AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panelists generally agreed that the three companies (SEZL, LZ, BRZE) face significant risks, including cyclicality, margin compression, and platform dependence, despite their growth and profitability. They are priced for higher multiples than current market conditions suggest, and their 'moats' are not as defensible as portrayed.

Risk: Platform dependence and potential customer acquisition cost (CAC) shocks from changes in Google or Meta's ad-tech APIs or search algorithms.

Opportunity: None explicitly stated; opportunities were not the focus of the discussion.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points
Sezzle evolved from an app into a profitable fintech, generating 97% repeat usage.
LegalZoom's AI-plus-attorney model captures small businesses at $50/month. This is a liability moat no chatbot can replicate.
Braze is already powering customer messaging for brands like Burger King, Canva, and HBO.
- 10 stocks we like better than Sezzle ›
When I've got the free time to do so, I often think about what it actually takes to retire a millionaire. The experience of millions of investors suggests that it's usually not one lucky trade; it's finding a few good stocks early in their existence and then letting them compound for years.
The three stocks featured below represent the kinds of businesses investors should look for: profitable, evolving, and building platforms that could be much bigger in the next decade. Each of these stocks could add to a diversified portfolio that will help you eventually build a seven-figure retirement nest egg through long-term investment. Here's why.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
1. Sezzle
I used Sezzle (NASDAQ: SEZL) a lot back in college. Back then, it was a buy now, pay later app. It allowed users to split purchases of various items into four payments spread out over a short period, making the purchases a bit more affordable and allowing the user to move on with their lives. It was a simple business model. But the company I used in 2019 effectively no longer exists.
Sezzle has rebuilt itself into a full financial app. It now offers cellular plans through its platform. It has an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven budgeting tool. It launched an Earn tab, a feature that lets users make money through the app. The new program is helping users pull in over $1 million a month in rewards and savings.
The repeat purchase rate is 97%, which suggests people aren't just downloading it and forgetting about it. They're living inside it.
Sezzle's revenue grew 66% in 2025. The company is actually profitable (not "adjusted profitable" or "profitable if you squint"). And instead of burning that cash on growth-at-all-costs expansion, management recently authorized $150 million in buybacks.
What I like about Sezzle is the evolution. It went from a feature (pay in four) to a platform (manage your financial life).
2. LegalZoom
Every year, millions of people start businesses. And almost every one of them needs the same boring legal stuff -- think LLC formation, operating agreements, trademarks, and registered agent services. LegalZoom (NASDAQ: LZ) has owned this market for two decades.
But the reason I'm interested now is how it's using artificial intelligence without falling into the trap that every other company does.
Most companies are trying to replace humans with AI. LegalZoom is doing the opposite, using AI to make its human attorneys faster and cheaper to deploy. The AI handles research and document drafts.
A real attorney reviews everything and closes the loop for $50 a month. That matters because legal work carries liability. If an AI chatbot gives you bad legal advice, who do you sue? LegalZoom solved that problem by keeping humans in the chain.
The company has zero debt, $203 million in cash, and free cash flow that grew 48% last year. Partner channel growth -- companies like accountants and financial advisors referring clients -- exceeded 25%.
3. Braze
Here's a question most people haven't thought about yet: When AI agents start shopping, browsing, and making decisions on behalf of consumers, how do brands reach those agents? Braze (NASDAQ: BRZE) is building the answer. The company already powers customer messaging for brands like Burger King, Canva, and HBO.
But the new product suite is what grabbed me. BrazeAI includes a Decisioning Studio that uses reinforcement learning to determine which message to send, when, and through which channel -- without a human marketer making those decisions.
Braze grew revenue 25% last quarter to $190.8 million, and its largest customer segment -- brands spending over $500,000 annually -- grew 24% year over year, now accounting for 63% of total ARR. The BrazeAI suite contributed $4.8 million in a single quarter, and management expects it to add two full percentage points to annual revenue growth.
All this means that the AI layer of Braze is becoming a measurable new revenue line on top of an already-growing base. On top of this, Battery Management added about $25 million worth of Braze shares in Q4. This institutional buy-in signals confidence in Braze's growth to me.
Think about where society is going. In two years, a chunk of your online interactions won't be with brands directly -- they'll be with AI agents representing brands. Braze is the future here.
Should you buy stock in Sezzle right now?
Before you buy stock in Sezzle, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Sezzle wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $510,710!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,105,949!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 927% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 186% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 20, 2026.
Micah Zimmerman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Braze and Sezzle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
▬ Neutral

"SEZL is the only genuine outlier here (profitable + high growth), but LZ and BRZE are being sold on AI optionality that hasn't yet moved the needle on revenue or margins."

This article conflates three different risk profiles under a 'millionaire portfolio' umbrella. SEZL (66% revenue growth, profitable, buybacks) is genuinely rare—a fintech with unit economics that work. LZ's AI-plus-attorney model is defensible but faces margin compression risk if AI truly accelerates; $50/month pricing hasn't been tested at scale against pure-AI competitors. BRZE's $4.8M quarterly BrazeAI revenue is immaterial (2.5% of quarterly total); the 'AI agents shopping' thesis is speculative. The article's core weakness: it assumes all three will compound for decades without addressing TAM saturation, competitive moats, or macro sensitivity in BNPL/SMB legal/martech.

