By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel discusses NewSquare's $12 million trim of PDP, with most agreeing it's profit-taking rather than a bearish signal, but there's concern about high valuations and sectoral concentration in PDP's holdings.
Risk: High valuations and concentration in growth stocks and infrastructure-linked industrials, which are sensitive to fiscal spending cycles and interest rate volatility.
Opportunity: PDP's momentum-driven strategy has shown strong performance, with a 7-point alpha over the S&P 500, and its expense ratio and AUM stability signal resilience.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
NewSquare sold 97,285 shares of PDP in the first quarter; the estimated trade size was $12.07 million based on quarterly average prices.
Meanwhile, the quarter-end position value decreased by $10.86 million, reflecting both share sales and price movements.
The transaction represented a 1.05% change in 13F AUM.
On May 8, 2026, NewSquare Capital filed with the SEC to report the sale of 97,285 shares of the Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (NASDAQ:PDP), an estimated $12.07 million trade based on quarterly average pricing.
According to a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing dated May 8, 2026, NewSquare Capital sold 97,285 shares of the Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (NASDAQ:PDP) during the first quarter. The estimated transaction value was $12.07 million, calculated using the average closing price for the quarter. The fund reported holding 108,116 shares, worth $13.05 million, at quarter-end.
NASDAQ:BND: $31.75 million (2.8% of AUM)
As of May 7, 2026, PDP shares were priced at $139.28, up 37% over the past year, with a 7 percentage-point alpha versus the S&P 500.
| Metric | Value | |---|---| | Price (as of market close May 7, 2026) | $139.28 | | One-year total return | 37% | | Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.1% | | AUM | $1.5 billion |
The Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF offers investors systematic exposure to U.S. equities demonstrating strong relative strength, using a rules-based methodology to capture momentum-driven performance. The fund's quarterly rebalancing ensures the portfolio remains aligned with prevailing market leadership trends. This disciplined approach provides access to a diversified set of high-momentum stocks while leveraging the liquidity and transparency of the ETF structure.
PDP delivered a 36.6% one-year NAV return through April 30 and outpaced the Russell 3000 Growth Index over one-, three-, and five-year periods, and that strong momentum-driven rally might be part of why NewSquare decided to trim its stake here. PDP’s strategy focuses on roughly 100 U.S. companies showing strong relative strength characteristics, with quarterly rebalancing designed to keep the portfolio tilted toward market leaders. Current top holdings include names like Comfort Systems USA, Apple, Amphenol, Quanta Services, and Western Digital.
For long-term investors, it’s important to remember that momentum strategies can work extremely well during strong bull markets, but they also tend to reverse quickly when leadership changes. PDP’s concentration in higher-growth sectors and relatively elevated valuation metrics, including a price-to-earnings ratio above 33, could leave the fund more vulnerable if market sentiment shifts. And ultimately, NewSquare Capital still retained more than $13 million worth of shares at quarter-end, suggesting the firm is likely just trimming exposure after outsized gains.
Before you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 10, 2026. *
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard International Equity Index Funds - Vanguard Ftse All-World ex-US ETF and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The sale is a mechanical portfolio rebalancing to manage risk concentration after outsized gains, rather than a bearish signal on momentum equities."
NewSquare’s $12 million trim of PDP isn't a signal of a market top; it’s a standard rebalancing exercise. With a 37% one-year return, PDP’s momentum-driven portfolio—heavy on high-beta names like Comfort Systems and Quanta Services—likely breached the firm's internal risk-weighting thresholds. At a 33x P/E, this ETF is priced for perfection, and the move reflects prudent profit-taking rather than a bearish macroeconomic call. The firm still holds $13 million, indicating they aren't exiting the theme, just harvesting gains to maintain their asset allocation targets. Investors should view this as tactical maintenance, not a fundamental shift in market leadership.
If NewSquare is trimming momentum exposure while the index is at all-time highs, they may be anticipating a volatility spike or a sector rotation that their proprietary models are flagging before the broader market reacts.
"This 1% AUM trim by one advisor is negligible profit-taking after PDP's outperformance, not a meaningful warning for momentum or growth stocks."
NewSquare's Q1 sale of 97k PDP shares ($12M, 1.05% of 13F AUM) trimmed exposure after 37% one-year gains but left a $13M stake (1.13% of assets), signaling profit-taking in a high-flyer rather than panic. PDP's Dorsey Wright momentum strategy—ranking ~100 U.S. stocks on relative strength, quarterly rebalanced—has alpha'd S&P (7pp) and growth indices, with industrials (Comfort Systems, Quanta) joining tech leaders. At 33x P/E, it's pricey, but momentum persists in bull trends; low 0.1% yield fits growth tilt. Article hypes one advisor's move as 'signal' amid promo for Motley Fool picks—classic noise. Broader context: 13Fs lag, PDP AUM stable $1.5B.
If NewSquare's trim reflects foresight on Fed pauses crimping growth momentum or rotation to value (mirroring their VTI/VEU overweight), PDP's 33x P/E could amplify drawdowns versus diversified ETFs.
