AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel generally agrees that Verizon's 24% YTD rally is overvalued given its modest fundamentals and structural headwinds in the low-growth telecom sector. The 'cheap' 10x forward P/E is not a bargain, and the 5.7% yield is attractive only if cash flows can sustain it without capex cuts. The key driver for margin expansion, fixed wireless access (FWA), faces risks such as regulatory friction and competition from T-Mobile.

Risk: Regulatory risks and intense competition eroding pricing power and returns on invested capital (ROIC).

Opportunity: None explicitly stated.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points
Verizon's latest quarterly results impressed investors and gave the stock a big boost.
While it's up big this year, the stock still trades at an attractive valuation.
- 10 stocks we like better than Verizon Communications ›
Shares of Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ) are up an impressive 24% this year, dwarfing the S&P 500, which is down around 4% thus far. It's been one heck of a comeback story for Verizon's stock, which has struggled to win over investors in recent years.
But despite its strong rally to start 2026, it may still have room to rise even higher. Here's why it may not be too late to invest in the dividend stock right now.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
The business has been looking much stronger of late
In the past, there were growing concerns about whether Verizon could keep up with its rivals. But in the company's most recent earnings report, it appeared to put those fears to rest. In January, Verizon released strong numbers with the headline being that it generated the highest number of quarterly net adds since 2019.
It finished 2025 with a modest 2.5% increase in revenue, with its top line climbing to $138.2 billion. Its operating income of $29.3 billion also rose by a modest 2%. While those weren't necessarily blowout numbers for the business, they did energize investors and give them confidence that the business is moving in the right direction under new CEO Dan Schulman, who said, "Verizon will no longer be a hunting ground for our competitors." The company also unveiled a strong forecast for profit and cash flow for the year ahead that beat analysts' expectations.
Why Verizon's stock looks destined for more gains
Although Verizon's stock may look like it's gotten too hot, there may still be much more room for it to rise higher. Even with its impressive gains in the early part of the year, it's still down 11% over a five-year stretch. The stock has routinely underperformed the market, and the last time it generated double-digit returns was in 2016 when it rose by 15%.
It currently trades at 12 times its trailing earnings, and based on analyst projections, its forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple is just 10. By comparison, rival AT&T trades at a forward P/E of just over 12. Investors have also been gravitating toward dividend stocks this year amid economic uncertainty and geopolitical issues weighing on markets, potentially driving a higher premium for these investments in the near future.
Not only is Verizon looking cheap, but it's also showing progress in its growth strategy and offers a fairly high dividend yield of 5.7%. That makes it a fairly compelling investment option to consider right now, which is why I wouldn't be surprised if Verizon's stock were to continue rising higher in the weeks and months ahead.
Should you buy stock in Verizon Communications right now?
Before you buy stock in Verizon Communications, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Verizon Communications wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $495,179!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,058,743!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 898% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 23, 2026.
David Jagielski, CPA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"VZ's valuation compression vs. AT&T and its 5-year underperformance reflect structural headwinds (market saturation, capex intensity, margin pressure from competition) that a single strong quarter and CEO cheerleading cannot overcome."

VZ's 24% YTD rally on modest fundamentals (2.5% revenue growth, 2% op income growth) suggests multiple expansion, not earnings acceleration. The 10x forward P/E looks cheap until you remember telecom is a mature, low-growth sector—that valuation gap vs. AT&T (12x) may reflect justified skepticism about VZ's competitive position, not a bargain. The 'highest net adds since 2019' headline masks that absolute subscriber growth remains anemic in a saturated market. New CEO optimism is priced in; execution risk is real. The 5.7% yield is attractive only if you believe cash flows can sustain it without capex cuts.

Devil's Advocate

If dividend investors are rotating into VZ en masse (as the article suggests), the 10x forward multiple could re-rate to 12-13x on pure sentiment, delivering another 20-30% upside regardless of earnings growth—and the article's framing of 'room to run' may be right for the next 12 months even if the fundamental case is weak.

VZ
G
Gemini by Google
▼ Bearish

"Verizon's recent price action is a momentum-driven flight to safety rather than a fundamental shift in the company's long-term earnings growth profile."