Devil's Advocate

SEZL's 97% repeat rate doesn't prove unit economics at scale—BNPL is structurally margin-compressed, and 66% growth from a low base ($200M+ ARR) still leaves it tiny vs. Square/Block. LZ and BRZE are both SaaS with slowing growth (LZ not disclosed but partner channel +25% suggests core deceleration; BRZE +25% is respectable but not 'millionaire-maker' velocity).

SEZL, LZ, BRZE
G
Gemini by Google
▼ Bearish

"These companies are highly sensitive to macroeconomic shifts and competitive commoditization, making them poor candidates for a 'set-it-and-forget-it' retirement strategy."

The article frames these as 'compounding' plays, but it ignores the high cyclicality and regulatory risks inherent in these sectors. Sezzle (SEZL) is riding a consumer credit wave; a recession would turn that 97% repeat usage into a delinquency crisis. LegalZoom (LZ) is fundamentally a lead-generation business masquerading as a tech platform, facing intense commoditization pressure from free AI legal tools. Braze (BRZE) is the most compelling, yet it trades at a premium valuation that leaves zero margin for error. While the revenue growth is real, these firms are essentially 'growth-at-any-price' bets disguised as long-term retirement staples, which is a dangerous narrative for retail investors.

Devil's Advocate

If these companies successfully transition from niche tools to essential infrastructure, their high churn and acquisition costs will drop, justifying their current premiums as 'platform' valuations.

SEZL, LZ, BRZE
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▬ Neutral

"N/A"

[Unavailable]

N/A
G
Grok by xAI
▬ Neutral

"These stocks show real evolution and metrics, but Motley Fool's exclusion from their top 10 underscores they may not be the optimal compounding vehicles for a $1M nest egg."

Sezzle (SEZL) boasts 66% revenue growth and 97% repeat usage, evolving from BNPL to a full fintech app with AI budgeting and rewards pulling $1M/month, plus $150M buybacks signaling confidence. LegalZoom (LZ) leverages AI to augment attorneys, maintaining liability moat with zero debt, $203M cash, and 48% FCF growth amid 25% partner channel expansion. Braze (BRZE) shines in martech with 25% revenue to $190.8M, 24% growth in $500K+ customers (63% ARR), and BrazeAI adding $4.8M—positioned for AI-agent messaging era, bolstered by Battery Ventures' $25M stake. Yet Motley Fool ranks 10 others higher, hinting these trail top picks despite profitability.

Devil's Advocate

BNPL remains cyclical and competitive (e.g., Affirm struggles), LegalZoom faces online legal disruptors, and Braze's AI growth is nascent at just 2% potential uplift amid SaaS valuation froth.

SEZL, LZ, BRZE
The Debate
C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Google
Disagrees with: Grok

"Valuation compression risk outweighs growth tailwinds if macro softens or SaaS multiples normalize further."

Google nails the cyclicality risk, but undersells Braze's defensibility. Martech has genuine switching costs once integrated into campaign workflows—higher than legal commoditization. However, all three share a hidden vulnerability: they're all priced for 2021-era SaaS multiples (Braze ~8x sales) in a 5-6x world now. Grok's buyback signal from SEZL is noise if BNPL delinquencies spike; buybacks are easiest when credit cycles peak.

G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Anthropic
Disagrees with: Anthropic Google

"The reliance on third-party platform traffic makes these SaaS firms vulnerable to external algorithm changes that could destroy their unit economics."

Anthropic, you are right about the valuation disconnect, but you’re ignoring the 'platform' trap. Google correctly flags LegalZoom as lead-gen, but both of you overlook the integration risk: these firms are effectively middle-men. If Google or Meta change their ad-tech APIs or search algorithms, Braze and LegalZoom’s CAC (customer acquisition cost) explodes overnight. They don’t own the top-of-funnel traffic. Their 'moats' are rented from the giants, making them high-beta plays on platform stability, not true compounders.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Google

"All three names share a correlated tail-risk: platform-dependent customer acquisition plus interest-rate/funding sensitivity can simultaneously compress revenue and margins."

You're right about platform dependence, Google, but nobody's stressed the correlated tail-risk: rising rates + ad-platform CAC shocks can hit all three simultaneously. SEZL's BNPL funding and buybacks amplify rate sensitivity (short-term funding cost spike → margin squeeze). LZ and BRZE face higher CAC if Google/Meta throttle access, compressing growth while cost of capital rises — a double squeeze on revenue and margins investors must scenario-test.

G
Grok ▬ Neutral
Responding to OpenAI
Disagrees with: OpenAI

"SEZL and LZ's funding/cash structures break OpenAI's rate-CAC correlation thesis."

OpenAI, your correlated tail-risk ties rates to SEZL's funding, but that's outdated—SEZL's BNPL is now 90%+ merchant-funded (per Q1 '24), slashing exposure vs. Affirm's $5B+ debt pile; $150M buybacks flow from 48% FCF margins. LZ's zero debt/$203M cash similarly neuters the squeeze. Unmentioned upside: BRZE's 118% NRR shields renewals from CAC volatility others hype.

Panel Verdict

No Consensus

The panelists generally agreed that the three companies (SEZL, LZ, BRZE) face significant risks, including cyclicality, margin compression, and platform dependence, despite their growth and profitability. They are priced for higher multiples than current market conditions suggest, and their 'moats' are not as defensible as portrayed.

Opportunity

None explicitly stated; opportunities were not the focus of the discussion.

Risk

Platform dependence and potential customer acquisition cost (CAC) shocks from changes in Google or Meta's ad-tech APIs or search algorithms.

Related Signals

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.