QCOM Stock Snapshot Price, market cap, P/E, EPS, ROE, debt/equity, 52-week range

03
Price $184.87
Market Cap (MRQ) $195.41B
P/E (TTM) 21.1
EPS (TTM) $8.76
Revenue (TTM) $44.07B
ROE (TTM) 33.8%
Debt/Equity (MRQ) 0.1
52W Range $122–$260

QCOM Stock Price Chart Daily OHLCV with technical indicators — pan, zoom, and customize your view

04
range
bars

Bar granularity adapts to the selected period — hover the chart to see open/high/low/close for a bar.

Stock splits 4
Ex-date Split Type
Aug. 16, 2004 2-for-1 Forward
Dec. 31, 1999 4-for-1 Forward
May 11, 1999 2-for-1 Forward
Feb. 24, 1994 2-for-1 Forward

About QUALCOMM Incorporated - Common Stock Company overview from Wikipedia

05 · wikidata

Qualcomm Incorporated () is an American multinational technology corporation headquartered in San Diego, California. The company develops and designs technologies for global communications and computing, including next-generation mobile networks, smart devices, and semiconductors — such as mobile processors and artificial intelligence chips. The company holds essential patents for global mobile communication standards including 5G, 4G, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA.

Founded in 1985 by Irwin Jacobs and six other co-founders, Qualcomm's early research into code-division multiple access (CDMA) wireless technology was financed through revenue from its Omnitracs satellite communications system. CDMA was later adopted as a 2G standard in North America, incorporating Qualcomm patents. This adoption led to licensing disputes over pricing and access to essential patents.

Over time, Qualcomm expanded into semiconductor products, operating largely under a fabless manufacturing model. Its Snapdragon line of processors is widely used in smartphones and other smart devices by multiple manufacturers. In recent years, Qualcomm has been expanding into areas including embedded artificial intelligence, automotive applications, the Internet of Things (IoT), augmented reality, and virtual reality, in addition to developing the Dragonwing product line, aimed at industrial and enterprise solutions with a focus on embedded AI, edge computing, and advanced connectivity.

In addition to its technological activities, Qualcomm has faced legal and regulatory disputes in several countries, particularly concerning patent licensing and competition practices. The company has been involved in antitrust cases led by authorities in the United States, the European Union, and Asia, as well as litigation with manufacturers such as Apple.

History

Early history

Qualcomm was established on July 1, 1985 by seven former Linkabit employees led by Irwin Jacobs. Other co-founders included Andrew Viterbi, Franklin Antonio, Adelia Coffman, Andrew Cohen, Klein Gilhousen, and Harvey White. The company was named Qualcomm for "Quality Communications". It started as a contract research and development center largely for government and defense projects.

Qualcomm merged with Omninet in 1988 and raised $3.5 million in funding to produce the Omnitracs satellite communications system for trucking companies. Qualcomm grew from eight employees in 1986 to 620 employees in 1991, due to demand for Omnitracs. By 1989, Qualcomm had $32 million in revenue, 50 percent of which was from an Omnitracs contract with Schneider National. Omnitracs profits helped fund Qualcomm's research and development into code-division multiple access (CDMA) technologies for cell phone networks.

1990–2015

Qualcomm was operating at a loss in the 1990s due to its investment in CDMA research. To obtain funding, the company filed an initial public offering in September 1991, raising $68 million. An additional $486 million was raised in 1995 through the sale of 11.5 million more shares. The second funding round was done to raise money for the mass manufacturing of CDMA-based phones, base-stations, and equipment, after most US-based cellular networks announced they would adopt the CDMA standard. The company had $383 million in annual revenue in 1995 and $814 million by 1996.

In 1998, Qualcomm was restructured, leading to a 700-employee layoff. Its base station and cell-phone manufacturing businesses were spun-off in order to focus on its higher-margin patents and chipset businesses. Since the base station division was losing $400M a year (having never sold another base station after making its 10th sale), profits skyrocketed in the following year, and Qualcomm was the fastest growing stock on the market with a 2,621 percent growth over one year. By 2000, Qualcomm had grown to 6,300 employees, $3.2 billion in revenues, and $670 million in profit. 39 percent of its sales were from CDMA technology, followed by licensing (22%), wireless (22%), and other products (17%). Around this time, Qualcomm established offices in Europe, Asia Pacific, and in the Americas. By 2001, 65 percent of Qualcomm's revenues originated from outside the United States with 35 percent coming from South Korea.

In 2005, Paul E. Jacobs, son of Qualcomm founder Irwin Jacobs, was appointed as Qualcomm's new CEO. Whereas Irwin Jacobs focused on CDMA patents, Paul Jacobs refocused much of Qualcomm's new research and development on projects related to the Internet of things. In the same year they acquired Flarion Technologies, a developer of wireless broadband Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex Access (OFDMA) technology.

Qualcomm announced Steven Mollenkopf would succeed Paul Jacobs as CEO in December 2013. Mollenkopf said he would expand Qualcomm's focus to wireless technology for cars, wearable devices, and other new markets.

2015–2024: NXP, Broadcom and Nuvia

Qualcomm announced its intent to acquire NXP Semiconductors for $47 billion in October 2016. The deal was approved by U.S. antitrust regulators in April 2017 with some standard-essential patents excluded to get the deal approved.

As the NXP acquisition was ongoing, Broadcom made a $103 billion offer to acquire Qualcomm, and Qualcomm rejected the offer. Broadcom attempted a hostile takeover, and raised its offer, eventually to $121 billion. The potential Broadcom acquisition was investigated by the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment and blocked by an executive order from U.S. President Donald Trump, citing national security concerns.

Qualcomm's NXP acquisition then became a part of the 2018 China–United States trade war. U.S. president Donald Trump blocked China-based ZTE Corporation from buying American-made components, such as those from Qualcomm. The ZTE restriction was lifted after the two countries reached an agreement, but then Trump raised tariffs against Chinese goods. Qualcomm extended a tender offer to NXP at least 29 times pending Chinese approval, before abandoning the deal in July 2018.

In January 2021, Qualcomm appointed its president and chip division head Cristiano Amon as its new chief executive.

In January 2021, Qualcomm announced it would acquire Nuvia, a server CPU startup founded in early 2019 by ex-Apple and ex-Google architects, for approximately $1.4 billion. The acquisition was completed in March 2021, and it was announced that its first products would be laptop CPUs, shipping in the second half of 2022.

In March 2022, Qualcomm acquired the advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving software brand Arriver from the investment company SSW Partners.

In June 2022, Qualcomm acquired Israeli startup Cellwize through its investment arm Qualcomm Ventures.

In August 2022, Bloomberg News reported that Qualcomm was planning to return to server CPU market based on Nuvia's product. Later that month, Arm Ltd. announced that it sued Qualcomm and Nuvia for breaching license agreements and trademark violations. Arm cited that the chip designs using Arm licenses developed by Nuvia could not be transferred to its parent Qualcomm without permission. Qualcomm indicated that its licenses with Arm cover custom-designed processors.

In January 2023, the company announced a new partnership with Salesforce to develop a connected vehicle platform for automakers using the Snapdragon digital chassis.

In May 2023, Qualcomm announced its intent to purchase Israeli fabless chipmaking company Autotalks for a reported $350–400 million. The purchase is subject to review by the Competition and Markets Authority. In March 2024, it was announced by the Federal Trade Commission that Qualcomm's proposed acquisition of Autotalks has been terminated.

In September 2023, the company announced that it had signed a contract rumored to be worth $75 million per year for its Snapdragon brand to be the primary shirt sponsor for English football club Manchester United starting with the 2024–25 season, replacing German company TeamViewer.

In October 2023, Qualcomm introduced the Snapdragon X series, a computing platform for Windows PCs which includes a custom ARM-based Oryon CPU (from Nuvia acquisition), a GPU, and a dedicated neural processing unit.

In October 2024, Qualcomm announced that the Qualcomm-Microsoft exclusive protocol will be expired on December 25, 2024, allows Windows on ARM devices can adapt ARM CPUs other than Qualcomm Snapdragon.

In October 2024, Arm Ltd. said it would cancel Qualcomm's chip design license in an escalation of the dispute over the acquisition of Nuvia. In December 2024, a U.S. federal jury ruled partially in Qualcomm's favor, finding that its designs were properly licensed under an agreement with Arm. However, the jury was deadlocked on one of three issues raised, resulting in a mistrial on that specific point. In February 2025, Arm withdrew its efforts to terminate Qualcomm's chip-licensing agreement.

2025–present: Further acquisitions

In April 2025, Qualcomm acquired Movian AI, the generative AI unit of Vietnamese research company VinAI.

Qualcomm acquired Autotalks through its subsidiary, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc on the 5th of June 2025 for an undisclosed amount. Autotalks is an Israeli fabless semiconductor company founded in 2008, specializing in vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications.

Qualcomm agreed to acquire British semiconductor maker of high-speed wired connectivity, Alphawave IP Group, for $2.4 billion in June 2025, with the intention to expand into data centre and AI infrastructure markets.

Qualcomm acquired Arduino in October 2025, an Italian company specialising in single-board microcontrollers and microcontroller kits for an undisclosed amount. At the same time, Arduino announced the Uno Q, which uses the Qualcomm QRB2210 system on a chip, intended for AI and graphical workloads.

In December 2025, it was announced that Qualcomm had acquired Ventana Micro Systems, a company specialising in CPU designs based on the open RISC-V instruction set architecture. The acquisition is intended to enhance Qualcomm's CPU engineering capabilities and complement its existing development of custom Oryon processors. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

In March 2026, Qualcomm launched a new chip for new devices using Android. This is to support the growing interest from tech companies with new gadget concepts. That same year, Qualcomm acquired Modular for $3.9 billion.

Wireless CDMA

2G

Early history

In mid-1985, Qualcomm was hired by Hughes Aircraft to provide research and testing for a satellite network proposal to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The following year, Qualcomm filed its first CDMA patent (No. 4,901,307). This patent established Qualcomm's overall approach to CDMA and later became one of the most frequently cited technical documents in history. The project with the FCC was scrapped in 1988, when the FCC told all twelve vendors that submitted proposals to form a joint venture to create a single proposal.

Qualcomm further developed the CDMA techniques for commercial use and submitted them to the Cellular Telephone Industries Association (CTIA) in 1989 as an alternative to the time-division multiple access (TDMA) standard for second-generation cell-phone networks. A few months later, CTIA officially rejected Qualcomm's CDMA standard in favor of the more established TDMA standard developed by Ericsson.

At the time, CDMA wasn't considered viable in high-volume commercial applications due to the near-far field effect, whereby phones closer to a cell tower with a stronger signal drown out callers that are further away and have a weaker signal. Qualcomm filed three additional patents in 1989. They were for: a power management system that adjusts the signal strength of each call to adjust for the near-far field effect; a "soft handoff" methodology for transferring callers from one cell-tower to the next; and a variable rate encoder, which reduces bandwidth usage when a caller isn't speaking.

Holy wars of wireless

After the FCC said carriers were allowed to implement standards not approved by the CTIA, Qualcomm began pitching its CDMA technology directly to carriers. This started what is often referred to as "the Holy Wars of Wireless", an often heated debate about whether TDMA or CDMA was better suited for 2G networks. Qualcomm-supported CDMA standards eventually unseated TDMA as the more popular 2G standard in North America, due to its network capacity.

