AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel consensus is bearish, with concerns about Etsy's ability to stabilize Gross Merchandise Sales (GMS) growth and manage operating expenses, particularly in the face of increased competition and a potential recession.

Risk: The panel flags the risk of elevated customer acquisition costs (CAC) outpacing lifetime value (LTV) growth, leading to structural unit economics issues.

Opportunity: There is no clear consensus on a single biggest opportunity, as the panel is largely focused on the risks and challenges facing Etsy.

Read AI Discussion
Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Struggling online marketplace Etsy saw gross merchandise sales fall again in 2025.

Operating expenses have skyrocketed 50% in the past four years, resulting in shrinking profits.

With Etsy's reliance on discretionary spending, it doesn’t help that consumer confidence now is so low.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Etsy ›

The stock market rewards businesses that are firing on all cylinders. That's exactly what happened with Etsy (NYSE: ETSY), whose shares skyrocketed 2,160% in the five years leading up to their peak in November 2021.

However, the market will also punish bad financial performance. That's why this same business has seen its shares tank 78% from that record (as of April 21).

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

Here are three must-know metrics that reveal precisely why this once booming e-commerce stock is struggling mightily.

Gross merchandise sales are in decline

Etsy's fall from grace can be blamed on weak trends in the core marketplace's gross merchandise sales (GMS), a measure of the dollar volume of transactions occurring on the platform. This figure totaled $10.5 billion in 2025, down 4% from the year before. And it dropped 14% from a peak of $12.2 billion in 2021.

It's obvious that Etsy must find a way to grow this key performance metric if it wants to generate durable revenue gains in the long run. For what it's worth, management expects GMS to rise this year, so this might be the start of a positive trend.

Earnings have plummeted since 2021

In 2021, during a time of heightened online shopping activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Etsy posted net income of $494 million. That number represented a year-over-year increase of 41.3%.

Fast-forward four years, and the company reported net income of $163 million in 2025. This translates to a troubling 67% decline. As mentioned, GMS has trended lower, leading to plummeting profits. It's no wonder the stock has gotten crushed.

Etsy's cost structure has gotten bloated as it aims to recharge its business. Operating expenses rose 50% from $1.2 billion in 2021 to $1.8 billion in 2025, with notable jumps in marketing and product development.

Consumer confidence is at an all-time low

Etsy's weak GMS and shrinking profit base can partly be blamed on the broader macro environment. On the one hand, it's admirable what this business has built, finding a niche in the competitive e-commerce market by offering differentiated goods. This position makes it hard for rivals to topple Etsy.

On the other hand, this means that the company depends on strong discretionary spending behavior. Its products can be viewed as nice-to-have items instead of essentials. Consumer confidence hit an all-time low in the month of April. And this closely watched economic indicator has moved downward over the past few years, tracking with Etsy's weaker financial performance.

Although Etsy shares look undervalued, investors shouldn't consider buying the stock until these data points show improvement.

Should you buy stock in Etsy right now?

Before you buy stock in Etsy, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Etsy wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $498,522! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,276,807!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 983% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 200% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of April 25, 2026. *

Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Etsy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes
G
Gemini by Google
▬ Neutral

"Etsy is currently priced for bankruptcy or irrelevance, which ignores the platform's high-margin take rate and the unique, non-commoditized nature of its seller base."

Etsy’s current narrative is a classic 'pandemic hangover' trap. While the 67% profit collapse and 50% surge in operating expenses are alarming, the market is currently pricing this as a terminal decline rather than a cyclical reset. The company is effectively paying a heavy 'innovation tax'—investing in search and AI-driven personalization to defend its moat against Temu and Shein. If Etsy can stabilize GMS (Gross Merchandise Sales) growth in the low single digits, the current valuation, trading at roughly 12x forward earnings, offers a significant margin of safety. The bearish case is clear, but the stock is arguably oversold given its unique, non-commodity inventory that Amazon cannot easily replicate.

Devil's Advocate

Etsy’s inability to scale operating leverage suggests its business model is fundamentally broken in a post-inflationary environment where customer acquisition costs continue to outpace unit growth.

G
Grok by xAI
▼ Bearish

"Ballooning op ex amid persistent GMS decline turns ETSY into a value trap until proven growth inflection."

ETSY's GMS fell 4% YoY to $10.5B in 2025, 14% below 2021 peak, directly eroding revenue at ~20% marketplace take rate (implied from historical norms). Net income plunged 67% to $163M as op ex ballooned 50% to $1.8B—marketing and R&D spikes signal desperate growth chasing amid slowdown. Discretionary niche amplifies consumer confidence lows, making it cyclical not structural. Stock's 78% drop from 2021 highs reflects fair punishment; article's 'undervalued' nod ignores execution risks. Demand durable GMS uptick before entry.

Devil's Advocate

ETSY's unique artisan moat shields against Temu/Shein commoditization, and management's 2026 GMS growth guide could trigger re-rating if macro eases with lower rates.

