What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is that the article is factually inaccurate and over-speculative, with significant risks outweighing potential opportunities.
Risk: High concentration and illiquidity risk in funds offering pre-IPO exposure to SpaceX, and the potential for capital rotation away from Tesla in the event of a SpaceX IPO.
Opportunity: None identified
Key Points
SpaceX recently filed for an initial public offering (IPO), but investors can get pre-IPO exposure to the rocket and satellite company.
The Ark Venture Fund has 17% of its assets invested in SpaceX, and the Baron Partners Fund has 33% of its assets in the company.
Alphabet owns roughly a 7% stake in SpaceX, and its diversified business makes it the least risky way to get pre-IPO exposure to the company.
- 10 stocks we like better than ARK Venture Fund ›
In April, SpaceX confidentially filed initial public offering (IPO) paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The company will host its IPO roadshow in June, where executives will pitch the stock to money managers. Shares will likely start trading on the public market by July.
The IPO promises to be a blockbuster event that draws particularly heavy demand from retail investors. SpaceX is reportedly seeking a $1.75 trillion valuation, which would immediately make it one of the 10 most valuable public companies in the world. Additionally, CEO Elon Musk hopes to raise $75 billion, more than double the current record for an IPO.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
For investors who cannot wait until SpaceX goes public, there are ways to get exposure to the rocket maker today. I will discuss three, starting with the most risky and ending with the least risky.
1. Ark Venture Fund
The Ark Venture Fund (NASDAQMUTFUND: ARKVX) is an actively managed interval fund that owns stock in 68 public and private equities. It seeks to "democratize venture capital, offering all investors access to what we believe are the most innovative companies." The top five positions are listed below:
SpaceX:17%OpenAI:11%Replit:5%Figure AI:4%Anthropic:4%
The Ark Ventures Fund returned 147% (28% annually) since its inception in 2022, beating the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) by 80 percentage points. Heavy exposure to SpaceX factored meaningfully into those gains, as did heavy exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) start-up OpenAI.
However, the Ark Ventures Fund is a rather risky way to get pre-IPO exposure to SpaceX for three reasons. First, its high net expense ratio of 2.9% means shareholders will pay $290 per year on every $10,000 invested in the fund. Second, as an interval fund, investors cannot sell at their discretion. Instead, Ark provides liquidity on a quarterly basis by offering to buy shares. Third, the fund is heavily invested in private companies.
2. Baron Partners Fund Retail Shares
The Baron Partners Fund Retail Shares (NASDAQMUTFUND: BPTRX) is an actively managed mutual fund that owns stock in about 25 companies, most of which are publicly traded. It seeks "capital appreciation through investments in growth companies of any size with significant long-term potential." The top five positions are listed below:
SpaceX:33%Tesla:20%Arch Capital Group:5%MSCI:4%Hyatt Hotels:4%
The Baron Partners Fund achieved a total return of 741% (23.7% annually) over the past 10 years, outpacing the S&P 500 by more than 450 percentage points. The driving force behind those astronomical gains was heavy exposure to SpaceX and Tesla.
Importantly, unlike the Ark Ventures Fund, shareholders can sell the Baron Partners Fund at their discretion. However, despite being more liquid, this fund is still fairly risky because it is concentrated in two companies. Also, the Baron Partners Fund has an expense ratio of 2.24%, meaning shareholders will pay $224 per year on every $10,000 invested.
3. Alphabet
In 2015, Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) (NASDAQ: GOOG) invested $900 million in SpaceX. The rocket and satellite company was worth approximately $12 billion at the time, which means Alphabet owned a roughly 7.5% stake.
That investment has already paid off handsomely. In 2026, SpaceX was valued at $1.25 trillion when it merged with xAI, meaning Alphabet's stake is now worth over $100 billion.
Looking ahead, if SpaceX does go public with a $1.75 trillion valuation, Alphabet's stake would climb to more than $120 billion. Alphabet shareholders would benefit because unrealized gains would hit the bottom as generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) earnings but also because SpaceX shares would be more liquid, meaning Alphabet could sell its stake for a substantial amount of cash.