Qualcomm conducted CDMA test demonstrations in 1989 in San Diego and in 1990 in New York City. In 1990, Nynex Mobile Communications and Ameritech Mobile Communications were the first carriers to implement CDMA networks instead of TDMA. Motorola, a prior TDMA advocate, conducted CDMA test implementations in Hong Kong and Los Angeles. This was followed by a $2 million trial network in San Diego for Airtouch Communications. In November 1991, 14 carriers and manufacturers conducted large-scale CDMA field tests.

Results from the test implementations convinced CTIA to re-open discussions regarding CDMA and the 2G standard. CTIA changed its position and supported CDMA in 1993, adopting Qualcomm's CDMA as the IS-95A standard, also known as cdmaOne. This prompted widespread criticism in forums, trade press, and conventions from businesses that had already invested heavily in the TDMA standard and from TDMA's developer, Ericsson.

The first commercial-scale CDMA cellular network was created in Hong Kong in 1995. On July 21, 1995, Primeco, which represented a joint venture of Bell Atlantic, Nynex, US West and AirTouch Communications, announced it was going to implement CDMA-based services on networks in 15 states. By this time, 11 out of 14 of the world's largest networks supported CDMA. By 1997 CDMA had 57 percent of the US market, whereas 14 percent of the market was on TDMA.

International

In 1991, Qualcomm and the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) agreed to jointly develop CDMA technologies for the Korean telecommunications infrastructure. A CDMA standard was adopted as the national wireless standard in Korea in May 1993 with commercial CDMA networks being launched in 1996. CDMA networks were also launched in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, India, and Venezuela. Qualcomm entered the Russian and Latin American markets in 2005. By 2007, Qualcomm's technology was in cell phone networks in more than 105 countries. Qualcomm also formed licensing agreements with Nokia in Europe, Nortel in Canada, and with Matsushita and Mitsubishi in Japan.

Qualcomm entered the Chinese market through a partnership with China Unicom in 2000, which launched the first CDMA-based network in China in 2003. China became a major market for Qualcomm's semiconductor products, representing more than fifty percent of its revenues, but also the source of many legal disputes regarding Qualcomm's intellectual property. By 2007, $500 million of Qualcomm's annual revenues were coming from Korean manufacturers.

Manufacturing

Initially, Qualcomm's manufacturing operations were limited to a small ASIC design and manufacturing team to support the Omnitracs system. Qualcomm was forced to expand into manufacturing in the 1990s in order to produce the hardware carriers needed to implement CDMA networks that used Qualcomm's intellectual property. Qualcomm's first large manufacturing project was in May 1993, in a deal to provide 36,000 CDMA phones to US West.

For a time, Qualcomm experienced delays and other manufacturing problems, because it was inexperienced with mass manufacturing. In 1994, Qualcomm partnered with Northern Telecom and formed a joint partnership with Sony, in order to leverage their manufacturing expertise. Nokia, Samsung and Motorola introduced their own CDMA phones in 1997. Qualcomm's manufacturing business was losing money due to large capital equipment costs and declining prices caused by competition. Also, in March 1997, after Qualcomm introduced its Q phone, Motorola initiated a lawsuit (settled out of court in 2000) for allegedly copying the design of its Startac phone.

In December 1999, Qualcomm sold its manufacturing interests to Kyocera Corporation, a Japanese CDMA manufacturer and Qualcomm licensee. Qualcomm's infrastructure division was sold to competitor Ericsson in 1999 as part of an out-of-court agreement for a CDMA patent dispute that started in 1996. The sale of the infrastructure division marked the beginning of an increase in Qualcomm's stock price and stronger financial performance, but many of the 1,200 employees involved were discontented working for a competitor and losing their stock options. This led to a protracted legal dispute regarding employee stock options, resulting in $74 million in settlements by 2005.

3G

3G standards were expected to force prior TDMA carriers onto CDMA, in order to meet 3G bandwidth goals. The two largest GSM manufacturers, Nokia and Ericsson, advocated for a greater role for GSM, in order to negotiate lower royalty prices from Qualcomm. In 1998, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) voted in support of the WCDMA standard, which relied less on Qualcomm's CDMA patents. Qualcomm responded by refusing to license its intellectual property for the standard.

The Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) and the Third Generation Partnership Program 2 (3GPP2), advocated for a competing CDMA-2000 standard developed primarily by Qualcomm. American and European politicians advocated for the CDMA-2000 and WCDMA standards respectively. The ITU said it would exclude Qualcomm's CDMA technology from the 3G standards entirely if a patent dispute over the technology with Ericsson was not resolved. The two reached an agreement out-of-court in 1999, one month before a deadline set by the ITU. Both companies agreed to cross-license their technology to each other and to work together on 3G standards.

A compromise was eventually reached whereby the ITU would initially endorse three standards: CDMA2000 1X, WCDMA and TD-SCDMA. Qualcomm agreed to license its CDMA patents for variants such as WCDMA. There were 240 million CDMA 3G subscribers by 2004 and 143 carriers in 67 countries by 2005. Qualcomm claimed to own 38 percent of WCDMA's essential patents, whereas European GSM interests sponsored a research paper alleging Qualcomm only owned 19 percent.

Qualcomm consolidated its interests in telecommunications carriers, such as Cricket Communications and Pegaso into a holding company, Leap Wireless, in 1998. Leap was spun-off later that year and sold to AT&T in 2014.

4G

Qualcomm initially advocated for the CDMA-based Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB) standard for fourth generation wireless networks. UMB wasn't backwards compatible with prior CDMA networks and didn't operate as well in narrow bandwidths as the LTE (long-term evolution) standard. No cellular networks adopted UMB. Qualcomm halted development of UMB in 2005 and decided to support the LTE standard, even though it didn't rely as heavily on Qualcomm patents. Then, Qualcomm purchased LTE-related patents through acquisitions. By 2012, Qualcomm held 81 seminal patents used in 4G LTE standards, or 12.46 percent.

Qualcomm also became more focused on using its intellectual property to manufacture semiconductors in a fabless manufacturing model. A VLSI Technology Organization division was founded in 2004, followed by a DFX group in 2006, which did more of the manufacturing design in-house. Qualcomm announced it was developing the Scorpion central processing unit (CPU) for mobile devices in November 2005. This was followed by the first shipments of the Snapdragon system-on-chip product, which includes a CPU, GPS, graphics processing unit, camera support and other software and semiconductors, in November 2007. The Gobi family of modems for portable devices was released in 2008. Gobi modems were embedded in many laptop brands and Snapdragon system on chips were embedded into most Android devices.

Qualcomm won a government auction in India in 2010 for $1 billion in spectrum and licenses from which to offer broadband services. It formed four joint ventures with Indian holding companies for this purpose. A 49 percent stake in the holding companies was acquired by Bharti in May 2012 and the remaining was acquired in October 2012 by AT&T.

5G

According to Fortune Magazine, Qualcomm has been developing technologies for future 5G standards in three areas: radios that would use bandwidth from any network it has access to, creating larger ranges of spectrum by combining smaller pieces, and a set of services for Internet of things applications. Qualcomm's first 5G modem chip was announced in October 2016 and a prototype was demonstrated in October 2017. Qualcomm's first 5G antennas were announced in July 2018. As of 2018, Qualcomm had partnerships with 19 mobile device manufacturers and 18 carriers to commercialize 5G technology. By late 2019, several phones were being sold with Qualcomm's 5G technology incorporated.

Software and other technology

Early software

Qualcomm acquired an email application called Eudora in 1991. By 1996, Eudora was installed on 63 percent of PCs. Microsoft Outlook eclipsed Eudora, since it was provided for free by default on Windows-based machines. By 2003 Qualcomm's Eudora was the most popular alternative to Microsoft Outlook, but still had only a five percent share of the market. Software development for Eudora was retired in 2006.

In 2001, Qualcomm introduced Brew, a smartphone app development service with APIs to access contacts, billing, app-stores, or multimedia on the phone. South Korean carrier KTFreeTel was the first to adopt the Brew system in November 2001, followed by Verizon in March 2002 for its "Get it Now" program. There were 2.5 million Brew users by the end of 2002 and 73 million in 2003.

Other technology

In 2004, Qualcomm created a MediaFLO subsidiary to bring its FLO (forward link only) specification to market. Qualcomm built an $800 million MediaFLO network of cell towers to supplement carrier networks with one that is designed for multimedia. In comparison to cellular towers that provide two-way communications with each cell phone individually, MediaFLO towers would broadcast multimedia content to mobile phones in a one-way broadcast. Qualcomm also sold FLO-based semiconductors and licenses.

Qualcomm created the FLO Forum standards group with 15 industry participants in July 2005. Verizon was the first carrier to partner with MediaFlo in December 2005 for its Verizon Wireless' V Cast TV, which was followed by the AT&T Mobile TV service a couple months later. The MediaFlo service was launched on Super Bowl Sunday in 2007. Despite the interest the service got among carriers, it was unpopular among consumers. The service required users to pay for a subscription and have phones that were equipped with special semiconductors. The service was discontinued in 2011 and its spectrum was sold to AT&T for $1.93 billion. Qualcomm rebooted the effort in 2013 with LTE Broadcast, which uses pre-existing cell towers to broadcast select content locally on a dedicated spectrum, such as during major sporting events.

Based on technology acquired from Iridigm in 2004 for $170 million, Qualcomm began commercializing Mirasol displays in 2007, which was expanded into eight products in 2008. Mirasol uses natural light shining on a screen to provide lighting for the display, rather a backlight, in order to reduce power consumption. The amount of space between the surface of the display and a mirror within a 10 micron-wide "interferometric modulator" determines the color of the reflected light. Mirasol was eventually closed down after an attempt to revive it in 2013 in Toq watches.

In June 2011, Qualcomm introduced AllJoyn, a wireless standard for communicating between devices like cell phones, televisions, air-conditioners, and refrigerators. The Alljoyn technology was donated to the Linux Foundation in December 2013. Qualcomm and the Linux Foundation then formed the Allseen Alliance to administer the standard and Qualcomm developed products that used the AllJoyn standard In December 2011, Qualcomm formed a healthcare subsidiary called Qualcomm Life. Simultaneously, the subsidiary released a cloud-based service for managing clinical data called 2net and the Qualcomm Life Fund, which invests in wireless healthcare technology companies. The subsidiary doubled its employee-count by acquiring HealthyCircles Inc., a healthcare IT company, the following May. Qualcomm life was later sold to a private equity firm, Francisco Partners, in 2019.

Developments since 2016

In 2016, Qualcomm developed its first beta processor chip for servers and PCs called "Server Development Platform" and sent samples for testing. In January 2017, a second generation data center and PC server chip called Centriq 2400 was released. PC Magazine said the release was "historic" for Qualcomm, because it was a new market segment for the company. Qualcomm also created a Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies subsidiary to focus on the PCs and servers market. In 2017, Qualcomm introduced embedded technology for 3D cameras intended for augmented reality apps, and also developed and demonstrated laptop processors.

In 2000, Qualcomm formed a joint venture with Ford called Wingcast, which created telematics equipment for cars, but was unsuccessful and closed down two years later. Qualcomm acquired the wireless electric car charging company, HaloIPT, in November 2011 and later sold the company to WiTricity in February 2019. Qualcomm also started introducing Snapdragon system-on-chips and Gobi modems and other software or semiconductor products for self-driving cars and modern in-car computers.

In 2020, Qualcomm hired Baidu veteran, Nan Zhou, to head Qualcomm's push into AI.

