Your UK pension is no longer safe from inheritance tax: what should you do?
By Maksym Misichenko · The Guardian ·
By Maksym Misichenko · The Guardian ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel agrees that the inclusion of pensions in the UK's inheritance tax net from April 2027 will significantly impact wealth management and insurance sectors, with increased demand for annuities and whole-of-life insurance. However, there is disagreement on the long-term effects and potential risks.
Risk: Mass migration into annuities could lead to significant reinvestment risk for insurers if interest rates normalize downward by 2026-27, along with potential forced equity selling due to pension fund rebalancing.
Opportunity: Increased demand for annuities and whole-of-life insurance, benefiting insurers like Legal & General and Aviva.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Many of us are still getting our heads around the price increases and tax tweaks that took effect this month, but you might want to give some thought to next April.
Some big changes to pensions, savings and investments are coming down the track, and there are things you can do now and in the coming months to get ready for them.
One change that is very much front of mind for a lot of older people – and is keeping financial advisers and wealth planners very busy – is Rachel Reeves’s “inheritance tax raid” on unspent pension money that takes effect in just under a year’s time.
This has prompted many people to take action to avoid being landed with a bill that, for some, could run into five or six figures.
Bringing unused pension pots within the scope of inheritance tax means that what was once seen as a tax on only the wealthiest “is now firmly a middle‑income issue,” says Rachael Griffin at the investment firm Quilter.
Nicholas Nesbitt, a partner at the accountancy firm Forvis Mazars, says that for families, “the time for planning is now. We’re seeing clients shifting their planning strategies, increasing retirement spending and accelerating gifting to cut the tax bill”.
At the moment, pension savings are not normally part of someone’s estate for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes. But from April 2027, money left in a defined contribution (AKA money purchase) pension after your death will be pulled into the IHT net. Most workplace pensions and all private pensions are this type.
IHT is a tax paid on someone’s assets after they die if they leave enough to go above a certain threshold. The standard IHT rate is 40%, and it is charged only on the part of the estate that is above the tax-free threshold, which is £325,000. (There is an extra allowance for homes.)
The change means “unused” pension savings could be taxed as part of someone’s estate if they help take the total value of the estate over the IHT threshold. Unused savings are money that hasn’t been used to claim an income, such as by buying an annuity.
The IHT exemption for spouses or civil partners will continue to apply, so everything can be left to them without a bill. But other beneficiaries could face tax.
There are various options for those who might be affected:
** Spend more money** For those well-off older people who can afford it, probably the easiest way to mitigate or reduce a potential IHT bill for their heirs is to spend more pension cash now – on themselves and/or their relatives.
Like many financial planners, Will Stevens, a partner at the wealth manager Killik & Co, has seen an increase in the number of older people withdrawing money from their pensions for the purpose of treating their family – for example, splashing out on a big holiday or taking everyone out for dinner and a show.
But everyone’s circumstances are different, and it is vital to ensure you have enough money to support yourself through the later years of retirement.
** Buy an annuity** One way to reduce the amount of unused money in your pension pot is to use some of it to buy an annuity. This is a product that gives you a regular, guaranteed income for the rest of your life (or for a fixed term). You can spend the money as you choose – including making a regular gift out of the income (see below).
Sales of annuities have soared: 2025 was a “record-breaking” year, and they now offer better value than they used to.
However, you will need to consider whether you want an annuity that covers just you (a single life annuity) or one that provides an income for your spouse, civil partner or another dependant after you die (a joint life annuity).
You will also need to choose whether you want a level annuity, which will pay you the same income each year, or an escalating one, which will provide an income that increases every year.
This week, a 65-year-old who uses £100,000 of their pension savings to buy a basic single life level annuity could secure an annual income of about £7,800, rising to about £8,500 and £9,700 respectively at age 70 and 75.
** Give **away money The new rules have triggered a wave of “gifting”.
There are various allowances people can use to give tax-free gifts. For example, you can give away assets or cash up to £3,000 in every tax year without them being added to the value of your estate. That £3,000 can be given to one person or split between several people. And you can carry any unused annual exemption forward to the next tax year – so two grandparents could give someone £6,000 each one year, says Stevens.
