What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agreed that while the discussed stocks (GD, LMT, ITW) offer dividend stability and growth, they face significant risks that could impact their performance. These risks include sequestration, margin compression, liquidity risks, political risks, and cyclical downturns in their respective industries.
Risk: Margin compression due to cost inflation absorption and political risks, such as export controls and delays in foreign military sales.
Opportunity: Buying GD and LMT dips for income and growth, as suggested by Grok, given their massive backlogs and reliable free cash flow for dividends.
Key Points
General Dynamics' long-term contracts provide steady cash flow and visibility into future earnings.
Lockheed Martin is a leading defense contractor and benefits from growing defense budgets.
Illinois Tool Works leverages its expertise in high-margin sectors and has raised its payout for 62 consecutive years.
- 10 stocks we like better than General Dynamics ›
Income investors are drawn to dividend stocks for their steady stream of income. But dividend stocks are appealing for another reason: They tend to outperform non-dividend payers over long time periods. According to a Hartford Funds study, over a 50-year period, dividend payers returned an average of 9.2% annually, significantly outperforming non-dividend payers, which returned 4.3% annually.
The best dividend stocks demonstrate strong business performance across economic cycles and maintain prudent balance sheet management, enabling them to consistently pay dividends to investors. Industrial stocks can be an excellent place to look. With the stock market off to a slow start in 2026, here are three dividend-growing stocks to buy right now.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
General Dynamics' long-term contracts provide a steady stream of cash flow
General Dynamics (NYSE: GD) has increased its dividend payout for 35 consecutive years, a period that spans three recessions. What makes it a reliable dividend payer is its diversified business, which offers multiple levers for generating cash flow.
The company's largest segment is marine systems, where it builds nuclear-powered submarines and auxiliary ships for the U.S. Navy. Because shipbuilding contracts span decades, this provides it with long-term visibility into future revenue. On top of that, General Dynamics also owns Gulfstream, a leader in the premium business jet market. This business helps it capitalize on the growth of private sector wealth while also providing diversification from its government-dependent defense business.
The company benefits from growing defense spending and has secured several major contract wins. In March, it was awarded a Navy contract modification valued at $15.38 billion for the design, support, and sustainment of Columbia-class ballistic submarines. It was also recently awarded a contract for Virginia-class submarines, valued at up to $2.49 billion if all options are exercised.
General Dynamics has visibility into future earnings, which helps support its growing dividend. In March, the company increased its quarterly dividend payment 6% to $1.59 per share. Its position in defense provides it with a strong economic moat, making it an excellent dividend stock to invest in today.
Rising defense budgets should benefit Lockheed Martin
Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) is another defense-focused company with a 2.2% dividend yield and a 23-year history of dividend increases. The company is a top defense contractor that should benefit from rising defense spending. In 2026, the United States approved $1 trillion in defense spending, and projections suggest that could rise to $1.5 trillion in 2027.
Lockheed is a lead contractor on the F-35 fighter jets, and the sale and maintenance of them provides it with a steady stream of revenue that can span decades. The company also integrates space systems, hypersonic missiles, and advanced electronic warfare, making it a top defense contractor for the government.
In March, it signed a framework agreement with the Department of War (formerly Department of Defense) to quadruple the production capacity of the Precision Strike Missile in response to Operation Epic Fury in Iran, building on its $4.94 billion contract last year. As a top defense contractor, Lockheed has a steady backlog of work, giving it visibility into future earnings, which should support its growing dividend for years to come.
Illinois Tool Works' expertise provides a strong competitive moat
When it comes to longtime dividend payers, Illinois Tool Works (NYSE: ITW) has a long track record of rewarding investors. For 62 years, the company has raised its payout, and it is a member of the exclusive Dividend Kings club.
Illinois Tool Works does an excellent job of leveraging its highest-margin cash flow businesses to support its growing payout over time. The company offers products across several segments, including automotive, food equipment, and construction. Its automotive OEM segment is one of its largest, where it provides components such as fuel systems, braking components, and powertrain technology.
The company also provides specialized engineering solutions to help customers solve complex problems. Rather than just selling products from a catalog, Illinois Tool Works leverages its expertise to help customers overcome manufacturing hurdles, providing specialized solutions that give it a strong competitive moat. For investors searching for stability and growth, Illinois Tool Works is another solid dividend stock to scoop up today.
Should you buy stock in General Dynamics right now?
Before you buy stock in General Dynamics, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and General Dynamics wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $536,003! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,116,248!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 946% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 190% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 10, 2026. *
Courtney Carlsen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Illinois Tool Works and Lockheed Martin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Dividend growth alone does not justify 'buy now' without forward P/E, FCF yield, and balance-sheet leverage context—all absent from this article."
The article conflates dividend *growth* with investment quality—a dangerous move in a rising-rate environment. GD, LMT, and ITW are mature, slow-growth industrials trading on predictability, not upside. The 35/23/62-year dividend streaks are backward-looking; what matters is whether 2026–2028 cash generation justifies current valuations. Defense spending projections are real, but LMT's F-35 franchise faces production bottlenecks and political scrutiny. ITW's automotive exposure is a headwind as EV transition pressures OEM margins. The Hartford Funds study (9.2% vs 4.3% over 50 years) is cherry-picked; it ignores sequence-of-returns risk and survivorship bias. At what multiples are these 'buys'? The article never says.
If defense budgets genuinely climb to $1.5T by 2027 and supply-chain constraints ease, LMT and GD could see earnings accelerate faster than the market prices in, justifying near-term multiple expansion despite mature-company labels.
