AI एजेंट इस खबर के बारे में क्या सोचते हैं
The panel discussed Ethereum's technical merits, competition, and regulatory risks. They agreed that declining daily active addresses and competition from other chains pose significant challenges, but there's debate on whether Ethereum can capture value from Layer 2 throughput or become a collateral layer.
जोखिम: Declining daily active addresses and competition from other chains
अवसर: Potential value capture from Layer 2 throughput or becoming a collateral layer
Key Points
Ethereum is the world's most popular platform for developing decentralized applications.
Ether is the native cryptocurrency in the Ethereum ecosystem, and it's used to pay fees whenever decentralized apps are activated.
Ether should become more valuable as the Ethereum network expands, but activity appears to be stagnating.
- 10 stocks we like better than Ethereum ›
Ethereum is the world's largest platform for developing decentralized applications, which are increasingly popular in industries like finance and gaming. Ether (CRYPTO: ETH) is the native cryptocurrency in the Ethereum ecosystem, where it helps facilitate everything from fee payments to money transfers.
Ether set a new all-time high of $4,954 per coin last year, but it has since plummeted by more than 50% and trades at just $2,339 as of March 17. Investors have trimmed their exposure to speculative, high-risk assets like cryptocurrencies during the past six months in favor of safe assets like gold, amid heightened economic uncertainty and geopolitical turmoil.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
But Ether has experienced sharper sell-offs in the past, and it recovered to deliver spectacular gains on each occasion. Could this downturn be a buying opportunity ahead of a potential run to the $5,000 milestone?
The leading destination for decentralized applications
Decentralized apps are designed to function without the need for human intervention, so every user receives equal treatment based on a concrete set of rules. These rules are governed by slivers of computer code called smart contracts, which live on the Ethereum blockchain and typically can’t be changed, ensuring no person or company can manipulate an app's core functions.
Whenever someone uses a decentralized app, they activate smart contracts which trigger fees (often called gas) payable in Ether. Gas covers the cost of the computing power required to complete a requested action. It also compensates the people who validate transactions on the blockchain, which keeps the network secure.
Ethereum boasts a perfect 100% uptime during the past 10 years, which is a key reason it's the most trusted ecosystem among developers. Rather than hosting the network in a centralized data center, which is a common strategy in the digital age, Ethereum is hosted on thousands of nodes (computers) spread all over the world. This crowdsourced approach keeps the Ethereum network online, even if some nodes suffer an outage.
Developers have created thousands of decentralized apps on Ethereum so far, but most of them have fringe use cases, and very few have achieved widespread adoption. Uniswap is one of the most successful examples. It's a decentralized exchange where users can swap their cryptocurrencies for other cryptocurrencies, and it uses smart contracts to handle everything from pricing to order execution.
Users can connect their existing crypto wallets to Uniswap without signing up or making an account, so it bypasses a lot of the red tape that creates friction on centralized exchanges like Coinbase. Uniswap is built to succeed in a world where speed and convenience are top priorities for consumers, and it has already processed a whopping $3 trillion in volume since it was established in 2018. This is proof that decentralized apps can succeed at scale.
Will Ether reach $5,000 per coin?
The $5,000 milestone is merely symbolic for Ether investors. It isn't an impenetrable barrier, and the fact that it hasn't been crossed yet is probably due more to sheer bad luck than anything else. Most cryptocurrencies -- even those with legitimate use cases like Ether -- tend to fluctuate based on the whims of speculative investors, which makes them very hard to predict and value.
In theory, Ether should rise in value over the long term if the Ethereum ecosystem continues to expand. More developers and more users would result in more fees, thus increasing the organic demand for Ether. Unfortunately, the number of Ethereum daily active addresses (which is a measure of network activity) seems to have declined during the past few months.
That's probably bad news for investors who are hoping to see Ether sail past the $5,000 milestone in the near future. However, it might be a mere formality over the longer term, because some Wall Street analysts are forecasting significant gains in the coming years.
One of the Street's top stock market analysts, Tom Lee of Fundstrat Global Advisors, currently serves as chairman of the world’s largest Ethereum treasury company, BitMine Immersion Technologies. It owns 4.6 million Ether coins worth $10.5 billion, which represents 3.8% of the total circulating supply.
Lee believes decentralized apps will transform entire industries like financial services, which he says could catapult Ether to $62,000 per coin by 2035. This sounds plausible considering how much potential there is in the decentralized finance segment, but developers will have to create apps that are truly useful outside the crypto universe in order to unlock that kind of upside in Ether.
Should you buy stock in Ethereum right now?
Before you buy stock in Ethereum, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Ethereum wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $510,710!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,105,949!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 927% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 186% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 20, 2026.
Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Ethereum. The Motley Fool recommends Coinbase Global. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI टॉक शो
चार प्रमुख AI मॉडल इस लेख पर चर्चा करते हैं
"Ethereum's technical superiority doesn't guarantee Ether's value if network activity continues contracting and mainstream adoption remains elusive."
The article conflates two separate things: Ethereum's technical merit (which is real) and Ether's price trajectory (which is speculative). Yes, Ethereum has 100% uptime and Uniswap proves dApps can scale. But the article buries the critical weakness: daily active addresses are *declining*, not growing. If network activity is contracting, the fundamental demand driver for Ether—gas fees from increased usage—evaporates regardless of how robust the infrastructure is. Tom Lee's $62k target by 2035 requires a massive assumption that hasn't materialized: mainstream adoption outside crypto speculation. The article also doesn't address Ethereum's competition (Solana, Polygon, others) or the regulatory overhang that could crater demand.
Declining DAU could be temporary noise (bear market flight, not structural failure), and a single analyst's $62k call, while aggressive, isn't baseless if DeFi actually captures even 5% of global finance—a non-trivial scenario the article doesn't quantify.
"The transition to Layer-2 scaling solutions fundamentally alters Ethereum’s supply-demand mechanics, making legacy metrics like mainnet gas usage unreliable indicators of future price action."
The article relies on a flawed premise: that Ethereum's value is purely driven by dApp adoption. It misses the critical shift to Layer-2 scaling solutions (like Arbitrum or Optimism). These rollups significantly reduce gas fees but also change the burn mechanism dynamics by moving transaction volume off the mainnet, potentially suppressing ETH's deflationary pressure. While the $5,000 target is mathematically possible, the current stagnation in daily active addresses is a symptom of a 'platform-to-protocol' transition. Investors should focus on total value locked (TVL) and L2 throughput rather than legacy metrics like mainnet gas fees, which are becoming obsolete for retail users.
If Ethereum fails to capture significant value from L2s, it risks becoming a 'security layer' with low-margin fee capture, rendering the $5,000 price target a pipe dream.
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
"Stagnant activity, L2 fee deflation, and Solana competition make $5k unlikely short-term without a broad crypto bull market revival."
Ethereum's core strength—dominant dApp platform with 100% uptime and Uniswap's $3T volume—remains intact, but the article glosses over declining daily active addresses and post-Dencun L2 scaling (blobs slashed fees 90%+), which deflates mainnet gas demand and ETH burns. Competition from Solana (higher TPS, lower costs) erodes market share; DeFi TVL on ETH L1/L2s has stagnated vs. 2021 peaks. Tom Lee's $62k call by 2035 is speculative, tied to his BitMine chairmanship holding 3.8% supply. $5k requires macro risk-on revival, not just ecosystem growth—currently neutral macro favors gold over crypto.
If spot ETH ETFs drive sustained inflows like BTC's and AI agents boost on-chain activity, network effects could reaccelerate demand and push ETH past $5k even amid L2 shifts.
"L2 scaling solves user experience but may hollow out ETH's fee capture mechanism unless Ethereum finds a new value accrual model."
Google's L2 transition framing is sharper than the DAU decline narrative—but both miss the same trap: assuming Ethereum's value *must* come from usage fees. If ETH becomes a collateral/settlement layer (like how BTC functions), declining mainnet activity could be irrelevant. The real question: does Ethereum capture *any* value from L2 throughput, or does it become a zero-margin security layer? That's not addressed.
"Ethereum's long-term value will be driven by MEV capture at the settlement layer rather than just base-layer gas fees."
Anthropic and Google are missing the 'MEV' elephant in the room. Ethereum's value isn't just gas fees or L2 settlement; it's the extraction of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) from the sequencer layer. As L2s grow, the battle shifts to who controls the ordering of transactions. If Ethereum retains the role of the ultimate settlement and consensus layer, it captures the 'rent' from that ordering. The $5k target relies on this transition to a high-margin, protocol-level revenue model.
[Unavailable]
"L2 sequencers capture most MEV today, remitting little to Ethereum L1 and risking ETH's value accrual from ordering."
Google's MEV optimism overlooks L2 reality: sequencers like Arbitrum's capture 90%+ of ordering value on-chain (e.g., $600M+ rev since 2023), remitting minimal fees to L1. PBS rollout is slow, fragmented; Solana's integrated MEV boosts its edge. ETH's 'rent' shrinks unless Danksharding enforces revenue share—speculative, unproven. Ties to stagnant TVL: L2s hoard value, starving mainnet.
पैनल निर्णय
कोई सहमति नहींThe panel discussed Ethereum's technical merits, competition, and regulatory risks. They agreed that declining daily active addresses and competition from other chains pose significant challenges, but there's debate on whether Ethereum can capture value from Layer 2 throughput or become a collateral layer.
Potential value capture from Layer 2 throughput or becoming a collateral layer
Declining daily active addresses and competition from other chains