Compared to the funds discussed, owning Alphabet stock is a less risky way to get SpaceX exposure before its IPO because Alphabet has a strong presence in three growing markets: advertising, cloud computing, and autonomous driving. Indeed, Wall Street expects the company's earnings to increase at 15% annually over the next three years, which makes the current valuation of 30 times earnings look reasonable.
Should you buy stock in ARK Venture Fund right now?
Before you buy stock in ARK Venture Fund, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and ARK Venture Fund wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $550,348! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,127,467!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 959% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 11, 2026. *
Trevor Jennewine has positions in Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, MSCI, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Hyatt Hotels. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article's core timeline is factually incoherent (2026 merger already happened vs. pending 2025 IPO), and indirect SpaceX exposure via these vehicles offers poor risk-adjusted returns given illiquidity, fees, and concentration risk."
This article contains a critical factual error that undermines its entire premise: it states SpaceX merged with xAI in 2026 and was valued at $1.25 trillion, yet claims the IPO filing happened in April with a $1.75 trillion valuation target. The timeline is internally contradictory—if a merger already occurred, there's no pending IPO. Beyond this, the article ignores that pre-IPO exposure via mutual funds carries illiquidity risk (ARKVX quarterly gates, BPTRX concentration) and that Alphabet's 7% stake, while real, represents only ~7% of GOOGL's value—hardly transformative. The 'blockbuster IPO' framing also overlooks execution risk: $75B raises are unprecedented, and regulatory/market conditions could shift dramatically by July.
If SpaceX's valuation has already inflated to $1.75T pre-IPO, retail investors buying mutual funds or GOOGL at current prices may be chasing gains already priced in; the IPO could underwhelm or face demand destruction if macro conditions deteriorate.
"The article's premise of a SpaceX IPO filing and a $1.75 trillion valuation is factually incorrect and appears to be hallucinated or based on fabricated data."
This article is riddled with factual errors and speculative fiction. SpaceX has not filed for an IPO; it remains a private company with no confirmed public timeline. The claim of a '$1.75 trillion valuation' is a 10x leap from the actual $180-$200 billion secondary market valuations reported in early 2024. Furthermore, the article references a non-existent 2026 merger with xAI. While ARKVX and BPTRX do offer legitimate exposure to SpaceX, the 2.9% and 2.24% expense ratios are predatory for retail investors. Alphabet's stake is a rounding error in its $2 trillion market cap, providing negligible 'upside' from SpaceX performance alone.
If the article is actually a leaked or 'future-dated' piece that accidentally published early, the underlying logic of using Baron Partners (BPTRX) for concentrated exposure remains the only viable path for non-accredited investors despite the high fees.
"Alphabet is the safest pre-IPO way to gain meaningful SpaceX exposure, but it’s an inefficient and partially priced hedge—don’t buy GOOGL solely for speculative, blockbuster SpaceX upside without accepting accounting, dilution, and execution uncertainties."
The article lists three pre-IPO routes: concentrated private-heavy funds (ARKV X, BPTRX) and indirect exposure via Alphabet (GOOGL). The headline risk is concentration and liquidity: ARK and Baron carry hefty SpaceX weights (17% and 33%) plus >2% expense ratios and limited resale flexibility (interval fund/illiquid private stakes or concentrated single-stock risk). Alphabet is the lower-risk path but the piece glosses over important details: whether Alphabet’s gain flows to GAAP earnings depends on accounting classification, and any IPO could dilute existing stakes or be subject to lock-ups. A $1.75T target and $75B raise feel speculative; execution, regulatory, and Starlink revenue risks could compress prospective upside.
If SpaceX proves Starlink profitability and commands a public market at or above the rumored $1.75T, concentrated holders and Alphabet could see large, rapid upside that dwarfs the funds’ fees and liquidity frictions. Buying Alphabet provides material, liquid exposure to a multi-hundred-billion-dollar stake without the lockup and governance risks of direct private placements.
