By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists have mixed views on NXT and BWXT, with concerns around execution risk, competition, and valuation gaps. They agree that the growth story hinges on sustained capex, favorable policy, and project execution.
Risk: Execution risk, including project delays and competition from new entrants, was the most frequently cited concern.
Opportunity: Gemini highlighted NXT's potential in the 'Energy-as-a-Service' shift, with AI-driven software decoupling the company from hardware commoditization.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Nextpower is becoming a “one-stop” shop for solar energy solutions.
BWX dominates a crucial link in the nuclear supply chain.
Energy stocks often experience cyclical swings, but the top stocks tend to be strong long-term investments because the world will continually consume more energy. But instead of sticking with the classic oil and gas stocks to profit from that trend, investors should consider buying some higher-growth plays in the solar and nuclear energy markets.
Both of those growing markets should benefit from global decarbonization initiatives, making them more resilient investments than the top fossil fuel stocks. If you want to profit from that shift, you should invest in these two higher-growth energy stocks: Nextpower (NASDAQ: NXT) in the solar market and BWX (NYSE: BWXT) in the nuclear market.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Nextpower is the world's largest producer of solar trackers, which tilt solar panels to follow the sun throughout the day. It also produces electrical balance-of-systems (eBOS) solutions for moving electricity from solar panels to the grid, robotics systems for maintaining solar farms, and AI software for predicting weather and automating a solar power plant's operations.
Nextpower still generates most of its revenue from selling solar trackers in North America, but it's expanding overseas and beefing up its smaller businesses through acquisitions. That expansion is locking in its customers, widening its moat against its competitors, and turning it into a "one-stop" shop that supports the entire lifecycle of a solar power plant.
The global solar market's total volume could expand at a 19.9% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, according to Mordor Intelligence, as more companies ramp up renewable energy investments to meet the power-hungry demands of of the artificial intelligence (AI), cloud infrastructure, and data center markets.
From fiscal 2025 (which ended last March) to fiscal 2027, analysts expect Nextpower's revenue and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to grow at CAGRs of 13% and 12%, respectively. With an enterprise value of $20.4 billion, it still looks reasonably valued at five times this year's sales and 22 times its adjusted EBITDA. So if you're looking for a simple play on the growing solar market, Nextpower checks all the right boxes.
BWX, which was spun off from Babcock & Wilcox (NYSE: BW) in 2025, is the only large-scale nuclear equipment manufacturing facility in North America. It produces specialized nuclear components, fuel systems, and naval reactor systems in its large precision nuclear fabrication facilities. It's also one of the only companies simultaneously licensed to work with regulated nuclear materials, handle high-assay enriched uranium (HALEU) and tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) fuel, and manufacture naval reactor components for the U.S. Navy.
Those facilities, which are widely considered irreplaceable parts of the nuclear supply chain, make BWX a linchpin of the nuclear energy market. Its heavy exposure to the defense sector also helped it keep growing, even as many countries reined in their nuclear spending in the decade after the Fukushima disaster in 2011.
BWX's backlog grew 50% year over year to $7.3 billion at the end of 2025, driven by the demand for naval propulsion components for submarines, commercial nuclear power components, and special materials. Its nascent small modular reactor (SMR) business, which produces smaller and easier-to-deploy nuclear reactors for remote areas, is also attracting more attention as a long-term play on the AI, cloud infrastructure, and data center markets.
From 2025 to 2028, analysts expect BWX's revenue and adjusted EBITDA to grow at 13% and 12% CAGRs, respectively. With an enterprise value of $20.1 billion, it isn't cheap at five times this year's sales and 30 times its adjusted EBITDA. Still, its wide moat and exposure to the resurgent nuclear energy market should justify that higher valuation.
Before you buy stock in Nextpower, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nextpower wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $469,293! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,381,332!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 993% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 18, 2026. *
Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends BWX Technologies and Nextpower. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Execution slippage and valuation sensitivity to AI timelines are larger risks than the article acknowledges."
The article positions NXT as a solar one-stop shop and BWXT as a nuclear supply-chain linchpin, both riding AI-driven power demand. Yet it downplays execution risk: NXT's overseas push faces Chinese tracker competition and margin pressure, while BWXT's SMR and naval backlog conversion has historically slipped by years. Both names trade at 5x sales with 12-13% EBITDA growth baked in; any delay in data-center buildouts or policy shifts on HALEU fuel could compress multiples quickly. The 19.9% solar CAGR cited is industry-wide, not company-specific.
If hyperscalers sign multi-year offtake deals accelerating SMR and tracker deployments, the current 22-30x EBITDA multiples could prove conservative rather than stretched.
"NXT's valuation assumes it will grow faster than the solar market itself, but the article provides no evidence it's gaining share against Chinese competitors or that eBOS/AI software will materially move the needle."
Both stocks face identical 13% revenue CAGRs through 2027–2028, yet BWX trades at 30x adjusted EBITDA versus NXT at 22x—a 36% premium for nominally equal growth. The article doesn't explain this valuation gap. BWX's moat (irreplaceable nuclear fabrication, HALEU licensing, Navy contracts) appears structurally stronger than NXT's solar tracker dominance, which faces commoditization pressure and Chinese competition. NXT's 5x sales multiple looks cheap only if the 19.9% solar market CAGR (2026–2031) translates to company-level growth—a heroic assumption given tracker market saturation. BWX's $7.3B backlog is tangible; NXT's expansion into eBOS and AI software is speculative.