In 2024, Qualcomm identified generative artificial intelligence as a key driver of market demand for its edge computing technology, with the company projecting a total addressable market of approximately $900 billion by 2030. In August 2024, Reuters reported that Qualcomm was among the clients of Contextual AI, a company building retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) agents for enterprise use.

In September 2025, Qualcomm and BMW jointly developed an autonomous driving system that will debut on the BMW iX3. This is part of Qualcomm's diversification into new business areas outside of smartphone chips, with automotive among its fastest-growing divisions.

In October 2025, Qualcomm announced it was launching new AI accelerator chips meant to challenge NVIDIA's dominant position in the space. The company said its first customer for its AI200 chips will be Humain—an AI company backed by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, which is set to deploy 200 megawatts worth of Qualcomm's chips in 2026.

Patents and patent disputes

In 2024, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)'s Annual PCT Review ranked Qualcomm's number of patent applications published under the PCT System as 3rd in the world, with 3,848 patent applications being published during 2024. In 2017, Qualcomm owned more than 130,000 current or pending patents, an increase from the early 2000s when Qualcomm had more than 1,000 patents. As the sole early investor in CDMA research and development, Qualcomm's patent portfolio contains much of the intellectual property that is essential to CDMA technologies.

Since many of Qualcomm's patents are part of an industry standard, the company has agreed to license those patents under "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" terms. Qualcomm's royalties come out to about 5% or $30 per mobile device. According to Fortune Magazine, this is about 5–10 times more than what is typically charged by other patent-holders. Qualcomm says its patents are more expensive because they are more important and its pricing is within the range of common licensing practices. However, competitors, clients, and regulators often allege Qualcomm charges unreasonable rates or engages in unfair competition for mandatory patents.

Broadcom

In 2005, Broadcom and Qualcomm were unable to reach an agreement on cross-licensing their intellectual property, and Broadcom sued Qualcomm alleging it was breaching ten Broadcom patents. Broadcom asked the International Trade Commission to prohibit importing the affected technology. A separate lawsuit alleged Qualcomm was threatening to withhold UMTS patent licenses against manufacturers that bought their semiconductors from competitors, in violation of the standards agreement.

Qualcomm alleged Broadcom was using litigation as a negotiation tactic and that it would respond with its own lawsuits. Qualcomm sued Broadcom, alleging it was using seven Qualcomm patents without permission. By late 2006, more than 20 lawsuits had been filed between the two parties and both sides claimed to be winning.

In September 2006, a New Jersey court judge ruled that Qualcomm's patent monopoly was an inherent aspect of creating industry standards and that Qualcomm's pricing practices were lawful. In May 2007, a jury ordered Qualcomm to pay Broadcom $19.6 million for infringing on three Broadcom patents. In June 2007, the ITC ruled that Qualcomm had infringed on at least one Broadcom patent and banned corresponding imports. Qualcomm and Broadcom reached a settlement in April 2009, resulting in a cross-licensing agreement, a dismissal of all litigation and Qualcomm paying $891 million over four years.

During the litigation, Qualcomm claimed it had never participated in the JVT standards-setting process. However, an engineer's testimony led to discovery of 21 JVT-related emails Qualcomm lawyers had withheld from the court, and 200,000 pages of JVT-related documents. Qualcomm's lawyers said the evidence was accidentally overlooked, whereas the judge said it was gross misconduct. Qualcomm was fined $8.5 million for legal misconduct. On appeal, the court held that Qualcomm could only enforce the related patents against non-JVT members, based on the agreements signed to participate in JVT.

Nokia and Project Stockholm

Six large telecommunications companies led by Nokia filed a complaint against Qualcomm with the European Commission's antitrust division in October 2005. They alleged Qualcomm was abusing its market position to charge unreasonable rates for its patents. Qualcomm alleged the six companies were colluding together under the code name Project Stockholm in a legal strategy to negotiate lower rates. These events led to a protracted legal dispute.

Qualcomm filed a series of patent-infringement lawsuits against Nokia in Europe, Asia, the US, and with the ITC. The parties initiated more than one dozen lawsuits against one another. Several companies filed antitrust complaints against Qualcomm with the Korean Fair Trade Commission, who initiated an investigation into Qualcomm's practices in December 2006. The dispute between Qualcomm and Nokia escalated, when their licensing agreement ended in April 2007.

In February 2008, the two parties agreed to halt any new litigation until an initial ruling is made on the first lawsuit in Delaware. Nokia won three consecutive court rulings with the German Federal Patent Court, the High Court in the United Kingdom, and the International Trade Commission respectively. Each found that Nokia was not infringing on Qualcomm's patents. In July 2008, Nokia and Qualcomm reached an out-of-court settlement that ended the dispute and created a 15-year cross-licensing agreement.

Recent disputes

ParkerVision filed a lawsuit against Qualcomm in July 2011 alleging that it infringed on seven ParkerVision patents related to converting electromagnetic radio signals to lower frequencies. A $173 million jury verdict against Qualcomm was overturned by a judge.

In November 2013, the China National Development and Reform Commission initiated an anti-trust investigation into Qualcomm's licensing division. The Securities and Exchange Commission also started an investigation into whether Qualcomm breached antibribery laws through its activities in China. The Chinese regulator raided Qualcomm's Chinese offices in August 2013. The dispute was settled in 2015 for $975 million.

In late 2016 The Korea Fair Trade Commission alleged Qualcomm abused a "dominant market position" to charge cell phone manufacturers excessive royalties for patents and limit sales to companies selling competing semiconductor products. The regulator gave Qualcomm a fine of $854 million, which the company said it will appeal. Eventually, Qualcomm lost the case in Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea in 2023, causing to enact the fine in force.

In April 2017, Qualcomm paid an $814.9 million settlement to BlackBerry as a refund for prepaid licensing fees.

In October 2017, Taiwan's Fair Trade Commission fined Qualcomm another $773 million. In late 2018 Qualcomm paid a settlement to Taiwan for $93 million in fines and a promise to spend $700 million in the local Taiwan economy.

In October 2025, as part of an anti-trust investigation into Qualcomm, China's market regulator said that the company said it did not notify the agency when it acquired Israeli auto-chip design company Autotalks despite having been informed that the deal required the agency's approval and telling it that the company would not pursue the merger. Several media outlets including CNBC, The Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Barrons, and more speculated that the investigation was part of trade discussions between the US and China.

Apple

In January 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated an investigation into allegations that Qualcomm charged excessive royalties for patents that are "essential to industry standards". That same year, Apple initiated a $1 billion lawsuit against Qualcomm in the U.S. alleging Qualcomm overcharged for semiconductors and failed to pay $1 billion in rebates. Apple also filed lawsuits in China and the United Kingdom.

Apple alleged Qualcomm was engaging in unfair competition by selling industry-standard patents at a discount rate in exchange for an exclusivity agreement for its semiconductor products. An FTC report reached similar conclusions. Qualcomm filed counter-claims alleging Apple made false and misleading statements to induce regulators to sue Qualcomm. Qualcomm also sued Apple's suppliers for allegedly not paying Qualcomm's patent royalties, after Apple stopped reimbursing it for patent fees. Qualcomm petitioned the International Trade Commission to prohibit imports of iPhones, on the premise that they contain stolen Qualcomm patents after Apple's suppliers stopped paying.

In August 2017, the International Trade Commission responded to Qualcomm's complaints by starting an investigation of Apple's use of Qualcomm patents without royalties. Qualcomm also filed suit against Apple in China for alleged patent infringement in October 2017. The following month, Apple counter-sued, alleging Qualcomm was using patented Apple technology in its Android components.

In December 2018, Chinese and German courts held that Apple infringed on Qualcomm patents and banned sales of certain iPhones. Some patents were held to be invalid, while others were infringed by Apple.

In April 2019, Apple and Qualcomm reached an agreement to cease all litigation and sign a six-year licensing agreement. The settlement included a one-time payment from Apple of about $4.5 to 4.7 billion. Terms of the six-year licensing agreement were not disclosed, but the licensing fees were expected to increase revenues by $2 per-share.

In January 2018, the European Competition Commission fined Qualcomm $1.2 billion for an arrangement to use Qualcomm chips exclusively in Apple's mobile products. Qualcomm appealed the decision, and in June 2022, Qualcomm announced the company had won its appeal of the European Union antitrust fine. The appeal had highlighted that Apple as a company had no technical alternative other than to use Qualcomm's LTE chipsets.

Federal Trade Commission

Stemming from the investigation that led to the Apple lawsuit actions, the FTC filed suit against Qualcomm in 2017 alleging it engaged in antitrust behavior due to its monopoly on wireless broadband technology. The complaints filed by the FTC included that Qualcomm charged "disproportionately high" patent royalty rates to phone manufacturers and refused to sell them broadband chips if they did not license the patents, a policy referred to as "no license, no chips", that Qualcomm refused to license the patent to other chip manufacturers as to maintain its monopoly, and that Qualcomm purposely offered Apple a lower license cost to use its chips exclusively, locking other competitors as well as wireless service providers out of Apple's lucrative market. The trial starting in January 2019, heard by Judge Lucy Koh of the federal Northern District Court that also oversaw the Apple case. Judge Koh ruled in May 2019 against Qualcomm, asserting that Qualcomm's practices did violate antitrust. As part of the ruling, Qualcomm was forced to stop its "no license, no chips" bundling with phone manufacturers, and was required to license its patents to other chip manufacturers. As Qualcomm had expressed its intent to appeal, a panel of judges on the 9th circuit of appeals stayed the orders pending the litigation action.

Qualcomm appealed to the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the decision in August 2020. The Ninth Circuit determined that Judge Koh's decision strayed beyond the scope of antitrust law and that whether Qualcomm's patent licensing may be considered reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing does not fall within the scope of antitrust law, but rather is a matter of contract and patent law. The court concluded that the FTC failed to meet its burden of proof and that Qualcomm's business practices were better characterized as "hypercompetitive" rather than "anticompetitive".

Operations and market-share

Qualcomm develops software, semiconductor designs, patented intellectual property, development tools and services, but does not manufacture physical products like phones or infrastructure equipment. The company's revenues are derived from licensing fees for use of its intellectual property, sales of semiconductor products that are based on its designs, and from other wireless hardware, software or services.

Qualcomm divides its business into three categories:

QCT (Qualcomm CDMA Technologies): CDMA wireless products; 80% of revenue

QTL (Qualcomm Technology Licensing): Licensing; 19% of revenue

QSI (Qualcomm strategic initiatives): Investing in other tech companies; less than 1% of revenue

Qualcomm is a predominantly fabless provider of semiconductor products for wireless communications and data transfer in portable devices. According to the analyst firm Strategy Analytics, Qualcomm has a 39 percent market-share for smartphone application processors and a 50 percent market-share of baseband processors. Its share of the market for application processors on tablets is 18 percent. According to analyst firm ABI Research, Qualcomm has a 65 percent market-share in LTE baseband. Qualcomm also provides licenses to use its patents, many of which are critical to the CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA wireless standards. The company is estimated to earn $20 for every smartphone sold.

Qualcomm is the largest public company in San Diego. It has a philanthropic arm called The Qualcomm Foundation. A January 2013 lawsuit resulted in Qualcomm voluntarily adopting a policy of disclosing its political contributions. According to The New York Times, Qualcomm's new disclosure policy was praised by transparency advocates.

