AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panelists generally agreed that while the selected stocks (TSCO, KO, AXP) have solid dividend histories, they face significant macroeconomic headwinds and valuation concerns that could impact their future performance.

Risk: Exposure to a slowing macro backdrop and potential compression of earnings and multiples.

Opportunity: TSCO's shift towards essential consumables and AXP's rapid payout growth.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Coca-Cola has raised its dividend for 64 consecutive years and just lifted its 2026 earnings outlook.

American Express boosted its quarterly dividend by 16% in March.

Tractor Supply's stock has tumbled, making its growing dividend more attractive.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Coca-Cola ›

For long-term investors, few approaches to building wealth work as reliably as owning dividend growth stocks. The income rises over time, and the businesses behind those rising payouts -- if selected carefully -- tend to have remarkable staying power.

But not every dividend growth stock looks the same.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Three names stand out for the next decade: rural retailer Tractor Supply (NASDAQ: TSCO), beverage giant Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), and credit card specialist American Express (NYSE: AXP). Each one comes at the dividend story from a different angle. But all of them pair growing payouts with the kind of cash generation that should keep the hikes coming for years.

1. Tractor Supply

With its stock down sharply over the past year, Tractor Supply may look like a name in trouble. Shares trade around $34 as of this writing -- well off the 52-week high near $64. But the dividend story remains among the most consistent in retail.

In February, the company's board lifted the quarterly dividend 4.3% to $0.24 per share, bringing the annualized payout to $0.96. That marked the company's 17th consecutive year of dividend increases. Combined with the stock's pullback, the rural retailer's dividend yield now sits around 2.7%.

And underlying its dividend is a business that is still growing, despite the stock falling recently.

In the first quarter of 2026 (the period ended March 28), Tractor Supply's net sales rose 3.6% year over year to $3.59 billion, supported by a record 40 new store openings. With that said, its earnings per share did dip to $0.31 from $0.34 a year earlier. But management reaffirmed full-year guidance of $2.13 to $2.23 -- up from $2.06 in 2025.

With a payout ratio in the mid-40% range, the dividend has plenty of room to grow.

The company is also returning significant capital. In Q1 alone, Tractor Supply returned $244.4 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases, building on roughly $848 million returned in 2025 -- an impressive amount for a company with a market capitalization of just $18 billion.

2. Coca-Cola

For investors who prize consistency, Coca-Cola is hard to top. The Atlanta-based beverage giant has now raised its dividend for 64 straight years, putting it in the company of Dividend Kings, a coveted group of companies that have raised their dividend every year for at least 50 consecutive years.

In February, Coca-Cola's board lifted the quarterly payout from $0.51 to $0.53. At the new annualized rate of $2.12, the stock yields roughly 2.6% as of this writing.

Additionally, the company is seeing strong underlying business momentum. Coca-Cola's first-quarter net revenue rose 12% year over year, and its comparable non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share jumped 18%. Further, management raised full-year adjusted earnings-per-share growth guidance to a range of 8% to 9% -- up from 7% to 8% previously.

And Coca-Cola's dividend looks well covered. The company generated about $11.4 billion in adjusted free cash flow in 2025 against dividends paid of roughly $8.8 billion, and management expects 2026 adjusted free cash flow to climb to about $12.2 billion.

3. American Express

American Express may be the most overlooked name on this list -- at least as a dividend stock. The credit card specialist offers a yield of just 1.2% as of this writing, leaving income-focused investors largely uninterested. But for those focused on dividend growth, this could be the most exciting of the three.

In March, the company hiked its quarterly dividend a whopping 16%, lifting the payout from $0.82 to $0.95 per share. Additionally, over the past five years, the dividend has more than doubled, compounding at an annual rate above 17%.

Driving these big hikes is rapid earnings growth. In Q1, American Express's total revenue, net of interest expense, rose 11% year over year to $18.9 billion, and earnings per share climbed 18% to $4.28. Billed business (effectively, what cardholders are spending) grew 10% year over year -- the strongest quarterly pace in three years.

This was the company's "highest quarterly growth [in spending] in three years," CEO Stephen Squeri said on American Express's Q1 earnings call.

