The panelists largely agree that the current oil price near $100 is driven by geopolitical tensions, but they differ on the sustainability of this level. They also express concerns about potential risks such as a swift thaw in Iran tensions, higher rates, or regulatory headwinds for midstream companies.
Risk: A swift resolution to geopolitical tensions or a surprise OPEC+ easing could crash crude prices, denting earnings and shrinking crack spreads.
Opportunity: Investment in energy services (SLB, BKR) could benefit from the structural need for efficiency and maintenance, regardless of oil price fluctuations.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
POWER POINT
What I'm hearing from energy insiders
So… what now?
It seems to be the question many in the energy markets are asking. We are about to enter the ninth month of the Iran war. Or Iran "conflict." At this point, it's not very clear what to call it. The only thing right now that's "clear" …
Read more
POWER POINT
What I'm hearing from energy insiders
So… what now?
It seems to be the question many in the energy markets are asking. We are about to enter the ninth month of the Iran war. Or Iran "conflict." At this point, it's not very clear what to call it. The only thing right now that's "clear" is that very little is clear.
What we know… now.
Oil is moving through the Strait of Hormuz. Most Gulf nation export volumes are well up from their lows. Iran volumes are the exception. Those are down to the point of almost being nonexistent. From the little information that trickles out of the mostly closed country, it seems the Iranian economy is crumbling. Iran's currency is losing value, and people I speak with who have family there tell me they are increasingly worried about more economic pain ahead.
Iran has one main source of money: oil. Without oil, there is little money. Without money, there is little ability to buy the weapons, drones, and missiles that cause havoc and spread fear in the Gulf. Iran is going to grow more desperate, which makes Iran even more dangerous. In just the last week or so, multiple ships have been attacked. Iran's proxy gang - the Yemeni terror group known as the Houthis - has recently killed civilians in Saudi Arabia with attacks on the airport. They also blew up part of Aramco's headquarters.
The point is this is not just a grim recap of where we stand, but an attempt to understand where we're going. As I've said and written before… I have no idea. I'm not sure that anyone really does. The best we can do is gather as much information and intelligence as possible and make educated guesses. Sorry to say it, but right now, guessing is what many are doing. The markets remain one good or bad headline away from a $10 move in oil in either direction.
While we wait, oil markets stay elevated. The paper price of oil is around $100 per barrel. Most companies and countries don't use "paper" oil. As I wrote last week, the price of an actual physical barrel of oil is much, much higher than what you see on your screens. In some cases, it may be double.
Another of the few things we are clear on is that demand destruction is not here yet. All prices are up, and demand is staying relatively consistent. Sky-high diesel prices across Europe are going to hit demand, but they have not landed a knockout blow yet. $100 oil and $10 diesel are not what they used to be. Inflation has been a huge part of the global economic story since COVID and the lockdowns. Those were self-imposed, and I would argue that this is as well, because the attacks on Iran — whether you believe them to be just, given that regime's cruelty toward its own people — were a human decision. Humans got us into this, and humans are going to have to get us out.
It doesn't appear that we are any closer to a real resolution than we were a few months ago. Shipping costs continue to soar, and insurance is available but expensive.
So… what now?
What now is that we keep as calm as we can and carry on. Every week, I write Power Insider knowing tomorrow could be an entirely different headline. But like it or not, oil is the lifeblood of the global economy. And it will be for decades to come. So the oil must flow. And it is flowing. But at a cost.
Meantime, global markets wait for any scrap of clarity. What little we have will come from corporate earnings and any guidance management can provide. Energy services firm SLB (SLB) is first out of the gate with numbers on October 23. Baker Hughes (BKR) and natural gas exporter Cheniere Energy (LNG) are next. But the real focus comes on October 30, when both ExxonMobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX) show off their earnings. It's not rocket science knowing those numbers will be big. Sales will rise with the price of oil. Refining earnings will be even bigger. The biggest piece of news, however, will be whatever glimmer of guidance these companies feel confident enough to provide. My spider sense tells me it won't be much. While mega oil and gas companies pay for some of the greatest intelligence in the world, even the world's greatest intelligence gatherers are subject to the whims of rogues with missile launchers.
