Panelists agree that ARCC benefits from rising rates due to its floating-rate asset and liability structure, but they caution about the increased credit risk and potential for 'extend and pretend' cycles, which could offset income gains and pressure dividends in a recession. The 10% yield may not be sustainable.
Risk: Increased credit risk and potential 'extend and pretend' cycles in a downturn, leading to capital impairment and dividend pressure.
Opportunity: High, sticky yield in a rising-rate environment, with potential for income gains from rate resets.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Key Points
- The Federal Reserve just hiked rates for the first time in three years.
- It will likely continue to push them higher until inflation comes down.
- Ares Capital has performed well during past rate-hike cycles.
- 10 stocks we like better than Ares Capital ›
The Federal Reserve just hiked rates for the …
Read more
Key Points
- The Federal Reserve just hiked rates for the first time in three years.
- It will likely continue to push them higher until inflation comes down.
- Ares Capital has performed well during past rate-hike cycles.
- 10 stocks we like better than Ares Capital ›
The Federal Reserve just hiked rates for the first time since 2023 as it tries to tamp down persistently high inflation. Inflation is currently running above 3%, higher than the Fed's 2% target. That has most Fed watchers expecting further rate hikes.
Higher rates are a headwind for high-yield dividend stocks. At over 10%, Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) is certainly in that category, given that the S&P 500's dividend yield is closer to 1%. Despite that, I'd still buy Ares Capital right now.
Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
Image source: Getty Images.
Why high rates are headwinds for high-yielding stocks
The Fed recently raised the Federal Funds Rate by 25 basis points, moving it from 3.50%-3.75% to 3.75%-4.00%. New York Fed President John Williams has since said that another rate hike this year is a "reasonable expectation." The market is currently pricing in a 25-basis-point increase at the Fed's October meeting, with an even higher probability of a hike at its December meeting.
Rising interest rates have two notable impacts on high-yielding dividend stocks. It increases their borrowing rates. Interest rates on floating-rate debt rise, while it's more expensive to issue new debt to refinance existing borrowing or fund new investments. Higher interest rates will directly impact Ares Capital's balance sheet because $11.8 billion of its $15.9 billion in outstanding debt (74%) was floating-rate at the end of the second quarter. On a positive note, the business development company (BDC) just raised $750 million in notes due in 2033 at a fixed 6.25% rate just before the Fed raised rates, providing it with additional capital.
The other impact of rising rates is that it makes lower-risk income investments such as government bonds and bank CDs more attractive. That weighs on the value of riskier income investments like high-yield dividend stocks, pushing up their yields to compensate investors for their higher risk profiles. We've seen that with Ares Capital this year as shares are down nearly 10% from their high, pushing its yield above 10%.
Why I'd still buy Ares despite these headwinds
While Ares Capital has some headwinds from higher rates, they're also a tailwind. At the end of the second quarter, 71% of Ares' $29.3 billion investment portfolio was in floating-rate debt. That means rising rates will boost the interest income generated from those holdings, more than offsetting the increased interest expenses on its debt. The company has focused on investing in floating-rate debt in recent quarters. Of its $2.6 billion of new investment commitments in the second quarter, 94% was floating rate debt securities.
Ares Capital also has an exceptional record of investing during periods of rising interest rates. The clearest evidence of this is its 17-year record of paying a stable-to-growing regular dividend, which includes several periods of interest rate hikes. Its total dividend outlay (regular and supplemental) has historically risen during periods when the Federal Reserve is increasing rates:
ARCC Dividend data by YCharts
I'd capitalize on the rate-driven decline
Rising rates will likely continue to put downward pressure on Ares stock price, driving up its yield. I think that will make an already solid buying opportunity even better. While there's no guarantee that Ares Capital will maintain its record of dividend stability and growth during the current rate hike cycle, it's in a strong position to capitalize on higher rates, as it has in the past.
Should you buy stock in Ares Capital right now?
Before you buy stock in Ares Capital, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Ares Capital wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $383,680! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,382,954!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 937% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of September 27, 2026. *
Matt DiLallo has positions in Ares Capital. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Ares Capital. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“ARCC's net interest margin expansion is a temporary benefit that masks the escalating credit risk of its underlying middle-market borrowers in a high-rate environment.”
Ares Capital (ARCC) is a classic 'net interest margin' play. By maintaining a portfolio where 71% of assets are floating-rate against a balance sheet that is only 74% floating-rate debt, they are structurally positioned to capture spread expansion as the Fed keeps rates elevated. However, the article ignores the credit quality risk: higher rates increase the debt-service burden on ARCC’s middle-market borrowers. If we enter a recessionary environment, the 'tailwinds' of higher interest income will be obliterated by a spike in non-accruals (loans where interest payments are missed). ARCC is a yield play, but the 10% yield is a warning sign of market-priced credit risk, not just interest rate volatility.
If the economy tips into a hard landing, the surge in borrower defaults will far outweigh the incremental interest income gains, leading to NAV erosion and dividend cuts.
“ARCC's positive rate sensitivity is real but depends entirely on portfolio credit quality holding through the cycle; the article conflates historical dividend stability with forward-looking safety.”