"Article fabricates an imminent blockbuster SpaceX IPO that isn't happening, inflating unverified pre-IPO exposure plays with high fees and liquidity risks."
This article is rife with factual errors: SpaceX has not confidentially filed for an IPO (Musk repeatedly stated no IPO until Starship maturity, latest ~$350B private valuation in late 2024 tenders); no 2026 xAI merger or $1.25T val; $1.75T/$75B raise is pure speculation labeled as fact. ARKVX (2.9% fees, quarterly liquidity) and BPTRX (2.24% fees, 53% SpaceX+Tesla) offer real but costly/illiquid exposure; GOOGL's stake diluted to ~4-5% (worth ~$15-20B), incidental to its 15% EPS growth at 23x fwd P/E. Skip hype—wait for real IPO news.
If SpaceX defies odds with a surprise IPO at nosebleed vals, these vehicles could deliver 5-10x returns, especially ARKVX's AI/SpaceX combo amid booming demand for Starlink.
"ARKVX concentration risk + illiquidity is worse than the article's valuation fiction; GOOGL buyers are paying for optionality that's already priced into secondary comps."
Everyone correctly identified the article's factual rot, but ChatGPT and Grok both underweight a real risk: even if SpaceX eventually IPOs at a lower valuation (say $500B–$800B), ARKVX's 17% weight means the fund itself becomes a single-stock proxy. ARK's track record on concentration + illiquidity is poor (see 2022). GOOGL exposure is safer, but nobody flagged that Alphabet's 4–5% stake is already marked-to-market in secondary comps—the IPO repricing could go either direction, and retail chasing GOOGL for 'SpaceX upside' is buying a financial engineering story, not a business thesis.
"Baron Partners (BPTRX) faces severe capital rotation risk between Tesla and SpaceX that could neutralize IPO gains."
Claude and Grok correctly identify Alphabet’s stake as marginal, but everyone is ignoring the 'Tesla Trap' in Baron Partners (BPTRX). With a 53% combined allocation to Musk ventures, BPTRX isn't a SpaceX play; it’s a Musk-key-man-risk vehicle. If a SpaceX IPO occurs, capital may rotate out of Tesla to fund the new shiny object, potentially cratering BPTRX’s NAV despite SpaceX gains. The liquidity mismatch in these funds remains the primary unpriced danger for retail.
"High annual fees on concentrated pre-IPO funds materially erode returns if the IPO is delayed — a 2.5% fee can cut a 15% gross annual return enough to shave ~10% off five‑year terminal value."
Gemini: you call Baron/ARK the "only viable path" for retail, but nobody quantified fee drag if the IPO is delayed. Example: assume SpaceX-related assets deliver 15% annual growth while the fund charges 2.5% annually; over 5 years gross = 1.15^5 = 2.01×, net = 1.125^5 = 1.80× — an absolute ~10.4% lower terminal NAV. For multi-year pre-IPO horizons, that fee/timing combo can turn a winning thesis into mediocre returns.
"Fee calculations undervalue binary IPO catalysts while everyone misses FCC regulatory blockers."
ChatGPT's fee drag example ignores event-driven upside: SpaceX Starlink hit $6.6B rev run-rate Q3'24 with 40%+ margins (Musk filings); a $500B+ IPO could 3x fund NAVs in months, dwarfing 2.5% annual fees. Bigger omission: FCC spectrum auction delays (next round 2025) could indefinitely postpone IPO, turning 'pre-IPO' funds into dead capital traps.
Panel Verdict
Consensus ReachedThe panel consensus is that the article is factually inaccurate and over-speculative, with significant risks outweighing potential opportunities.
None identified
High concentration and illiquidity risk in funds offering pre-IPO exposure to SpaceX, and the potential for capital rotation away from Tesla in the event of a SpaceX IPO.