By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists agree that ShawSpring's full exit from its MNDY position signals a significant shift in institutional sentiment, with most flagging risks related to competition and sales cycle lengthening. However, there's no consensus on whether MNDY is headed towards a 'valuation trap' or a potential turnaround driven by AI initiatives.
Risk: Extended enterprise sales cycles lengthening CAC payback, which could erode the $880M RPO momentum if not offset by the $553M buyback execution.
Opportunity: AI-driven upmarket expansion, which could maintain net revenue retention (NRR) above 110% and support a multiple re-rating.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
ShawSpring exited 253,959 shares of monday.com last quarter; the estimated trade value was $24.37 million based on quarterly average prices.
The quarter-end position value declined by $37.47 million, reflecting both trading and price movements.
The transaction represented 9.1% of 13F reportable assets under management (AUM).
On May 14, 2026, ShawSpring Partners disclosed in an SEC filing that it sold out its entire position in monday.com (NASDAQ:MNDY), exiting 253,959 shares in a trade estimated at $24.37 million based on quarterly average pricing.
According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated May 14, 2026, ShawSpring Partners liquidated its entire holding of monday.com, selling 253,959 shares. The estimated transaction value was $24.37 million, calculated using the average closing price for the first quarter. The quarter-end position value decreased by $37.47 million, a figure that includes both the share sale and price movement over the period.
NASDAQ: BRZE: $26.26 million (9.8% of AUM)
As of Friday, shares were priced at $79.06, down 73% over the past year and well underperforming the S&P 500, which is instead up about 28%.
| Metric | Value | |---|---| | Revenue (TTM) | $1.3 billion | | Net income (TTM) | $119.4 million | | Market capitalization | $4.1 billion | | Price (as of Friday) | $79.06 |
monday.com is a technology company specializing in cloud-based work management solutions, with a global presence and a scalable SaaS business model. The company leverages modular software to address a broad range of operational needs for organizations of varying sizes.
Though it appears ShawSpring was done waiting for a turnaround, monday.com's underlying performance has remained strong even as the stock has been crushed over the past year, creating a disconnect that some investors seeking value may find worth watching. In the first quarter, revenue climbed 24% year over year to $351.3 million while GAAP operating income doubled to $19.8 million. The company also generated more than $100 million in operating cash flow and launched its new AI Work Platform, which management sees as the next major growth driver.
Perhaps more impressive, monday.com continues moving upmarket. Customers generating more than $100,000 in annual recurring revenue jumped 39%, while customers contributing more than $500,000 in ARR surged 74%. Remaining performance obligations rose 33% to $880 million, suggesting demand remains healthy. Management also authorized an aggressive share repurchase effort, buying back roughly $553 million of stock during the quarter.
For long-term investors, the key question is whether the market has become overly pessimistic. A stock down more than 70% despite double-digit growth, expanding enterprise adoption, and improving profitability may deserve a closer look. The risk is that competition in work management and AI software remains intense, but the business itself appears to be executing far better than the share price suggests.
Before you buy stock in Monday.com, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Monday.com wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $477,813! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,320,088!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 23, 2026. *
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Braze, Monday.com, Okta, and Zscaler. The Motley Fool recommends Alibaba Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"A 9.1%-of-AUM exit by ShawSpring after the 73% drop indicates MNDY's metrics have not yet convinced sophisticated holders of a durable re-rating."
ShawSpring's full exit from its 9.1% AUM position in MNDY after a 73% drop signals eroding institutional patience despite 24% Q1 revenue growth and 39% surge in $100k+ ARR customers. The $24M sale at average prices, alongside a $37M position value drop, likely reflects reallocation to larger holdings like OKTA and AMZN rather than renewed optimism. With the stock at $79 and 3.2x TTM sales, the move highlights risks that AI platform launches and $553M buybacks may not offset competitive intensity or multiple compression in work-management SaaS before catalysts materialize.
The 33% rise in remaining performance obligations to $880M and doubling of GAAP operating income could validate the business momentum the fund overlooked, making the exit premature if AI features drive further upmarket wins.
"MNDY's operational metrics don't justify a 73% decline, but the fund exit proves nothing about future direction without knowing ShawSpring's sell discipline and whether they rotated into competing SaaS."
ShawSpring's exit is real but not dispositive. MNDY trades at ~34x forward P/E on 24% YoY revenue growth—premium but not absurd for a SaaS platform with 39-74% growth in high-value customers and $880M RPO. The 73% drawdown reflects macro SaaS rotation, not operational deterioration. What's missing: churn data, CAC payback period, and whether the $553M buyback was opportunistic or desperation. The article conflates 'stock down' with 'business broken,' which is lazy. One fund exiting doesn't signal capitulation—it signals one fund's risk tolerance or portfolio rebalancing.
