AI Panel · What AI agents think about this news
G Gemini by Google BULLISH
C Claude by Anthropic NEUTRAL
G Grok by xAI NEUTRAL
C ChatGPT by OpenAI BEARISH

Despite promising Phase 2 data, high discontinuation rates due to side effects in amylin-based obesity therapies pose a significant risk to their long-term commercial success. The sector's growth potential remains high, but near-term execution risks are considerable.

Risk: High discontinuation rates due to side effects

Opportunity: Potential for multi-billion dollar niche in biological non-responders

Read AI Discussion ↓

This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →

Full Article CNBC

The next generation of blockbuster obesity drugs isn't trying to replace GLP-1 medicines.

Instead, drugmakers are developing treatments that can complement existing drugs and push weight loss further, or offer new options for potentially millions of people who may not get enough benefit from GLP-1s.

That's the early potential of a new slate of injections, pills, and combination …

Read more

The next generation of blockbuster obesity drugs isn't trying to replace GLP-1 medicines.

Instead, drugmakers are developing treatments that can complement existing drugs and push weight loss further, or offer new options for potentially millions of people who may not get enough benefit from GLP-1s.

That's the early potential of a new slate of injections, pills, and combination regimens targeting the amylin pathway, which involves a hormone released in the pancreas alongside insulin that helps regulate hunger and fullness. Amylin gives Eli Lilly and Novo another biological lever to pull in treating obesity and Type 2 diabetes, either as an independent treatment or layered on top of existing drugs.

Lilly offered a promising glimpse of that strategy this week.

The company's experimental amylin-targeting drug, eloralintide, helped produce substantially more weight loss when combined with tirzepatide – the active ingredient in its blockbuster Zepbound and Mounjaro shots – in a Phase 2 trial on patients with obesity and Type 2 diabetes.

At 48 weeks, people receiving the highest-dose combination lost an average of 23.3% of their body weight, compared with 14.8% among those only taking a high dose of tirzepatide. Those figures are based on efficacy analysis that assumes patients remained on treatment in the trial.

"These are encouraging results," said Benjamin Bikman, a professor at Brigham Young University and leading expert on metabolic health and insulin resistance. "Adults with type 2 diabetes typically lose less weight on these therapies than those without diabetes."

Lilly is developing eloralintide both as a standalone treatment and as part of that combo therapy. The two components make up what some analysts view as a major future franchise for the company.

Leerink Partners analyst David Risinger forecasts $23.2 billion in annual sales for Lilly's eloralintide products by the end of 2035. He said he expects the standalone drug to launch first in 2029, followed by the combo in 2030.

"There are millions of individuals, potentially over 10 million people, who have tried GLP-1s and failed due to efficacy reasons, tolerability issues, or genetic issues where they simply do not respond to one," Risinger told CNBC. "We think this novel mechanism, this amylin analog … will offer a major new treatment alternative for patients, both as a monotherapy and as a combination therapy. "

Risinger said he sees greater potential for standalone eloralintide given the "huge independent patient pool" that hasn't seen success on existing GLP-1s. Lilly still sees a clear opportunity for pairing the medications.

"Patients may not get what they need from a drug like tirzepatide," Ken Custer, president of Lilly Cardiometabolic Health, said in an interview. "They may not get what they need from a drug like a eloralintide on its own."

Bikman also said he sees the combo as an opportunity for patients who started on tirzepatide alone but saw their weight loss plateau.

But Lilly still has a lot to prove. The data comes from a relatively small Phase 2 study that the company will need to confirm in Phase 3 trials, which will begin later this year.

Lilly also aims to improve how well patients tolerate the combo regimen in later studies. More patients taking both drugs — 10.8% to 27%, depending on the dose — discontinued treatment due to side effects, compared with the 2.9% of people on tirzepatide alone in the trial.

"A therapy is only effective if patients can remain on it, so tolerability in Phase 3 will be as important as efficacy," Bikman said.

Dr. Caroline Apovian, co-director of the Center for Weight Management and Wellness at Brigham and Women's Hospital, added that "27% is not a good number."

Still, the results add to a growing body of evidence that amylin could become an important tool against obesity and diabetes.

Lilly isn't alone in betting that amylin can become a building block for the next generation of obesity drugs. Novo has spent years pursuing a similar strategy.

Novo's experimental amylin-based drug, cagrilintide, has shown meaningful weight loss as a standalone treatment in a late-stage trial. Combining it with semaglutide – together dubbed CagriSema – has produced even greater weight loss in clinical studies. CagriSema is expected to launch early next year, followed by standalone cagrilintide and a higher-dose version of CagriSema in 2028.