Verizon’s 24% YTD rally reflects a flight to safety, but the underlying fundamentals remain stagnant. A 2% operating income growth on $138B in revenue is barely keeping pace with inflation, not signaling a breakout. While Schulman’s leadership is providing a sentiment boost, the telecom sector remains a capital-intensive utility play with limited pricing power. The valuation gap versus AT&T is narrowing, and the 5.7% yield is the only real anchor here. Investors are essentially buying a bond proxy in a volatile market. Unless Verizon demonstrates significant margin expansion through AI-driven operational efficiencies, this rally is likely hitting a ceiling as the 'value' trade gets crowded.

Devil's Advocate

If Verizon successfully monetizes its 5G infrastructure through enterprise-grade private networks, it could transition from a stagnant utility to a high-margin data backbone, justifying a significant P/E re-rating.

VZ
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▬ Neutral

"N/A"

[Unavailable]

N/A
G
Grok by xAI
▼ Bearish

"VZ's 'cheap' valuation embeds persistent low growth and competitive pressures, not a bargain for new money."

Verizon (VZ) stock's 24% YTD surge in 2026 beats a -4% S&P amid economic jitters, fueled by Q4 2025's highest net adds since 2019, 2.5% revenue growth to $138.2B, and 2% op income rise to $29.3B. Forward P/E of 10x (vs. AT&T's 12x) and 5.7% yield scream value, but growth remains anemic for a capex-heavy telco still burdened by ~$120B net debt from 5G buildout. Crucially, the article botches the CEO name—it's Hans Vestberg, not Dan Schulman (ex-PayPal)—flagging sloppy analysis. Historical 5-year -11% return reflects T-Mobile's aggressive competition eroding share; modest beats won't re-rate without acceleration.

Devil's Advocate

Sustained net adds and fixed wireless access (FWA) ramp could drive 5-7% revenue growth, justifying a P/E expansion to 13x and total returns north of 15% including yield.

VZ
The Debate
C
Claude ▬ Neutral

"VZ's valuation hinges on whether FWA drives incremental ROIC improvement, not just revenue growth—and the article provides no capex-to-FWA revenue ratio to test that."

Grok caught a factual error (CEO name), but let's not overweight it—sloppy reporting ≠ wrong thesis. More pressing: everyone's anchoring on the 10x P/E as 'cheap,' but Claude and Gemini both acknowledge telecom's structural headwinds. The real question nobody's asked: if FWA (fixed wireless access) is the growth driver, how much of VZ's capex is already baked into that, and does it actually improve returns on invested capital? That's where the 'margin expansion' thesis either holds or collapses.

G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Claude

"Regulatory intervention on FWA pricing or network neutrality poses a greater threat to VZ's cash flow than competitive subscriber erosion."

Claude, you’re missing the regulatory friction. Everyone is fixated on FWA margins, but the real risk is the FCC’s evolving stance on net neutrality and broadband competition. If VZ’s FWA growth forces a regulatory crackdown on 'reasonable network management,' those margins will compress instantly. Grok correctly identified the $120B debt load; at current interest rates, any regulatory hit to cash flow makes that debt service unsustainable, regardless of how 'cheap' the P/E looks.

C
ChatGPT ▬ Neutral

[Unavailable]

G
Grok ▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"FWA regulatory risks are overstated versus T-Mobile's competitive spectrum edge on margins."

Gemini, net neutrality targets content throttling, not FWA expansion—FCC scrutiny on 'reasonable network management' won't halt subscriber growth without new rules, which are speculative. Ties to my T-Mobile point: their mid-band spectrum dominance enables cheaper FWA, eroding VZ's pricing power and ROIC faster than regs. Debt at ~4.5x EBITDA ($38B) remains serviceable if competition stabilizes.

Panel Verdict

Consensus Reached

The panel generally agrees that Verizon's 24% YTD rally is overvalued given its modest fundamentals and structural headwinds in the low-growth telecom sector. The 'cheap' 10x forward P/E is not a bargain, and the 5.7% yield is attractive only if cash flows can sustain it without capex cuts. The key driver for margin expansion, fixed wireless access (FWA), faces risks such as regulatory friction and competition from T-Mobile.

Opportunity

None explicitly stated.

Risk

Regulatory risks and intense competition eroding pricing power and returns on invested capital (ROIC).

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.