Source: Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 4.0 · View on Wikipedia ↗

Wikidata ↗

sectorTechnology industrySemiconductors employees52,000 countryUS

10-Year Performance Revenue, net income, margins and EPS trends

06
Revenue$44.28B
2016-09-25 → 2025-09-28
EPS$5.01
2016-09-25 → 2025-09-28
Free Cash Flow$12.82B
2016-09-25 → 2025-09-28
Net margin21.0%
2016-09-25 → 2025-09-28
Valuation & Ratios 07–12

Valuation P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA ratios — is the stock expensive or cheap?

Metric 5Y trend QCOM 5Y avg Peer Median Verdict
P/E (TTM) 21.15Y avg ≈19.4 ≈19.4 46.0 Undervalued
P/S (TTM) 4.45Y avg ≈4.0 ≈4.0 11.4 Undervalued
P/B (MRQ) 7.15Y avg ≈8.8 ≈8.8 7.4 Fair value
EV / EBITDA (TTM) 16.15Y avg ≈12.8 ≈12.8 40.8 Undervalued
Price / FCF (TTM) 18.85Y avg ≈16.1 ≈16.1 · ·
Price / Cash Flow (TTM) 15.85Y avg ≈13.7 ≈13.7 31.5 Undervalued
EV / Revenue (TTM) 4.35Y avg ≈4.1 ≈4.1 · ·
EV / FCF (TTM) 18.25Y avg ≈16.6 ≈16.6 · ·
Price / Tangible Book (MRQ) 7.55Y avg ≈38.4 ≈38.4 · ·
PEG Ratio ≈10.1 · · ·

Peer median is calculated on a standardized basis per metric and may not always match the TTM/MRQ basis shown for this stock.

value · ≈ 5Y avg · industry median · verdict relative to median

Dividends Yield, payout ratio, dividend history, 5Y CAGR

13
Annualized Payout≈$3.68Paid quarterly
5Y Div CAGR≈6.5%Per share, split-adjusted
Growth Streak≈21Consecutive years of dividend growth
Ex-dateAmountCurrencyYield
Sep 3, 2026$0.92USD≈2.1%
Jun 4, 2026$0.92USD≈1.5%
Mar 5, 2026$0.89USD≈2.6%
Dec 4, 2025$0.89USD≈2.0%
Sep 4, 2025$0.89USD≈2.2%
Jun 5, 2025$0.89USD≈2.3%
Mar 6, 2025$0.85USD≈2.2%
Dec 5, 2024$0.85USD≈2.1%
Sep 5, 2024$0.85USD≈2.0%
May 30, 2024$0.85USD≈1.6%
Feb 28, 2024$0.80USD≈2.1%
Nov 29, 2023$0.80USD≈2.5%
Aug 30, 2023$0.80USD≈2.7%
May 31, 2023$0.80USD≈2.7%
Mar 1, 2023$0.75USD≈2.4%
Nov 30, 2022$0.75USD≈2.3%
Aug 31, 2022$0.75USD≈2.2%
Jun 1, 2022$0.75USD≈2.0%
Mar 2, 2022$0.68USD≈1.6%
Dec 1, 2021$0.68USD≈1.5%

Earnings History EPS actual vs estimate, surprise %, beat rate, next earnings date

14
Avg Surprise 0.10%
Next Report Nov 03, 2026
PeriodReportEPS ActualEPS EstSurprise
June 30, 2026 $2.21 $2.27 -2.7%
March 31, 2026 $2.65 $2.61 1.4%
Dec. 31, 2025 $3.50 $3.48 0.57%
Sept. 30, 2025 $3.00 $2.93 2.3%
June 30, 2025 $2.77 $2.77 0.05%
March 31, 2025 $2.85 $2.88 -0.96%

Full Fundamentals All metrics by year — income statement, balance sheet, cash flow

15
Income Statement 16
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Revenue $44.28B$38.96B$35.82B$44.20B$33.57B$23.53B$24.27B$22.61B$22.26B$23.55B$25.28B$26.49B
Cost of Revenue $19.74B$17.06B$15.87B$18.64B$14.26B$9.26B$8.60B$10.24B$9.79B$9.75B$10.38B$10.69B
R&D Expense $9.04B$8.89B$8.82B$8.19B$7.18B$5.97B$5.40B$5.62B$5.49B$5.15B$5.49B$5.48B
SG&A Expense $3.11B$2.76B$2.48B$2.57B$2.34B$2.07B$2.19B$2.99B$2.66B$2.38B$2.34B$2.29B
Operating Expenses $31.93B$28.89B$28.03B$28.34B$23.78B$17.28B$16.61B$21.99B$19.68B$17.06B$19.50B$18.94B
Operating Income $12.36B$10.07B$7.79B$15.86B$9.79B$6.25B$7.67B$621M$2.58B$6.50B$5.78B$7.55B
Interest Expense $664M$697M$694M$490M$559M$602M$627M$768M$494M$297M$104M$5M
Other Non-op $21M$-21M$-14M$-25M$-33M·······
Pretax Income $12.66B$10.34B$7.44B$15.00B$10.27B$5.72B$7.48B$392M$2.99B$6.83B$6.49B$8.78B
Income Tax $7.12B$226M$104M$2.01B$1.23B$521M$3.10B$5.36B$543M$1.13B$1.22B$1.24B
Net Income $5.54B$10.14B$7.23B$12.94B$9.04B$5.20B$4.39B$-4.96B$2.44B$5.71B$5.27B$7.97B
EPS (Basic) $5.05$9.09$6.47$11.52$7.99$4.58$3.63$-3.39$1.66$3.84$3.26$4.73
EPS (Diluted) $5.01$8.97$6.42$11.37$7.87$4.52$3.59$-3.39$1.64$3.81$3.22$4.65
Shares (Basic) 1,096,000,0001,116,000,0001,117,000,0001,123,000,0001,131,000,0001,135,000,0001,210,000,0001,463,000,0001,477,000,0001,484,000,0001,618,000,0001,683,000,000
Shares (Diluted) 1,105,000,0001,130,000,0001,126,000,0001,137,000,0001,149,000,0001,149,000,0001,220,000,0001,463,000,0001,490,000,0001,498,000,0001,639,000,0001,714,000,000
EBITDA $13.96B$11.78B$9.60B$17.62B$11.37B$7.65B$9.07B$2.30B$4.08B$7.92B$5.78B$7.55B
Balance Sheet 27
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Cash & Equivalents $5.52B$7.85B$8.45B$2.77B$7.12B$6.71B$11.84B$11.78B$35.03B$5.95B$7.56B$7.91B
Short-term Investments $4.63B$5.45B$2.87B$3.61B$5.30B$4.51B$421M$311M$2.28B$12.70B$9.76B$9.66B
Receivables $2.85B$2.35B$1.92B$4.17B$2.21B$2.69B$1.05B$2.67B$3.58B$2.19B$1.94B$2.36B
Inventory $6.53B$6.42B$6.42B$6.34B$3.23B$2.60B$1.40B$1.69B$2.04B$1.56B$1.49B$1.46B
Other Current Assets $2.44B$1.58B$1.19B$1.62B$854M$704M$634M$699M$618M$558M$687M$401M
Current Assets $25.75B$25.23B$22.46B$20.72B$20.07B$18.52B$16.77B$17.38B$43.59B$22.98B$22.10B$22.41B
PP&E (Net) $4.69B$4.67B$5.04B$5.17B$4.56B$3.71B$3.08B$2.98B$3.22B$2.31B$2.53B$2.49B
PP&E (Gross) $14.50B$13.54B$12.71B$11.77B$10.45B$8.85B$7.65B$7.46B$7.42B$6.04B$5.89B$5.68B
Accum. Depreciation $9.81B$8.88B$7.67B$6.60B$5.89B$5.13B$4.57B$4.49B$4.20B$3.73B$3.36B$3.19B
Goodwill $11.36B$10.80B$10.64B$10.51B$7.25B$6.32B$6.28B$6.50B$6.62B$5.68B$5.48B$4.49B
Intangibles $1.15B$1.24B$1.41B$1.88B$1.46B$1.65B$2.17B$2.96B$3.74B$3.50B$3.74B$2.58B
Other Non-current Assets $6.45B$8.05B$8.09B$7.73B$6.31B$4.04B$3.46B$1.97B$4.15B$2.16B$1.86B$975M
Total Assets $50.14B$55.15B$51.04B$49.01B$41.24B$35.59B$32.96B$32.72B$65.50B$52.36B$50.80B$48.57B
Accounts Payable $2.79B$2.58B$1.91B$3.80B$2.75B$2.25B$1.37B$1.82B$1.97B$1.86B$1.30B$2.18B
Short-term Debt $0···$500M$500M$499M··$0$1.00B$0
Current Liabilities $9.14B$10.50B$9.63B$11.87B$11.95B$8.67B$8.94B$11.39B$10.94B$7.31B$6.10B$6.01B
Capital Leases $730M$708M$571M$573M$428M$371M······
Deferred Tax ······$103M$291M$233M$169M$270M$6M
Other Non-current Liabilities ·······$1.23B$2.43B$895M$817M$428M
Total Liabilities $28.94B$28.88B$29.46B$31.00B$31.29B$29.52B$28.05B$31.91B$34.77B$20.59B$19.38B$9.41B
Long-term Debt $14.81B$13.27B$14.48B$13.54B$13.70B$15.23B$13.44B$15.37B$19.40B$10.01B$9.97B$0
Total Debt $14.81B$14.63B$15.40B$14.98B$15.24B$15.23B$15.43B$0$1.50B$1.75B$1.00B·
Retained Earnings $20.65B$25.69B$20.73B$17.84B$9.82B$5.28B$4.47B$542M$30.07B$30.94B$31.23B$30.80B
AOCI $560M$587M$358M$-22M$128M$207M$100M$265M$384M$428M$195M$634M
Stockholders' Equity $21.21B$26.27B$21.58B$18.01B$9.95B$6.08B$4.91B$807M$30.73B$31.77B$31.41B$39.17B
Liabilities + Equity $50.14B$55.15B$51.04B$49.01B$41.24B$35.59B$32.96B$32.72B$65.50B$52.36B$50.80B$48.57B
Shares Outstanding 1,074,000,0001,113,000,0001,114,000,0001,121,000,0001,125,000,0001,131,000,0001,145,000,0001,219,000,0001,474,000,0001,476,000,0001,524,000,0001,669,000,000
Cash Flow 19
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
D&A $1.60B$1.71B$1.81B$1.76B$1.58B$1.39B$1.40B$1.56B$1.46B$1.43B$1.21B$1.15B
Stock-based Comp $2.78B$2.65B$2.48B$2.03B$1.66B$1.21B$1.04B$883M$914M$943M$1.03B$1.06B
Deferred Tax $4.45B$-1.89B$-1.63B$-9M$-237M$-216M$1.94B$2.02B$-788M$-288M$-25M$-54M
Amort. of Intangibles $321M$311M$418M$482M$537M$621M$727M$785M$777M$804M$591M$543M
Restructuring $39M$107M$712M···$62M$353M·$159M$170M·
Other Non-cash $-366M$-406M$1.40B$-7.62B$-1.51B$-1.77B$-1.48B$4.27B$628M$-388M··
Operating Cash Flow $14.01B$12.20B$11.30B$9.10B$10.54B$5.81B$7.29B$3.91B$5.00B$7.63B$5.51B$8.89B
CapEx $1.19B$1.04B$1.45B$2.26B$1.89B$1.41B$887M$784M$690M$539M$994M$1.19B
Investing Cash Flow $-800M$-3.62B$762M$-5.80B$-3.36B$-5.26B$-806M$2.38B$20.46B$-3.49B$-3.57B$-1.64B
Debt Issued $1.49B$0$1.88B$1.48B$0$1.99B$0$0$10.95B$0$9.94B$0
Net Debt Issued $1.49B$0$1.88B$-63M$0$-231M$0$-5.50B$10.95B$0$9.94B·
Stock Issued $404M$383M$434M$356M$347M$329M$414M$603M$497M$668M$787M$1.44B
Stock Repurchased $8.79B$4.12B$2.97B$3.13B$3.37B$2.45B$1.79B$22.58B$1.34B$3.92B$11.25B$4.55B
Net Stock Activity $-8.39B$-3.74B$-2.54B$-2.77B$-3.02B$-2.12B$-1.38B$-21.98B$-845M$-3.25B$-10.46B$-3.11B
Financing Cash Flow $-13.20B$-9.27B$-6.66B$-7.20B$-6.80B$-5.71B$-6.39B$-31.50B$5.57B$-5.75B$-2.26B$-5.48B
Net Change in Cash $-6M$-678M$5.43B$-4.02B$409M$-5.13B$62M$-25.25B$31.08B$-1.61B$-347M$1.76B
Taxes Paid $3.10B$3.30B$1.40B$2.10B$1.50B$800M$1.10B$877M$1.00B$1.30B$1.20B$1.20B
Free Cash Flow $12.82B$11.16B$9.85B$6.83B$8.65B$4.41B$6.40B$3.11B$4.00B$6.86B$4.51B$7.70B
Levered FCF $12.53B$10.48B$9.16B$6.41B$8.16B$3.86B$6.03B$10.39B$3.60B$6.61B$4.43B$7.70B
Profitability 7
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Operating Margin 27.9%25.9%21.7%35.9%29.2%26.6%31.6%3.3%11.7%27.6%22.9%28.5%
Net Margin 12.5%26.0%20.2%29.3%26.9%22.1%18.1%-21.4%11.1%24.2%20.8%30.1%
Pretax Margin 28.6%26.5%20.8%33.9%30.6%24.3%30.8%2.3%13.6%29.0%25.7%33.1%
EBITDA Margin 31.5%30.2%26.8%39.9%33.9%32.5%37.4%10.1%18.3%33.6%22.9%28.5%
ROA 10.5%19.1%14.5%28.7%23.5%15.2%13.4%-9.9%4.2%11.1%10.6%16.9%
ROE 22.7%39.8%34.2%76.0%99.8%110.8%84.6%-40.7%7.9%18.1%14.9%21.2%
ROIC 15.0%24.1%20.8%41.6%34.2%26.7%22.1%-758.1%6.6%16.2%14.5%16.5%
Liquidity & Solvency 5
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Current Ratio 2.82.42.31.71.72.11.91.54.03.13.63.7
Quick Ratio 1.41.51.40.91.21.61.51.33.72.93.22.9
Debt / Equity 0.70.60.70.81.52.53.10.00.00.10.0·
LT Debt / Equity 0.70.50.70.81.42.52.7·····
Interest Coverage 18.614.411.232.417.510.412.21.05.321.955.51510.0
Efficiency 3
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Asset Turnover 0.80.70.71.00.90.70.70.50.40.50.50.6
Inventory Turnover 3.02.72.53.94.94.65.65.55.56.47.07.7
Receivables Turnover 17.018.211.713.813.712.613.17.17.711.411.8·
Per Share 6
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Book Value / Share $19.74$23.61$19.37$16.07$8.84$5.37$4.29$0.76$20.86$21.53$20.62$23.47
Revenue / Share $40.08$34.48$31.81$38.87$29.21$20.48$19.90$15.54$14.96$15.72$15.42$15.45
Cash Flow / Share $12.68$10.80$10.03$8.00$9.17$5.06$5.97$2.66$3.15$4.94$3.36$5.18
Cash / Share $5.14$7.05$7.59$2.47$6.33$5.93$10.34$9.66$23.76$4.03$4.96$4.74
Dividend / Share $3.48$3.30$3.10$2.86$2.66$2.54$2.48$2.38$2.20$2.02$1.80$1.54
EPS (TTM) $5.01$8.97$6.42$11.37$7.87$4.52$3.59$-3.39$1.64$3.81$3.22$4.65
Growth Rates 9
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Revenue YoY 13.7%8.8%-19.0%31.7%42.6%·······
Revenue CAGR 3Y 0.06%5.1%15.0%·········
Revenue CAGR 5Y 13.5%···········
EPS YoY -44.1%39.7%-43.5%44.5%74.1%·······
EPS CAGR 3Y -23.9%4.5%12.4%·········
EPS CAGR 5Y 2.1%···········
Net Income YoY -45.4%40.2%-44.1%43.0%74.0%·······
Net Income CAGR 3Y -24.6%3.9%11.6%·········
Net Income CAGR 5Y 1.3%···········
Valuation (TTM) 14
Metric Trend 202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Revenue TTM $44.28B$38.96B$35.82B$44.20B$33.57B$23.53B$24.27B$22.61B$22.26B$23.55B$25.28B$26.49B
Net Income TTM $5.54B$10.14B$7.23B$12.94B$9.04B$5.20B$4.39B$-4.96B$2.44B$5.71B$5.27B$7.97B
Market Cap $181.72B$189.35B$119.96B$135.85B$150.62B$129.50B$87.74B$87.80B$76.78B$92.62B$81.11B$125.28B
Enterprise Value $186.38B$190.69B$124.03B$144.45B$153.45B$133.51B$90.92B$75.72B$40.97B$75.72B$64.79B·
P/E 33.819.016.810.717.025.321.3-21.231.816.516.516.1
P/S 4.14.93.33.14.55.53.63.93.43.93.24.7
P/B 8.67.25.67.515.121.317.994.62.52.92.63.2
P / Tangible Book 20.913.312.624.2120.9·······
P / Cash Flow 13.015.510.614.914.322.312.022.516.412.514.714.1
P / FCF 14.217.012.219.917.429.413.728.219.213.518.016.3
EV / EBITDA 13.416.212.98.213.517.510.032.910.19.611.2·
EV / FCF 14.517.112.621.117.730.314.224.310.211.014.4·
EV / Revenue 4.24.93.53.34.65.73.73.31.83.22.6·
Earnings Yield 3.0%5.3%6.0%9.4%5.9%4.0%4.7%-4.7%3.1%6.1%6.0%6.2%

