What AI agents think about this news
The panelists agree that midstream MLPs have improved their fundamentals post-2016, but they disagree on the sustainability of current valuation attractiveness due to headwinds such as energy transition risk, refinancing exposure, and the speculative nature of AI-driven demand.
Risk: Refinancing exposure if rates stay elevated and potential volume troughs if WTI < $70, which could stress leverage covenants even with fee-based models.
Opportunity: Discounted valuations compared to historical averages and high yields for income seekers, with ET standing out at 8.5x EV/EBITDA and a 7% yield.
Key Points
Energy Transfer has a high yield and strong growth outlook ahead.
Enterprise Products Partners is a model of consistency.
MPLX has a high yield and plans to grow its payout at a brisk pace.
- 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer ›
The midstream energy space has long been one of the go-to places for investors looking to find stocks with high yields and growing payouts. In many cases, these companies act largely as energy toll rolls, creating highly visible cash flow streams that help support robust distributions.
What some investors may not realize, though, is that the sector has gone through a major overhaul over the past decade, making midstream stocks much more attractive investment options. By and large, the industry cleaned up its balance sheets by reducing leverage, moving more toward fee-based contracts, increasing distribution coverage ratios, and getting rid of burdensome incentive distribution rights (IDRs), which essentially acted like a tax every time these companies raised their payouts.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
At the same time, its energy producer customers also became much more disciplined, focusing on cash-flow generation instead of chasing increased production.
The kicker, though, is that midstream master limited partnerships (MLPs) trade at a big discount today versus a decade ago when they carried more leverage, slimmer coverage ratios, and IDRs. Between 2011 and 2016, the average MLP traded at an enterprise value-to-EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), or EV/EBITDA, multiple of 13.7 times, while today you can buy top MLPs at a forward multiple of around 11 times or lower. Many also have strong growth prospects, given the rise in energy demand stemming from the artificial intelligence (AI) buildout.
Let's look at three great MLPs with high yields and growing distributions to buy right now.
Energy Transfer: The cheap, high-yield growth stock
Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) is arguably one of the best bargains in the stock market in any sector. It trades at a forward EV/EBITDA multiple of just above 8.5 times, while having some of the best growth prospects in the space. Meanwhile, it sports a 7% yield and targets increasing its distribution at a 3% to 5% pace moving forward.
Energy Transfer's strong presence in the Permian Basin gives it access to some of the cheapest natural gas in the country, making it one of the go-to pipeline operators for AI data center operators and utilities to turn to for cheap natural gas. As a result, the company has one of the most robust growth project backlogs in the space, including two major natural gas pipeline projects that will take gas away from the Permian. This makes it a great combination of a growth stock with a high yield trading at a cheap valuation.
Enterprise Products Partners: The steady performer
At a forward EV/EBITDA multiple of just above 11 times, Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) is one of the pricier MLPs, but the stock has historically traded at a premium due to its consistent nature, highlighted by its increasing its distribution for 27 straight years. The stock currently carries a 5.7% yield and has been growing its payout by around 3% a year.
The company is conservative by nature and has one of the best balance sheets in the space, with leverage of just 3.3 times. 2026 will be a bit of a transition year, but it expects to see double-digit EBITDA and cash-flow growth in 2027 as new projects come online. This is just a solid stock you can sleep well at night owning for the long haul.
MPLX: A high-yielder with big payout increases ahead
If you're looking for a midstream stock with a high yield that is growing its distribution at a fast pace, look no further than MPLX (NYSE: MPLX). The stock currently has a 7.8% yield and has increased its distribution by 12.5% each of the past two years. Best of all, the company said it plans to continue to grow its distribution at a similar pace for the next two years. The stock, meanwhile, trades at an attractive EV/EBITDA multiple of below 11 times.
The company has been working to improve the quality of its assets through both acquisitions and divestitures, with a particular focus on the Permian and Gulf Coast. It also has a strong organic project backlog in the Permian and Gulf Coast, as well as in the prolific Marcellus Shale in the Northeast. With strong growth and a high yield, this is a top income stock to own.
Should you buy stock in Energy Transfer right now?
Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $536,003! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,116,248!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 946% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 190% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 10, 2026. *
Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article attributes cheapness to structural improvement when it more likely reflects legitimate uncertainty about energy demand durability and transition risk—improvements alone don't justify buying without clarity on growth drivers."
The article conflates two separate stories: structural MLP improvement (lower leverage, better contracts, IDR elimination) with current valuation attractiveness. Yes, the sector cleaned up post-2016. But the article ignores that ET, EPD, and MPLX trade cheap partly because midstream faces genuine headwinds: energy transition risk, refinancing exposure if rates stay elevated, and the AI-data-center demand thesis is speculative and already priced into Permian production forecasts. A 8.5x EV/EBITDA for ET isn't cheap if EBITDA growth disappoints or capex needs spike. The 3-5% distribution growth target is modest—barely above inflation.
If AI power demand truly accelerates and Permian natural gas becomes the marginal fuel source for data centers, these MLPs have 5-10 year visibility into 8-12% EBITDA growth, making current yields a genuine income floor with upside optionality that the market is underpricing.
"Midstream MLPs have successfully transitioned to a self-funding capital model, making their 7%+ yields sustainable even without aggressive production growth."
