'We don't look at the sky anymore': The Air India crash victims who were not on the plane
By Maksym Misichenko · BBC Business ·
By Maksym Misichenko · BBC Business ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is that the article lacks market-moving information, but highlights potential risks and costs for Indian aviation, especially carriers operating near densely populated areas. Key risks include regulatory tightening, increased insurance premiums, and litigation costs.
Risk: Regulatory tightening and increased insurance premiums due to proximity liability and potential flight path restrictions
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
**Warning: The story contains details some readers might find distressing **
The photographs are the first thing Prahlod Thakur sees when he wakes up.
They hang on the bright green peeling walls of his small Ahmedabad home, among religious icons, brass vessels and fading family portraits. One frame holds the face of his wife, Sarlaben. Another shows his granddaughter, Aadhya, wearing a white dress and smiling.
Both of them were in the BJ Medical College hostel complex, less than 2km (1.2 miles) from the Ahmedabad airport, when an Air India plane crashed into it in June last year. There were 260 victims - 241 were on the plane. Sarlaben and Aadhya were among the 19 killed on the ground.
A year later, the loss still feels fresh.
"I just miss them," says Thakur. "I see the photos and feel like crying."
Investigators are soon expected to release a report on the crash. Much of the attention over the past year has focused on the passengers aboard the London-bound flight and the unanswered questions surrounding its final moments.
In Ahmedabad, another question lingers: what happens to a place after a catastrophe becomes part of its daily life?
Unlike most disaster sites, where the scars eventually disappear, at BJ Medical College grief has become a permanent resident.
A year on, the hostel struck by the plane still stands like an open wound. Its upper floors stand ripped open to the sky, concrete hangs in jagged slabs and a smoke-blackened staircase disappears into darkness. Soot streaks the walls, while suitcases and clothes remain buried beneath dust, rubble and twisted steel.
Officials have approved plans to demolish the damaged complex and build a new hostel. For now, though, the wreckage remains.
Students pass the hostel on their way to lectures as aeroplanes rumble overhead every few minutes. For decades, the sound blended into the city's background noise, as familiar and unremarkable as the traffic on the roads.
Since the crash, Thakur says, it carries a very different meaning.
"Whenever a plane passes by, we feel the same pain," he says. "We don't even look at the sky."
For 15 years, the family ran a tiffin service for doctors at the adjoining hospitals, cooking and delivering meals across the medical campus. Their two-year-old granddaughter spent much of her time there, rarely leaving her grandmother's side.
Lunch was being served at the mess when the plane crashed. Sarlaben was working there and, when Aadhya needed the washroom, she took her upstairs. Moments later, the aircraft came crashing in.
Thakur, who was working in another building, dropped everything and ran towards the smoke. He only remembers fragments now: the explosion, heat, gas cylinders strewn across the kitchen and his desperate search from room to room, calling his wife's name: "Sarla, Sarla."
Around him, survivors staggered out from the wreckage while others remained trapped inside as rescue teams battled through smoke and debris. For nearly a week, the family searched hospitals, wards and relief camps across Ahmedabad, chasing rumours and repeatedly asking the same questions. Six days later, they found Sarlaben and Aadhya in a hospital mortuary.
Today, when Thakur thinks of Aadhya, he remembers the biscuits he brought home and the way she ran into his arms. When he speaks of Sarlaben, he remembers a woman who spent much of her life feeding others.
"Everyone got along with her," he says. "She was a very good woman."
At almost the same moment that Thakur was running towards the smoke, students inside the mess were trying to understand what had happened.
Arman Khan Pathan was late for lunch. His best friend, Aditya Dayal, was later still.
Those few minutes would separate their experiences of the crash, but not their memories of it.
Pathan had just sat down to eat when a deafening sound erupted. Moments later, part of the building had collapsed around him, and a table pinned his legs down. As cylinders exploded and dust filled the room, rescuers were forced back by fresh blasts. Trapped and struggling to breathe, Pathan smashed a window with his bare fist.
"It was pitch black," he recalls. "I was suffocating."
By the time rescue workers pulled him free, Dayal had reached the scene.
He remembers smoke rising above the building where he and his friends had eaten almost every day. Students ran in every direction, trying to understand what had happened.
Together with others, Dayal helped carry Pathan out on a mattress and into an ambulance.
A year later, sitting in their hostel room, the two friends still recall the bodies that arrived that afternoon. As trainee doctors, they were no strangers to death, but nothing had prepared them for this.