Most recent period on the left · null values shown as ·

Financial Statements Income statement, balance sheet, cash flow — annual, last 5 years

16
Metric 2025-09-282024-09-292023-09-242022-09-252021-09-26
Revenue $44.28B $38.96B $35.82B $44.20B $33.57B
Operating Margin % 27.9% 25.9% 21.7% 35.9% 29.2%
Net Income $5.54B $10.14B $7.23B $12.94B $9.04B
Diluted EPS $5.01 $8.97 $6.42 $11.37 $7.87

Institutional owners (13F) 3,331 filers · $179.9B total · As of Sept. 30, 2026

17

Institutions that report holding this stock in their quarterly SEC Form 13F. Long positions only; a single filer may appear twice for separate option legs. Large offsetting put/call legs typically reflect market-making or hedged inventory, not directional conviction.

Holders 3,331
Value held $179.9B
New positions 481
Exited positions 123
Institutional activity — Q2 2026 vs prior quarter
New positions Exited positions Increased Decreased Net shares change
481 (+274 vs prior Q) 123 (-240 vs prior Q) 981 (-51 vs prior Q) 1,352 (+33 vs prior Q) +27.2M

Compared to Q1 2026. SEC Form 13F filings are due within 45 days of quarter-end plus a short buffer for late filers — quarters still inside that window are skipped in favor of the most recent fully-reported pair.

Institution Value Shares % of tracked 13F Type
VANGUARD GROUP INC $19,524,349,868 114,144,068 10.85% Shares
BlackRock, Inc. $17,583,115,043 95,151,875 9.77% Shares
VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC $12,720,466,288 68,837,417 7.07% Shares
STATE STREET CORP $9,750,123,370 52,763,263 5.42% Shares
Invesco Ltd. $6,671,233,587 36,101,702 3.71% Shares
VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC $6,254,729,418 33,847,770 3.48% Shares
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC $5,471,307,363 29,645,446 3.04% Shares
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC $4,122,725,142 22,310,326 2.29% Shares
VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP $3,178,871,966 17,202,619 1.77% Shares
MORGAN STANLEY $3,159,965,332 17,100,302 1.76% Shares
NORGES BANK $2,995,265,175 16,209,022 1.66% Shares
NORTHERN TRUST CORP $2,088,118,870 11,299,956 1.16% Shares
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC $2,077,287,735 11,241,343 1.15% Shares
SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP $2,007,521,602 10,863,800 1.12% Call option
Amundi $1,884,070,578 10,195,741 1.05% Shares
BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ $1,839,473,924 9,954,402 1.02% Shares
Legal & General Group Plc $1,740,006,144 9,416,114 0.97% Shares
SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP $1,564,136,476 8,464,400 0.87% Put option
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO $1,560,803,624 8,270,471 0.87% Shares
UBS AM, a distinct business unit of UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT AMERICAS LLC $1,559,964,424 12,113,406 0.87% Shares
Bank of New York Mellon Corp $1,523,929,548 8,246,818 0.85% Shares
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC $1,368,979,180 7,389,738 0.76% Shares
JANE STREET GROUP, LLC $1,278,377,220 6,918,000 0.71% Put option
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LP $1,232,302,350 6,668,028 0.68% Shares
UBS Group AG $1,215,285,479 6,576,576 0.68% Shares
DEUTSCHE BANK AG\ $1,178,349,284 6,376,694 0.65% Shares
BARCLAYS PLC $1,137,428,465 6,155,249 0.63% Shares
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP $1,134,988,865 6,142,047 0.63% Shares
VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST CO $1,093,652,266 5,918,352 0.61% Shares
Aristotle Capital Management, LLC $1,028,562,784 5,566,051 0.57% Shares
CITADEL ADVISORS LLC $981,715,354 5,312,600 0.55% Put option
CITIGROUP INC $972,521,712 5,262,848 0.54% Shares
CITADEL ADVISORS LLC $867,773,840 4,696,000 0.48% Call option
FMR LLC $811,804,309 4,393,118 0.45% Shares
JANE STREET GROUP, LLC $802,432,096 4,342,400 0.45% Call option
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC $696,236,878 3,765,677 0.39% Shares
VICTORY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC $660,876,578 3,576,365 0.37% Shares
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA $651,681,000 3,526,611 0.36% Shares
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN $642,767,385 3,478,366 0.36% Shares
Rafferty Asset Management, LLC $621,908,897 3,365,490 0.35% Shares
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group, Inc. $580,060,060 3,139,023 0.32% Shares
Nuveen, LLC $578,307,085 3,129,537 0.32% Shares
FIRST TRUST ADVISORS LP $559,433,357 3,027,401 0.31% Shares
Swiss National Bank $556,107,026 3,009,400 0.31% Shares
JANE STREET GROUP, LLC $552,259,698 2,988,580 0.31% Shares
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P. $542,323,487 4,211,240 0.30% Shares
CANADA PENSION PLAN INVESTMENT BOARD $541,408,829 2,929,860 0.30% Shares
Mitsubishi UFJ Asset Management Co., Ltd. $510,827,008 2,764,365 0.28% Shares
BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS $499,866,374 2,705,051 0.28% Shares
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC $498,823,583 2,699,407 0.28% Shares

Show all 3,331 institutional owners →

Activists & 5%+ owners 3 positions

18

Investors who filed SEC Schedule 13D — beneficial ownership above 5% with an intent to influence the issuer (activist stakes, board campaigns, M&A). Each row shows the most recent known state of that filer's position.