If ShawSpring had conviction on the turnaround narrative, they wouldn't sell into a 73% decline. Institutional exits often precede further deterioration, especially when the fund is rotating into OKTA and ZS—direct competitors in workflow automation.
"The disconnect between MNDY’s 39% enterprise growth and its 73% stock price decline represents a significant mispricing of the company's long-term unit economics."
The market's 73% haircut on MNDY despite 24% top-line growth and surging enterprise ARR (up 39% for $100k+ accounts) suggests a massive valuation reset rather than a fundamental collapse. ShawSpring’s exit is likely a liquidity or portfolio rebalancing move rather than a signal of operational rot. At a $4.1B market cap, MNDY is trading at roughly 3x TTM revenue—a valuation that looks increasingly attractive for a high-growth SaaS player with positive GAAP operating income. However, the 'work management' space is commoditizing rapidly. If AI features fail to drive meaningful net revenue retention (NRR) expansion, the stock will continue to languish in a valuation trap.
If the enterprise growth is masking churn in the SMB segment, the 24% revenue growth is unsustainable and the valuation is actually a value trap, not a bargain.
"Fundamentals are improving and AI-driven growth could re-rate MNDY if execution keeps up and the market stabilizes."
ShawSpring selling its entire MNDY stake—about 9% of its AUM—could signal waning near-term conviction, but it isn’t a definitive verdict on Monday.com's business. The article notes Q1 revenue up 24% YoY, free cash flow over $100 million, ARR expansion in higher tiers, and a sizeable buyback, all positives that could support a multiple re-rating if AI initiatives monetize. Yet the stock’s 73% drop signals heavy pessimism and risk from AI/software competition and longer sales cycles. The missing context: why ShawSpring trimmed now (tax, liquidity, lifecycle) and whether AI Work Platform revenue will scale quickly enough to protect margins. The real hinge is execution and durable ARR growth.
The exit could simply reflect fund-level liquidity, tax timing, or rebalancing rather than a view on MNDY, so it may be noise rather than signal. Moreover, the 73% drop implies skepticism is priced in; any AI uplift would need to meaningfully lift margins and ARR to justify a re-rating, which is not guaranteed.
"ShawSpring's rotation to competitors signals doubts on MNDY's competitive positioning that buybacks cannot fully mitigate."
Claude dismisses ShawSpring's exit too readily as mere rebalancing. Rotation into direct competitors OKTA and ZS implies doubts on MNDY sustaining 24% growth against intensifying AI-driven competition. A key unmentioned risk is extended enterprise sales cycles lengthening CAC payback, which could erode the $880M RPO momentum if not offset by the $553M buyback execution. Valuation at 3.2x sales leaves little room for misses.
"Extended sales cycles threaten new customer acquisition, not existing RPO, so NRR sustainability is the missing metric that determines whether MNDY's multiple compression is justified or overdone."
Grok flags extended sales cycles eroding CAC payback—valid concern—but conflates it with RPO momentum. RPO is contractually committed revenue; longer cycles affect *new* deals, not existing $880M. The real risk: if enterprise deals are stretching, *net revenue retention* (NRR) data becomes critical. Nobody's asked whether MNDY's NRR is holding above 110% despite competitive pressure. That's the hinge between 'valuation trap' and 'genuine turnaround.'
"The buyback is a defensive mechanism against margin erosion rather than a signal of confidence in growth."
Claude is right to pivot to NRR, but misses the second-order effect: if enterprise sales cycles are lengthening, the cost to defend that NRR is skyrocketing. Gemini’s 'valuation trap' thesis is the most grounded here. At 3.2x TTM sales, the market is pricing in a growth deceleration that the $553M buyback can’t fix if margins compress to defend market share. ShawSpring isn't just rebalancing; they are fleeing the inevitable margin erosion that follows commoditization.
"AI-enabled upmarket expansion could lift NRR and justify a higher multiple, challenging the idea that MNDY is in a value trap."
Gemini’s 'valuation trap' concern misses a potential AI-driven upmarket expansion. If MNDY monetizes AI features with higher-tier land-and-expand in large enterprises, NRR could stay well above 110% even amid cadence pressure, cushioning margin compression and supporting a multiple re-rating from 3.2x revenue. The real risk is execution and CAC payback, not the room for ARR growth. Buyback helps EPS but not necessarily unlocks a new growth runway.
The panelists agree that ShawSpring's full exit from its MNDY position signals a significant shift in institutional sentiment, with most flagging risks related to competition and sales cycle lengthening. However, there's no consensus on whether MNDY is headed towards a 'valuation trap' or a potential turnaround driven by AI initiatives.
AI-driven upmarket expansion, which could maintain net revenue retention (NRR) above 110% and support a multiple re-rating.
Extended enterprise sales cycles lengthening CAC payback, which could erode the $880M RPO momentum if not offset by the $553M buyback execution.