Many victims were so badly charred they were unrecognisable. The smell, Dayal says, lingered long after he left - and still returns unexpectedly.
"It made me want to throw up," he recalls.
The conversation drifts to the friends they lost. Pathan mentions a classmate who was the only brother to several sisters, the child on whom a family had pinned its hopes. Like so many others, he had spent years working towards a future that vanished in a matter of seconds.
For some, the crash lingers in a different way.
Brijesh, who was riding a scooter to the mess with two friends when the plane came down, still undergoes physiotherapy for burn injuries. He wears pressure garments through Ahmedabad's heat and struggles to turn the pages of textbooks. "It happened," he says. "What can be done?"
He passes the ruins sometimes. Like many students, he has developed a habit of looking away, as if the building might disappear if he refuses to acknowledge it.
The people who live around the college have less choice.
On the afternoon of the crash, Vijay was at home, about 200m away, when he heard an explosion. He jumped on his bike and headed towards the source. By the time he arrived, the aircraft had disintegrated and fire was racing through the buildings.
For several hours, the neighbourhood became a rescue zone as residents joined firefighters, soldiers and emergency workers, carrying blankets and water, covering bodies and helping survivors.
The images still haunt him.
"Wherever I look, there is fire," Vijay says. "Someone's head, someone's hands."
In the weeks that followed, the city's attention slowly moved on. The ambulances left. The television crews did too. The urgency that had consumed the campus gave way to the harder job of the aftermath.
At BJ Medical College, life had to resume.
And much of the burden fell on Meenakshi Parikh, the dean, who had to keep the medical college functioning even as it grappled with overwhelming grief.
Looking back, she remembers not one tragedy but many folded into one: parents searching for children, students healing from injuries, her overworked staff and families awaiting DNA results.
"One part of me was occupied with what needed to be done," she says. "Another was trying to understand what had happened."
One conversation has remained with her.
A man who lost his son, daughter-in-law and granddaughter refused to leave until he saw their bodies. Officials explained that DNA testing was needed to confirm their identities.
"My eyes are the DNA test," he told them, insisting he would recognise his family no matter what condition they were in.
Parikh pauses when she recalls it. "I could see where he was coming from."
Over time, the rhythms of college life returned. Classes resumed, exams were held and new students arrived.
As the anniversary, 12 June, approaches, the college has planned a prayer meeting, a blood donation drive and the planting of trees in memory of those who died.
Yet moving forward, Parikh says, is not the same as moving on.
"There wasn't one moment when I felt I had processed it," she says. "It was a gradual process of settling back into life."
Back at his house, Thakur is trying to do the same.
He reaches for his phone. There is a video he often watches, recorded the day before the crash.
In it, Aadhya carefully feeds her grandmother a morsel of food. Sarlaben smiles.
Outside, another aircraft crosses the Ahmedabad sky.
Thakur does not look up.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Near-term impact on India's aviation equities is likely muted absent a disclosed investigation outcome or confirmed safety-costs; the true risk lies in potential regulatory shifts and capex needs."
This piece foregrounds human tragedy near Ahmedabad and the residual grief of a university campus. The obvious market takeaway—that Indian aviation carries elevated risk—rests on thin ground: the article does not present evidence of a systemic safety failure or forthcoming regulatory upheaval. The strongest near-term read is market indifference; any price movement would require a disclosed investigation outcome or concrete cost estimates for safety upgrades. Longer term, safety policy shifts or airport-improvement mandates could raise capex for carriers and operators, but might also improve resilience and reduce tail risk. Missing context includes DGCA findings, liability and compensation timelines, and which infrastructure upgrades are actually planned.
But a strong counter is that a high-profile crash can catalyze rapid regulatory tightening. India’s aviation sector has historically faced tighter oversight after incidents, which could meaningfully raise costs and squeeze margins.
"Urban aviation infrastructure faces a looming re-evaluation of liability risk that could compress margins for carriers operating near high-density zones."
The human tragedy at BJ Medical College highlights a critical, often-overlooked systemic risk in aviation: the 'proximity liability' of urban airports. While the article focuses on the emotional aftermath, the financial implication for Air India and the aviation sector is a potential shift in insurance premiums and regulatory requirements for flight paths over high-density zones. If the upcoming report confirms pilot error or mechanical failure, we could see a re-rating of risk for carriers operating near densely populated educational or medical hubs. Investors should watch for increased litigation costs and potential zoning restrictions that could force expensive operational changes, impacting long-term EBITDA margins for regional carriers.