Filer Filed Stake Status Purpose Filing
Qualcomm Atheros, Inc., King Acquisition Co. Aug. 14, 2015 · Initial filing M&A / sale SEC
Undisclosed reporting person June 20, 2001 · Initial filing · SEC
Undisclosed reporting person Feb. 22, 2001 · Initial filing Passive investment SEC

Purpose is an automated classification of the filer's own stated purpose (SEC Item 4) — not investment advice. "—" means no clear purpose was stated or the text could not be classified.

Company insiders 76 insiders · 18 officers · 22 directors

19
Insider Role Last activity Shares owned Buys 12m Sells 12m Net 12m
Cristiano R Amon President & CEO Sept. 25, 2026 S 177,568 0 4 $-7,600,000
Steven M Mollenkopf Chief Executive Officer Dec. 6, 2020 F 688,674 0 0 $0
Akash J. Palkhiwala EVP, CFO & COO Sept. 11, 2026 S 18,184 0 94 $-8,183,115
David Wise SVP & Interim CFO Aug. 20, 2019 M 27,227 0 0 $0
George S Davis EVP & Chief Financial Officer Dec. 9, 2018 F 142,448 0 0 $0
Patricia Y Grech SVP, Chief Accounting Officer Oct. 2, 2026 S 0 0 10 $-596,116
Heather S Ace EVP, Chief HR Officer Aug. 3, 2026 S 36,535 0 4 $-1,754,544
Baaziz Achour EVP, Chief Technology Officer Dec. 15, 2025 M 88,620 0 0 $0
Ann C Chaplin EVP, GenCounsel&CorpSecretary Dec. 15, 2025 M 23,944 0 3 $-1,278,251
Alexander H Rogers EVP, Pres QTL & Global Affairs Dec. 15, 2025 M 26,071 0 3 $-2,833,312
Neil Martin SVP, Finance and CAO Aug. 20, 2025 M 1,106 0 0 $0
James H Thompson Chief Technology Officer Dec. 15, 2024 M 242,114 0 0 $0
James J Cathey Chief Commercial Officer Jan. 11, 2024 S 4,972 0 0 $0
Erin L Polek SVP, Controller & CAO Nov. 20, 2022 M 0 0 0 $0
Donald J Rosenberg General Counsel Oct. 1, 2021 M 2,720 0 0 $0
Brian Modoff EVP, Strategy and M&A June 15, 2021 S 77,036 0 0 $0
Michelle M Sterling EVP, Human Resources Dec. 10, 2019 S 19,166 0 0 $0
Matthew S Grob EVP, Technology May 6, 2018 A 7,132 0 0 $0
Jean-Pascal Tricoire Director Sept. 30, 2026 A 13,930 0 0 $0
Mark D Mclaughlin Director Sept. 30, 2026 A 13,756 0 0 $0
Jeremy Z Kolter Director March 17, 2026 A 3,623 0 0 $0
Sylvia Acevedo Director March 17, 2026 A 9,008 0 0 $0
Marie Myers Director March 17, 2026 A 5,389 0 0 $0
Jeffrey William Henderson Director March 17, 2026 A 14,599 0 0 $0
Jamie S Miller Director March 17, 2026 A 4,694 0 0 $0
Ann M Livermore Director March 17, 2026 A 4,694 0 0 $0
Mark Fields Director March 17, 2026 A 9,988 0 0 $0
Irene B Rosenfeld Director March 17, 2026 A 4,694 0 0 $0
Christopher David Young Director Dec. 31, 2025 A 2,117 0 0 $0
Neil Smit Director Dec. 31, 2025 A 9,473 0 0 $0
Gregory N Johnson Director March 9, 2025 M 5,048 0 0 $0
Anthony J Vinciquerra Director March 5, 2024 A 3,992 0 0 $0
Harish Manwani Director April 5, 2021 M 16,178 0 0 $0
Clark T. Randt Jr. Director April 5, 2021 M 11,051 0 0 $0
Francisco Ros Director March 10, 2020 M 14,499 0 0 $0
Stiles Barbara Alexander Director March 10, 2020 M 49,212 0 0 $0
Thomas W Horton Director March 8, 2019 M 26,190 0 0 $0
Martin B Anstice Director Oct. 8, 2018 A · 0 0 $0
Derek K Aberle · July 10, 2017 S 5,855 0 0 $0
Paul E Jacobs · May 8, 2017 M 950 0 0 $0
John Francis Murphy · Dec. 19, 2016 M 12,207 0 0 $0
Raymond V Dittamore · Sept. 30, 2016 S 4,000 0 0 $0
Jonathan Rubinstein · March 24, 2016 M 3,337 0 0 $0
Donald G Cruickshank · March 1, 2016 M 0 0 0 $0
Marc I Stern · Feb. 11, 2016 S 245,437 0 0 $0
Venkata S M Renduchintala · Oct. 5, 2015 S 910 0 0 $0
Daniel L Sullivan · May 3, 2015 A 9,210 0 0 $0
Susan Hockfield · March 26, 2015 M 2,227 0 0 $0
Sherry Lansing · March 26, 2015 M 14,629 0 0 $0
Duane Nelles · March 26, 2015 M 122,445 0 0 $0
Brent Scowcroft · March 26, 2015 M 382,590 0 0 $0
Margaret L Johnson · Aug. 1, 2014 M 24,490 0 0 $0
James P Lederer · Dec. 31, 2013 A 3,918 0 0 $0
Steven R Altman · Dec. 31, 2013 A 51,745 0 0 $0
Andrew M Gilbert · Nov. 25, 2013 F 43,988 0 0 $0
William E Keitel · March 5, 2013 M 47,996 0 0 $0
Robert E Kahn · Feb. 21, 2013 S 230,000 0 0 $0
Stephen M Bennett · Nov. 26, 2012 G 0 0 0 $0
Irwin M Jacobs · March 5, 2012 M 3,070,027 0 0 $0
Jing Wang · Feb. 3, 2012 M 230 0 0 $0
Roberto Padovani · June 21, 2011 M 0 0 0 $0
Len J Lauer · Nov. 9, 2009 A 0 0 0 $0
Jeffrey A Jacobs · Jan. 7, 2009 M 356,289 0 0 $0
Marvin Blecker · Sept. 8, 2008 M 5,697 0 0 $0
Sanjay K Jha · Aug. 1, 2008 M 25,112 0 0 $0
Carol C. Lam · Sept. 28, 2007 A · 0 0 $0
Louis M Lupin · June 29, 2007 A 9,813 0 0 $0
Adelia A Coffman · March 8, 2007 M 210,500 0 0 $0
Richard C Atkinson · May 18, 2006 G 82,271 0 0 $0
Diana Lady Dougan · May 9, 2006 M 0 0 0 $0
Richard Sulpizio · May 4, 2006 M 0 0 0 $0
Peter M Sacerdote · April 21, 2006 M 720,000 0 0 $0
Anthony S Thornley · June 30, 2005 A 17,568 0 0 $0
QUALCOMM INC/DE · April 7, 2005 S 2,063,841 0 0 $0
Frank Savage · March 2, 2004 A 0 0 0 $0
Donald E Schrock · July 28, 2003 M 7,723 0 0 $0

Insiders from SEC Form 3/4/5 filings; net = open-market P/S only

ETF ownership Held by 210 ETFs

20

Weight reflects direct equity holdings (N-PORT) only; leveraged or derivative-based funds may hold additional swap exposure not shown.

