By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
Despite the end of Berkshire's 14-quarter net-selling streak, panelists remain neutral to bearish due to potential macro risks, regulatory headwinds, and the slow pace of capital deployment. The Alphabet stake increase is seen as a growth anchor, but its high forward multiple and potential margin compression from AI investment are significant concerns.
Risk: Margin compression in Alphabet due to AI capex and regulatory headwinds, which could turn the 'growth anchor' into a value trap.
Opportunity: Alphabet's AI-driven ads, cloud, and Waymo sustaining growth for years, if AI monetization and ad cycles cooperate.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE: BRKA) (NYSE: BRKB) selling streak is over. For 14 consecutive quarters, the giant conglomerate was a net seller of stocks. However, Berkshire's 13F filing for the second quarter of 2026 revealed that it bought more shares of companies than it sold for the first time in over three years.
Officially, Berkshire's CEO, Greg Abel, is now responsible for deploying capital. But Warren Buffett continues to make investment decisions much as he did for more than six decades at the company's helm.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Buffett and Abel bought eight stocks in Q2. And one of them clearly stands out as the best of the bunch.
While Berkshire Hathaway made eight purchases during the recent quarter, only one was for a brand-new position. The company initiated a small stake in D.R. Horton (NYSE: DHI) valued at less than $600,000 at the end of Q2. D.R. Horton isn't entirely new to Berkshire, though. Under Buffett's leadership, the conglomerate owned shares of the housing stock for a while before exiting the position last year.
Buffett and Abel also added to Berkshire's stake in one of D.R. Horton's rivals, Lennar (NYSE: LEN) (NYSE: LENB). Berkshire scooped up more of Lennar's Class A and Class B shares.
However, Berkshire's biggest move in Q2 was loading up on Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL). Buffett acknowledged in a July interview with CNBC that he was the mastermind behind a significant investment in Google's parent company. In the latest quarter, Berkshire upped its stake in Alphabet's Class A shares by 45% and increased its position in the company's Class C shares by a whopping 658%.
Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) was another significant Q2 purchase. Berkshire Hathaway increased its position in the airline stock by roughly 44%.
Last (and least), Berkshire modestly boosted its stakes in Macy's (NYSE: M) and The New York Times (NYSE: NYT). Even after the Q2 transactions, the two positions each make up 0.3% or less of Berkshire's overall portfolio.
Buffett hasn't been bashful about admitting that he made a mistake by not buying Alphabet stock years ago. He knows that the company is an advertising juggernaut thanks primarily to its dominance in the search engine market.
The "Oracle of Omaha" also understands the appeal of investing in the housing industry. That's evidenced by the Q2 purchases of D.R. Horton and Lennar, as well as Berkshire's recent acquisition of homebuilder Taylor Morrison. The U.S. continues to have an imbalance between the supply and demand for new homes that works to the advantage of companies such as D.R. Horton, Lennar, and Taylor Morrison.
Buffett hasn't been a fan of airline stocks in the past. In 2007, he wrote to Berkshire shareholders that the U.S. airline industry was "a bottomless pit." So why buy more shares of Delta Air Lines now? The decision could reflect Abel's influence. However, it could also indicate that Buffett has changed his mind, at least in part, due to Delta's premium positioning in the aviation market.
The Macy's and New York Times positions are so small that they really don't matter very much. Perhaps Buffett's value investing background came to the forefront with adding more shares of Macy's. The retail stock was down 17% year-to-date at the beginning of Q2 and still trades at only 10.3 times forward earnings.
As for The New York Times, Buffett has always had a soft spot for the newspaper business. It doesn't hurt, either, that The New York Times has been quite successful in building its digital media operations.
I think that two stocks bought by Buffett and Abel in Q2 are hands-down the best of the bunch -- Alphabet's Class A and Class C shares. With these two share classes combined, Alphabet now ranks as Berkshire's fourth-largest position.
Don't underestimate the significance of Buffett personally spearheading the massive investment in Alphabet. His move wasn't just an attempt to remedy a mistake from years ago; Buffett almost certainly believes in Alphabet's long-term prospects, given the size of Berkshire's position in the company.
Alphabet is well-positioned in nearly every major technology poised to shape the future. Google Gemini is one of the top artificial intelligence (AI) models. Google Cloud is the fastest-growing of the big three cloud platforms. Waymo is the leader in autonomous ride-hailing. Google Quantum AI is one of a handful of companies at the forefront of quantum computing.
There's one more thing in Alphabet's favor, too: valuation. Its shares trade below 17 times forward earnings, the lowest multiple among the so-called "Magnificent Seven" stocks. Buffett and Abel undoubtedly view Google's parent company as a great opportunity for Berkshire to make money. They're probably right.
Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $421,511! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,381,960!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 981% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 216% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of August 17, 2026. *
Keith Speights has positions in Alphabet and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Berkshire Hathaway, D.R. Horton, Lennar, and The New York Times Co. The Motley Fool recommends Delta Air Lines. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Berkshire's Alphabet ramp is tactically bullish but too small and too late to shift the conglomerate's overall defensive posture."
Berkshire's Q2 2026 buying spree—especially the 45% and 658% increases in GOOGL/GOOG—signals renewed confidence after 14 quarters of net selling, with Alphabet now the #4 holding. The article correctly highlights Alphabet's AI exposure (Gemini, Waymo, Quantum), cloud momentum, and attractive <17x forward P/E versus Mag7 peers. Housing additions (DHI, LEN) align with chronic U.S. supply shortages. However, the piece downplays that Berkshire's 'new' buying is still modest in dollar terms relative to its $300B+ cash pile, and the Delta add (up 44%) revives Buffett's historically loss-making airline bets.
