x forward P/E on decelerating growth—that multiple only works if the company maintains high-teens growth consistently. Losing key salespeople and cutting guidance suggests execution risk, not just temporary headwinds. The article's AI-tailwind argument is generic; it doesn't address whether ZS's platform actually wins incremental share in the AI-security arms race versus pure-play competitors like CrowdStrike (CRWD) or Palo Alto (PANW). The 61% drawdown from highs looks dramatic but reflects multiple compression from 60x+ to 27x—still not cheap for a decelerating compounder.
If ZS stabilizes ARR growth at 16-17% and the sales leadership vacuum gets filled within 2-3 quarters, the stock could re-rate back to 35-40x forward P/E on renewed confidence, delivering 30%+ upside from current levels.
"Zscaler's valuation is currently disconnected from its decelerating growth profile, leaving it vulnerable to further multiple compression regardless of its long-term cybersecurity relevance."
The 32% haircut on ZS is a classic 'valuation reset' masquerading as a sales force issue. While management cited turnover, the real issue is the deceleration in ARR growth to 16-17%. In the SaaS world, once a high-multiple stock loses its 'hyper-growth' premium, the P/E contraction is brutal. Trading at 27x forward earnings, ZS is still priced for perfection in a sector where Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike are aggressively bundling platforms. ZS's 'Zero Trust' model is sticky, but if they cannot maintain their premium pricing power against platform-wide competitors, that 27x multiple could easily compress toward 20x, implying further downside risk despite the recent bounce.
If Zscaler's AI-driven threat detection provides a unique, non-commoditized moat, the market may be ignoring a massive margin expansion opportunity as they scale past the current sales friction.
"Zscaler faces meaningful downside risk from decelerating ARR growth and a lofty valuation that offers little cushion for further misses or macro weakness."
The article frames Zscaler’s drop as an overreaction to a modest guidance miss and highlights AI-related demand as a tailwind. Yet the pullback may reflect more tangible risks: next-year ARR growth guided to 16-17% is a meaningful deceleration, and the stock trades at roughly 27x forward earnings versus a 22x market multiple, leaving less buffer for multiple compression. Execution risk is real (loss of salespeople) and could signal slower pipeline conversion. The piece omits key context like prior growth trajectory, potential margin dynamics, customer concentration, and how AI-driven demand translates into durable bookings. In a backdrop of macro uncertainty, the setup tilts bearish unless a clear accelerant emerges.
Bull case: AI security demand should sustain durable, double-digit ARR growth and Zscaler’s platform positioning supports solid margins and renewal stability, justifying a higher multiple even if near-term growth slows.
"Sales turnover risks faster churn and deeper multiple compression than the ARR miss alone suggests."
Claude's claim that the 32% drop is fully rational ignores how the sales turnover could trigger secondary effects on renewal rates rather than just near-term pipeline. If enterprise customers delay zero-trust expansions while ZS rebuilds its team, churn may rise faster than the 16-17% ARR guide implies, pushing the 27x multiple toward 22x even if AI demand materializes. This compounds the competitor bundling risk Gemini flagged but doesn't quantify.
"Sales turnover is a near-term execution risk, but NDR trends and bundling pressure are the actual indicators of durable demand weakness."
Grok's churn hypothesis is plausible but speculative. The 16-17% ARR guide already reflects management's forward view—if they expected material churn acceleration, they'd guide lower or flag it explicitly. What's missing: ZS's net dollar retention (NDR) trend. If NDR stays >120%, renewal health is intact despite sales friction. Competitor bundling (Gemini's point) is the real threat, not sales turnover alone. That's structural, not cyclical.
"NDR is a lagging indicator that masks the immediate danger of a broken enterprise sales engine in a shifting competitive landscape."
Claude, you are missing the forest for the trees regarding NDR. Net Dollar Retention is a lagging indicator; by the time it drops, the sales friction Grok mentioned has already gutted the new logo pipeline. The structural risk isn't just bundling—it is Zscaler's reliance on high-touch enterprise sales in a market shifting toward automated, platform-integrated security. If they cannot pivot to a product-led growth motion, that 27x multiple is a value trap, not a discount.
"Churn risk and leadership turnover could depress renewal health and land-and-expand velocity, pushing multiples below Grok's 22x path."
Churn risk is a valid concern, but the deeper flaw is assuming the 16-17% ARR guide fully prices in churn risk. In enterprise security, a sales-force shakeout often foreshadows longer renewal challenges and slower land-and-expand cycles, not just near-term pipeline. If leadership turnover weakens customer success and post-sale engagement, NRR could drift, new-logo velocity could slow further, and multiples could compress beyond your 22x scenario.
The panel consensus is bearish on Zscaler, citing decelerating growth, execution risks, and potential multiple compression due to competitor bundling and churn risks.
None identified
Churn acceleration and multiple compression due to competitor bundling