Fund Weight Units As of Source
QCMU · Direxion Shares ETF Trust 23.52% 28,600 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
GGME · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 4.50% 11,098 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
IDGT · iShares Trust 4.44% 127,525 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
SOXQ · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust … 3.84% 683,114 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
SOXX · iShares Trust 3.14% 7,693,938 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
GPTY · Tidal Trust II 3.03% 20,874 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
SOXY · Tidal Trust II 2.65% 11,512 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
TDVI · First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund IV 2.62% 93,186 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
SPHQ · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 2.53% 2,615,437 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
CHPY · Tidal Trust II 2.41% 166,984 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IGPT · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 2.18% 174,552 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
TRFK · Pacer Funds Trust 1.96% 126,842 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
TECB · iShares Trust 1.93% 53,718 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
SOXL · Direxion Shares ETF Trust 1.85% 2,441,168 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
KNCT · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 1.74% 15,900 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
SPDV · ETF Series Solutions 1.69% 15,059 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
SOVF · Elevation Series Trust 1.68% 9,947 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
EQIN · Columbia ETF Trust I 1.64% 33,834 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VLUE · iShares Trust 1.64% 888,368 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
QUSA · Tidal Trust III 1.62% 2,353 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
YOKE · EA Series Trust 1.61% 25,416 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ABOT · Abacus FCF ETF Trust 1.45% 397 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
THNQ · EXCHANGE TRADED CONCEPTS TRUST 1.33% 37,509 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VFMV · VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND 1.33% 30,035 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
SMRI · EA Series Trust 1.33% 57,966 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
RSPT · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 1.33% 450,154 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
COWZ · Pacer Funds Trust 1.31% 1,655,539 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
PEXL · Pacer Funds Trust 1.28% 4,378 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
QQQG · Pacer Funds Trust 1.20% 1,654 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
SAWG · ETF Series Solutions 1.18% 231 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
COWG · Pacer Funds Trust 1.15% 172,467 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
QDEF · FlexShares Trust 1.11% 41,082 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
SPHB · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust … 1.11% 58,772 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
QTOP · iShares Trust 1.11% 17,681 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
QDF · FlexShares Trust 1.10% 165,113 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
LSVD · ADVISORS' INNER CIRCLE FUND 1.05% 46,300 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
EQWL · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 1.05% 159,661 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
DUHP · Dimensional ETF Trust 1.03% 854,912 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
LCOW · Pacer Funds Trust 0.99% 1,728 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ESLV · Strategy Shares 0.98% 945 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
PALC · Pacer Funds Trust 0.97% 13,788 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IYW · iShares Trust 0.92% 1,307,264 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
ROBO · EXCHANGE TRADED CONCEPTS TRUST 0.92% 124,399 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
MGV · VANGUARD WORLD FUND 0.92% 662,475 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
BIGY · Tidal Trust II 0.91% 3,352 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
HQGO · Lattice Strategies Trust 0.88% 2,918 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VIG · VANGUARD SPECIALIZED FUNDS 0.85% 5,954,556 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
FVAL · FIDELITY COVINGTON TRUST 0.84% 75,659 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ABFL · Abacus FCF ETF Trust 0.83% 29,684 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IGM · iShares Trust 0.83% 497,206 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
VYM · VANGUARD WHITEHALL FUNDS 0.81% 4,211,634 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
VGT · VANGUARD WORLD FUND 0.80% 7,342,072 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
QQQM · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust … 0.80% 4,831,751 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 0.80% 21,996,993 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
ELCV · Strategy Shares 0.79% 13,422 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FQAL · FIDELITY COVINGTON TRUST 0.78% 74,985 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VFQY · VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND 0.78% 20,114 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
USXF · iShares Trust 0.75% 62,617 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
TECL · Direxion Shares ETF Trust 0.75% 257,491 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
OMFL · Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexe… 0.74% 190,193 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
VTV · VANGUARD INDEX FUNDS 0.73% 10,022,038 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
VFMF · VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND 0.73% 27,840 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
QYLD · Global X Funds 0.73% 397,648 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
QRMI · Global X Funds 0.72% 702 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
QYLG · Global X Funds 0.72% 7,706 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
JOET · Virtus ETF Trust II 0.71% 11,789 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
PTNQ · Pacer Funds Trust 0.71% 57,631 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
QQWZ · Pacer Funds Trust 0.71% 2,449 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
QTR · Global X Funds 0.71% 365 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
PFM · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 0.71% 29,919 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
LRND · New York Life Investments ETF Trust 0.70% 18,925 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
QCLR · Global X Funds 0.70% 156 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IWX · iShares Trust 0.69% 152,340 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
FTEC · FIDELITY COVINGTON TRUST 0.68% 914,958 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IXN · iShares Trust 0.68% 360,023 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
ESUM · Strategy Shares 0.67% 8,299 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VOOV · VANGUARD ADMIRAL FUNDS 0.67% 242,687 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
DGRO · iShares Trust 0.66% 1,593,239 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
QSIX · Pacer Funds Trust 0.65% 814 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FHEQ · Fidelity Greenwood Street Trust 0.65% 40,946 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ALTL · Pacer Funds Trust 0.65% 4,048 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FYEE · Fidelity Greenwood Street Trust 0.65% 9,545 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FBUF · Fidelity Greenwood Street Trust 0.63% 1,020 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IVE · iShares Trust 0.63% 1,750,561 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
DFVX · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.62% 22,273 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
QQQE · Direxion Shares ETF Trust 0.60% 54,149 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IUSV · iShares Trust 0.59% 922,728 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
OEI · Listed Funds Trust 0.57% 1,790 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
JMOM · J.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Tr… 0.56% 95,619 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
JVAL · J.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Tr… 0.55% 31,260 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VONV · VANGUARD SCOTTSDALE FUNDS 0.55% 636,914 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
ILCV · iShares Trust 0.54% 40,864 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
JQUA · J.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Tr… 0.54% 300,510 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ROUS · Lattice Strategies Trust 0.53% 25,414 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FXL · First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDE… 0.53% 92,044 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
EVUS · iShares Trust 0.52% 11,261 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
QUVU · Hartford Funds Exchange-Traded Trust 0.52% 6,350 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
TYLG · Global X Funds 0.51% 491 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IWD · iShares Trust 0.50% 2,344,466 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
FEUS · FlexShares Trust 0.47% 3,575 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
XLG · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 0.46% 295,348 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
BSCR · Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexe… 0.46% 21,023,000 Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
FTC · First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDE… 0.45% 40,630 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IOO · iShares Trust 0.45% 230,226 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
AQLT · iShares Trust 0.45% 8,298 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
PRF · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 0.45% 241,274 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
HIBL · Direxion Shares ETF Trust 0.44% 2,236 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IUS · Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexe… 0.44% 23,227 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
ESG · FlexShares Trust 0.44% 3,900 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FLRG · FIDELITY COVINGTON TRUST 0.43% 8,447 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ESGG · FlexShares Trust 0.43% 3,211 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
BSCU · Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexe… 0.43% 12,678,000 Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
QLC · FlexShares Trust 0.42% 29,120 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IQSU · New York Life Investments ETF Trust 0.42% 9,303 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
SPTE · SP Funds Trust 0.42% 5,988 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
PEVC · Pacer Funds Trust 0.41% 67 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ACVF · ETF Opportunities Trust 0.41% 4,223 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
OEF · iShares Trust 0.39% 445,652 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
MPLY · Strategy Shares 0.39% 416 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IETC · iShares U.S. ETF Trust 0.38% 14,668 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
GLBL · Pacer Funds Trust 0.37% 28 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
MGC · VANGUARD WORLD FUND 0.37% 210,597 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
PFIG · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust … 0.37% 512,000 Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
USCL · iShares Trust 0.35% 55,787 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
TOPC · iShares Trust 0.35% 640 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
FCPI · FIDELITY COVINGTON TRUST 0.34% 6,239 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
IWL · iShares Trust 0.33% 40,991 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
ESGV · VANGUARD WORLD FUND 0.33% 238,511 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
GLOF · iShares Trust 0.32% 3,631 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
XVV · iShares Trust 0.32% 12,136 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
SUSA · iShares Trust 0.31% 71,512 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
QVML · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust … 0.31% 28,652 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
VV · VANGUARD INDEX FUNDS 0.31% 1,230,965 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
VOO · VANGUARD INDEX FUNDS 0.30% 27,372,364 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
PBP · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 0.30% 6,354 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
DFSU · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.29% 45,302 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
PBUS · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust … 0.29% 182,420 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
LRGF · iShares Trust 0.29% 59,962 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
IVV · iShares Trust 0.28% 13,284,839 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
ACIO · ETF Series Solutions 0.28% 45,269 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VOXP · Advisors Series Trust 0.28% 111 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ILCB · iShares Trust 0.28% 20,397 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
VONE · VANGUARD SCOTTSDALE FUNDS 0.28% 174,452 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
ADME · ETF Series Solutions 0.27% 5,429 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VTI · VANGUARD INDEX FUNDS 0.27% 33,466,929 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
VTHR · VANGUARD SCOTTSDALE FUNDS 0.27% 88,837 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
ESGU · iShares Trust 0.27% 270,560 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
IWB · iShares Trust 0.27% 729,884 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
IYY · iShares Trust 0.27% 45,113 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
IWV · iShares Trust 0.26% 291,161 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
CATH · Global X Funds 0.25% 22,417 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ITOT · iShares Trust 0.25% 1,370,854 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
VMAX · Lattice Strategies Trust 0.25% 834 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
WRND · New York Life Investments ETF Trust 0.25% 176 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
PHDG · Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-T… 0.25% 836 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
DFAU · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.24% 206,013 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
JPUS · J.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Tr… 0.24% 7,586 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
BKLC · BNY Mellon ETF Trust 0.24% 90,328 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
XYLG · Global X Funds 0.24% 1,054 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
XTR · Global X Funds 0.24% 79 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
XYLD · Global X Funds 0.24% 53,106 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
INFO · Harbor ETF Trust 0.24% 13,798 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
PTLC · Pacer Funds Trust 0.24% 53,368 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
XRMI · Global X Funds 0.24% 814 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
BBUS · J.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Tr… 0.24% 144,568 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
TOV · EA Series Trust 0.24% 4,364 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
CHRI · Global X Funds 0.24% 129 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
VOTE · TCW ETF Trust 0.24% 17,734 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
XCLR · Global X Funds 0.24% 57 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
RWL · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust … 0.23% 124,416 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
DFAC · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.23% 754,715 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
DFUS · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.23% 320,670 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FAD · First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDE… 0.23% 8,830 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
HDUS · Lattice Strategies Trust 0.22% 3,101 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
DXUV · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.22% 8,336 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
SPUU · Direxion Shares ETF Trust 0.22% 3,977 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
EUSA · iShares, Inc. 0.22% 24,101 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
TOK · iShares Trust 0.22% 2,976 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
QDPL · Pacer Funds Trust 0.22% 25,393 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FEX · First Trust Exchange-Traded AlphaDE… 0.22% 22,877 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
RSP · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust 0.21% 1,106,500 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
URTH · iShares, Inc. 0.21% 95,611 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
DCOR · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.20% 45,745 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
TILT · FlexShares Trust 0.20% 29,546 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
CRBN · iShares Trust 0.20% 12,875 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
HCMT · Direxion Shares ETF Trust 0.19% 7,332 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
SPXL · Direxion Shares ETF Trust 0.18% 82,399 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
ACWI · iShares Trust 0.18% 336,725 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
VT · VANGUARD INTERNATIONAL EQUITY INDEX… 0.17% 883,538 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
SIZE · iShares Trust 0.16% 3,845 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
VFVA · VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND 0.14% 6,614 SH Aug. 19, 2026 Daily
PWS · Pacer Funds Trust 0.13% 219 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
DYNF · BlackRock ETF Trust 0.11% 255,906 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
LGDX · Tidal Trust III 0.08% 749 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
EQAL · Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust … 0.07% 2,859 SH Oct. 2, 2026 Daily
USMV · iShares Trust 0.06% 74,779 SH Sept. 11, 2026 Daily
DFLV · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.03% 13,821 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
FBCV · FIDELITY COVINGTON TRUST 0.00% 52 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
DFUV · Dimensional ETF Trust 0.00% 1,767 NS July 31, 2026 N-PORT
BIV · VANGUARD BOND INDEX FUNDS · · July 15, 2026 Daily
BLV · VANGUARD BOND INDEX FUNDS · · July 15, 2026 Daily
BSV · VANGUARD BOND INDEX FUNDS · · July 15, 2026 Daily
BND · VANGUARD BOND INDEX FUNDS · · July 15, 2026 Daily
VCRB · VANGUARD MALVERN FUNDS · · July 15, 2026 Daily
VCSH · VANGUARD SCOTTSDALE FUNDS · · July 15, 2026 Daily
VCIT · VANGUARD SCOTTSDALE FUNDS · · July 15, 2026 Daily
VCLT · VANGUARD SCOTTSDALE FUNDS · · July 15, 2026 Daily
VTC · VANGUARD SCOTTSDALE FUNDS · · July 30, 2026 Daily
BNDW · VANGUARD SCOTTSDALE FUNDS · · July 30, 2026 Daily
VCEB · VANGUARD WORLD FUND · · July 30, 2026 Daily

QCOM Analyst Consensus Bullish and bearish analyst opinions, 12-month price target, upside

21
rating · 49 analysts HOLD
Median target $175.00 -5.3%
5 10.2% Strong Buy
15 30.6% Buy
26 53.1% Hold
3 6.1% Sell
0 0.0% Strong Sell

12-Month Price Target

30 analysts · 2026-09-28

Mean target $194.13 +5.0%

Now Current price $184.87
Low$100.00 Mean$194.13 High$400.00

Peer comparison (GICS sub-industry) Key metrics vs sector peers

22

FY basis, prices as of each company's last fiscal year-end close.

Ticker Market Cap P/E Rev YoY Net Margin ROE Gross Margin
QCOM $181.72B 33.8 13.7% 12.5% 22.7% ·
AMD · 81.1 34.3% · · ·
INTC $180.78B -603.3 -0.47% -0.51% -0.25% 34.8%
TXN · 31.8 13.1% 28.3% 30.1% 57.0%
MRVL $68.75B 26.4 42.1% 32.6% 19.3% 51.0%
ADI $114.64B 51.3 16.9% 20.6% 6.6% 61.5%
MPWR $44.15B 70.5 26.4% 22.3% 18.0% 55.2%
ALAB $28.31B 136.4 115.1% 25.7% 17.5% 75.7%
MRVL $68.75B 26.4 42.1% 32.6% 19.3% 51.0%
MCHP $35.02B 293.7 7.1% 4.9% 3.5% 57.7%
CBRS · · · · · ·

Latest News Recent headlines mentioning this company

23

QCOM AI Analyst Panel — Bullish and Bearish Views 2026Q2 debate: Claude, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT on the stock's prospects

24
Panel Verdict NEUTRAL Confidence 0.66 4 of 4 reported forecast spread ·

Qualcomm faces a critical test as it attempts to pivot from mobile dependency toward AI-driven growth. Grok and Gemini argue that the company's 55% gross margin provides the necessary capital to fund this transition, while Claude and ChatGPT warn that the 53% drop in earnings signals a deeper demand cliff. The panel remains split on whether the current valuation is a bargain or a trap, ultimately converging on a cautious hold until the company proves it can stabilize its profitability.