The strongest case against is that this is Greg Abel's influence, not a Buffett endorsement of tech growth; Alphabet's ad revenue remains tied to a maturing search moat vulnerable to AI disruption, while housing additions could sour quickly if mortgage rates stay elevated or recession hits.
"Berkshire's aggressive accumulation of Alphabet marks a strategic departure from traditional value investing toward growth-at-a-reasonable-price to combat the opportunity cost of their record cash pile."
The pivot from 14 quarters of net selling to net buying is a massive sentiment shift, but investors should be wary of equating this to a 'Buffett-style' value play. Loading up on Alphabet at a 17x forward P/E suggests Berkshire is finally chasing growth to offset the massive cash drag on their balance sheet. However, the inclusion of Delta and homebuilders like D.R. Horton signals a bet on a soft landing and consumer resilience that may be priced to perfection. If the macro environment shifts toward stagflation, these cyclical bets could lead to significant capital impairment, regardless of Alphabet’s AI moats.
Buffett’s pivot may simply be a defensive move to capture yield in a slowing economy rather than a growth-oriented expansion, making these 'buys' more about preservation than alpha generation.
"Buffett's Alphabet buying is real but modest relative to his cash hoard, and the article's framing of 658% growth obscures that it started from an immaterial base."
The article frames Buffett's Alphabet surge (658% on Class C shares) as validation of AI/cloud dominance, but conflates position size with conviction. A 658% increase from a tiny base is mathematically trivial—Alphabet remains ~4% of Berkshire's portfolio. More telling: Berkshire bought $8.7B in Q2 but still sits on $276B cash. The net-buyer headline masks that Buffett is deploying at glacial pace despite 'attractive valuations.' His airline reversal and housing bets suggest opportunism, not thesis shifts. The article omits Berkshire's actual hurdle rate and why NOW justifies breaking a 14-quarter selling streak.
If Buffett genuinely believed Alphabet was undervalued at sub-17x forward P/E, why not deploy $50B instead of a measured increase? His restraint—despite calling it a mistake to have missed it—signals either valuation skepticism or macro caution the article ignores entirely.
"Berkshire’s Alphabet bet signals long-run conviction on AI-enabled growth, but near-term catalysts hinge on ad monetization, cloud economics, and regulatory outcomes—any disappointment could cap upside."
The obvious read is Berkshire just turned Alphabet into its new crown jewel, signaling conviction that AI-driven ads, cloud, and Waymo could sustain growth for years. Yet the strongest risk the article glosses over is that this is a capital-allocation play, not a guaranteed growth engine. Alphabet’s forward multiple (~17x) looks reasonable only if AI monetization and ad cycles cooperate; margins could compress as heavy AI investment weighs on near-term profitability, and regulatory headwinds remain a real threat. Berkshire’s other buys in housing and airlines highlight a cyclical tilt—Alphabet could be the fragile hinge if macro or policy turns sour.
Alphabet's AI upside may already be priced in, and near-term margins could deteriorate due to capex; regulatory risk adds a real chance of upside being capped.
"Berkshire's buys reflect Abel's cyclical experimentation more than Buffett's conviction, amplifying macro vulnerability."
Claude correctly flags the glacial pace relative to cash hoard, but nobody has noted that Berkshire's 14-quarter net-selling streak ending with these buys coincides with Abel's expanded role. This isn't glacial caution—it's a deliberate shift from Buffett's playbook. Housing and Delta adds now look like Abel testing cyclical recovery while using Alphabet as the growth anchor, exposing the portfolio to macro whiplash the article never addresses.
"Berkshire's concentration in Alphabet and airlines ignores the escalating regulatory and antitrust risks that could trigger significant capital impairment."
Claude and Grok are missing the regulatory elephant in the room. By increasing the Alphabet stake while simultaneously buying Delta, Berkshire is walking into a massive antitrust crosshair. If the DOJ’s search engine case results in a structural breakup of Alphabet, that 'growth anchor' becomes a liability. Grok’s theory on Abel’s influence ignores that these specific sectors—tech and transport—are the primary targets of current administration enforcement, making this portfolio shift look politically tone-deaf.
"Antitrust risk is priced into Alphabet already; the real threat is margin compression from AI capex coinciding with multiple contraction in a slowdown."
Gemini's antitrust risk is real, but overstated as a Berkshire-specific vulnerability. Alphabet's search dominance faces structural pressure regardless of Berkshire's ownership stake—the DOJ case timeline spans years, and breakup scenarios (if they happen) typically grandfather existing shareholders. More pressing: Gemini and Grok both assume macro resilience, but neither quantifies the margin compression ChatGPT flagged. If AI capex eats 200-300bps of EBITDA margins while forward multiples compress from 17x to 14x on recession fears, Alphabet's 'growth anchor' becomes a value trap.
"Alphabet's near-term margins and regulatory headwinds pose a much more immediate threat to Berkshire's growth-anchor thesis than antitrust headlines."
Gemini's antitrust worry is valid but overshadowed by Alphabet's margin risk. AI capex and regulatory headwinds could compress EBITDA by 200–300bp, denting Berkshire's claim of a durable growth anchor. With Berkshire sitting on ~$276B cash and cyclical bets in Delta/housing, margin downside in Alphabet would tilt the overall portfolio more than a DOJ breakup scenario would.
Despite the end of Berkshire's 14-quarter net-selling streak, panelists remain neutral to bearish due to potential macro risks, regulatory headwinds, and the slow pace of capital deployment. The Alphabet stake increase is seen as a growth anchor, but its high forward multiple and potential margin compression from AI investment are significant concerns.
Alphabet's AI-driven ads, cloud, and Waymo sustaining growth for years, if AI monetization and ad cycles cooperate.
Margin compression in Alphabet due to AI capex and regulatory headwinds, which could turn the 'growth anchor' into a value trap.