By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on EPD, ENB, and ARCC due to risks associated with rate changes, credit cycles, and regulatory headwinds.
Risk: Margin squeeze scenario for ARCC and EPD/ENB losing their inflation-hedge status.
Opportunity: None identified.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
You shouldn't significantly increase your position in a high-yield dividend stock without considering several factors. For example, it's not wise to buy so much of any given stock that it negatively impacts your overall portfolio diversification. You also need to evaluate the chances of a dividend cut in the near future.
That said, some high-yield dividend stocks are strong candidates for additional capital. Here are three you won't regret doubling up on right now.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) is a midstream energy leader that certainly checks off the high-yield box. The master limited partnership (MLP) pays a distribution yield of roughly 5.8%. Is this distribution safe? I think so.
For one thing, Enterprise has increased its distributions for 27 consecutive years. This track record underscores management's ability to navigate turbulence, given that the period includes the financial crisis of 2007 through 2009 and the COVID pandemic.
I also like Enterprise Products Partners' rock-solid balance sheet. It's no coincidence that the MLP has the highest credit rating in the midstream energy industry. Enterprise also has a very manageable debt leverage ratio of 3.2x.
Why load up on this pipeline stock now? The Iran war shows no signs of ending soon. Enterprise Products Partners' more than 50,000 miles of pipeline are critical in U.S. oil and gas exports, which should remain high as long as the conflict continues. Even if hostilities cease, the surging demand for natural gas driven by data centers should serve as a nice tailwind for Enterprise for years to come.
I'd put Enbridge (NYSE: ENB) in the same category as Enterprise Products Partners. It's also a midstream leader. Enbridge's forward dividend yield stands at roughly 5%. And its dividend looks quite safe, in my opinion.
Enbridge has an even more impressive streak of dividend hikes than Enterprise, having raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Its returns have trounced the S&P 500's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) since the turn of the century.
The company's pipelines transport around 30% of the crude oil produced in North America and 20% of the natural gas consumed in the U.S. The same tailwinds that are helping Enterprise Products Partners also benefit Enbridge.
Importantly, though, Enbridge isn't just a pipeline operator. Thanks to key acquisitions, the company is also the largest natural gas utility in North America by volume. This business gives Enbridge added stability, which makes doubling up on the stock less scary.
Not all of the good high-yield dividend stocks to buy right now are in the energy sector. Ares Capital (NASDAQ: ARCC) is the largest publicly traded business development company (BDC).
If you're looking for an especially juicy dividend, you might love Ares Capital. Its forward dividend yield tops 10.2%. Ordinarily, such a lofty yield would make me nervous. However, I think this BDC will be able to keep dividends flowing at least at the current level.
Ares Capital has consistently maintained or grown its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Its core earnings per share continue to exceed the dividends paid. What I really like is that Ares Capital has around $988 million of spillover income -- undistributed income that could be used to supplement future dividend distributions.
What about the concerns that software and services make up 22% of Ares Capital's portfolio and that artificial intelligence (AI) could disrupt software companies? Ares Capital has engaged a reputable consulting firm to perform an independent review of its software exposure. This evaluation found that the BDC's AI-related risk is "relatively limited." Around 85% of Ares Capital's software portfolio had a low risk of AI disruption.
There's one other reason I think doubling up on Ares Capital now could pay off. Futures reflect a probability of up to 91% of an interest rate hike by the end of this year. Ares Capital would benefit from higher rates, which would boost its net investment income.
Before you buy stock in Enterprise Products Partners, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Enterprise Products Partners wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $377,990! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,269,518!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 896% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 206% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of July 26, 2026. *
Keith Speights has positions in Ares Capital, Enbridge, and Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Ares Capital and Enbridge. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article's "no-regret double-up" thesis ignores credit-cycle risk in ARCC and elevated valuations plus regulatory overhang in the midstream names, making broad high-yield energy and BDC exposure less compelling than presented."
The article pitches EPD (5.8% yield), ENB (5.0%), and ARCC (10.2%) as can't-miss high-yield doubles, citing long distribution-growth streaks, stable leverage, and tailwinds from geopolitics, data-center gas demand, and possible rate hikes. While MLPs benefit from inelastic U.S. export volumes, the piece downplays commodity-price volatility, rising interest costs on variable-rate debt, and regulatory threats to pipeline expansions. ARCC's 10%+ yield looks attractive but its BDC model is highly sensitive to credit cycles; software/AI exposure, even if "limited," sits inside leveraged portfolios that historically suffer in recessions. Missing context: both EPD and ENB trade at premiums to historical EV/EBITDA, and ARCC's spillover cushion can evaporate quickly if portfolio companies default.
If the Fed actually cuts rates instead of hiking (current futures show only ~15% chance of a 2025 hike, not 91%), ARCC's net investment income would compress; simultaneously a quick Middle East ceasefire plus LNG oversupply could flatten midstream volumes and force distribution resets that end the 27- and 31-year streaks the article touts.
"The article’s reliance on imminent interest rate hikes as a tailwind for Ares Capital is fundamentally disconnected from current macroeconomic expectations."