"NewSquare's trim is rebalancing, not a conviction short on momentum; the article conflates the two and oversells both the bullish 'just taking profits' and bearish 'momentum is broken' narratives."
NewSquare's $12M PDP trim is being framed as profit-taking after 37% YTD gains, but the real signal is subtler. They reduced PDP from 1.13% to 1.05% of AUM—a 7% relative cut—while their core holdings (VTI, VEU, SCHX) remain untouched. This isn't panic; it's rebalancing. The article conflates 'momentum worked so trim it' with 'momentum is breaking.' But PDP's 7-point alpha over S&P 500 persists. The risk isn't that NewSquare knows something; it's that momentum funds ARE cyclical, and a single advisor's Q1 trim tells us nothing about whether the cycle has actually turned. The 33x P/E cited is high, but relative to growth rates in PDP's holdings, not obviously broken.
One advisor trimming $12M from a $1.5B fund after a 37% run is exactly when you'd expect profit-taking—and if NewSquare is smart enough to build a $1.1B AUM portfolio, they may be reading macro signals (rate expectations, earnings deceleration) that haven't yet hit retail. The article's dismissal of valuation risk at 33x P/E could be dangerously naive.
"A small quarter-end trim in PDP is unlikely to reveal a durable stance on momentum; the real test will be a series of subsequent changes and regime shifts, not a one-off sale."
NewSquare’s Q1 PDP trim—97,285 shares, about 1% of PDP’s 13F AUM—reads as modest profit-taking rather than a strategic pivot. PDP’s 37% 1-year return and ~7 pp alpha to the S&P 500 argue in favor of momentum leadership, but the risk is regime-dependent: high valuations (PDP P/E around 33) and concentration in growth can reverse quickly if rates rise or leadership rotates. The 13F snapshot is only a quarterly, long-hold view and doesn’t reveal intramonth flows or PDP’s liquidity. The chart would be more meaningful with follow-on moves or shifts into other exposure, not a single quarter trim.
The move could be noise or routine rebalancing, not a signal; momentum regimes can persist longer than a single trade suggests, so reading a trim as a broader negative could be premature.
"The PDP trim reflects a specific valuation ceiling in infrastructure-linked industrials rather than broad portfolio maintenance."
Claude and Grok both downplay the 33x P/E, assuming momentum justifies the premium. However, they ignore the specific sectoral concentration in PDP—Comfort Systems (FIX) and Quanta (PWR) are infrastructure-linked industrials, not just 'growth.' These names are highly sensitive to fiscal spending cycles and interest rate volatility. If NewSquare is trimming, it’s not just 'routine rebalancing'; it’s likely an acknowledgement that the infrastructure super-cycle is hitting a valuation ceiling where the risk-reward ratio has fundamentally deteriorated.
"PDP's dynamic relative strength rebalancing neutralizes static sectoral risks Gemini highlights."
Gemini overstates PDP's 'infrastructure super-cycle' vulnerability—FIX and PWR rank high on relative strength, but Dorsey Wright's quarterly rebalance rotates out laggards dynamically, limiting concentration risk. NewSquare's 7% AUM trim post-37% gains is textbook discipline, not a rates/fiscal bet. Unmentioned: PDP's 0.29% expense ratio and $1.5B AUM stability signal resilience vs. flashier momentum ETFs.
"Quarterly rebalancing creates a timing vulnerability that an active manager like NewSquare can exploit before the broader market reprices infrastructure exposure."
Grok's defense of Dorsey Wright's 'dynamic rotation' sidesteps Gemini's real point: quarterly rebalancing lags market turns. If fiscal/rate headwinds accelerate mid-quarter, PDP stays overweight infrastructure until the next rebalance. NewSquare's trim timing—post-37% gains, pre-earnings season—suggests they're front-running that lag, not just harvesting. The $1.5B AUM stability proves nothing; flows lag price discovery.
"PDP's risk isn't just its high P/E, but its concentration in two infrastructure-heavy names and sensitivity to regime shifts, which can trigger a rapid momentum unwind if rates or capex expectations move."
Gemini's point on infrastructure exposure is valid, but the bigger risk is PDP's concentration and regime sensitivity. Two names (FIX, PWR) dominate; a capex slowdown or jump in rates could unleash a sharp momentum unwind, not captured by a 33x P/E snapshot. Also, a 1% AUM trim may be noise; momentum funds rely on frequent rebalancing—if the next signal flips mid-quarter, PDP could underperform fast.
The panel discusses NewSquare's $12 million trim of PDP, with most agreeing it's profit-taking rather than a bearish signal, but there's concern about high valuations and sectoral concentration in PDP's holdings.
PDP's momentum-driven strategy has shown strong performance, with a 7-point alpha over the S&P 500, and its expense ratio and AUM stability signal resilience.
High valuations and concentration in growth stocks and infrastructure-linked industrials, which are sensitive to fiscal spending cycles and interest rate volatility.