A separate small gift allowance lets you give as many gifts of up to £250 a person as you want each tax year, as long as you haven’t used another allowance on the same person. There’s also an allowance for tax-free gifts to people getting married or civil partnered.
In addition, the “potentially exempt transfer” rules allow you to give money or gifts of any amount or value to anyone, which will not attract IHT as long as you live for seven years after giving them.
Starting to give gifts out of regular income is another option. You can give away as much money as you want as long as it comes out of a regular income, rather than capital, and does not affect the giver’s standard of living. “Examples of this could include paying school fees for a grandchild or contributing to a Junior Isa,” says Helen Morrissey at the investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown. This isn’t a straightforward area, so you may want to take advice.
** Pay** down a grandchild’s student loan Amid the concern about millions of graduates saddled with ballooning student loan debts, you may want to help pay off a grandchild’s loan. “It’s a solution to two people’s very different problems at once,” says Stevens.
It is very easy to pay money off your child or grandchild’s student loan. You can make a repayment towards someone else’s loan without even signing in to their online account: you just need the surname and customer reference number.
However, if you do opt to do this, it would be considered a gift under IHT rules, Stevens says: even if you are not directly giving them money, you are paying off a debt they owe.
** Take out life insurance** Financial advisers are reporting a surge in sales of a type of life insurance that can be used to pay off a potential IHT bill and thereby avoid the need to sell the family home or other assets to meet the liability.
Whole of life insurance guarantees a payout to your beneficiaries on your death, regardless of when that happens, provided you keep paying your premiums, says Kevin Carr, director at the platform Protection Review.
There are various types of policy and it can be pricey, but Stevens says it needs to be something you know you can continue to afford as you get older. “If you end up missing payments at a later date, you can lose your cover, and if [that happens], you lose all the money you’ve made in payments so far,” he says.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The shift in IHT rules will drive a structural surge in demand for life insurance and annuity products as retirees seek to preserve capital against the 40% tax drag."
The inclusion of pensions in the inheritance tax (IHT) net from April 2027 represents a fundamental shift in UK wealth management, effectively ending the pension's status as a tax-efficient estate planning vehicle. While the article highlights defensive strategies like gifting and annuities, it ignores the behavioral risk: retirees may prematurely deplete capital, increasing longevity risk—the danger of outliving one's assets. For the insurance sector, this is a clear tailwind, particularly for 'Whole of Life' policies. Investors should watch insurers like Legal & General (LGEN) and Aviva (AV.), which stand to benefit from increased demand for IHT-mitigation products, though the broader impact on pension fund inflows could be negative as the tax-shielded incentive diminishes.
The policy could be amended or reversed by a future government before the 2027 implementation date, making current aggressive divestment and gifting strategies potentially premature and unnecessary.
"IHT raid catalyzes annuity sales boom at peak rates, providing multi-year tailwind for specialists like JUST.L amid already elevated 2025 volumes."
UK's April 2027 IHT inclusion for unspent DC pensions (median pot ~£88k per ONS) will accelerate annuity and whole-of-life insurance demand, with 2025 already a record annuity year at yields ~7.8% for a 65yo £100k single-life level policy. Insurers like Just Group (JUST.L, annuity focus) and Legal & General (LGEN.L) gain structurally; advisers report gifting surges (e.g., £3k annual exemption + carry-forward). Second-order boost to consumer spending/holidays, but risks underspending in longevity (avg life expectancy 81). DB pensions (~80% of private sector) exempt, narrowing impact. Planners busy, fees up.
Spousal exemption shields most intra-family transfers, and with £325k nil-rate band (+£175k residence allowance), only top-decile estates truly hit—potentially capping sales surge as many pots stay untouched.
"The April 2027 rule change will drive a 12-18 month surge in annuity sales and life insurance demand, but the article overstates the 'middle-income' scope—most affected households already have advisers and will optimize, while true mass-market impact is limited."