The market may view this as a 'black swan' isolated event, meaning the impact on insurance premiums or operational costs will be negligible and fail to affect the broader aviation sector's valuation.
"This article is journalism about trauma recovery, not financial analysis — it contains no new facts about the crash investigation, airline operations, or regulatory response that would move markets."
This is a human-interest piece about grief and trauma following the June 2023 Air India crash in Ahmedabad — not financial news. The article contains no market-moving information: no new investigation findings, no regulatory changes, no airline operational data, no stock price implications. It's investigative journalism about psychological aftermath. Air India (AI) trades on NSE/BSE but this article provides zero valuation, safety record, or competitive context relevant to equity investors. The crash itself (260 deaths, 19 on ground) was already public; this adds emotional narrative, not material facts.
If the investigation report (mentioned as 'soon expected') reveals systemic failures at Air India or Indian aviation regulators, that could trigger regulatory action, fines, or operational restrictions — making this article a precursor to actual financial news rather than mere human interest.
"Ground-level aftermath at BJ Medical College exposes hidden, non-passenger liabilities that standard airline valuation models tend to undervalue."
The article details persistent trauma and physical damage at BJ Medical College a year after the June 2024 Air India crash, with the wrecked hostel still standing and affecting daily routines for students and staff. This points to prolonged operational friction for the institution, including disrupted medical training and potential delays in infrastructure rebuilds. From a financial lens, such stories expose unmodeled tail risks in aviation liability and insurance reserves, where ground casualties near airports add complexity beyond passenger claims. The piece also shows how community memory can slow normalization, possibly extending indirect costs like lost productivity at the college.
The college has already resumed classes, exams, and enrollment, indicating that any operational drag is short-lived and unlikely to produce measurable financial impact on related sectors or Tata Group entities tied to Air India.
"Regulatory timing and capex drag could dwarf insurance premiums as the dominant financial risk from the Ahmedabad incident."
Gemini, you anchor on proximity liability and insurance spikes, but the bigger lever is regulatory timing and capex, not just premiums. A rapid investigation-led tightening could force flight-path constraints or airport upgrades that roll into debt covenants and margins for carriers near urban hubs. If the market prices in only insurance effects, it underestimates the potential systemic capex drag and longer lag before relief shows up—making the sector's risk/reward asymmetric to the downside.
"Public pressure following high-profile ground casualties will likely force non-market regulatory interventions that increase operational costs for Indian carriers."
Claude, you dismiss this as mere human interest, but you ignore the 'social license to operate.' In India, high-profile tragedies involving public institutions like BJ Medical College create immense political pressure for rapid, populist regulatory action. This isn't just about insurance; it’s about the DGCA mandating costly infrastructure changes or flight path restrictions to appease public sentiment. This political volatility is an unpriced risk that could compress margins for Air India and other carriers significantly faster than standard safety protocols.
"Regulatory capex and political pressure are plausible but historically slow in India; the investigation report, not grief narratives, determines whether this becomes financial news."
Gemini and ChatGPT both assume regulatory tightening is imminent, but neither cites DGCA precedent or timeline. India's aviation regulator has historically moved slowly post-incident—the 2009 Air India Express crash took years for meaningful capex mandates. Political pressure ≠ rapid policy. Claude's right that we're missing the actual investigation findings. Without those, 'social license' and 'proximity liability' are narrative scaffolding, not risk quantification. Watch for DGCA report timing, not sentiment.
"Persistent physical damage enables direct institutional lawsuits that accelerate liability costs ahead of regulatory changes."
Claude rightly notes the 2009 precedent for slow DGCA action, but the wrecked hostel still standing at BJ Medical College creates a distinct channel for direct institutional claims against Air India for ongoing operational losses and rebuild costs. These civil suits from a public medical college could hit reserves and Tata Group entities well before any regulatory capex mandates materialize, exposing an unpriced litigation vector that bypasses policy timelines entirely.
The panel consensus is that the article lacks market-moving information, but highlights potential risks and costs for Indian aviation, especially carriers operating near densely populated areas. Key risks include regulatory tightening, increased insurance premiums, and litigation costs.
Regulatory tightening and increased insurance premiums due to proximity liability and potential flight path restrictions