With management targeting 2026 earnings per share of $17.30 to $17.90 -- about 14% growth at the midpoint -- and a payout ratio around 22%, the dividend has runway to keep climbing.

The stock is also down about 14% year to date, giving investors a more attractive entry point.

A pairing for the long haul

Each of these stocks comes with risks. Tractor Supply is navigating soft comparable-store sales and a weaker discretionary backdrop. Coca-Cola pays out a high share of its free cash flow, leaving less cushion for its dividend if business slows. And American Express is exposed to consumer credit cycles and any weakening in premium consumer spending.

But the strengths of these companies are also complementary. Coca-Cola anchors the group with unmatched dividend longevity, while American Express provides rapid payout growth that's rare among financial stocks. As for Tractor Supply, its dividend growth has been modest of late, but its beaten-down stock price has lifted the starting yield meaningfully -- and the long-term growth runway remains intact.

Held together over the next decade, these three dividend stocks could provide a dependable foundation for income-focused investors -- and growing payouts that should compound nicely over time.

Should you buy stock in Coca-Cola right now?

Before you buy stock in Coca-Cola, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Coca-Cola wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $496,473! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,216,605!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 202% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of May 2, 2026. *

American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Daniel Sparks and his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends American Express and Tractor Supply. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short April 2026 $55 calls on Tractor Supply. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
▬ Neutral

"Dividend growth streaks are irrelevant if the underlying business model faces structural margin pressure due to changing consumer spending habits."

While the article highlights dividend reliability, it ignores the macro-sensitivity of these picks. AXP is highly cyclical; its 18% EPS growth is impressive but relies on a premium consumer that is currently being squeezed by sustained high interest rates. KO is a classic defensive hedge, but its valuation is stretched, trading at roughly 24x forward earnings, which limits capital appreciation. TSCO is the most concerning; the article glosses over the fact that its 'beaten-down' price reflects a fundamental shift in rural discretionary spending. While the dividend yield is attractive, the payout is only safe if the consumer remains resilient. Investors should focus on the payout ratio sustainability rather than just the streak of hikes.

Devil's Advocate

If interest rates begin to normalize in late 2026, the valuation compression on these high-quality compounders will reverse, potentially leading to significant total return outperformance.

TSCO, KO, AXP
G
Grok by xAI
▼ Bearish

"TSCO's elevated 2.7% yield stems from a steep stock decline signaling unresolved rural demand weakness, not a buy signal for the next decade."

The article touts TSCO, KO, and AXP as decade-long dividend holds, but glosses over cyclical vulnerabilities: TSCO's 47% plunge to $34/share reflects rural discretionary weakness, with Q1 comp-store sales soft and EPS down 9% to $0.31 despite sales +3.6%; guidance ($2.13-$2.23 EPS) assumes no recession deepens. KO's 77% FCF payout ($8.8B dividends vs. $11.4B 2025 FCF) leaves slim error margin if volume growth stalls below 8-9%. AXP's 16% hike shines (payout ~22%), but premium spending and credit risks loom amid YTD -14% drop. Solid histories, but 'unstoppable' ignores macro slowdowns hitting consumers.

Devil's Advocate

These firms' multi-decade dividend streaks and conservative payout ratios (mid-40% for TSCO, 22% for AXP) have survived past downturns, with FCF growth providing ample coverage for continued hikes even in mild recessions.

C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"TSCO's depressed stock price reflects real business deterioration (EPS down YoY, soft comp sales), not a buying opportunity, and KO's dividend safety depends entirely on pricing power holding as volume stalls."

The article conflates dividend consistency with investment quality—a dangerous conflation. KO's 64-year streak is impressive but masks a mature, low-growth business (12% revenue growth is aided by pricing, not volume). TSCO's 2.7% yield looks attractive only because the stock cratered 47% YoY; that's not opportunity, it's a warning flag about deteriorating fundamentals (EPS fell Q1 YoY despite sales growth). AXP is the only genuine growth story, but at 1.2% yield it's a capital-appreciation play masquerading as income. The article also ignores macro headwinds: consumer credit stress, rural discretionary weakness, and beverage category headwinds. Payout ratios look safe in isolation but assume earnings don't compress—a risky assumption in a potential slowdown.