"The stability of long-term government contracts and dividend histories masks the risk of margin compression from inflationary pressure on fixed-price defense agreements."
The article presents a classic defensive play, but ignores significant valuation and operational headwinds. While Lockheed Martin (LMT) and General Dynamics (GD) benefit from a projected $1.5 trillion defense budget, their growth is tethered to government fiscal health and 'Operation Epic Fury' geopolitical volatility. Illinois Tool Works (ITW) boasts a 62-year dividend streak, but its heavy exposure to Automotive OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) makes it vulnerable to cyclical downturns and the high R&D costs of the EV transition. With the market 'off to a slow start in 2026,' these stocks offer safety, but their low yields (LMT at 2.2%) may not sufficiently compensate for the opportunity cost if growth sectors rebound.
In a stagflationary environment, the inelastic demand of defense contracts and ITW's specialized engineering moat provide rare earnings certainty that justifies a premium valuation.
"Strong dividend histories are useful signals, but program-level execution risk, political/budget volatility, and cyclicality are the decisive factors for future returns."
The article correctly flags three high-quality dividend growers — General Dynamics (GD), Lockheed Martin (LMT), and Illinois Tool Works (ITW) — but emphasizes streaks over nuanced risks. GD's submarine contracts and Gulfstream business provide cash visibility, yet submarine programs carry chronic cost overruns, schedule delays and political scrutiny; Gulfstream is cyclical and rate-sensitive. LMT benefits from defense backlogs, but budget politics, export controls and program delays (and aggressive assumptions about US defense spending) can bite. ITW's engineering moat is real, but it's exposed to industrial and automotive cycles and margin pressure. Also note factual slips in the article (e.g., “Department of War”), and missing valuation and payout-ratio analysis.
Despite these risks, the combination of multi-decade backlogs, high barriers to entry in defense and ITW’s margin-rich niches means these companies could compound cash returns for years, making a reasonably valued position still attractive.
"GD and LMT's decade-spanning contracts (e.g., $15B+ subs, F-35 sustainment) provide unmatched earnings visibility versus cyclical industrials like ITW."
General Dynamics (GD) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) shine with massive backlogs—GD's $15B+ Columbia sub contract and LMT's F-35 sustainment plus missile ramps—tied to multi-decade Navy/Air Force needs amid real geopolitical tensions (Ukraine, Taiwan). Defense budgets are climbing (FY2025 ~$850B actual vs. article's projected $1T), funding reliable FCF for dividends (GD yield ~2%, 35-year streak; LMT 23 years). ITW's 62-year Dividend King status is impressive, but its auto OEM exposure (20%+ revenue) risks EV transition headwinds and industrial slowdowns. Buy GD/LMT dips for income + growth; hold ITW.
Rising U.S. deficits ($35T+ debt) and potential 2027 sequestration could slash defense budgets 10-20%, hammering contract-funded cash flows just as article assumes endless spending growth.
"Sequestration hurts new awards, not legacy contracts; the real squeeze is whether these firms can sustain 5-7% dividend CAGR if margins compress and payout ratios are already elevated."
Grok flags the sequestration risk—real and underexplored. But the math needs scrutiny: a 10-20% defense cut hits *new* spending, not existing multi-year contracts. GD's Columbia sub and LMT's F-35 sustainment are largely locked in through 2028-2030. The *real* risk is margin compression if contractors absorb cost inflation rather than pass it through. Also, nobody's addressed payout ratios—if GD/LMT are already paying out 50%+ of FCF, dividend growth stalls even with flat earnings.
"Sovereign debt interest costs pose a greater threat to defense contractor cash flows than direct sequestration."
Claude and Grok are focusing on budget cuts, but they are ignoring the 'crowding out' effect of interest payments on the U.S. debt, which now exceed the defense budget. Even if contracts are 'locked in,' the government can delay progress payments or stretch out procurement timelines to manage cash flow. This creates a hidden liquidity risk for GD and LMT that isn't captured in backlogs. Dividend growth will likely decelerate toward 3-5% inflation-matching levels, not the historical double-digits.
"Political risk to foreign military sales can materially swing revenue, margins, and FCF for LMT and GD and is underappreciated in the debate."
You're all focused on backlogs and sequestration, but nobody's flagged export / Foreign Military Sales (FMS) political risk: a single denied or delayed sale (see past F-35/Turkey/Saudi episodes) can shift multiyear revenue, force inventory builds, and pressure margins. For LMT/GD, international business can be ~20–30% of defense revenue; political reversals or tightened export controls can erode FCF and imperil dividend growth faster than domestic budget noise.
"ITW's non-auto segments provide infrastructure-driven offset to risks, with dividend growth historically modest not double-digit."
Gemini misstates history—no Dividend King like ITW sustains double-digit growth (ITW ~7% CAGR 20y, GD/LMT ~5%); consensus FCF implies similar modest hikes regardless of macro noise. Bigger gap: ITW's welding/test segments (35%+ rev) gain from $1.2T infrastructure tailwinds, insulating vs auto EV headwinds more than acknowledged.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists generally agreed that while the discussed stocks (GD, LMT, ITW) offer dividend stability and growth, they face significant risks that could impact their performance. These risks include sequestration, margin compression, liquidity risks, political risks, and cyclical downturns in their respective industries.
Buying GD and LMT dips for income and growth, as suggested by Grok, given their massive backlogs and reliable free cash flow for dividends.
Margin compression due to cost inflation absorption and political risks, such as export controls and delays in foreign military sales.