By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel's discussion on NBXG's performance and Herzfeld's exit is mixed, with concerns about leverage and discount capture in a high-rate environment, but also opportunities due to the fund's discount and yield.
Risk: Structural risk of NBXG's leverage in a high-rate environment, which could eat into NAV if semiconductor holdings face a 'capex pause'.
Opportunity: The fund's 13.4% NAV discount and 11.2% distribution rate, which could be mathematically attractive for income investors if sentiment improves.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Thomas J. Herzfeld Advisors exited 412,390 shares of NBXG in the first quarter; the estimated trade size was $5.65 million based on quarterly average prices.
The quarter-end position value decreased by $5.95 million, reflecting both trading activity and stock price moves.
The transaction represented 1.92% of reportable 13F AUM.
The position previously accounted for 2.0% of the fund’s AUM as of the prior quarter.
On May 12, 2026, Thomas J. Herzfeld Advisors, Inc. reported selling out its entire position in the Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NYSE:NBXG), with an estimated transaction value of $5.65 million based on quarterly average pricing.
According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated May 12, 2026, Thomas J. Herzfeld Advisors eliminated its holding in Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NYSE:NBXG), selling 412,390 shares. The estimated transaction value was $5.65 million, calculated using the average unadjusted close for the first quarter of 2026. The quarter-end value of the position fell by $5.95 million, reflecting both the sale and changes in NBXG’s share price over the period.
NASDAQ: HERZ: $12.51 million (4.3% of AUM)
As of May 11, 2026, shares of NBXG were priced at $15.42, up about 21% over the past year.
| Metric | Value | |---|---| | Revenue (TTM) | $325.84 million | | Net income (TTM) | $321.28 million | | Dividend yield | 9% | | Price (as of market close May 11, 2026) | $15.42 |
The Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc. is a non-diversified, limited term closed-end management investment company with a mandate to deliver both capital appreciation and income. The fund leverages Neuberger Berman's expertise in asset management to identify and invest in companies at the forefront of digital connectivity and infrastructure evolution. Strong net income and a high dividend yield reflect the fund's disciplined investment approach and focus on delivering value to shareholders.
This sale ultimately seems like a move away from a volatile, AI-heavy thematic trade that has become increasingly difficult to navigate amid geopolitical tensions, rate uncertainty, and sharp swings in tech sentiment. NBXG has still delivered solid returns over the past year, but the underlying volatility inside the portfolio appears to have made some investors uncomfortable.
In its latest commentary, the fund itself acknowledged that the first quarter became one of the “more complex macro backdrops in recent memory,” citing Middle East conflict, rising oil prices, and growing skepticism around AI infrastructure spending. NBXG’s NAV fell 8.5% during the quarter, badly lagging the MSCI All Country World Index decline of 3.2%.
Still, management remains aggressively positioned around AI infrastructure. Semiconductor and semiconductor-adjacent holdings represented 32% of assets at quarter-end, with major exposure to Nvidia, Taiwan Semiconductor, Western Digital, and SK hynix. The fund also continues investing in private growth companies tied to connectivity and digital infrastructure themes.
For long-term investors, the biggest attraction may actually be valuation. NBXG traded at roughly a 13.4% discount to NAV at quarter-end while offering an 11.2% market distribution rate. But the fund’s recent performance also highlights how crowded and sentiment-driven AI infrastructure investing has become, especially when macro conditions deteriorate quickly.
Before you buy stock in Neuberger Berman Income Funds - Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Neuberger Berman Income Funds - Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $460,826! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,345,285!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 983% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 12, 2026. *
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Herzfeld's full liquidation of NBXG indicates that institutional confidence in AI-thematic closed-end funds is deteriorating due to excessive NAV volatility and macro-driven underperformance."
Herzfeld’s exit from NBXG is a classic 'smart money' retreat from thematic beta. When a fund’s NAV craters 8.5% in a quarter while the broader MSCI ACWI only dips 3.2%, it signals that the fund’s concentration in high-beta semiconductor and AI infrastructure names is no longer providing the expected alpha. Herzfeld is likely rotating out of this volatile, sentiment-driven exposure into more stable, yield-oriented vehicles. The 13.4% discount to NAV is a siren song for value hunters, but it’s a 'value trap' if the underlying holdings face further multiple compression in a high-rate, geopolitically unstable environment. Investors should view this exit as a warning that the 'AI connectivity' trade is losing its institutional conviction.
The exit could simply be a tactical rebalancing to lock in gains after a 21% annual climb, rather than a fundamental loss of faith in the fund's long-term AI infrastructure thesis.
"Herzfeld's 2% AUM exit is insignificant noise masking NBXG's compelling 13.4% NAV discount and 11.2% distribution rate in a high-conviction AI infrastructure theme."
Herzfeld's complete exit of a mere 1.92% AUM position ($5.65M) in NBXG is portfolio noise, not a ringing endorsement against the fund—especially with their top holdings skewed to other CEFs like FSSL (12%) and PDX (9.4%). NBXG trades at a 13.4% discount to NAV (forward-looking value of assets minus liabilities) with an 11.2% market distribution rate on a 9% yield, up 21% over the past year despite Q1 NAV -8.5% lag vs. MSCI ACWI's -3.2%. Heavy 32% semis/AI infra (Nvidia, TSMC) bets align with secular connectivity growth, making volatility a buyer's opportunity amid macro jitters.