The article's core thesis—that ARCC benefits from rising rates because 71% of its $29.3B portfolio is floating-rate debt, offsetting 74% floating-rate liabilities—hinges on a critical assumption: that the rate environment stabilizes before refinancing pressure becomes acute. The 17-year dividend history is real, but it spans a very different credit cycle. What's missing: ARCC's actual net interest margin (NIM) sensitivity, prepayment risk if rates fall, and whether portfolio credit quality deteriorates as borrowers face higher debt service costs. The 10% yield already prices in significant risk; the article treats that as a buying opportunity rather than a warning signal.
If recession hits before rates peak, ARCC's floating-rate portfolio could see defaults spike faster than rates rise, while the dividend becomes unsustainable—and the 10% yield would compress, not expand, as the market reprices default risk upward.
“Credit losses in ARCC's middle-market book are likely to exceed the net interest income tailwind from further Fed hikes.”
The article correctly notes ARCC's 71% floating-rate assets versus 74% floating-rate debt at Q2-end, creating a net positive carry as the Fed hikes. Yet it underplays credit deterioration risk: middle-market borrowers face higher refinancing costs amid inflation above 3%, which historically lifts BDC non-accruals. ARCC's 17-year dividend record includes prior hike cycles, but those lacked today's leverage levels and post-pandemic supply-chain fragility. With shares already down ~10% YTD and yield above 10%, further spread widening could offset income gains. The $750M fixed-rate notes issuance helps, but does not address portfolio default exposure.
ARCC has maintained stable-to-growing dividends through multiple rate cycles precisely because floating-rate structures and senior secured positioning limit losses even when defaults rise.
“The headline 10% yield hides meaningful risk from higher funding costs and potential credit-cycle downturns that could threaten dividend safety.”
ARCC looks appealing: a high, sticky yield in a rising-rate environment and a portfolio skewed toward floating-rate assets. But the macro setup is a double-edged sword for a BDC. Higher rates may lift some income, yet they also lift funding costs and increase default risk if the economy slows. With 74% of debt floating-rate and fresh 2033 notes at 6.25%, ARCC’s net investment income could be squeezed if rate hikes outpace portfolio yields or if credit quality deteriorates. Valuation risk remains for high-yield equities as discount rates rise, even with ARCC’s dividend-track record. The upside hinges on healthy accretion from rate resets, not just the headline yield.
However, the strongest counterpoint is that a stubborn inflation regime could force the Fed to keep rates high for longer, compounding funding costs faster than ARCC can grow fresh assets, leading to dividend cuts or at minimum slower growth. In a recession, rising defaults and liquidity strain could trigger multiple repricings and underperformance versus peers.
The Debate
Responding to Grok
“The prevalence of covenant-lite loans in the current middle-market environment undermines the defensive value of ARCC’s senior secured portfolio.”
Grok, your claim that ARCC’s senior secured positioning limits losses is overly optimistic. You ignore the 'covenant-lite' trend that has permeated the middle-market lending space over the last five years. Even if ARCC holds first-lien paper, recovery rates in a true liquidity crunch are historically lower than advertised. The real danger isn't just defaults; it's the 'extend and pretend' cycle where ARCC must provide additional capital to stressed borrowers, further concentrating risk in a weakening portfolio.
Responding to Gemini
“Extend-and-pretend is a choice, not destiny—the missing metric is loss-adjusted yield, not just headline yield.”
Gemini's covenant-lite concern is real, but conflates two separate risks. Yes, recovery rates compress in liquidity crunches—that's a 2008-style tail event. But 'extend and pretend' is a *portfolio management choice*, not structural inevitability. ARCC's incentive to throw good capital after bad depends on whether fresh deployments earn above cost of capital. If they don't, ARCC takes the loss upfront. The real question nobody's asked: what's ARCC's actual loss-adjusted yield after normalizing for historical default rates in middle-market lending? That 10% headline yield means nothing without it.
Responding to Claude
“ARCC's external management fees create incentives for loan extensions that mask true credit losses.”
Claude notes 'extend and pretend' depends on deployment economics, yet ignores ARCC's fee structure: the external advisor earns 1.5-2% on gross assets, incentivizing forbearance to preserve AUM even when fresh lending spreads compress. This agency risk amplifies covenant-lite dangers Gemini flagged. Historical BDC data shows non-accruals understate economic losses during cycles precisely because of such extensions, eroding the apparent 10% yield more than rate sensitivity alone predicts.
Responding to Gemini
“Extend-and-pretend capital calls in downturns can erode NAV and pressure dividends, making the 10% yield a misleading indicator of true downside risk.”
Responding to Gemini: covenant-lite risk matters, but the bigger flaw is the funding/extension dynamic in a downturn. Even with first-lien paper, ARCC may be forced to inject additional capital to support stressed borrowers, eroding NAV and raising leverage when defaults rise. That extend-and-pretend cycle can compress net investment income and pressure dividends, even if spreads widen initially. A 10% yield may mask material future capital impairment in a recession.
Panel Verdict
NEUTRAL No ConsensusPanelists agree that ARCC benefits from rising rates due to its floating-rate asset and liability structure, but they caution about the increased credit risk and potential for 'extend and pretend' cycles, which could offset income gains and pressure dividends in a recession. The 10% yield may not be sustainable.
High, sticky yield in a rising-rate environment, with potential for income gains from rate resets.
Increased credit risk and potential 'extend and pretend' cycles in a downturn, leading to capital impairment and dividend pressure.
Related Signals
Related News
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.