By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists generally agreed that the article's recommendations of Palantir, Alphabet, and SMH ETF as decade-long AI winners are overhyped and risky, with high valuations, uncertain growth, and potential execution challenges.
Risk: Stretched valuations and uncertain monetization of AI investments
Opportunity: None explicitly stated
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Investing in artificial intelligence (AI) seems to have become more challenging over the last few months. More than one year after generative AI stoked excitement for tech investors, specific stocks such as Nvidia, Super Micro, and CrowdStrike seem to have drawn most of the interest and have risen to nosebleed valuations.
Fortunately for investors who feel they missed out on these stocks, AI will likely be more than a flash in the pan. Thus, one can buy and hold specific AI stocks for the next decade with a reasonable expectation of earning significant returns. These three stocks should deliver for investors.
At first glance, investors might assume they've missed out on Palantir Technologies (NYSE: PLTR). The stock is up fourfold since its low in late 2022. Also, the recent revenue growth is unlikely to impress growth investors.
Nonetheless, investors may have yet to fully realize the game-changing potential of its generative AI product: the Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP). AIP builds on the analysis capabilities of its older Gotham and Foundry platforms. While those platforms also relied on AI, the productivity gains reported by AIP users have yielded eye-popping results.
After attending AIP boot camps, companies seem to find multiple use cases. One prospective customer accomplished more in a day through AIP than a hyperscaler (like Amazon Web Services) might have achieved in four months, while another claimed to build 10 times faster with three times fewer resources. Such results seem to quickly lead to new seven-figure deals for Palantir.
As mentioned, results may take time. In the first quarter of 2024, revenue of $634 million rose 21%, which appears modest when comparing growth to its price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 24.
Still, its net income of $106 million is up more than sixfold from year-ago levels. If revenue growth starts to reflect the productivity gains and increased deal volumes driven by AIP, the stock price growth should accelerate significantly over the next few years.
In addition to up-and-coming AI companies, investors may also want to look at one of the pioneers in this field: Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) (NASDAQ: GOOG). Alphabet began using the technology in 2001 and became an AI-first company in 2016, employing the technology in all subsequent product releases.
However, the rise of ChatGPT left investors with the impression that Alphabet had fallen behind its peers. For the first time in decades, Google's dominant search engine faced a credible competitive threat.
Nonetheless, before writing off Alphabet, investors should remember that it has released its own generative AI tool in the form of Google Gemini. Moreover, Google Cloud, which is the third-largest cloud company, ensures it will play a critical role in deploying this technology for clients.
Furthermore, Alphabet combined its research teams in April 2023 to form Google DeepMind. With $108 billion in liquidity backing its efforts, Alphabet is unlikely to stay behind in this field.
Finally, at a price-to-earnings ratio of 28, it is cheaper than its mega-tech competitors. Between its breadth of experience in AI and its tremendous resource base, the Google parent will likely remain a force in the AI industry for a long time to come.
Investors who prefer not to risk precious capital on the fortunes of a particular company may simply want to invest in most of the top chip stocks through the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (NASDAQ: SMH). Most of the companies within the exchange-traded fund (ETF) either design or manufacture AI-ready chips. Without this technology, AI would not have been possible.
This ETF invests around 20% of its assets in Nvidia, with an additional 13% in the leading chip manufacturer Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The rest of its holdings make up less than 10% of the fund each, though Broadcom, Advanced Micro Devices, and Micron are among the 26 stocks held.
Moreover, it reported returns of 28% per year over the last 10 years. In comparison, the benchmark SPDR S&P 500 reported an average yearly return of 13% over the same period -- less than half the return of the VanEck ETF.
Furthermore, VanEck's ETF expense ratio is 0.35%, slightly below the average expense ratio, which is 0.37%, according to Morningstar. Thus, the fund has delivered these outsized returns at an affordable price.
Indeed, the fund does not guarantee it can match the 28% average annual return over the last 10 years. However, if one wants outsized returns with lower risk and without the work involved in finding such stocks, they will likely find both in the VanEck Semiconductor ETF.
Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $757,001!*
Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 24, 2024
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Will Healy has positions in Advanced Micro Devices, CrowdStrike, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, Palantir Technologies, Salesforce, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, and Tencent. The Motley Fool recommends Alibaba Group, Broadcom, and International Business Machines and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Durable monetization and cyclic AI capex are the gating factors; hype alone won't sustain a decade of outperformance."
While the article touts Palantir, Alphabet, and the SMH ETF as decade‑long AI winners, the strongest counter is that AI optimism is already priced in and growth remains uncertain. Palantir’s AIP monetization hinges on multi‑year enterprise deals that may disappoint; Alphabet’s AI edge could erode if competition and data access tighten, even with Gemini. The SMH exposure to Nvidia creates a crash‑risk scenario if AI capex cools or chip pricing dips. A decade horizon demands more than hype—monetization durability, margin expansion, regulatory risk, and compute/energy costs will shape returns, not just headline AI breakthroughs.
If AI productivity accelerates and capex remains resilient, Palantir and Alphabet could re‑rate faster than the bears expect, and SMH’s cyclic exposure may prove less of a drag than feared. In that case, the article’s caution could understate the upside.