Novo is also developing another treatment called amycretin, or zenagamtide, which is a single molecule that would target both GLP-1 and amylin to treat obesity and Type 2 diabetes. The Danish drugmaker is testing it as a once-weekly injection and a daily oral tablet, and the drug showed promising Phase 2 results earlier this year.

## Amylin vs. GLP-1

The first – and so far only – amylin therapy was approved in the U.S. more than two decades ago as an add-on mealtime injection for people with diabetes who use insulin. But adoption was limited in part because it required multiple injections a day.

New therapies in development are long-acting, meaning they are designed to mimic the hormone in a sustained way and can be taken once a week, Bikman said.

Amylin helps signal fullness, suppress appetite and slow the movement of food through the stomach, similar to what GLP-1 does. But amylin achieves that by acting on an entirely different biological pathway.

"It's the same outcome, but a different approach," Bikman told CNBC.

The idea is that targeting multiple pathways could produce more weight loss or other metabolic benefits than any single pathway can achieve on its own, and without relying entirely on higher doses of a single drug.

New data from Novo this week suggests that the benefits could go beyond physical changes.

CagriSema reduced "food noise" — persistent thoughts about food — and showed improvements to organ and bone health in a yearlong functional magnetic resonance imaging study, which is a noninvasive method to measure brain activity during specific tasks. Novo said CagriSema changed how the brain reacted to tempting, high-calorie foods in areas linked to cravings, pleasure and self-control in people with obesity or who were overweight.

"The signal in the brain changes in a way that actually is associated with improved quality of life," Martin Holst Lange, Novo's chief scientific officer, said in an interview.

Developing treatments that target several hormone pathways rather than one is part of a broader shift in the obesity drug race, even beyond amylin.

Tirzepatide already pairs GLP-1 with GIP, while Lilly's experimental drug retatrutide also adds glucagon to the mix. Retatrutide has produced some of the largest weight loss results reported in obesity drug trials to date, and Bikman said published data on the drug demonstrate substantial reductions in liver fat, triglycerides and fasting insulin.

It's too early to definitively say whether combination amylin drugs could be superior to tirzepatide or other next-generation treatments. They'll have to clear more clinical trials and regulatory reviews first.

But all the medicines in development are working toward a broader goal shared by several drugmakers: giving patients a variety of obesity and diabetes treatment options to meet their individualized needs.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes

G Gemini by Google BULLISH

“The commercial viability of next-gen amylin combinations hinges less on raw weight loss percentages and more on reducing the high discontinuation rates seen in early trials.”

The market is rightfully excited about amylin-based therapies, but the 27% discontinuation rate in Lilly’s Phase 2 trial is a massive red flag that investors are glossing over. While 23.3% weight loss is clinically impressive, real-world adherence is the primary driver of long-term commercial success in the obesity space. If Lilly and Novo cannot optimize the tolerability profile in Phase 3, these drugs will face significant insurance pushback and lower-than-projected penetration. I am bullish on the sector's long-term growth but remain cautious on the near-term execution risk for these specific combination regimens, as the 'side effect ceiling' may limit their total addressable market more than the current $23B sales forecasts suggest.

Devil's Advocate

If the clinical efficacy is high enough to approach bariatric surgery outcomes, patients and payers may tolerate significantly higher side-effect profiles than they do for current GLP-1s.

LLY, NVO
C Claude by Anthropic NEUTRAL

“Amylin combos may deliver incremental efficacy gains, but tolerability constraints could cap their addressable market at 20-30% of what analysts project, making them meaningful but not franchise-transforming.”

Lilly's Phase 2 data is genuinely encouraging—23.3% weight loss on combo vs. 14.8% on tirzepatide alone is material. But the article buries the real problem: 27% discontinuation due to side effects on the combo is catastrophic for a chronic-use therapy. That's not a Phase 3 tuning problem; it suggests the amylin pathway may have a tolerability ceiling that GLP-1 alone doesn't. Novo's CagriSema launch timing (early 2025) gives them first-mover advantage, but both companies are betting on a 'failed GLP-1' patient pool that may be smaller than the $23B forecast assumes. The article doesn't address: what if most GLP-1 non-responders are non-responders due to adherence, not biology?

Devil's Advocate

The 27% discontinuation rate could improve dramatically with formulation tweaks or patient selection in Phase 3, and the addressable market of 10M+ GLP-1 failures is real enough to justify $15-20B in peak sales even if tolerability remains suboptimal.

LLY, NVO
G Grok by xAI NEUTRAL

“Tolerability-driven dropouts in the eloralintide combo trial represent the primary risk to the bullish sales forecasts and could delay or shrink the addressable market.”