This is a genuine structural shift in UK wealth taxation, but the article conflates urgency with inevitability. April 2027 is 16 months away—enough time for political reversal (Labour faces backlash; a future government might carve exemptions). The article also undersells the friction: annuity sales surged partly due to rate environment, not just IHT panic. Life insurance as a hedge is expensive and requires discipline over decades. Gifting strategies are real but complex—'potentially exempt transfers' require 7-year survival, which is speculative for older cohorts. The biggest miss: this will likely accelerate pension drawdowns and annuity purchases in 2025-26, creating a temporary revenue boost for insurers and fund managers, but the long-term effect is capital flight into spending or overseas structures, not market-neutral repositioning.
If the political cost becomes too high, a future government could delay or carve out exemptions (e.g., for spouses or defined benefit pensions), rendering current panic-driven decisions suboptimal and creating regret selling in annuities at today's yields.
"The real risk is that this reform will mostly shift IHT liabilities and retirement liquidity rather than eliminating them, potentially eroding retirement security for those who try to game the timing."
Reality check: April 2027’s IHT change isn’t a universal windfall. The £325k nil-rate band plus the main residence allowance and spousal exemption still shield many estates. The 'unused pension' rule depends on death timing and seven-year gifting—but many plans won’t cross the IHT line, and a donor surviving seven years is uncertain. Annuities and life cover add costs, inflation risk, and reduce retirement liquidity when you may need it most. The piece glosses policy risk and interactions with pension death benefits. Don’t over-rotate to gifting or guarantees without a careful personal stress test.
Devil’s advocate: For households near or above the IHT threshold with sizeable pension pots, unused funds could still become a meaningful liability; accelerating gifts or buying annuities might pay off if timing and rate assumptions line up, so the article’s blanket warning risks missing real beneficiaries.
"The projected insurance windfall ignores the long-term reinvestment risk and the high mortality-linked failure rate of aggressive gifting strategies."
Grok and Gemini are overestimating the 'tailwind' for insurers. If the 2027 change triggers a mass migration into annuities, insurers face significant reinvestment risk if interest rates normalize downward by 2026-27. Furthermore, Claude correctly identifies that the 7-year survival rule for 'potentially exempt transfers' makes gifting a high-stakes gamble for the elderly. The real risk isn't just longevity; it's the systemic mispricing of death benefit liabilities if annuity demand spikes artificially ahead of the deadline.
"Annuity issuers gain from high locked yields if rates fall; DC drawdowns risk UK equity sell-off."
Gemini, your insurer reinvestment risk claim is flawed: annuity writers lock in today's ~5.3% 30yr gilt yields against multi-decade liabilities, profiting if rates fall by 2027 as asset returns outpace new business costs. Bigger unmentioned risk: policy sparks DC drawdown frenzy (£2trn+ in UK DC assets), triggering fund liquidations and FTSE selling pressure into 2026—equities bearish short-term.
"Accelerated pension drawdowns could trigger structural equity selling pressure via fund rebalancing, not just annuity demand."
Grok's FTSE liquidation thesis is underexplored. If £2trn DC assets see even 5-10% accelerated drawdowns into 2026, that's £100-200bn equity selling pressure into a potentially illiquid market. Claude flagged capital flight; Grok quantified it. But nobody's addressed pension fund rebalancing cascades—if gilts rally on rate-cut expectations, funds de-risk equities mechanically. This isn't just annuity demand; it's forced selling into weakness.
"Reinvestment risk remains a meaningful drag on long-term insurer profitability despite locked annuity yields."
To Grok: reinvestment risk isn’t dead just because annuity writers lock in 30-year gilt yields. If rates fall by 2027, new business costs rise while pre-priced liabilities underwrite, compressing margins. Moreover, the £2trn DC drawdown you cited implies near-term gilt volatility and potential forced equity reallocations, not a smooth liability hedge. The real risk is a fragile balance between IHT-driven demand and funding strain in insurers’ long-duration books.
The panel agrees that the inclusion of pensions in the UK's inheritance tax net from April 2027 will significantly impact wealth management and insurance sectors, with increased demand for annuities and whole-of-life insurance. However, there is disagreement on the long-term effects and potential risks.
Increased demand for annuities and whole-of-life insurance, benefiting insurers like Legal & General and Aviva.
Mass migration into annuities could lead to significant reinvestment risk for insurers if interest rates normalize downward by 2026-27, along with potential forced equity selling due to pension fund rebalancing.