Think You Can Ignore RMDs? Here's What It Could Cost You.

Key Points
Although RMDs can drive up your taxes, not taking them could lead to even worse consequences.
There are strategies you can use to lessen the blow of RMDs.
With proper planning, you can reduce RMDs or even eliminate them altogether.
- The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook ›
If you save for your senior years in a traditional retirement account, you won't have complete control over your money later in life. Once you turn 73 (or 75, depending on your year of birth), you'll have to start taking mandatory withdrawals known as required minimum distributions (RMDs).
If you're getting close to that point and are thinking you'll just ignore your RMDs, you may want to come up with a different plan. Blowing off your RMDs could prove to be a costly mistake.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Watch out for steep penalties
With a traditional individual retirement account (IRA) or 401(k), you get a tax break on your contributions. The IRS wants to get a chance to tax that money eventually, which is why it imposes RMDs.
RMDs are due every year by Dec. 31. If you don't take an RMD on time, you could face a 25% penalty on whatever sum you don't remove from your savings.
Now, if you have a small IRA with a $2,000 RMD, failing to take it means facing a $500 penalty. It's not a great thing to lose money, period, but a $500 penalty is one you may be able to recover from pretty easily.
If you're on the hook for a $40,000 RMD, though, then failing to take it on time could mean getting penalized $10,000. If you have a $100,000 RMD, not taking it could mean losing $25,000 to the IRS.
For this reason, ignoring RMDs isn't smart. But that doesn't mean you can't lessen the blow.
How to reduce the pain of RMDs
RMDs can trigger a potentially large tax bill, as well as other consequences. If they cause a big increase in your income, you could face taxes on Social Security benefits and surcharges on your Medicare premiums.
The good news is that there are steps you can take to reduce the blow of RMDs. One option is to do qualified charitable distributions, or QCDs. These allow you to send money from your retirement account directly to a qualifying charity, allowing you to avoid taxes.
QCDs can be done only from an IRA, not a 401(k). If you have a 401(k) plan, though, you should be able to roll that money into an IRA to allow for QCDs.
You can also look at doing Roth conversions ahead of retirement to get out of RMDs completely. Say you have $500,000 in a traditional retirement account, and you retire at age 63 and start living off of Social Security and wages from a part-time job.
In that scenario, you may be in a pretty low tax bracket. And you have 10 years before RMDs begin.
You could, at that point, convert $50,000 a year of your savings to a Roth IRA. You'll raise your tax bill each year, but you may not push yourself into an unreasonably high tax bracket if you space those conversions out.
As much as RMDs can be a thorn in your side, ignoring them could only make things worse. Rather than risk a penalty, find ways to make RMDs less of a problem -- or do a conversion that lets you off the hook completely.
The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.
One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.