By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel has mixed views on the safety and sustainability of high-yielding stocks VZ, MO, and PEP. While some see them as 'Dividend Kings' offering safe passive income, others warn of secular risks, stagnation, and duration risk in a higher-rate environment.
Risk: Duration risk in a higher-rate environment and structural headwinds in each company's sector.
Opportunity: Potential diversification within MO's oral tobacco portfolio offsetting regulatory pressure.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
High dividend yields can cut both ways, especially if your investing goal is to generate as much income as possible. Monster yields can mean mountains of passive income, but they are also riskier, and you often wind up losing money if the company has to cut the dividend. But there are high-yield dividend stocks out there with strong financials, some with yields as high as 4%, 5%, even 6% or more.
Here are three dividend stocks, each yielding at least 4.3%. These dividends come backed by healthy fundamentals with years of proven performance. You can confidently buy these stocks right now and enjoy the passive income that comes with them.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Cellphones and internet connectivity are staples in almost every household in America. People pay their phone bill like they pay their electric and gas utilities, which has made Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ) a very dependable dividend stock. The leading U.S. wireless carrier has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years, giving investors consistent growth alongside its juicy 6.4% yield.
The dividend is quite sustainable at only 57% of Verizon's 2026 earnings estimates and 58% of trailing-12-month cash flow. That means Verizon has plenty of financial breathing room to continue raising the dividend while still meeting the capital expenditure needs of its extensive infrastructure. The stock is hard to pass up when trading at less than 9 times its forward earnings, given that analysts expect high-single-digit earnings growth ahead.
Tobacco companies continue to stay relevant despite smoking rates peaking in the United States decades ago. Altria Group (NYSE: MO) dominates America's cigarette market with Marlboro, though it also sells various cigars, oral tobacco, and smoke-free products. Tobacco is notoriously addictive, making Altria an extremely resilient business over the years. It continues to squeeze out growth by raising its prices each year.
Altria is already a Dividend King, a company with over 50 consecutive annual dividend increases. The dividend payout ratio is manageable at 74% of 2026 earnings estimates and is backed by Altria's balance sheet and a multibillion-dollar stake in Anheuser-Busch InBev. Altria will probably continue growing earnings at a low-single-digit pace, but you don't need much when the stock trades at under 13 times forward earnings and yields 5.9%.
It's hard to find much safer stocks than diversified food and beverage giant PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP). The company dominates your local grocery store with brands spanning soda and other beverages, chips, snacks, and breakfast foods. People always need to eat and drink, so PepsiCo continues to make money through recessions, pandemics, you name it. That's made the stock a Dividend King with over five decades of dividend growth.
PepsiCo currently spends most of its cash flow on dividends, which is admittedly not ideal. That said, PepsiCo has $10.7 billion in cash and an A+ rating on its balance sheet, so there's probably still minimal risk of a dividend cut. Analysts see PepsiCo growing earnings at a mid-single-digit rate moving forward, so the payout ratio can decline over time. Shares look like a bargain at under 16 times 2026 earnings estimates and offer a strong 4.3% starting yield.
Before you buy stock in Verizon Communications, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Verizon Communications wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $377,990! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,269,518!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 896% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 206% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of July 26, 2026. *
Justin Pope has positions in PepsiCo. The Motley Fool recommends Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article underplays secular volume and regulatory pressures that could force payout compression despite currently healthy ratios."
The article pitches VZ (6.4% yield), MO (5.9%), and PEP (4.3%) as safe high-yield passive-income vehicles backed by low payout ratios, recession resilience, and cheap valuations (9-16x forward earnings). While the yields are genuine and payout ratios appear manageable, the piece glosses over secular risks: telecom capex pressure and cord-cutting for Verizon, accelerating cigarette volume declines plus regulatory/tax threats for Altria, and PepsiCo's high cash-flow payout amid slowing volume growth and private-label competition. The 'Dividend King' framing implies permanence that history shows can break under prolonged industry stress.
These three names have delivered total returns that crushed the broad market over the past decade precisely because the high yields were sustainable; the article's risks are already priced in and the 4-6% starting yields still look attractive versus 10-year Treasuries near 4%.
"These companies are essentially 'bond proxies' whose dividend sustainability is threatened by secular volume declines and high capital expenditure requirements, making them poor substitutes for true growth assets."
This article frames these as 'safe' income plays, but it ignores the fundamental stagnation inherent in these sectors. Verizon (VZ) faces massive debt loads and a capital-intensive 5G rollout that limits free cash flow flexibility. Altria (MO) is a classic 'value trap'—the declining smoking volume is only offset by aggressive price hikes that are hitting a ceiling, and the reliance on their AB InBev stake is a hedge, not a growth engine. Even PepsiCo (PEP) is showing cracks as consumer elasticity wanes. These aren't 'growth' stocks; they are bond proxies. In a high-rate environment, the yield spread over Treasuries is too thin to justify the equity risk premium.