If AI data centers drive a 30%+ renewable energy buildout over 3 years, NXT's integrated platform strategy could capture disproportionate share gains and justify re-rating to 8–10x sales. BWX's nuclear upside may already be priced in given the 50% YoY backlog growth and post-Fukushima sentiment shift.
"NXT and BWXT are industrial infrastructure plays whose valuations currently price in perfect execution, leaving little margin for error in a high-interest-rate environment."
The article frames NXT and BWXT as pure-play energy growth, but investors must distinguish between cyclical manufacturing and true secular growth. NXT's 22x EBITDA multiple is aggressive for a hardware-heavy solar tracker business prone to margin compression from commoditization and trade policy risks. Conversely, BWXT is less a 'growth' play and more a high-barrier-to-entry defense contractor. While the nuclear backlog is robust, the SMR market remains speculative with significant regulatory and capital expenditure hurdles. Investors should view these as industrial infrastructure bets rather than tech-like growth stocks, as their valuation multiples are increasingly sensitive to interest rates and government procurement cycles rather than just energy demand.
If the AI data center energy crisis proves as acute as projected, the valuation premiums for NXT and BWXT may actually expand as they become the only viable, scalable infrastructure providers for the grid.
"Valuations look extended given sensitivity to subsidies, project timing, and execution risk; the growth story is real but not guaranteed."
Article pitches Nextpower as a 'one-stop' solar enabler and BWX as a nuclear supply-chain linchpin, aligning with the decarbonization thesis. Yet the growth story hinges on sustained capex for AI/cloud, favorable policy, and rapid SMR/HALEU adoption—metrics that can shift with subsidies or project delays. Valuations are rich: Nextpower ~5x revenue, ~22x EBITDA; BWX ~5x revenue, ~30x EBITDA, despite cyclical solar demand and high execution risk. The piece glosses margin trajectories, integration risk from acquisitions, and potential supply-chain/geopolitical headwinds. Overall, a high-conviction secular bet that still requires near-perfect policy support and project execution to justify the price.
The secular tailwinds may be real, but the catalysts are policy- and project-driven; a delay in SMR commercialization or a subsidy rollback could trigger meaningful multiple compression even if fundamentals stay solid.
"BWXT's moat may prove less defensible than claimed once subsidized competitors enter HALEU fabrication."
Claude's valuation gap analysis assumes BWXT's nuclear moat is durable, yet ignores how HALEU supply constraints could invite new domestic fabricators funded by recent DOE grants. If those entrants secure even 15% of the naval-adjacent backlog by 2028, BWXT's 30x EBITDA multiple compresses faster than NXT's 22x despite similar revenue CAGRs. This risk compounds when paired with Gemini's interest-rate sensitivity point, as both multiples already embed aggressive terminal growth assumptions.
"BWXT's multiple compression risk is timing-driven (SMR delays), not competition-driven (new fabricators lack the qualification moat)."
Grok's DOE-funded fabricator threat to BWXT is plausible but underspecified. Naval contracts have 20+ year qualification cycles—new entrants can't displace 15% of backlog by 2028 without already having security clearances and production certifications in place. The real compression risk isn't competition; it's if SMR capex timelines slip another 3-5 years, pushing revenue recognition past 2028 and forcing multiple reset. Neither Claude nor Grok quantifies this timing risk adequately.
"NXT's valuation premium potential lies in software-margin expansion, whereas BWXT remains constrained by the lower-margin, fixed-contract nature of defense and nuclear infrastructure."
Claude is right about the naval moat, but both panelists miss the true catalyst: the 'Energy-as-a-Service' shift. NXT isn't just selling trackers; they are pivoting to software-defined grid management. If they achieve even 5% attach rates on their AI-driven tracking software, they decouple from hardware commoditization. Conversely, BWXT remains a pure industrial play tethered to government procurement. The valuation gap isn't a mistake; it's the market pricing in NXT's potential software-margin expansion versus BWXT's fixed-margin defense reality.
"The 5% attach-rate for AI software is a high hurdle; without it, NXT's multiple expansion is unlikely."
Gemini's Energy-as-a-Service catalyst for NXT—5% attach-rate for AI-driven software—is appealing but hinges on enterprise procurement, pricing, and integration costs that the panel glossed over. A 2–3 year sales cycle and potential software churn mean the margin uplift may be far more modest than implied, keeping hardware-driven growth and 5x revenue as the chief driver. If AI software adoption stalls, NXT's multiple expansion looks unlikely.
The panelists have mixed views on NXT and BWXT, with concerns around execution risk, competition, and valuation gaps. They agree that the growth story hinges on sustained capex, favorable policy, and project execution.
Gemini highlighted NXT's potential in the 'Energy-as-a-Service' shift, with AI-driven software decoupling the company from hardware commoditization.
Execution risk, including project delays and competition from new entrants, was the most frequently cited concern.