"Current valuations for AI-linked equities are pricing in perfect execution, leaving zero room for the inevitable cyclical volatility of tech spending."
The article's recommendation of Palantir (PLTR) and Alphabet (GOOGL) ignores the massive valuation hurdle of a 24x price-to-sales ratio for PLTR, which requires flawless execution to justify current pricing. While AIP boot camps show promise, they are not yet translating into the hyper-growth required to sustain that multiple. Alphabet remains a value play, but the 'AI-first' narrative faces an existential threat from search disruption and antitrust headwinds that could erode margins. The SMH ETF is a safer proxy, but it is heavily concentrated in cyclical hardware. Investors should be wary of chasing these names at current levels without a clear margin of safety, as the 'AI infrastructure' spending cycle may face a mid-term lull.
If generative AI adoption hits an inflection point, the productivity gains at companies like Palantir could lead to margin expansion that makes current nosebleed valuations look like a bargain in retrospect.
"The article mistakes secular AI tailwinds for tactical buy signals, ignoring that all three recommendations are already priced for optimistic scenarios with minimal margin of safety."
This article conflates 'AI will be important' with 'these three picks will outperform.' PLTR trades at 24x sales on 21% revenue growth—a 1.1x PEG ratio that's not cheap for a company still unprofitable on GAAP basis (the $106M net income figure excludes stock-based comp, which was ~$200M in Q1). Alphabet at 28x P/E is reasonable but already prices in AI dominance; the article ignores search disruption risk from Claude/ChatGPT. SMH's 28% annualized return over 10 years is backward-looking; semiconductor cycles are notoriously mean-reverting, and current valuations assume AI capex stays elevated indefinitely. The article offers no valuation framework for why now is the time to buy, only that AI matters.
If AIP's productivity claims translate to $500M+ ARR within 18 months and PLTR reaches 40% gross margins, the stock could re-rate to 12-15x sales; Alphabet's moat in search and cloud infrastructure is genuinely defensible; SMH provides diversified chip exposure without single-stock risk.
"Valuation multiples and single-supply-chain concentration make these AI names riskier decade holds than the article suggests."
The article pitches PLTR, GOOGL, and SMH as decade-long AI holds but glosses over stretched valuations and execution risks. PLTR trades at 24x sales on 21% Q1 revenue growth despite AIP anecdotes; Alphabet faces direct search disruption from OpenAI-backed Bing while burning cash on DeepMind; SMH's 20% Nvidia weighting plus Taiwan Semiconductor exposure ties returns to one supply chain vulnerable to geopolitics and energy limits. Historical 28% SMH returns occurred in a low-rate, pre-AI-bubble environment unlikely to repeat. Regulatory scrutiny on AI usage and rising capex could compress margins faster than productivity gains materialize.
If enterprise AIP adoption scales to seven-figure deals at the pace claimed and Google Cloud captures 30%+ of AI workloads, multiples could expand rather than contract even from today's levels.
"AIP unit economics and customer concentration risk threaten Palantir's upside more than the lofty 24x sales multiple suggests."
Gemini overemphasizes the hurdle of a 24x sales multiple without quantifying discounted cash flow. AIP deals are often multi-year and heavily front-loaded in implementation costs; even if ARR grows, gross margins may compress once onboarding, integration, and support scale, and customer concentration risk can amplify volatility—one or two large customers renegotiating or churning could disproportionately hit PLTR’s upside. Until AIP's unit economics are clearer, these valuations look precarious.
"Energy infrastructure constraints will decouple software-as-a-service winners from hardware-dependent semiconductor cyclicality."
Claude is right to flag the GAAP vs. non-GAAP disconnect, but everyone is ignoring the energy constraint. PLTR and GOOGL aren't just software plays; they are tethered to the physical reality of power grid limitations. If data center capacity becomes the primary bottleneck by 2026, software-heavy firms like PLTR may outperform hardware-heavy SMH constituents, as the latter faces margin compression from rising utility costs and localized power scarcity, not just the cyclicality mentioned by Grok.
"Energy constraints are a sector-wide headwind, not a relative advantage for PLTR over SMH."
Gemini's energy constraint angle is underexplored but risks oversimplifying. Power scarcity doesn't inherently favor PLTR over SMH—it compresses *all* AI capex returns. If grid limits bind by 2026, the entire sector faces margin pressure, not a relative win for software. PLTR still needs AIP ARR to justify 24x sales; energy costs just raise the hurdle. SMH's hardware exposure becomes a hedge against software-only plays forced to cut capex, not a liability.
"Power constraints would hit PLTR's growth harder by delaying AIP deployments reliant on SMH hardware."
Gemini's energy thesis misses that PLTR's AIP still requires GPU clusters from NVDA and TSM suppliers inside SMH. Power shortages by 2026 would delay enterprise deployments, compressing PLTR's 21% revenue growth faster than diversified hardware demand that includes non-AI cycles. This connects ChatGPT's monetization risks with the capex delays Claude noted, leaving software plays equally exposed.
The panelists generally agreed that the article's recommendations of Palantir, Alphabet, and SMH ETF as decade-long AI winners are overhyped and risky, with high valuations, uncertain growth, and potential execution challenges.
None explicitly stated
Stretched valuations and uncertain monetization of AI investments