The article's reliance on 'interest rate hikes' as a catalyst for Ares Capital (ARCC) is factually misaligned with current market consensus, which is pricing in cuts, not hikes. While EPD and ENB offer defensive income, the thesis ignores the regulatory and environmental headwinds facing midstream infrastructure. Specifically, the 'data center' demand for natural gas is a long-term secular trend, but it doesn't solve the immediate capital expenditure hurdles or the political risk associated with pipeline permitting. Investors should be wary of the 'yield trap' potential in BDCs if credit quality deteriorates in a slowing economy, regardless of the interest rate environment.
The primary risk is a systemic economic slowdown where midstream volumes plummet and BDC portfolio companies default, rendering 'stable' dividends unsustainable despite historical streaks.
"ARCC's 10.2% yield is sustainable only in a narrow rate environment; a sharp rise or fall both threaten dividend coverage, making it the riskiest of the three despite the article's confidence."
This article conflates three structurally different assets under a 'double down' thesis that doesn't hold. EPD and ENB are mature midstream operators with 27-31 year dividend streaks—their safety rests on stable cash flows, not geopolitical tailwinds. The 'Iran war' rationale is speculative; U.S. energy exports depend on global demand, not conflict duration. ARCC is a BDC whose 10.2% yield is mathematically sustainable only if rates stay elevated or credit spreads don't widen. The article's rate-hike thesis contradicts its own data: futures show 91% probability of a hike, meaning the market has already priced this in. The real risk: if rates rise sharply, BDC valuations compress and credit quality deteriorates. The article also omits leverage risk—EPD's 3.2x debt is manageable today but vulnerable in a recession.
If rates actually fall instead of rising, ARCC's net investment income collapses and dividend coverage deteriorates fast. Meanwhile, the 'data center demand for natural gas' thesis for EPD/ENB is unproven at scale and faces headwinds from renewable energy adoption.
"The biggest risk is that the high yields rely on fragile cash-flow resilience to energy demand, rate moves, and credit conditions; a material downturn or regulatory change could trigger dividend cuts or much slower growth."
Takeaway: The article leans into high-yield names (EPD, ENB, ARCC) as 'buy now' plays, but it glosses over key risks. EPD/ENB are midstream pipelines whose cash flows ride energy volumes and capex cycles; a shift lower in oil/gas demand or a spike in financing costs could erode distributions or slow growth, even if yields look tasty. ARCC faces rate-risk and credit-cycle exposure in a rising-rate environment; undistributed income helps today, but funding costs and default risk could widen, particularly if the middle market slows. The 'Iran tailwinds' and AI risk notes feel speculative and not guaranteed; diversification risk remains if you truly double down.
Rising rates could initially bolster ARCC's net investment income, but if credit conditions deteriorate or default rates rise, distributions could be jeopardized; EPD/ENB faces regulatory and capex headwinds that could erode cash flow despite high yields.
"Dovish pivot likely erodes coverage for ARCC while freezing midstream growth, a correlation the panel underweights."
Claude's rate-hike math is inverted: futures imply ~85% chance of cuts by end-2025, not hikes. This compresses ARCC's floating-rate NII faster than any credit improvement. EPD/ENB's 3.2-4.1x leverage looks fine until a simultaneous LNG glut and permitting freeze hits; nobody has flagged the correlated duration risk across all three if policy turns dovish.
"The market is ignoring the dual-threat of declining net investment income for BDCs alongside persistent default risk in a weakening credit environment."
Grok correctly identifies the rate-hike hallucination in the source text, but everyone is missing the counter-cyclical trap: if rates fall to support the economy, ARCC’s floating-rate income drops, yet the credit-default risk in their portfolio remains elevated. We are looking at a potential 'margin squeeze' scenario where EPD/ENB lose their inflation-hedge status while ARCC’s dividend coverage ratio faces a double-whammy of compressed net investment income and rising non-accruals in their middle-market portfolio.
"A dovish pivot simultaneously compresses ARCC's floating-rate income and erodes EPD/ENB's volume support, but ARCC breaks first—creating a forced-seller dynamic if distributions are cut."
Gemini nails the margin-squeeze trap, but I'd sharpen it: ARCC's undistributed income buffer (currently ~15% of distributions) evaporates if NII compresses *and* non-accruals spike simultaneously. That's not just a coverage ratio problem—it's a distribution-cut trigger. EPD/ENB's inflation-hedge claim already looks broken if energy demand stalls; adding dovish policy removes their last tailwind. The correlated duration risk Grok flagged is real, but the sequencing matters: rate cuts hit ARCC first (NII compression), then EPD/ENB (volume risk). Timing mismatch = forced selling.
"ARCC's NII is highly sensitive to credit-cycle and rate moves; rate cuts could compress NII and trigger dividend risk even if default rates are modest, undermining the supposed cushion."
Grok, your emphasis on dovish rate paths as a catalyst overlooks sequencing risk: a quick rate cut could actually compress ARCC's NII faster than any credit improvement, especially if credit quality weakens. The undistributed income cushion (~15% in ARCC's distributions) is a fragile buffer that can evaporate with rising non-accruals and wider spreads. Meanwhile, EPD/ENB remain exposed to volume and capex shocks, not just rate optics.
The panel consensus is bearish on EPD, ENB, and ARCC due to risks associated with rate changes, credit cycles, and regulatory headwinds.
None identified.
Margin squeeze scenario for ARCC and EPD/ENB losing their inflation-hedge status.