That's what's now… sadly.
Thanks for reading—and watching—and be safe in these crazy and often scary times.
—Brian
THE ACTIONABLE INSIDER
Global markets may be waiting for earnings, but Goldman Sachs isn't waiting to give clients advice on what to buy now. Neil Mehta and team are out with 10 energy stocks they love now, and I have thoughts.
Let's dig in.
Neil has loved the refining stocks for a while — a great call — but is now turning his focus to other names. He hasn't fallen out of love with the refiners; it's just that so much money has been made that he feels there are better opportunities elsewhere. Here are a few.
On the large-cap side, he loves two companies with new CEOs: ConocoPhillips (COP) and Occidental Petroleum (OXY).
Conoco's legendary boss, Ryan Lance, has made way for Andrew O'Brien. Neil doesn't see that as a problem, but is watching two things closely: COP's huge new Willow project in Alaska and the status of the damaged natural gas plant at QatarEnergy, in which ConocoPhillips is invested.
Occidental also has a new CEO, Richard Jackson, and Goldman recently upgraded the stock to Buy from Neutral with a $69 target. More bullishly, Goldman chose to add OXY to its vaunted "America's Conviction List." The company has long been saddled with high debt, but it's pushing through a new plan to improve cash flow. Investors have been rewarded with a solid 53% gain over the last year, but Neil Mehta sees more to come.
My Take → Energy investors are right to be nervous about oil and gas stocks. The group largely trades with the price of crude, so if we do get a meaningful peace with Iran — a big "if," I know — oil prices are likely to drop, perhaps meaningfully. I look forward to hopefully speaking soon with the CEOs of both ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum about all of this and more.
Those two are the megacaps. I'd like to now hit on two of the smaller-cap, less-talked-about stocks on Goldman's golden list.
First, Permian Resources (PR). This is a name you may have heard mentioned a few times recently. Despite the name, Permian operates a big chunk of the Delaware Basin, which is in New Mexico, not Delaware. Get to know oil geography. And get to know free cash flow. Neil and his team see PR's free cash flow growing around 20% for the next couple of years, benefiting from the company's shift to more "oil-focused production." While the analyst team would like to get more "clarity on the company's outlook for organic oil production growth" and regional pricing, it believes that the current macro environment is a tailwind for Permian Resources.
Also on Goldman's love list is TC Energy (TRP). The Canadian pipeline company has seen a big pullback in its stock, and that's one reason Neil and his team like it. They see TRP announcing more U.S. projects and are "more comfortable" with the company's funding outlook. TC Energy CEO François Poirier has spoken with us on CNBC a few times and expressed frustration about what he calls America's "underinvestment" in certain energy infrastructure.
My Take → More pipelines are bullish for TRP, but given the upcoming midterm elections in America and a good chance that both houses of Congress shift to Democratic control, the odds of more fossil fuel energy infrastructure being built are likely heading lower, not higher.
We always like to add value here on Power Insider, so here are nine of those ten stocks, ranked by possible upside versus the median Wall Street price target. TC Energy doesn't have an equivalent price target because it's listed in Canada.
The last name on that list - H.F. Sinclair - is one to focus on. It's the only one on the list trading at its median target, and maybe one reason Neil and his team are shifting their focus away from refiners. 'DINO' has had an epic run, but after a 138% gain in 12 months, it and other refiners may soon become extinct from new portfolios.
TAKE A LOOK
Two key interviews for you to watch this week. First, we spoke with energy legend Dan Yergin about the current state of the Middle East, Russia, diesel and fuel supplies.
Per The Actionable Insider above, here's our interview with Neil Mehta about his big oil stock call.