Q1 underperformance signals flawed timing in a crowded AI trade, where semis exposure amplifies risks from US-China tensions, oil spikes, and AI capex skepticism—potentially widening the NAV discount further if sentiment sours.
"A single $5.65M exit by a 1.92% stakeholder is not evidence of thematic collapse; the real risk is whether NBXG's 8.5% Q1 underperformance reflects structural portfolio weakness or temporary macro noise."
This article conflates a single $5.65M exit by one advisor with a broader indictment of AI infrastructure investing. Thomas J. Herzfeld Advisors represents 1.92% of NBXG's AUM—a rounding error. The real story is NBXG's 13.4% NAV discount paired with an 11.2% distribution rate, which is mathematically attractive for income investors even if sentiment is fragile. The fund's 21% YTD return and 32% semiconductor weighting suggest the market hasn't capitulated on AI infrastructure; one exit doesn't signal regime change. However, the 8.5% Q1 NAV decline versus 3.2% MSCI decline is material underperformance that warrants scrutiny.
If one sophisticated advisor is already rotating away from AI infrastructure into diversified holdings (FSSL, PDX, FSCO), it may signal early institutional recognition that valuations have decoupled from fundamentals—meaning the 13.4% discount could compress further, not tighten, if macro deteriorates.
"The real alpha in NBXG comes from its discount-to-NAV and the sustainability of its 9% yield, not from a small fund-trade."
Thomas J. Herzfeld's exit of 412,390 NBXG shares represents about 1.92% of the firm’s 13F AUM—tiny in context and not a reliable read on the AI/connectivity theme. The quarter-end NAV fell 8.5% while NBXG traded at a 13.4% discount to NAV and yielded roughly 11%. The portfolio is heavily concentrated in AI hardware names (Nvidia, TSMC, Western Digital, SK hynix), which means a macro shock or capex pause could pressure both NAV and fund sentiment. Missing context: leverage, private holdings, liquidity risk, and how much the discount could compress or widen in different macro regimes. Still, the case for NBXG hinges on discount capture more than headline trades.
But this could be a red flag: if Herzfeld's move signals risk-off toward AI-heavy funds, others may follow, widening NBXG's discount and pressuring NAV.
"NBXG’s leverage structure makes it uniquely vulnerable to interest rate sensitivity and potential NAV erosion beyond just the semiconductor sector's volatility."
Claude and Grok are ignoring the structural risk of NBXG's leverage in a high-rate environment. CEFs like NBXG often use debt to juice that 11.2% distribution; if the underlying semiconductor holdings face a 'capex pause,' the cost of that leverage will eat into NAV faster than the market expects. Herzfeld isn't just rotating; he’s likely de-risking against the interest expense sensitivity inherent in leveraged AI-infrastructure plays. The discount isn't a 'value' signal; it's a volatility premium.
"Herzfeld's shift stays within leveraged CEFs, not a broad AI de-risk."
Gemini, calling Herzfeld's move 'de-risking against leverage sensitivity in AI plays' misses that he's rotating into peer CEFs like FSSL (12% of his portfolio) and PDX (9.4%)—also leveraged, yield-focused funds. NBXG's 11.2% distribution comfortably covers generic CEF borrowing costs (~4-5%). Unmentioned risk: correlated CEF discounts widening together if rates stay elevated.
"Herzfeld's rotation into peer CEFs undermines the 'de-risking leverage' thesis and suggests fund-specific, not thematic, concerns."
Grok's point about Herzfeld rotating into peer CEFs (FSSL, PDX) rather than exiting leverage entirely is the critical detail everyone glossed over. If he's swapping one leveraged yield vehicle for others, this isn't de-risking—it's tactical reallocation within the same risk class. Gemini's leverage argument only holds if Herzfeld is moving to unleveraged or lower-leverage holdings. The real question: why NBXG specifically over FSSL/PDX? That's where the signal lives, not in the exit itself.
"NBXG’s leverage and refinancing risk mean a 'tactical reallocation' within leveraged peers can still provoke NAV downside and a widening discount if rates stay high."
Claude, you treat the move as tactical within the same risk class. The risk you miss: NBXG’s leverage stack and its refinancing sensitivity. Even small shifts among leveraged peers can signal risk-off reallocations that widen discounts and pressure NAV when rates stay high. If the discount tightens less than NAV stability, income investors could face a double hit: shrinking NAV and persistent distribution pressure.
The panel's discussion on NBXG's performance and Herzfeld's exit is mixed, with concerns about leverage and discount capture in a high-rate environment, but also opportunities due to the fund's discount and yield.
The fund's 13.4% NAV discount and 11.2% distribution rate, which could be mathematically attractive for income investors if sentiment improves.
Structural risk of NBXG's leverage in a high-rate environment, which could eat into NAV if semiconductor holdings face a 'capex pause'.