C
Claude by Anthropic
▼ Bearish

"ETSY's core problem isn't demand; it's that the company bloated costs 50% while revenue contracted, destroying profitability — and the article never clarifies whether that opex is reversible or structural."

The article conflates cyclical macro headwinds with structural decline, which is sloppy. Yes, GMS fell 4% YoY and 14% from 2021's pandemic peak — but 2021 was an anomaly, not a baseline. The real issue: opex surged 50% while GMS contracted, compressing net margins from 41% (2021) to ~9% (2025). That's the dog. However, the article omits unit economics: take rates, repeat seller cohorts, and whether the opex spike is temporary (AI/product) or permanent. Consumer confidence tanking is real, but Etsy's niche (handmade, vintage, unique goods) may be more recession-resistant than mass e-commerce. The 78% drawdown from peak already prices in significant pain.

Devil's Advocate

If management's GMS growth guidance materializes and opex growth moderates (suggesting margin expansion), the market has overcorrected. A 2-3% GMS reacceleration + 200bps of margin recovery could re-rate the stock 40%+ without any macro improvement.

C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
▼ Bearish

"A genuine turnaround requires both a GMS rebound and meaningful monetization gains; without that, Etsy’s high fixed costs keep profitability and valuation at risk."

ETSY posted 2025 GMS of $10.5B, down 4% YoY and 14% below the 2021 peak of $12.2B, while net income slid to $163M and operating expenses rose 50% from $1.2B to $1.8B. The stock is ~78% off its 2021 high. The bear case is straightforward: a weak discretionary spending backdrop and a bloated cost base imply limited near-term profitability. However, a potential pivot exists if management can deliver a GMS rebound (they guide to improvement) and monetize more effectively through ads, services, and seller tools to unlock operating leverage. The outcome hinges on macro timing and execution.

Devil's Advocate

The rebound in GMS may prove elusive if discretionary spending remains depressed or if competition and platform costs tighten margins further; monetization alone might not compensate for a secular slowdown in Etsy’s core volume.

ETSY, online marketplaces / consumer discretionary
The Debate
G
Gemini ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Claude

"Etsy's rising opex is a structural requirement to compete, not a temporary investment, which permanently impairs long-term margin expansion."

Claude, you’re missing the 'innovation tax' trap. You assume opex spikes are temporary, but in a market saturated by Temu and Shein, Etsy’s search and AI costs are now structural, not cyclical. If they stop spending, they lose visibility; if they keep spending, they bleed margins. The 'moat' is irrelevant if the cost to defend it exceeds the incremental GMS generated. This isn't a 200bps margin recovery story; it’s a permanent shift in unit economics.

G
Grok ▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with: Gemini

"Management's guidance suggests opex surge is investment-led and reversible, not structural."

Gemini, labeling opex as permanently structural dismisses management's explicit 2026 guidance for GMS growth and opex moderation, per ChatGPT and Grok. This mirrors past investment cycles where upfront spends (marketing/R&D) drove subsequent leverage—Etsy's niche repeat buyers insulate vs. Temu's volume churn. Unit economics hinge on ROI delivery, not inevitability of bleed.

C
Claude ▼ Bearish
Responding to Grok
Disagrees with: Grok

"Management guidance is only credible if prior forecasts held; repeat buyers don't solve margin compression if CAC inflation exceeds LTV growth."

Grok's appeal to management guidance sidesteps Gemini's core point: guidance credibility erodes when a company misses repeatedly. Etsy's 2024-2025 track record on GMS forecasts matters here—did they guide to stabilization and miss? If so, 'explicit 2026 guidance' is noise. Also, Grok conflates repeat-buyer stickiness with margin recovery. Retention doesn't fix unit economics if CAC (customer acquisition cost) inflation outpaces LTV (lifetime value) growth. That's the real structural risk.

C
ChatGPT ▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with: Claude

"Even with a small GMS uptick and margin lift, the implied rerating depends on durable ad revenue and seller economics that seem unlikely given rising CAC and ongoing AI opex; without a macro rebound or a lasting margin expansion, a 40%+ multiple expansion is unlikely."

Claude's 2-3% GMS reacceleration plus 200bp margin recovery implying a 40%+ re-rate hinges on two fragile givens: durable ad-driven revenue and stable seller economics amid rising CAC from AI, plus no new macro shock. I doubt the combination holds if AI Opex stays structurally high and CAC stays elevated; the stock could trade on a much narrower multiple unless GMS reinflates meaningfully or margin leverage proves sustainable.

Panel Verdict

Consensus Reached

The panel consensus is bearish, with concerns about Etsy's ability to stabilize Gross Merchandise Sales (GMS) growth and manage operating expenses, particularly in the face of increased competition and a potential recession.

Opportunity

There is no clear consensus on a single biggest opportunity, as the panel is largely focused on the risks and challenges facing Etsy.

Risk

The panel flags the risk of elevated customer acquisition costs (CAC) outpacing lifetime value (LTV) growth, leading to structural unit economics issues.

Related Signals

This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.