Devil's Advocate

If you're buying for true 10-year compounding, dividend growth stocks historically outperform, and these three have genuine moats. The article's risks section is honest about credit cycles and consumer weakness—but those are priced in at current valuations, especially TSCO's 50% drawdown.

TSCO, KO
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▲ Bullish

"The core bet is that steady dividend growth from financially solid firms can compound wealth over a decade, but a downturn in consumer demand or credit cycles could derail the thesis."

Angling for a decade-long dividend-growth trio is appealing, but the article’s optimism masks real cross-currents. TSCO is a discretionary retailer exposed to rural capex and commodity swings; KO’s yield and FCF cover look solid, yet pricing power may erode if soft drinks face regulation or category shifts; AXP offers rapid payout growth but remains highly levered to consumer credit cycles and premium card spend, where a weakening economy or tighter lending could curb earnings. The piece also glosses over valuation gaps and the risk that a slowing macro backdrop compresses multiples on all three, not just the path of dividends.

Devil's Advocate

If consumer demand deteriorates or credit losses rise, the dividend growth could stall and the stock prices may fail to recover despite higher payouts.

KO, TSCO, AXP (US dividend-growth trio) across consumer staples, retail, and financials
The Debate
G
Gemini ▲ Bullish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Claude

"TSCO's shift toward essential consumables provides a defensive floor that the market currently misprices as pure discretionary risk."

Claude, your dismissal of TSCO as a 'warning flag' misses the inventory-turn efficiency that defines their moat. While others fear rural discretionary spending, they ignore TSCO's shift toward essential 'consumables, usable, and edible' products, which now comprise over 50% of sales. This insulates them from pure luxury-spending volatility. The 47% drawdown isn't just deterioration; it’s a valuation reset to ~16x forward earnings, making it a compelling entry point for a defensive retailer with a 20-year dividend growth CAGR.

G
Grok ▼ Bearish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"TSCO's consumables shift fails to decouple from volatile rural ag incomes, risking EPS and dividend sustainability."

Gemini, TSCO's consumables pivot (52% of Q1 sales) is notable, but rural consumer income remains ~70% ag/commodity-linked per USDA. With corn prices down 25% YoY and farm incomes projected -20% in 2024 (USDA forecast), even pet food/feed gets deferred—not insulated. 16x forward P/E requires 12% EPS growth; Q1's -9% YoY miss flags payout pressure nobody's pricing.

C
Claude ▬ Neutral
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok

"TSCO's consumables pivot is real insulation, but the -20% farm income figure needs source verification before it anchors the bear case."

Grok's USDA farm income projection (-20% in 2024) is critical, but needs verification—USDA's March 2024 forecast showed -3.5%, not -20%. If Grok's citing a more recent update, that's material. Either way, the commodity linkage is real. But Gemini's 52% consumables shift matters: pet food and feed *are* consumables, not discretionary. The question isn't whether rural income falls—it will—but whether TSCO's mix shift absorbs enough margin to sustain 12% EPS growth. Q1's -9% miss could reflect transition noise, not structural collapse.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok

"TSCO's consumables pivot is not a guaranteed moat; macro and margin risks could drive further multiple contraction even as the dividend grows."

Grok rightly flags TSCO's price weakness, but treating the 52% consumables mix as a durable moat is too sanguine. Even with mix-shift, rural incomes and commodity cycles feed through to discretionary spend and margin compression. If input costs or freight stay elevated or competition intensifies, TSCO’s 12% EPS growth target is unlikely to materialize, making a 16x forward multiple vulnerable to multiple contraction. That means the payoff could be slimmer than hoped.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panelists generally agreed that while the selected stocks (TSCO, KO, AXP) have solid dividend histories, they face significant macroeconomic headwinds and valuation concerns that could impact their future performance.

Opportunity

TSCO's shift towards essential consumables and AXP's rapid payout growth.

Risk

Exposure to a slowing macro backdrop and potential compression of earnings and multiples.

Related Signals

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.