By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on the outlook for midstream giants like Enbridge, Kinder Morgan, and Oneok. While some see defensive utility and growth potential in their fee-based contracts and backlogs, others caution about interest rate sensitivity, counterparty risk, and volume risk, especially in a recession scenario.
Risk: Volume risk and counterparty risk in a downturn
Opportunity: Growth potential from backlogs and fee-based contracts
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
About 98% of Enbridge's earnings come from stable sources.
Kinder Morgan has $10 billion of commercially secured projects in its backlog.
Oneok produces stable earnings and has several expansions in its backlog.
Oil prices have gone on a hyperbolic run this year due to the war with Iran. WTI, the primary U.S. oil price benchmark, has jumped 60% to more than $90 a barrel. Surging crude prices are a near-term boon for oil producers as they're on track to reap windfall profits.
However, many oil market watchers expect crude prices to cool off later this year as shipping through the Strait of Hormuz normalizes. As a result, the profit gusher oil stocks are currently enjoying will likely be temporary.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Many pipeline stocks, on the other hand, primarily operate under long-term, fixed-rate contracts, ensuring stable earnings long after the Iran conflict ends. Add in their large project backlogs, and they're ideal energy stocks to buy and hold long term. Here are three contract-rich pipeline stocks to buy right now.
Enbridge (NYSE: ENB) is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The Canadian company transports 30% of the oil produced in North America, 20% of U.S. gas consumption, operates the largest natural gas utility in North America by volume, and is a leading investor in renewable energy.
Government-regulated rate structures and take-or-pay contracts underpin more than 98% of Enbridge's earnings. As a result, it produces very resilient earnings. Enbridge's profits are so predictable that it has achieved its annual financial guidance for 20 consecutive years.
Enbridge pays out 60% to 70% of its stable cash flows in dividends (a current yield of 5.4%). It reinvests the remainder into growing its operations. Enbridge currently has about 39 billion Canadian dollars ($28.3 billion) of commercially secured expansion projects in its backlog, which should enter service through the early 2030s. That supports Enbridge's expectation that it can grow its cash flow per share by around 3% this year and by roughly 5% annually thereafter, giving it the fuel to continue increasing its dividend. Enbridge has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years (in Canadian dollars).
Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) is a leading natural gas infrastructure company that transports 40% of all U.S. natural gas production. The pipeline giant is also a leading U.S. refined products and terminal operator and one of the largest carbon dioxide transporters in the country.
Take-or-pay agreements, fee-based contracts, or hedges back 96% of Kinder Morgan's cash flows. That provides it with very durable and predictable earnings. The company plans to pay out about 40% of its cash flow in dividends this year (a current yield of 3.7%), retaining the rest to reinvest in expansion projects.
Kinder Morgan currently has $10 billion of commercially secured expansions in its backlog. About 90% of its backlog is new natural gas pipelines and related infrastructure that should enter commercial service by the middle of 2030. Additionally, Kinder Morgan is pursuing another $10 billion of primarily natural gas infrastructure projects. These projects will grow the company's earnings in the coming years, giving it more fuel to increase its dividend, which it has done for nine years in a row.
Oneok (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy midstream company. It gathers, processes, transports, and stores natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, and refined products.
Most of its business segments expect to get about 90% of their earnings from fee-based sources this year (the NGL segment is 85%). That provides the company with very stable cash flows to pay dividends (a 5% current yield) and to invest in expansion projects.
Oneok currently has several expansions in the backlog, including joint ventures building a new export terminal and a gas pipeline. These projects should enter commercial service by mid-2028. They will grow the company's earnings, supporting its plans to increase its dividend by 3% to 4% per year.
There's growing optimism that the current ceasefire will hold, and that the sides are nearing a peace deal that will reopen the Strait of Hormuz. That would likely mean oil prices will head lower, along with oil company windfall profits.
However, it won't have much impact on the earnings and growth profiles of contract-rich pipeline stocks. That makes them ideal energy stocks to buy and hold for dividend income and steady growth.
Before you buy stock in Oneok, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Oneok wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $573,160! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,204,712!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,002% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 195% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 15, 2026. *
Matt DiLallo has positions in Enbridge and Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Enbridge and Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool recommends Oneok. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The stability of midstream cash flows is heavily contingent on interest rate environments, making these stocks vulnerable to debt-servicing costs that the article completely overlooks."
The article correctly highlights the defensive utility of midstream giants like Enbridge, Kinder Morgan, and Oneok, but it ignores the significant interest rate sensitivity inherent in their capital-intensive business models. While 'take-or-pay' contracts provide cash flow visibility, these firms carry massive debt loads. If the 'Iran conflict' premium in oil prices persists, it may keep inflation expectations elevated, forcing central banks to maintain higher-for-longer interest rates. This increases the cost of servicing debt and refinancing the massive backlogs mentioned. Investors should focus on the net debt-to-EBITDA ratios rather than just dividend yields, as rising capital costs could compress the very margins the article assumes are locked in.
Midstream companies often utilize inflation-indexed escalators in their contracts, which can actually protect their margins and cash flows during periods of higher interest rates and inflation.
"ENB's unmatched C$39B backlog and 98% stable earnings base ensure 5%+ CFPS growth through 2030s, insulating it from post-Iran oil price normalization."