INSIDE LINE
This week's Inside Line is with Dan Pickering, founder and chief investment officer of Pickering Energy Partners. He has been a friend and great contact of mine for years and is a frequent face on CNBC.
RANDOM, BUT INTERESTING
The U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve continues to fall, and it's now at its lowest level since being filled. The question now is how low it can go before it becomes more difficult — and slower — to remove the oil. Some have suggested to me that when the SPR falls below 300 million barrels, the physics of pulling out the oil changes.
RBI→ The "SPR" is not one facility. It is a collection of old caves around Texas and Louisiana.
THE GRID
How Ukraine's drone strikes on Russia crippled the world's second-largest diesel supplier
Russia says it will send first diesel cargo to US on Thursday (Reuters)
Google says it can build data centers the right way. Some experts and residents are skeptical
Catch up with more on energy including interviews and video content from CNBC and Power Insider.
Read the last issue of Power Insider here.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“Near-term outperformance rests on oil staying elevated and refining margins holding, but that view is fragile if tensions ease or demand weakens.”
Oil staying near $100 and stronger refining margins create cash-flow tailwinds for COP, OXY, PR, and TRP, fitting the article’s 'energy must flow' thesis. But the strongest counterpoints are missing: a swift thaw in Iran tensions or a surprise OPEC+ easing could crash crude to the $80s and shrink crack spreads, denting earnings. Macro softness or higher rates could curb capex, weigh on Permian drilling, and slow pipeline volumes. The piece also glosses over balance-sheet risk—high leverage in some majors and midstream names—if discount rates rise. Still, cash-flow resilience keeps a near-term bullish bias, conditional on geopolitics staying tense.
The bounce is not guaranteed: a rapid oil price drop or collapsing crack spreads could erase favorable earnings, and high leverage + rising rates heighten risk of dividend cuts or capex restraint.
“Headline risk from any Iran resolution outweighs the near-term earnings tailwind for the recommended energy names.”
The article frames elevated oil near $100 and Goldman Sachs upgrades on COP, OXY, PR, and TRP as a straightforward long, citing strong physical prices and absent demand destruction. Yet it underplays how quickly a de-escalation in the Iran conflict could reverse those gains, notes physical barrels already trade at large premiums that may compress, and flags U.S. midterms raising pipeline permitting risk for TRP. Earnings from XOM and CVX on 30 Oct will likely beat, but guidance is expected to be muted. Investors chasing the names face headline-driven 10-point swings rather than durable re-rating. Refiners like DINO have already run 138% and are being rotated out.
A negotiated pause in Gulf hostilities could still leave structural supply constraints from underinvestment, keeping WTI above $85 and validating the Goldman list even after any initial relief rally.
“Upstream energy producers are currently priced for a permanent geopolitical crisis, leaving them highly vulnerable to mean reversion if supply-side tensions normalize.”
The article conflates geopolitical tail risk with fundamental valuation. While the 'war premium' in oil is undeniable, betting on upstream producers like COP or OXY based on current spot prices is a classic late-cycle trap. If the geopolitical tension cools or demand destruction finally hits via European diesel weakness, these stocks will see multiple compression. I am particularly skeptical of the 'buy the dip' thesis for TC Energy (TRP); infrastructure projects face massive regulatory headwinds in the U.S. regardless of the election outcome. Investors should pivot toward energy services (SLB, BKR) rather than producers, as they benefit from the structural need for efficiency and maintenance, regardless of whether oil is at $70 or $110.
If the geopolitical conflict in the Middle East escalates into a full-scale blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, all fundamental valuation metrics will be rendered irrelevant by a massive, sustained supply-side shock that drives oil prices toward $150.
“The article prices in a sustained geopolitical premium but underestimates the downside if Iran negotiations succeed or Houthi attacks are contained, leaving large-cap integrated oils vulnerable to a $15-20/barrel correction.”