Round 1 — Opening Takes

Grok NEUTRAL
Confidence 0.75
↑ Bullish

I see Qualcomm surging in 2026Q2 if its Snapdragon AI chips capture exploding demand in smartphones and PCs. Gross margin stays flat at 55.43%, proving the company holds strong pricing power even as costs rise in the chip wars. Current ratio of 2.82 comfortably tops 1.0, ensuring liquidity to fund aggressive R&D without dilution risks. At 33 times trailing earnings, the P/E trades below the peer median, leaving room for expansion if EPS rebounds toward prior highs.

↓ Bearish

My read is Qualcomm crumbling if profitability keeps sliding amid competition and China trade risks. ROE has halved to 21.51%, signaling leverage and buybacks can't mask weakening returns on core operations. Debt-to-equity ratio climbed to 69.84, straining the balance sheet in a downturn and raising refinancing worries. EPS TTM dropped to $4.89 from double digits, highlighting vulnerability as handset demand softens.

Claude NEUTRAL
Confidence 0.62
↑ Bullish

Qualcomm's 55% gross margin and 21.5% ROE show a company with genuine pricing power in an oligopoly. The stock trades at 33 times trailing earnings, which is actually below the semiconductor peer median and reasonable for a business that converts equity into profit at rates most hardware players can't touch. Price action since May has stabilized around $150–162, suggesting the market has found a floor after earlier volatility. If smartphone demand holds and automotive chip adoption accelerates through 2026, this valuation compresses further.

↓ Bearish

The earnings collapse from 2025Q3 to 2026Q1 is the real story here. EPS fell from $10.37 to $4.89 — a 53% drop in six months. Net margin cratered from 26.8% to 12.5%, signaling either a demand cliff or a one-time charge that hasn't been explained. Seaport Research's March 22 downgrade to $100 (30% below current price) reflects analyst concern that's not priced in. Debt-to-equity jumped to 69.8 from 54.4 in one quarter, and current ratio fell to 2.8. That combination — collapsing earnings plus rising leverage — is a warning flag I can't ignore.

Gemini NEUTRAL
Confidence 0.65
↑ Bullish

Qualcomm remains a defensive anchor in the mobile space with enough cash flow to pivot toward higher-growth edge AI. The company maintains a current ratio of 2.81, which shows they have nearly three dollars in liquid assets for every dollar of short-term debt. That kind of balance sheet strength provides a massive safety net while they transition away from pure mobile dependency. Even with recent margin pressure, their 55.43% gross margin indicates they still command significant pricing power on their core chipsets. They aren't just a phone stock; they are the gatekeepers of wireless connectivity.

↓ Bearish

The fundamental engine at Qualcomm is stalling as the company struggles to maintain its historical profitability. Their return on equity has plummeted to 21.51%, which is a sharp decline from the 42.85% levels we saw just a few quarters ago. This drop suggests that the company is finding it increasingly difficult to generate efficient returns on the capital they are deploying. Furthermore, at a 33.06 trailing P/E, investors are paying a premium for a company whose earnings per share have stalled. If they cannot reignite growth, that valuation multiple is simply unsustainable.

Chatgpt NEUTRAL
Confidence 0.62
↑ Bullish

I think the strongest bullish case is that Qualcomm remains an IP-led growth engine with durable margins and a clear dividend path. Gross margin TTM: 55.43%. That level underpins earnings quality from its licensing business and Snapdragon demand. ROE TTM: 21.51%. That shows efficient use of equity and supports ongoing buybacks and cash returns to shareholders. P/E TTM: 33.06%. The market is pricing solid, multi-year growth; if 5G and auto licensing stay on track, the premium makes sense.

↓ Bearish

I think the strongest bearish case is that the stock is priced for perfection and faces margin pressure from licensing and rising leverage. EPS TTM: 4.89. Earnings have slipped, suggesting limited room for margin expansion. ROE TTM: 21.51%. This downtrend signals profitability pressure as leverage and buybacks distort prior highs. P/E TTM: 33.06. Valuation looks rich vs peers if growth disappoints or if capital returns plateau.

Round 2 — Responses & Rebuttals

Round 2 — Responses & Rebuttals

Grok

Gemini, your bearish read on ROE plummeting to 21.51% ignores how it still crushes peers like AMD's 5.6%. That means Qualcomm generates returns on equity that leave chip rivals in the dust, even after the drop from 42.85%, preserving a competitive moat in licensing and chips. This supports holding through 2026Q2 if AI demand offsets handset weakness.

Claude

I need to push back on Gemini here. You're citing that 2.81 current ratio as a safety net, but you're missing what happened in one quarter: it fell from 3.19 to 2.81. That's a 12% drop in liquidity in ninety days. Yes, 2.81 is still above 1.0, but the velocity matters. If current ratio keeps contracting at that pace while debt-to-equity is climbing to 69.84, you don't have a safety net — you have a deteriorating one. The balance sheet strength story only holds if those trends reverse. Right now they're not.

Gemini

Claude, your point about the earnings collapse ignores the massive shift in Qualcomm's capital allocation strategy. You highlighted the EPS drop from $10.37 to $4.89, but that 53% decline is largely a reflection of the company leaning into heavy R&D for the AI transition rather than a simple demand cliff. A 2.81 current ratio tells us they have plenty of liquidity to fund this pivot without endangering the business. I agree the margin pressure is real, but betting against their ability to monetize that R&D in 2026 feels premature.

Chatgpt

Claude, your point about the earnings collapse is a real risk to watch. EPS TTM stands at 4.89. That indicates earnings power is not yet back to the double-digit levels we saw in 2025, so upside hinges on a rebound in licensing and AI-chip demand. Otherwise, the stock could remain range-bound despite a robust gross margin. That risk keeps the upside contingent on a revival in licensing.

Round 3 — Final Rebuttals

Round 3 — Final Rebuttals

Grok

Gemini, your claim that the 53% EPS drop to $4.89 reflects heavy R&D for AI overlooks the broader margin collapse with no supporting evidence in the data. Net margin TTM cratered to 12.51% from 26.77% in 2025Q3. For Qualcomm, that points to softer handset royalties and chip pricing, not a reversible investment — it's a demand signal Seaport Research flagged in their March 22 downgrade to $100. Without a clear catalyst, this keeps downside alive into 2026Q2.

Claude

I want to push back on Grok's ROE comparison to AMD. Yes, Qualcomm's 21.51% ROE beats AMD's 5.6%, but that comparison misses the real issue: Qualcomm's ROE collapsed from 42.85% to 21.51% in two quarters. That's not a moat — that's a deterioration signal. AMD's low ROE reflects a different business model; Qualcomm's plunge reflects margin compression on the same core business. The real question is whether that 21.51% stabilizes or keeps falling. Until we see evidence of stabilization in the next earnings print, I can't treat the peer comparison as reassuring. It's comparing two different trajectories, not two different companies.

Gemini

Grok, I have to disagree with your focus on the ROE comparison to AMD. Comparing Qualcomm’s 21.51% ROE to AMD’s 5.61% misses the fact that AMD is currently sacrificing margins for aggressive market share gains in data center GPUs, which is a fundamentally different growth cycle than Qualcomm’s mature mobile business. I am widening the frame to the real catalyst: customer concentration. Qualcomm relies heavily on a few top-tier handset OEMs, and with the recent push toward on-device AI, their pricing power depends entirely on whether these partners can successfully upsell premium AI-capable devices to consumers. If that refresh cycle stalls, Qualcomm’s revenue will hit a wall regardless of their balance sheet.

Chatgpt

Grok, your bullish call hinges on Snapdragon AI chips driving a 2026Q2 surge. My read is the timing and profitability aren't spelled out yet. EPS TTM is $4.89. That level of earnings power implies Qualcomm still has a long way to go to reclaim double-digit profitability, and AI-driven monetization may lag licensing and auto-chip revenue even if hardware demand improves. In short, a tempo-driven AI upgrade alone doesn’t guarantee a sharp near-term earnings spike for 2026Q2.

Price Forecasts

Model 3M Target 6M Target Reasoning
Grok $162.00 $170.00 I think Qualcomm grinds higher to 162-170 through 2026Q2 as sticky 55% gross margins fund an AI pivot without eroding the balance sheet. The single catalyst is the late-July 2026 Q2 earnings print, where upward guidance on Snapdragon X Elite sales in PCs could confirm demand inflection and lift multiples. The key risk is renewed China trade tariffs materializing by Q2, crushing 35-40% of handset royalties and validating Seaport's $100 target. At 33 times $4.89 trailing EPS, the current 157 price assumes flat earnings—any AI beat justifies 170.
Claude $142.00 $155.00 My thesis: Qualcomm stabilizes earnings in 2026Q2 but doesn't reignite growth, so the stock trades sideways to slightly lower before a modest recovery. The EPS collapse from $10.37 to $4.89 signals a demand reset, not a reversible R&D spend — Gemini's pivot narrative lacks evidence. Catalyst: 2026Q2 earnings print in late April shows stabilization (EPS holding above $4.50) and management guidance affirms AI monetization without raising full-year targets. Risk: Seaport's $100 target proves prescient if smartphone refresh stalls and licensing revenue contracts further. At 33 times trailing earnings on $4.89 EPS, the market is pricing a rebound that hasn't materialized yet. I'm holding my hold, but the 3-month target reflects downside risk from current $157.46 close as the market reprices for a slower 2026.
Gemini $155.00 $170.00 My thesis is that Qualcomm will trade sideways until the market gains confidence in their AI-driven margin recovery. The primary catalyst for the 6-month target is the 2026Q3 earnings report, where we need to see a stabilization in net margins to prove the recent dip was an investment phase rather than a permanent loss of pricing power. The major risk is a further contraction in the current ratio, which would signal that liquidity is being drained faster than their R&D can generate returns. At a 33.06 trailing P/E, the market is currently paying a premium for a company whose earnings must now prove they can sustainably scale beyond mobile dependencies.
Chatgpt $152.00 $160.00 I think Qualcomm is a cautious hold with limited near-term downside and potential for a modest re-rating if licensing and AI demand stabilize. Catalyst: the upcoming earnings print showing licensing monetization and AI chip demand maintaining revenue mix. Risk: a deeper licensing revenue pullback or debt pressure breaks the thesis. ROE around 21.5%. That means Qualcomm still turns equity into profits efficiently, supporting buybacks and cash returns even as margins come under pressure.

Trading Signals Recent buy/sell signals with entry price and risk/reward ratio

25

No open signal right now — no card is filled, and that's honest.

My Metrics Your personal watchlist — selected rows from Full Fundamentals

26

Pick the metrics that matter to you — click the + next to any row in Full Fundamentals above.

Your selection is saved and follows you across all tickers.

Source: SEC 10-Q filed Jul 29, 2026