This article rightly highlights ENB, KMI, and OKE's fee-based contracts shielding 96-98% of earnings from oil volatility tied to the Iran conflict, with backlogs (ENB's C$39B/$28.3B, KMI's $10B+$10B pursuing, OKE's expansions to 2028) driving 3-5% annual cash flow/dividend growth and yields of 3.7-5.4%. ENB's scale—30% NA oil transport, 20% US gas—and 31-year dividend raises make it the standout. Article glosses over execution risks like FERC approvals/delays on natgas pipes amid LNG demand uncertainty and leverage sensitivity to rates.
Even 'commercially secured' backlogs face cancellation risks from environmental lawsuits or customer pullbacks if recession curbs energy demand, while high payout ratios (ENB 60-70%, KMI 40%) limit flexibility if growth disappoints.
"Contract-backed cash flows are durable, but not immune to macro headwinds or regulatory risk; the article undersells both the recession scenario and the permitting/cost risks embedded in multi-year backlogs."
The article conflates two separate theses: that Iran conflict creates near-term oil tailwinds (true but temporary) and that pipeline stocks are insulated from geopolitical shocks (overstated). Yes, ENB, KMI, OKE have 90%+ contracted cash flows—that's real. But the article ignores that long-term contracts often include inflation escalators AND volume-risk clauses. If a recession hits and industrial demand collapses, even 'take-or-pay' agreements face renegotiation pressure. The $28B+ combined backlogs are also underdated: projects entering service 2028–2032 face permitting delays, cost overruns, and potential regulatory headwinds (especially carbon/climate policy). The dividend growth math (3–5% annually) assumes no multiple compression if rates stay elevated.
If the Iran ceasefire holds and crude normalizes to $70–75/bbl, these stocks' valuations could compress 10–15% on sentiment alone, even if fundamentals remain intact—and the article's premise that 'it won't have much impact' assumes the market prices these rationally.
"Backlog-backed cash flows in midstream aren't guaranteed to deliver dividend growth; capital costs, regulatory risk, and macro shifts could erode yields."
While the piece hawks ENB, KMI, and OKE as 'contract-rich' with backlog-backed growth, the bull thesis omits counterweights. Backlog conversion is not cash in hand; projects can slip, financing costs rise, and inflation can compress free cash flow available for dividends. Rate-based fee structures face regulatory risk and could be reset or delayed, muting growth. A macro backdrop of slower demand, higher capex costs, or policy shifts toward electrification could blunt expansion plans and compress earnings multiples. Iran-war volatility may fade, but the core structural risks to midstream cash flows remain, making the upside less certain than advertised.
Strongest counter: ENB's description of 98% take-or-pay for its earnings and the fee-based cash flows for KMI/OKE suggest earnings resilience; even if backlogs falter, the income stream could stay intact, limiting downside.
"Midstream contracts are not immune to credit risk, as a recession would threaten the solvency of the producers underpinning these fee-based cash flows."
Claude is right about the 'take-or-pay' fallacy, but everyone is ignoring the counter-party risk. These contracts are only as good as the creditworthiness of the producers. If the Iran conflict spikes oil prices, it helps producers, but if a recession hits, the E&P firms backing these midstream contracts face insolvency risk. We aren't just looking at interest rate sensitivity; we are looking at the potential for widespread contract defaults in the Permian or WCSB if energy prices crater.
"Counter-party risk is minimal due to investment-grade diversification, and OKE gains from natgas demand growth independent of oil volatility."
Gemini, counter-party risk is overstated: ENB reports 80%+ of contracts with investment-grade counterparties (producers, utilities, LDCs), diversified beyond Permian E&Ps. With WTI at $75+, producer balance sheets are robust, not fragile. Unflagged upside: OKE's MidCon gas expansions tie into AI data center natgas boom (projected +20 Bcf/d by 2030), fully decoupled from Iran oil shocks.
"Volume deferral by solvent counterparties poses more risk to midstream backlogs than outright default, and OKE's DC demand thesis overstates its exposure to that secular trend."
Grok's AI data center thesis is real but underbaked. OKE's MidCon expansions serve regional industrial load, not hyperscale DC clusters (AWS/Meta build near cheap power sources like Texas, PJM). The +20 Bcf/d projection conflates total US demand growth with OKE's addressable market. More critical: Grok dismisses counterparty risk too fast. Investment-grade counterparties matter, but 20% of ENB's contracts aren't IG-rated. If WTI falls to $60 and E&P capex freezes, even IG producers defer projects—volume risk, not default risk, is the real threat.
"Take-or-pay resilience hinges on counterparty quality and volumes, not just inflation-linked cash flows."
Grok's '80% IG' backdrop and AI data center expansion sound compelling, but they overlook volume risk and non‑IG counterparties. Even with take-or-pay structures, a downturn could trigger renegotiations or project delays; 20% non-IG exposure plus regulatory or permit risks could erode cash flow resilience just when rates stay high. The article should price in volume stress and counterparty diversity, not just backlogs and inflation escalators.
The panel is divided on the outlook for midstream giants like Enbridge, Kinder Morgan, and Oneok. While some see defensive utility and growth potential in their fee-based contracts and backlogs, others caution about interest rate sensitivity, counterparty risk, and volume risk, especially in a recession scenario.
Growth potential from backlogs and fee-based contracts
Volume risk and counterparty risk in a downturn