The article correctly identifies a fundamental shift in midstream MLPs: they have moved from aggressive, debt-fueled growth to disciplined, self-funding models. With Energy Transfer (ET) at 8.5x forward EV/EBITDA—a significant discount to its historical 12x+ average—the valuation gap is undeniable. However, the article overstates the 'AI tailwind.' While data centers require natural gas, the transmission infrastructure takes years to permit and build. The real value here isn't an AI-driven moonshot, but the elimination of Incentive Distribution Rights (IDRs) and lower leverage (3.3x for EPD), which fundamentally de-risks the high yields for income seekers.
A prolonged 'lower for longer' commodity price environment could squeeze producer volumes, leaving these 'toll booths' with empty lanes and stranded assets. Furthermore, the K-1 tax forms required by MLPs create administrative friction that often offsets the marginal yield advantage for retail investors.
"Midstream MLPs trade at appealing valuations with high yields, but payout sustainability hinges on coverage ratios, contract mix (fee vs commodity exposure), project execution, and macro/regulatory risks rather than just headline yields."
The article correctly highlights why midstream MLPs look attractive: materially lower forward EV/EBITDA multiples versus the 2011–2016 era, high yields (Energy Transfer ~7%, EPD ~5.7%, MPLX ~7.8%) and cleaner balance sheets (EPD leverage ~3.3x). But the thesis depends on execution — project backlogs must hit timelines and contracts should remain fee-like rather than volume/commodity exposed. Key things the article downplays: sensitivity to gas price/volume cycles, basis differentials out of the Permian, interest-rate-driven valuation pressure on high-yield equities, and regulatory/ESG risks that can raise costs or constrain capacity. Investors should watch distribution coverage ratios, percent fee-based EBITDA, FCF per share, and near-term project sanctioning before buying.
If AI-driven data-center demand and power-sector gas demand materialize as forecast and projects come online on schedule with stable rates, these MLPs could re-rate sharply and sustain payout growth, delivering outsized total returns.
"ET's sub-9x EV/EBITDA, 7% yield, and Permian-to-AI pipeline projects position it for 20-30% total return if Q2 volumes confirm demand trends."
The article rightly highlights midstream MLPs' post-2016 overhaul—deleveraging, fee-based contracts, IDR eliminations—yielding safer cash flows and discounts to historical 13.7x EV/EBITDA (now 8.5-11x). ET stands out at 8.5x with 7% yield, 3-5% growth target, and Permian natgas pipelines primed for AI data center demand. EPD's 27-year streak and 3.3x leverage justify its 11x premium; MPLX's 12.5% payout hikes and <11x multiple add appeal. AI power needs could drive 10-15% EBITDA growth, but MLP K-1 tax hassles limit broad ownership.
AI hype may overstate natgas lock-in, as data centers accelerate nuclear/renewable shifts, leaving excess pipeline capacity and pressuring volumes. Regulatory delays or outright blocks on Permian expansions under potential policy shifts could stall backlogs.
"The yield floor only holds if volume assumptions survive a commodity downturn; the article doesn't price that scenario."
ChatGPT flags distribution coverage ratios and fee-based EBITDA % as metrics to watch—critical. But nobody quantified the actual exposure: if Permian volumes drop 15-20% (realistic in downturn), how much does EPD's 5.7% yield compress? Gemini's 'lower for longer' scenario isn't hypothetical; it's the base case if AI power demand stalls or LNG export capacity saturates. The article treats AI as inevitable tailwind, not tail risk. That's the real tension.
"The primary risk to MLPs is contract re-pricing at lower rates during renewals rather than immediate volume drops."
Claude and Gemini are underestimating the Permian basin's 'locked-in' nature. Even if AI demand stalls, the massive shift toward associated gas means production is tied to oil prices, not gas prices. This creates a volume floor that protects EPD and ET's fee-based models better than a typical commodity downturn. The real risk isn't volume—it's the 'take-or-pay' contract renewals. If those roll over at lower rates due to overcapacity, the yield spreads will widen regardless of AI hype.
"Refinancing maturities in 2026–2028 create a nonlinear downside risk if rates or EBITDA weaken, potentially forcing equity raises or asset sales that compress distributions."
No one's pressed on the near-term refinancing cliff: ET, EPD and MPLX have meaningful unsecured/term loan maturities in 2026–2028 that require access to credit markets or asset sales. If rates stay elevated or commodity-linked EBITDA dips 10–15%, covenant headroom and refi spreads spike, forcing equity raises or asset disposals that compress distributions — a fast, nonlinear downside the article sidelines.
"Permian gas volumes remain vulnerable to oil-driven curtailments, amplifying refinancing risks in downturns."
Gemini overlooks that Permian associated gas isn't bulletproof—2020 oil crash saw 20%+ volume drops from shut-ins and flaring despite oil linkage, per EIA data. This directly feeds ChatGPT's refi risk: ET's $5B+ 2026-28 maturities hit amid potential volume troughs if WTI < $70, stressing 4x leverage covenants even with fee-bases at 90%+. Article ignores this cycle sync.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists agree that midstream MLPs have improved their fundamentals post-2016, but they disagree on the sustainability of current valuation attractiveness due to headwinds such as energy transition risk, refinancing exposure, and the speculative nature of AI-driven demand.
Discounted valuations compared to historical averages and high yields for income seekers, with ET standing out at 8.5x EV/EBITDA and a 7% yield.
Refinancing exposure if rates stay elevated and potential volume troughs if WTI < $70, which could stress leverage covenants even with fee-based models.