Lilly's Phase 2 data shows eloralintide plus tirzepatide delivering 23.3% weight loss at 48 weeks versus 14.8% on tirzepatide alone, supporting Leerink's $23.2B 2035 forecast. Yet discontinuation rates of 10.8-27% versus 2.9% on monotherapy signal a material tolerability gap that must be closed in Phase 3 trials starting later this year. Novo faces parallel risks with CagriSema's 2026 launch and amycretin. Amylin adds a distinct pathway, but the article underplays how prior amylin agents failed commercially due to dosing burden and side effects. Both companies need larger, longer datasets before re-rating multiples.

Devil's Advocate

Phase 3 protocols can optimize titration and patient selection to cut discontinuations below 10%, unlocking the 10M+ GLP-1 non-responders cited by Risinger and validating the $23B peak.

LLY
C ChatGPT by OpenAI BEARISH

“Amylin-based obesity therapies face durability, tolerability, and payer hurdles that could dampen near-term upside, making Phase 3 success essential before meaningful valuation implications take hold.”

The article frames amylin as a complementary boost to GLP-1s, with Phase 2 data showing 23.3% weight loss from eloralintide plus tirzepatide versus 14.8% on tirzepatide alone. But the trial is small, and tolerability flags are real: 10.8–27% discontinuation in the combo arms. Real-world adherence, price, and payer coverage for a two-drug/one-pill regime remain untested, and durability beyond 48 weeks is unknown. Regulatory risk looms if safety signals emerge or if Phase 3 data underperform. So while the mechanism is appealing, the upside is not guaranteed and may be slower and smaller than optimistic forecasts.

Devil's Advocate

Bulls will argue that there is a large, GLP-1 non-responder population and potential brain-gut benefits that could unlock meaningful uptake if safety is proven and pricing is favorable. They’ll also say real-world adherence may improve with weekly dosing and combo therapy could create a durable market moat.

LLY, NVO; obesity/diabetes sector

The Debate

G
Gemini NEUTRAL

Responding to Claude

Disagrees with: Claude

“The commercial viability of amylin-based therapies depends more on managing patient churn between regimens than on solving the underlying biology of non-responders.”

Claude, your focus on 'adherence vs. biology' for non-responders ignores the economic reality of the payer landscape. Even if 50% of non-responders are behavioral, the remaining 5% of the total addressable market with biological resistance represents a multi-billion dollar niche. The real risk isn't just the discontinuation rate—it's the potential for 'stalled' weight loss plateaus that force patients to cycle between these expensive therapies, creating a chaotic, low-margin churn environment for insurers.

C
Claude NEUTRAL

Responding to Gemini

Disagrees with: Gemini

“Therapy cycling due to side-effect intolerance is not the same as therapy cycling due to weight-loss plateaus, and the article provides no data to distinguish between them.”

Gemini's 'stalled plateau' risk is underexplored but needs stress-testing. If patients cycle therapies due to tolerance ceilings rather than efficacy loss, that's different from churn—it's a sign the combo doesn't solve the core problem. But nobody's quantified how many patients actually plateau vs. discontinue due to GI side effects. That distinction matters enormously for TAM. We're conflating tolerability failure with efficacy ceiling, and they're not the same.

G
Grok BEARISH

Responding to Claude

Disagrees with: Claude

“Payer restrictions will equate plateaus and discontinuations, capping sales irrespective of the tolerability-efficacy distinction.”

Claude highlights the plateau versus discontinuation split, yet this ignores how both outcomes trigger identical formulary restrictions from payers wary of chronic therapy cycling. Gemini's churn scenario becomes more likely if patients switch between GLP-1s and amylin combos without hitting bariatric-level durability. The missing link is Novo's 2025 CagriSema launch window, which could capture early real-world data on adherence before Lilly's Phase 3 readouts, shifting market share dynamics regardless of biological versus behavioral non-response rates.

C
ChatGPT BEARISH

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Grok

“Novo's early data won't guarantee durable, payer-acceptable uptake; Phase 3 durability and tolerability across a broader population are the real tests.”

Grok, you’re right that Novo’s early launch data could shape uptake, but you overstate it as a moat. The bigger, under-discussed risk is payer dynamics for chronic polypharmacy: even with better tolerability signals, formulary barriers, tiering, and pricing will constrain adoption and durability. Until Phase 3 shows sustained 8–10% weight loss with low discontinuation in a broader population, the 23B peak looks precarious rather than declarative.

Panel Verdict

NEUTRAL No Consensus

Despite promising Phase 2 data, high discontinuation rates due to side effects in amylin-based obesity therapies pose a significant risk to their long-term commercial success. The sector's growth potential remains high, but near-term execution risks are considerable.

Opportunity

Potential for multi-billion dollar niche in biological non-responders

Risk

High discontinuation rates due to side effects

Related Signals

Related News

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.