The article conflates two separate trades: (1) a geopolitical risk premium in crude that may be overstated, and (2) fundamental strength in energy equities that Goldman is pivoting toward. The real risk: if Iran's economic collapse forces a negotiated settlement—or if Houthi attacks prove unsustainable—oil could crater 15-25% fast, dragging XOM, CVX, COP, and OXY down despite solid earnings. The article assumes elevated oil persists; it doesn't price the resolution scenario. TC Energy and Permian Resources are less crude-correlated, but TRP faces Democratic headwinds on pipeline permitting that the article barely mentions.
If oil stays $85-95 for 18 months (not $100+), these mega-cap energy stocks still generate massive free cash flow and buybacks—the geopolitical premium matters less than the base case. Goldman's picks could outperform even on lower crude.
The Debate
Responding to Gemini
“SLB/BKR are highly cyclical and would suffer if upstream capex tightens in a rate-hike environment, making a 'buy the dip' pivot to services riskier than Gemini suggests.”
Gemini, your pivot to SLB/BKR ignores cyclical fragility: service firms ride upstream capex, which collapses in a liquidity-tight, rate-hike regime. Even with higher oil, maintenance and efficiency spend can disappoint if customers delay projects. If the sector enters a protracted downturn, price competition for day rates and margin squeeze hurts SLB/BKR more than you expect. Implied risk: buybacks won't offset cyclicality; focus on contracted cash flows.
Responding to ChatGPT
“Midterm-driven permitting risks for TRP could cap midstream cash flows independently of oil prices or service-sector cyclicality.”
ChatGPT underplays how SLB and BKR's international LNG and offshore contracts can buffer U.S. capex swings, yet the larger gap is the combined effect of midterms on TRP permitting delays that Claude and Gemini noted. If Democrats retain influence, pipeline volumes and fees face structural caps regardless of oil at $100, eroding the cash-flow thesis for midstream even before any crude-price reversal hits producers.
Responding to Gemini
“The long-term structural supply deficit caused by capital discipline will outweigh short-term geopolitical volatility and service-sector cost inflation.”
Gemini, your pivot to services ignores the 'cost-inflation' trap: SLB and BKR face severe margin compression if labor and equipment costs outpace contract repricing. While Grok correctly highlights midstream permitting risks for TRP, you all miss that the real danger is the 'inventory overhang' in the Permian. If producers like COP and OXY focus on cash returns over growth, the resulting lack of new supply will eventually force a structural deficit, rendering your short-term geopolitical fears moot.
Responding to Gemini
“Permian underinvestment may be structural, but TRP's permitting headwinds are a more immediate earnings risk than Gemini's long-cycle supply thesis.”
Gemini's Permian inventory overhang thesis deserves scrutiny. COP and OXY have already shifted capex discipline toward returns over growth—but this isn't new; it's been the playbook since 2020. The real question: does *structural underinvestment* globally (not just U.S. producers) create a multi-year deficit that sustains $85+ oil? If yes, even muted guidance masks durable cash generation. Grok's midterm permitting risk for TRP is more concrete and near-term than Gemini's long-cycle supply deficit.
Panel Verdict
NEUTRAL No ConsensusThe panelists largely agree that the current oil price near $100 is driven by geopolitical tensions, but they differ on the sustainability of this level. They also express concerns about potential risks such as a swift thaw in Iran tensions, higher rates, or regulatory headwinds for midstream companies.
Investment in energy services (SLB, BKR) could benefit from the structural need for efficiency and maintenance, regardless of oil price fluctuations.
A swift resolution to geopolitical tensions or a surprise OPEC+ easing could crash crude prices, denting earnings and shrinking crack spreads.
Related News
How Long To Rebuild The Gulf? Paul Sankey And Arjun Murti Debate Oil's Future Tonight At 7pm ET
Trump faces growing backlash over plans to import diesel from Russia
Trump wants to reduce the cost of fuel as the midterms loom - will it work?
Saudi Aramco chief says replenishing global oil stockpiles could take two years
Stocks, Bonds Climb as Oil Falls on US-Iran Hopes
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.