If we enter a prolonged recession, these 'defensive' stocks will significantly outperform the S&P 500 as investors flee to stable, dividend-paying cash cows.
"High yields reflect market consensus on stagnation, not hidden value; buyers should verify they're comfortable with low single-digit earnings growth, not assume the yield compensates for it."
This article conflates yield with safety—a dangerous equation when rates are elevated. VZ at 6.4% yield trades at 9x forward earnings because the market prices in structural headwinds: capex intensity, wireless commoditization, and fixed-line subscriber pressure. MO's 5.9% reflects existential volume decline offset by pricing power that faces regulatory/ESG headwinds. PEP at 4.3% with a 74%+ payout ratio leaves minimal margin for error if organic growth disappoints. The article omits that high yields often signal the market has priced in stagnation, not opportunity. These aren't hidden gems—they're mature, slow-growth businesses. That's fine for retirees seeking cash flow, but framing them as 'bargains' ignores duration risk in a higher-rate environment.
If rates stay elevated or rise further, these 4-6% yields become genuinely attractive on a real (inflation-adjusted) basis, and the article's core thesis—that healthy balance sheets support sustainable payouts—is defensible for 5-10 year holders.
"High yields today can be attractive only if earnings stay supportive; risks from rising rates, regulation, and input costs could erode dividend safety and total return."
Today's pitch leans into safe passive income from VZ (6.4%), MO (5.9%), and PEP (4.3%), but the headline safety is a mirage. The yields rest on steady, if not spectacular, earnings and a willingness to tolerate ongoing capex (Verizon), regulatory risk (Altria), and margin pressure from input costs and FX (PepsiCo). Dividend sustainability hinges on earnings staying within the payout envelope; any acceleration in interest rates or a macro downturn could tighten financial breathing room and trigger slower or canceled dividend growth. The piece also relies on selective history (Dividend Kings) and marketing psychology more than a rigorous risk audit. Still, the trio offers diversification within a high-yield sleeve—if you accept the risk.
But the strongest counterpoint is that a sustained rise in interest rates or a macro downturn could trigger multiple compression and force dividend cuts. If any one of these names hiccups on earnings, the high yield may prove less protective than advertised, dragging total return.
"Altria's oral-nicotine growth is accelerating and may blunt traditional cigarette decline faster than consensus expects."
Claude correctly flags payout ratios and duration risk, but nobody has noted that MO's cigarette volume declines have accelerated to -8% YoY in recent quarters while its oral tobacco portfolio (on! and Copenhagen) is now growing double-digits—potentially offsetting regulatory pressure faster than the article or panel assumes. This diversification inside the 'value trap' is under-appreciated.
"Grouping PEP with VZ and MO as simple bond proxies ignores the superior inflation-hedging capacity of PEP's brand-driven pricing power."
Gemini’s 'bond proxy' framing misses the critical distinction in capital structure. VZ and MO are essentially leveraged bets on terminal value, whereas PEP is a consumer staple with pricing power that acts as an inflation hedge. Calling them all 'bond proxies' ignores that PEP’s 4.3% yield is backed by brand equity, not just utility-like cash flows. If inflation stays sticky, PEP’s ability to pass on costs makes it fundamentally superior to the debt-laden VZ.
"MO's oral tobacco growth is a tactical offset, not a strategic pivot; total volume headwinds remain and pricing power is hitting a wall."
Grok's oral tobacco offset is real but incomplete. MO's on! and Copenhagen growth masks that total volume (cigarettes + oral combined) is still declining mid-single digits. Pricing power has limits—MO's price/mix gains have slowed to 3-4% YoY as elasticity kicks in. The oral portfolio buys time but doesn't solve the structural headwind. Gemini's inflation-hedge distinction for PEP is sharper than the 'bond proxy' label, but that hedge only works if margins hold—and they're compressing.
"PEP's margin resilience is not guaranteed; inflation and input costs could erode dividend safety even with pricing power."
Point to challenge: Gemini’s inflation-hedge framing for PEP ignores margin risk. Even with strong pricing power, PEP's margins have crept down as costs (commodities, packaging, FX) tighten; a sustained inflation overshoot or sharper input-cost erosion could compress earnings, jeopardizing the 4.3% yield's sustainability. If margins contract, the 'dividend-growth ballast' weakens and the stock acts more like a high-yield commodity than a real inflation hedge.
The panel has mixed views on the safety and sustainability of high-yielding stocks VZ, MO, and PEP. While some see them as 'Dividend Kings' offering safe passive income, others warn of secular risks, stagnation, and duration risk in a higher-rate environment.
Potential diversification within MO's oral tobacco portfolio offsetting regulatory pressure.
Duration risk in a higher-rate environment and structural headwinds in each company's sector.